Updates from December, 2011 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 17:55 on December 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Lying Parasites! Aged ‘Asylum Kids’ Allotted Homes As Aussies Wait in Line! 


    Since Christmas is coming, as a gesture of Seasonal Goodwill, I’m dedicating this post to the eccentric (that’s giving his left-lib hysteria the benefit of the doubt) so-called Australian whose sheer hatred of my warnings about the menace facing his country has reached fever pitch, so much so that he just sent me an alcohol-fuelled comment accusing me of being an ‘intolerant bigot!’ Heck, what other kind of bigot is there?

    Perhaps he could try to be a little less tautological next time – but he’s banned anyway. unlike lefties who can make a rational case for their odd views!

    The sad little oik has been getting more and more uptight, mostly at the fair comment I make on the lying parasites seeking ‘asylum’ at Aussie tax-payers’ expense, but also at my denunciation of the perv power movement’s advance on Australia fair; I really do wonder why he’s so obsessed with those wretched creatures.

    Still…I always pay attention to criticism, even his, and since he has long been adamant that ‘asylum-seekers’ deserve all they can squeeze out of OZ, I checked back to see if their demands are as modest and justified as he and his fellow-cultural marxists claim.

    Obviously, no real Aussie citizen should be given lower priority than the bludge-boaties, but that’s what’s been happening in Melbourne.
    Instead of keeping unwanted arrivals in detention – and Oz has vast desert tracts ideal for isolating undesirables – the Gillard Government has been letting them jump the hard-pressed housing queue, and into the finest of properties too.

    A Melbourne home that asylum seekers are living in.

    ASYLUM seekers are being put up in taxpayer-funded homes worth up to $500,000 while 38,000 Victorians languish on the public housing waiting list.

    A group of three teenage asylum seekers are being held in a large family home that boasts a sprawling garden, polished floorboards, modern stainless steel kitchen and double garage…More than two-thirds of the refugees in Victoria’s biggest youth detention centre, which can hold 150, have recently been transferred to suburban homes. The houses are funded by the Immigration Department and each has a resident social worker. The waiting list for public housing in Victoria sits at more than 38,000, up 1000 from the last quarter.

    The asylum seeker home in Thomastown would be out of reach for many battling homeseekers, unable to afford the average $280,000 spent on first homes.

     
     

    And as if that iniquitous favouritism isn’t nauseating enough, the fact is that these ‘teenagers’ may well not be teens at all, merely lying, with readily gullible Gilliard minions to hear and obey, in order to gain privileged status.

    refugees

    …..  Herald Sun 16/5/11

    IMMIGRATION detainees are pretending to be teens to get their visa applications processed quicker and live in better conditions.

    Victoria’s biggest youth immigration detention centre in Broadmeadows is filled with many asylum seekers claiming to be under 18 to escape the tougher regulations for adults, an investigation has discovered.

    Secret photos obtained by the Herald Sun reveal men with obvious signs of ageing, including crow’s-feet, wrinkles around their eyes and receding hairlines. Experts say the men are more likely to be aged in their 20s.

    Several Immigration Department sources have confirmed the con. Immigration officials lack time and resources to investigate people’s ages so they deliver them to youth detention centres with “a wry smile”, a whistleblower said.  “There are some massive guys, we’re talking about man mountains, in the centre. Sixteen-year-olds just aren’t built like that,” the source said.

    Adult detainees bullied genuine youngsters at the facility, it was revealed.

    University of Technology Sydney forensic anatomist Dr Meiya Sutisno said an initial assessment of a selection of the photographs showed men not minors. “They are not juveniles, definitely not,” she said. Dr Sutisno said the men in photos she had seen were aged between 18 and their late-20s.

    Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison said the age scam had become widely known among asylum seekers and the department was unable to prove people’s ages. “They (the department) have no idea how old these people are,” he said. “They just guess.”

    Sources revealed:

    MANY detainees deliberately have no documentation of their age so they can lie about how old they are.

    SOME asylum seekers have privately confessed to being more than a decade older than they claimed….Asylum Seeker Resource Centre coordinator Pamela Curr said many didn’t know their ages because it was not in their culture to celebrate birthdays. “They say what they have been told to say by people smugglers.”

    ——————————————————————–

    Huh! She’s on their side, and she admits they’re liars. And this week we have the Courier Mail. December 07, 2011

    THE biggest boatload of asylum seekers since Julia Gillard took over as Prime Minister has sailed into Australian waters. Almost 170 people were crammed on to the latest people smuggling vessel, which arrived just hours after another boat carrying 54 asylum seekers. Since late October about 1000 asylum seekers have come to Australia on rickety boats.
     
    No wonder these people are still pouring in. Word gets out about their pampered existence once they get ashore.  And the costs are myriad! Not least their penchant for vandalising the facilities generously provided.

    New information released through Senate estimates shows a massive repair bill of almost $18 million. Department staff questioned during Budget estimates said insurance could pay for much of the damage but taxpayers faced a bill of up to $5 million.

    Turn them back, round them up, kick them out!

    .

     
    • Sytea 15:38 on December 10, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I meet you here and you say it is time to wake people up….a good idea. Australia want to become Musiim?

      Like

    • Sue 00:34 on December 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      This is way out of hand. Abbott should do something for a change, don’t see him standing up anymore for what is right for Australians. He just sits back and lets gilliard and co let Aussie’s suffer. Abbott is gutless just like the rest of them. I don’t like any MP’s they are only thinking of themselves, and don’t give a dam about us Aussie’s anymore.

      Like

    • Nick Folkes, APP Sydney Organiser 06:36 on December 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Sue, I agree Abbott is gutless. The current bunch of Politicians are self serving and do not give a damn about the Australian people.

      The Australian Protectionist party is a new Federally registered political party. The APP is a pro-Australian political party which believes the national interest should also be put first.

      Check out at APP at www. protectionist.net.

      Like

    • Caylee 02:52 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Wow, this is disgusting. I thought racism and intolerance was starting to fade out of Australia. Clearly assholes still exist. It’s understandable that you’d write a post like this, having no experience in the horror these people endure everyday. And why should you have to? From the way you write you clearly feel superior to them anyway. I’d like to see you in a war torn country with inexistant morals and ethics and see the efforts you go to in order to escape to somewhere that you can support and protect your family and work hard in a place that doesnt violate all of your human rights. Clearly you have done little to no research on the topic as I am doing at the moment writing an essay on it. So these people liked about their age? Wouldn’t you if your only other option was death? Or torture? Dont judge until you’ve experienced what they have. And you can block me, I dont care. But you need to know that you are outspoken and uneducated and despite the fact you use fancy words and structure your argument well, you still have to have valid content. Which you do not. You disgust me. Yuck.

      Like

      • ross1948 02:58 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Thanks, Caylee.
        Sounds like your own essay might end up being somewhat one-sided too.
        Best publish it as a blog articel rather than hand it in to your tutor, unless he or she sees life through the tinted prism you enjoy using.

        Like

        • bluey 09:16 on May 1, 2012 Permalink

          You idiot Ross, of all the stupid things to suggest for not taking Refugees you come up with the land cannot support more people. The fact is Australia still vastly unpopulated and Australia has an active immigration process just to ensure she can support the aging population. I know you like to bundle 10year old children into your demonisation of whole groups of people but at least once she some common sense and do some research before you make a fool of yourself again

          Like

        • ross1948 09:58 on May 1, 2012 Permalink

          You are immensely ill-mannered and I suspect you are the banned liar, but I’ll allow your crassness to surface once merely in order to suggest this -read what is written.
          I merely pointed out that Caylee’s comparison of Italy and Australia was not valid, in that the one may be vastly bigger but that is only because of desert spces.
          There are many other, and more important reasons to exclude parasitic queue-jumpers, but that wil be for Caylee and her critics to pursue if they wish.
          I have been perfectly polite to Caylee, but as usual, you shoot off your objectionable gob and hence you are banned (again)

          Like

      • Gaye 06:12 on April 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Caylee, you are so right, it is so disgusting… and just look at this site.. and to think that people would not want these wonderful people in their country…

        The Religion of Peace

        Like

    • Caylee 03:11 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Actually it’s not one sided. I’m arguing human rights cannot be protected along with border security. However there is a difference between looking at an argument from both sides (being able to defend both sides) and blatant racism. “Oz has vast desert tracts ideal for isolating undesirables.” I’d like to see an academic article labelling them so politically incorrect.

      Like

      • ross1948 03:54 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        And there, Caylee, we have the problem.
        I think you would NOT like to see anyone using ‘politically incorrect’ terminology.
        Australia, like the UK, USA and Canada have educational elites that dictate what may or may not be said in their fora, thus skewing debate before it begins.
        The entire concept of PC is inimical to free discussion of issues.

        Like

    • Caylee 06:14 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      You could have easily vented your frustration with the Australian refugee and asylum seeker policy without racism and offending people who stumble upon your blog. I found this site by accident, and frankly wish I hadn’t. ‘Political Correctness’ is the reason Australia is respected by other nations. I just hope no people from the Middle East or Asia have seen this site, because I imagine they’d be extremely hurt.

      Like

      • ross1948 06:23 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        PC stunts free speech – your own Andrew Bolt is only one who has been dragged into court for saying what he thinks.

        I should have thought countries earn respect by standing up for their own and not rolling over for illegals and their multicult accomplices.
        Far from winning respect, Western countries are regarded as mugs in much of the territory you refer to, for letting in uninvited queue-jumpers who, as you acknowledge, readily resort to lies to gain admission.
        Not to mention destroying millions of tax-dollars worth of property when the ingrates run amok in detention centres. Great candidates for citizenship.

        Good luck with your essay, Caylee, but try not to be so myopic – education means listening to all angles on issues, and not denouncing those who differ as ‘uneducated!’

        Like

      • Ree 10:52 on April 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        And yet, Caylee, here you are, returning again and again to a site you vilify and discount. Grow up little one and realise we are aiming for a country where OUR children get the advantages of OUR tax dollars before the lying scum – yup IMO, SCUM – take it all.
        As for your comment about them being hard working? Nope, haven’t seen the majority of them working at all.
        Why should they when the get such great handouts from our governement. Indeed, they are complaining they aren’t getting enough. 100’s were placed into the community of Woodside, Adelaide and have already created gangs, trouble spots with police in constant attendance and a forum of discontent in the community with their constant demands that they are not being “given” enough.
        How much more are we supposed to give them? Put my children out of their beds and clothes and give it to them? Not on my tax dollar, sweetheart!

        Like

        • Caylee 12:44 on April 29, 2012 Permalink

          And what evidence do you have to support your claims? There have been outbursts as they are living in poor conditions. Obviously the facilities are acceptable, however there are serious mental and physical health problems which occur in these facilities as one would expect with children as young as 10 being detained for a year or more. And yes more cooperation from them would be nice, and the current system ensures we do not get terrorists. Which is great, but, (and I’ll refer you now to some actual research from reliable sources, unlike trashy media) Australia is obliged to help. That is the vow it took when it signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. And I shouldn’t be returning to this pathetic blog, it is a huge waste of time, but it is mighty interesting- the ignorant replies I receive. I may have been rude in my initial post, however that rudeness does not measure against the insensitivity of the author of this blog.

          Like

        • ross1948 13:32 on April 29, 2012 Permalink

          In what way am I insensitive, Caylee?

          I am sensitive to Canada’s legitimate aspirants who wish to migrate under the rules, while so-called Tamil ‘refugees’ weasel in and then go home to Sri Lanka for holidays.

          I am sensitive to the indifference of the elite in most Western countries, who pander to multicult by grabbing tax-dollars/pounds/euros from hard-working citizens, to provide facilities for ‘asylum-seeking’ louts and layabouts to vandalise. Yes, especially very sensitive to such disgusting ingrates’ anti-social antics.

          I am sensitive to Brits, Aussies, Canadians etc who have housing problems, only to see uninvited queue-jumpers given accommodation at their expense.

          I am sensitive to a democratic deficit when no referendum is provided on any aspect of immigration, and when those politicians who do speak up are accused of ‘populism’ – which only means appealing to the people.

          Don’t worry about being rude. You’re a long way off the vicious personal abuse which I DO have to block, sent by left-libs who truly hate free speech on these matters. Or would you too have my kind of criticisms shut down?

          Like

      • Gaye 13:15 on April 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Caylee, you obviously did not look at the site that I put in here for you as you have not made a comment on it,… you might have to cut and paste..
        Caylee, you are so right, it is so disgusting… and just look at this site.. and to think that people would not want these wonderful people in their country…

        The Religion of Peace

        Like

      • Gaye 14:11 on April 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Caylee,
        They are provided with financial resources by the Australian taxpayer even to paying the legal costs of arguing their cases, over and over and we pay it for them — one estimate is that the cost of REMOVING an illegal immigrant is, on average, approximately $60,000.
        Don’t you see what their imams/clerics say, the bottom line is, our government is spending billions OF OUR MONEY on essentially people who hate our guts, (they say so) people who essentially want to change our way of life to suit themselves, people with such a different outlook on life – it just doesn’t work and they keep coming.

        TAXPAYERS will pay nearly $1 billion to process and detain boat people over the next 12 months as the surge in unauthorised arrivals continues unabated.
        And on top of that the cost of feeding, housing, and processing asylum-seekers is expected to hit $706 million over the coming financial year, all this while OUR OWN people are living on the streets, under bridges and in cars and this includes families, while this fool of a government houses some of the illegals in motels.

        Just 4 kms away from us the motel is being paid with our tax money to house many illegals.
        They have 3 meals a day, swimming pools, TV’s and everything that they want.
        Yes, it is hard for the illegals and their children to live in detention centers, but illegals have paid up to $20.000 to get out here, but how does it feel to know that illegals were getting help while we do nothing about our own.

        Surely it is worse for our kids to be living under bridges year after year, with no baths, no toilets, imagine the emotional damage that that does to our own little ones, so living in detention centers with everything supplied sure is a far better bet.
        Think Caylee, they tell us that they have have escaped war and persecution, yet as soon as they become naturalised they go home for holidays.

        Like

        • Caylee 07:56 on May 1, 2012 Permalink

          Gaye I’m confused, you just argued above this that you are disgusted also but have now changed your argument as they use tax payer money? I’m a little lost. As for not replying to your link, my apologies as it has not come up on my screen, perhaps thre has been a glitch somewhere as there is no url, but if you post it again I will have a look 🙂 I understand the financial strain refugees are on the Australian Government. A LOT of money is being spent, and it is a shame given it could be used on Australians. But the way I look at it is we have support services in place for disadvantaged Australians, i.e. vinnies, salvos, food vans, homeless shelters etc. The people from these countries do not have the same luxuries. If they are poor, they live in poverty until they die, there are no support services. I wish it were cheaper to accommodate refugges, I really do and wont debate that with anyone as it is the valid point that’s been made on here, however at the end of the day Australian signed the agreement. They have to maintain the standards, they don’t have a choice or else they go against everything they signed. I’d also like to argue that three meals a day and a television aren’t really luxuries of life, though I understand your frustration. Finally, comparing the land mass of Australia with other countries in the world, Australia is one of the biggest, yet it does not even make the top 5 for countries that accept refugees? The US, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden all receive the most refugees. Which is very surprising considering the size difference of say Italy and Australia.

          Like

        • ross1948 08:38 on May 1, 2012 Permalink

          Caylee, I’m content to leave the Aussie commenters to debate you, but would just point out that land-mass is not entirely related to what population level can be sustained.
          Having flown to Sydney often, I think much of the territory I flew over would not match the viability of most parts of Italy or most European states..

          Like

        • Gaye 10:47 on May 2, 2012 Permalink

          Sorry Caylee, to confuse you…
          It is not the tax payers money that angers me if it was being used wisely.. I am sick of giving money to nations who are doing well, or where even after decades of us pouring money into it that it seems to only be the heads who are doing wonderfully, and nothing else has changed.. we have so many of our own who need help and I am not talking about being on the dole for most or all of their lives.
          I never mind helping people out for a time, but not forever..
          We have people living in cars and on the streets, then we use our taxes to put illegals into motels..
          You obviously have never looked at the percentage of immigrants who are doing crime in Australia and other countries that have been nice enough to take them in and if taking these people in is so wonderful and helpful to our country then how dare we take this wonderful help away from their countries.

          I also said that we are told that it has cost them around $20.000 to be able to get aboard these dangerous boats.
          We are told that they are in so much fear of their lives that they will travel in dangerous waters and in dangerous boats, that they destroy their ID papers so as they can not be sent back, and tell us that they are in fear of their lives,
          BUT these fearful people go home for holidays as soon as they are naturalised, my Muslim neighbours go home often, strange how they suddenly find their identity and where they come from… and heck we can’t even afford to visit once and my husband is a teacher…
          Just type in google, thereligionofpeace for the site that I gave you…

          Like

        • Gaye 11:32 on May 2, 2012 Permalink

          Caylee, yes our land mass is massive, but most of it cannot be lived on.. it is desert. My husband travels out to see parents from his school of distance education and it is miserable out there..
          In New Zealand you can have 14 sheep per acre, here you are lucky to have 14 acres per one sheep… on one of the farms it is bigger than Texas but it is so barren that it takes that amount of land to make a little living out of it..
          Some say that we can take a lot more but no we cannot take in many more, remember that people will of course mutiply…
          My father in New Zealand made a living for my two sisters and our mother with only 250 acres.. but one of Michaels families here in Australia has 900 thousand acres, and are struggling to survive as it is so hot and dry.. You can’t feed humans and animals if you do not have water. Most of Australia is desert, it is only SOME of the coastal areas that people can live on and even then it is such an old country that there is really not much goodness in the soil there either…

          Like

        • Caylee 21:22 on May 2, 2012 Permalink

          From that link, look at where the conflict is… The examples on the homepage alone are in Afghanistan and other places in the middle east, or course they are fleeing here to escape that. And actually, its not all Muslims. Yes I agree some parts of their culture makes me uncomfortable but it is ignorant to think all Muslims are doing this. The people in those examples are extremists and terrorists and should not b a reflection on the entirety of Islam. When looking at Catholicism or Christianity is everyone as bad as the crazy cults in America or aus? No, they are extremists. It is important to distance them from all of Islam. And those phrases from the Koran are disturbing but I believe to peaceful Muslims there is more to it than meets the eye and is perhaps not as violent as it is portrayed in that disturbing website. Maybe your neighbors can visit home now they have money and security? Maybe they visit it because some people they love weren’t able to escape or the situation has improved over there. N as far as for homeless here, as I’ve mentioned, there are services available. Tho if the government put more effort into making middle Australia inhabitable rather than expensive refugee strategies, they might b able to accommodate more. Shame. An they don’t all hate our guts. Regardless of ur opinion on that, and that’s quite ignorant considering there are many nice refugees who, like anyone else work hard in the community, contrary to popular mislead belief they do exist. And they are grateful to Australia for what it has done for them. I’ll repeat, annoyingly, again , that Australia is doing what it is doing because it HAS to. Please keep this in mind people.

          Like

        • Gaye 09:36 on May 4, 2012 Permalink

          Hi Caylee,
          No Caylee, it is that the first part of the “Quran that is pretty good with much of the same things as the New Testament has in it, but then when Mohammad gathered enough numbers to become a force he became a force.. Much came about because the Christians and Jews would not except him as a prophet, as he did not fit what a prophet is.. so to put it mildly he became very upset at this.

          I would have to agree with you in regards Catholicism, but what you perhaps do not know is unlike Islam the New Testament does not tell people to go out and kill those who will not submit until the whole world is for Allah… Where the quran says to kill all their enemies the NT says to love your enemies, and pray for them.. there is a vast difference between the two books, even as far as Allah was a god before Mohammad’s time.

          Archaeology provides irrefutable evidence that Allah, far from being the biblical God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, was actually the pre-Islamic pagan moon-god. Indeed, it is an established archaeological fact that worship of the moon-god was the main religion of the ancient Middle East. According to archaeologists, the chief deity of Mecca was the moon-god called al-ilah (meaning the god or the idol), which was shortened to Allah in pre-Islamic times.
          He was a god of Agriculture, WAR and the SWORD… he was the most popular of the 360 gods of the time… Then Mohammad decided that there was to be only one god… perhaps came about by his wife telling him that the visions that he was having when he had his fits was the arch-angel Gabriel and as she believed in only one god it should be this way.

          Perhaps you have not read what is in the Quran and others of their books, perhaps you see nothing in verses like this…
          Qur’an:8:67… “It is not fitting for any prophet to have prisoners until he has made a great slaughter in the land.”
          Ishaq:327…”Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.'”
          Bukhari:V5B59N516… “When Allah’s Apostle fought or raided people we raised our voices saying, ‘Allahu-Akbar! Allahu-Akbar! None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.'”

          Ishaq:285… “Then the Apostle went raiding in the month of Rabi u’l-Awwal making for the Quraysh. Then he raided the Quraysh by way of Dinar.”
          Ishaq:289… “Muhammad summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out and attack it. Perhaps Allah will give it to us as prey.”
          Koran 9:29 “Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission.”
          Koran 8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”
          Koran 8:39 “So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).”

          Ishaq:324 “He said, ‘Fight them so that there is no more rebellion, and religion, all of it, is for Allah only. Allah must have no rivals.’”

          Ishaq:587 “Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have mutilated every opponent. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them, for they must suffer disgrace.”
          Muslim:C9B1N31 “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify to the fact that there is no god but Allah, and believe in me (that) I am the Messenger and in all that I have brought.”

          Tabari VI:138 “Those present at the oath of Aqabah had sworn an allegiance to Muhammad. It was a pledge of war against all men. Allah had permitted fighting.”

          If you have got this far, these are just a few.. Quite different from the God of the New Testament..where God send his son to die for us, whilst the Qur’anic Allah requires Muslims’ sons to die for him,”
          This is why there are so many terrorist, as they are the good Muslims they are doing what they are commanded to do, when their numbers are large..

          Like

        • Caylee 22:40 on May 4, 2012 Permalink

          You have done ur Research, good. However I still can’t accept the opinion. Once again extremists are the ones who do that, most Muslims would ignore those parts, much as some Christians disregard parts of the bible.

          Like

    • Caylee 06:30 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I’ll listen to anyone who has a problem with asylum seekers, as currently it is an issue. But I wont listen to anyone who refers to them as ‘Lying Parasite.’ They are still human beings and they still have rights.

      Like

      • ross1948 06:52 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Okay, Caylee, I’ll leave this open for anyone who wishes to argue with you.

        Like

    • Wacka 07:58 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Well a “spade” is a spade isn’t it? I think the topic is spot on. Just because you have the misconception of the meaning of “racism” doesn’t mean that it is..

      Bottom line is, you’ve approached the article with an attitude of depicting an ethnic group of being civilly retorted and ridiculed.. And have attached the label yourself, relating this as being a derogative article targeting the ethnicity of asylum seekers.
      The article merely related the lying habits and practices of current refugees and asylum seeking individuals taking advantage of OUR SYSTEM, thats right, “OUR”..
      If the article was about those that played soccer, would that be a racially depicted comment?.. being that a fair proportion of those that play soccer have various cultural backgrounds..
      If a spade is a spade, call it how you see it.. If it was racially depicted, it would’ve outlined itself within the context the article was written in..
      Bottom line is, it’s not ok to take advantage of anyone or anything, especially by means of deception, no matter what your background is. I think you’ll agree upon that.
      Though having watched policies change within our border security and migrational authorities, it seems though the mentality behind the “lying parasites” is prodominant within the asylum system.. I find it hard to put the priorities of foreign individuals before local individuals. It’d be nice to see the homeless off the street, single mothers/parents subsidised (appropriately of course) Carer fascilities should be at the top of the list, followed by the yourth programs, educational infrastructure, teachers and personnel, more support for rural and agricultural industries, then maybe, just maybe, a little for the the people who are trying to fit THEMSELVES into our constitution by illegal immagration.
      Then after all that, then of course, the front-benchers can go to the bottom of the list, and our fine prime minister should be not even in contention for any further benefits. She’s half the problem, if she can get away with lying to the public, nation, the system, and take it for a ride, why shouldn’t those at the top of her policy list. Asylum seeking refugees.

      Like

      • Caylee 08:13 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Of course if it were about soccer players it wouldn’t be racist. It would be a generalisation and steretyping which is equally unjustifiable. What about the asylum seekers who arrive by boats (the wrong thing to do) but are genuinely nice people trying to get a better life. Once again, if you were in their position I think you’d do the same. And no, the current policy isn’t great, but do you have a better suggestion that doesn’t involve violating human rights from the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights of which Australia is a signatory? It’s not Gillard being an idiot, it’s an obligation and agreement Australia signed. Article 14 of the declaration: 1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. What they are doing is allowed.

        Like

    • suzi 08:03 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      they are lying parasites. we have exactly the same problem in the uk.

      Like

    • Caylee 08:06 on April 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      They’re not parasites. They’re people. You just happen to be born into a more privileged life.

      Like

      • Gaye 11:16 on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Caylee, no matter how much money has been given to these people from different nations, nothing has changed for them for centuries, so many do nothing much for themselves, and yes there are some who do work hard, but do you ever wonder why thousands of clerics/imams say to kill the infidels, and who are not stopped by the Muslim masses…

        My ancestors and probably yours have gone through being taken over by other nations many times but none of our people have sat there doing nothing, our ancestors did something about it, they worked hard and did the best for their children..

        Yes we have been born in a more privileged society, but it was not always so. Our people worked hard to get there, often losing and starting again..
        You have obviously not read the last three quarters of their Quran, I say the last three quarters as the first quarter is pretty good, probably because Mohammad’s first wife was a Catholic, and a very rich widow before he married her…
        Perhaps you have not read that they can lie to infidels, for the cause of Allah, to their enemies, ((and as we are not Muslims we are always the enemy) to their wives etc as long as they do not mean it in their hearts..
        They keep quoting the good verses to us and leave out later verses like the ones that say to kill those who will not submit until the whole world is for allah. And if you like I can put in a few of these verses for you..

        Do you not see that there is non stop world wide Muslim violence, and have you not read how they reward the countries who have been kind enough to take them in???? Have you not read of the gang rapes of our girls and the % of them that are involved in crime compared to our people.
        Heck, here in Australia we now have them going into shopping centers and shooting up, killing innocent people, and they tell us that they are not allowed to kill innocent people, which is true but they do not tell you that non Muslims are not counted as the innocent..

        Like

        • Caylee 21:26 on May 2, 2012 Permalink

          What makes the first quarter of the Koran so good? That there is a catholic in it? I wonder how much damage Catholicism has done over the years… If I had to pick a religion to defend id take Islam over Catholicism anyday. Despite the lack of conflict in the religion it has other effects. being baptized catholic and turning atheist- I see little to no benefit of Catholicism, which can be equally as ‘backward’. Once again, let’s not take an extremist group and associate them with all Muslims, if we’re making intelligent arguments.

          Like

      • Gaye 10:51 on May 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Caylee, I would suggest that you go and live in some of the Muslim areas in your country, Australia, France, Holland and then try arab countries and you would quickly change your mind…
        you might have to cut and paste the headings on these and they are horrific, sad it is only just a pinch of what is going on..
        Police in Sydney, Australia’s largest city, are trying to cope with a new problem: gang rapes of young White girls
        by gangs of non-White immigrants.
        Rapists Nations. Gang rapes of young White girls by gangs of non …
        More than 70 White girls, ranging in age from 13 to 18, have been abducted from … from Sydney, as many as two dozen men seized a young girl in a school yard and raped … Police are hesitant to crack down on the rape gangs from fear of being … Last month the heaviest rioting yet in England by Asian gangs hit the city of
        ————————————————-
        6000 girls sexually exploited in UK gangs – Channel 4 News

        28 Mar 2012 – Channel 4 News reveals the extent to which girls are being sexually exploited or gang raped in street gangs across the UK. Paraic O’Brien
        ———————————————–
        —————————————————————–
        we are shocked most of all by recent cases where judges and newspapers have seemed to conspire together to suggest that girls of 12, 13, 14 are responsible for being raped.” Rape is rape, to any girl even if she is dressed inappropriately, let alone saying that it is the fault of a 12, 13, 14 year old… see..

        21 Apr 2012 – “Muslim gang jailed for kidnapping and raping two girls as part of their Eid … But Judge Melbourne Inman QC said the girls had still been children ….. Based on Islamic law, and Islamic attitudes more generally, …
        ———————————————–
        This above is just the smallest tip of a massive iceberg, millions are not even reported.. and you cannot tell me that our governments do not know that all this is going on and if they do not then they should NOT be in government. They must also know that these immigrants have a bigger percentage on welfare, in jail, committing crimes, etc than any other race… yet they keep importing them at an alarming and ever increasing rate.. what are they being personally paid to cause politicians to continue to put our country in such danger..

        Like

    • Irish 09:15 on May 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      One verse from the koran
      “Seek them out (the unbelievers) and kill them wherever you find them”, is that what we should live with ??
      Why do they throw their papers overboard?
      why do they now say that the housing paid for by the taxpayer is not to their standard?
      why, as the minority have they changed our food to halal and everything become politically correct?
      they celebrate the death of our soldiers! but when we MENTION the death of one of them we are racist!, imams have advocated the death of all westerners and nothing is done about it but when somebody talks about killing a taliban they are charged
      They are winning this war because the weak assed govt is letting them all thanks to tony abbot and his refusal to ship them to malaysia
      imagine yourself in say 20 years living under a burka and being ruled by sharia, then tell me that they are a good people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Like

      • Caylee 13:37 on May 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        not even going to waste my time on this one… Im done. I can only argue the same point so many times.

        Like

        • ross1948 16:23 on May 8, 2012 Permalink

          Feel free to drop by anytime. Caylee..good to see some debate.

          Like

        • Gaye 10:49 on May 9, 2012 Permalink

          Caylee, I understand where you are coming from but please wonder why is it that when there are so many clerics/Imams/muslim teachers who teach many thousands of Muslims each time, how to hate, kill, and convinced Muslims that Shahada violence against the U.S. or Israel will lead to martyrdom, why then are these clerics/iamams/teachers not dealt with if it is a religion of peace, trouble is that there are so many thousands of clerics/imams/teachers teaching this, and what causes these people to be what we call terrorists, extremists and why is this not the same with any other religion …You have to realize that they do not call them extremists/terrorists only to us.. Surely you must wonder why is it only this religion out of the many in the world who actually teach hate/ etc in their services and to their people, and where it is found in their holy books, no other religion teaches hate..
          Imagine if a Monk, Llama, minister or pastor taught hatred of others to their congregation, the whole congregation would kick him out and report him for violence.. not so with Muslims.. I have or did have hundreds of vidoes showing them teaching hatred to children, children repeating after them to kill non believers, etc.. It is not a few Muslims it is part of Islam…
          And yes there has been many horrific things done in the name of religions including Christianity, but unlike islam, it is not part of any other religion nor is it taught in the New Testament nor is it taught by Jesus who said to love even your enemies, do good to others and he did not say to do good to only those who believed in Jesus either..

          Like

  • ross1948 04:15 on December 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Scotland – Prods n Papes Unite for Decency -and YOU Can Help! 


    Hard to imagine a more slanted approach than The Scotsman’s report published 2/12, on the SNP attack on Scotland’s heritage of decency.

                      Braveheart Never Fought For Pervert ‘Marriage!’

    The headline’s fine,an encouraging ;’Kirk Joins the Fight Against Homosexual Marriages – nice to note they don’t use that abomination ‘gay’ to describe perv cohabitation. And they remind us that the Catholics already are on the good guys’ side.

    But as you wade through it, what do we discover but

    The uncompromising position of the church, which has an estimated 500,000 members, is a setback for the SNP government, which has signalled its intention to move with the times and legalise homosexual weddings….Rev Peter Johnston, spokesman for the progressive OneKirk group, said: “There may be many gay and lesbian people within the Church who will be disappointed at reading this response from the Church of Scotland.”\

    But this brief post is not to waste time examining how a descent into moral squalour can be defined as ‘moving with the times’ Or ‘progressive.’

    Here’s a clip from NOM’s American website.

    In what appears to be a desperate attempt to sway the outcome, the Scottish Government has been persuaded to accept responses from outside the UK, allowing gay marriage groups to organize supporters from around the world in their campaign to rewrite Scotland’s marriage law.

    Please help give the Scottish Government an accurate perception of world opinion on same-sex marriage! ScotlandforMarriage.org has set up an approved web portal at which you can answer the six questions being asked by the Scottish government. All responses will be sent directly to the Scottish Government.

    Time is short. Please take action today!

     
    • Jim O'Neill 12:13 on December 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Please read the article on the website link for my opinion regarding the homosexual mafia.

      Godspeed, Jim O’Neill

      Like

  • ross1948 02:01 on December 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    OWS Hunger Strike – Consult The Iron Lady! 


      Ordering Chinese Take-Away in Bulk?

    New York City—On Saturday, December 3, in Liberty Plaza, we—THE OWS HUNGER STRIKERS—will begin a hunger strike. We are striking to demand outdoor space for a new occupation. We will hold our strike, for its duration, outside at Duarte Square on Sixth Avenue and Canal Street in Manhattan as part of a continued effort seeking sanctuary on Trinity Wall Street’s unused and vacant lot of land. Should we be arrested, we will continue the strike in jail. We are calling on Occupiers across the nation to join us.

    ————————————————————–

    SPLENDID IDEA!

    Time to brush off Maggie Thatcher’s ‘Handbook on How to Handle Hunger-Strikers!’

    Or else dig out the compendium of jolly jokes that circulated shortly afterwards. e.g.

    Question – What’s two miles long with an IQ of 17?

    Answer – Bobby Sands’ funeral procession!

    Maggie understood exactly what to do when some dirty trouble-makers went on hunger strike – absolutely nothing.

    Amazingly, there are still a few nitwits who blame her for the deaths of Sands and Co., when all they had to do was order a nice plate of Irish stew and they’d likely be alive today – possibly holding Ministerial office, given the craven UK leaders since Mrs. T.

    They died of their own volition, flouting the tenets of their own religion.

    —————————————————–

    As for New York today, if these mangy layabout revolutionists proceed, sound-thinking citizens should stroll by, munching on aromatic Christmas Dinner left-overs (right-overs won’t do! )

    But Santa mustn’t tempt them with chocs or oranges if their no doubt noisome seasonal stockings are hung outside the tent. He should deliver USEFUL things, with stickers attached reminding them of the text that ‘man shall not live by bread alone.

    Bars of soap might be a nice idea!

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: