AmNewtsty – Gingrich Offers Not a Choice But an Echo
This morning night I was watching late ABC news and was sad to see Newt Gingrich showing sympathy with crimmigrants. I watched him yesterday telling the world that the longer a law-breaker has gotten away with his or her law-breaking, the more we should indulge their crimes. What a peculiar outlook this candidate has!
Sounds like he’s not so much a Newt but a RINO.
There are an estimated ten – twelve million illegal aliens in the USA, all of whose presence is an affront to the many honest men and women who have applied to migrate to America and are waiting, maybe have been waiting, for years to turn their aspiration into reality. The crimmigrants are contemptible queue-jumpers, no better than the so-called ‘asylum-seekers’ here in Australia, and most decent Americans want the illegals deported. Not Gingrich.
He said that if they’d managed to dodge justice for ‘years and years,’ it would be ‘inhumane’ to catch them now and kick them out! His ‘humanity-gap’ remains undefined, however. Is it ten years? Twenty? Five? Seven and a half? Will he apply this new concept of equality under the law to other serious offences, like bank robbery or rape, with gangsters and sex offenders who have striven successfully to keep out of police hands for similar periods of time coming forward gleefully to claim their Newt-Amnesty?
He invoked Americans’ respect for the institution of the family to justify his pro-crimmigrant call – an irrelevant and irrational argument, for if he’s referring to either spouses or children of a captured crimmigrant, as we must assume he is, then in what way is meting out justice deleterious to their relationship? If their crim gets deported, they are not being held in America against their will – they can follow him home to where he belongs.
I’d first heard of Gingrich’s folly on ABC’s ‘The Drum,’ and the bulk of its participants were pinko dorks, slagging off the American politicians for being too ‘rightwing,’ yet there was nothing extreme or objectionable about what we heard, apart from Gingrich’s crimmigrant c**p.
Cain said we should ‘kill terrorists before they kill us.’ That’s not extremism, just common-sense. Similarly with Michelle Bachmann’s statement that terrorists should not be given ‘Miranda Warnings,’ but dealt with as they deserve.
What’s wrong with that? The Drum dumbos may feel sorry for the terrorists and think the terrorists ought to be treated like pick-pockets, but surely Australians who remember the Bali bombings will applaud Cain and Bachmann. I certainly do.
I was having some steak and chips at the Bondi RSL last night ($8.00 Wednesday night special!) and found a copy of current issue of the North Shore Times.
There’s an excellent lady who writes for that modest local newspaper, and no doubt for others too, name of Wendy Kay, whose every paragraph oozes sense. For example, she’s appalled by “a world where asylum seekers carry on like pork chops over unpopular rulings, where there’s a call for personal computers in prison cells to be a right not a privilege, and where the great unwashed throw tantrums in the CBD because others who work hard for a living make lots of money.”
Good on ya, love! That sounds like the Real Australia talking! Not like the Drum bums!
=======================================================================
