Pity Poor Piggies – Jihad Against Pork in West Java AND the UK!


It ain’t just these piggies who lack freedom!

===============================================================

West Java to ban pig farming due to MUI’s ‘haram’ edict

Jakarta Post 14th August
The sheer intolerance in this latest decree pronounced in Indonesia’s most Islamist province is exemplified in this extract from the above report, whch you should read in its entirety.
West Java Husbandry Agency head Koesmayadi Tatang Padmadinata said the ban on pig farming was related to potential environmental pollution.
Really?

=

=

No, not really. It’s a sectarian problem.

“The Indonesian Ulema Council [MUI] edict on impurities states that Muslims are forbidden from coming into contact with any dirt related to pigs. That’s the problem,” Koesmayadi said in Bandung on Monday.

=======

So how many jobs will be lost due to this sectarian fatwa? Does anyone know, or care?

And it’s hard enough to find bacon in the stores as it is!

Having said all that, it was horrifying to learn recently that the same sort of shariah agenda is being implemented across the British Isles!

A report in the UK Daily Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9335831/Bangers-ban-in-hundreds-of-schools.html   tells us that ‘ in Luton, 23 out of 57 schools which contract their dinners from the local authority have a “no pork” policy. In Bradford the figure is 24 out of 160; in Newham, east London, it is 25 out of 75; in Tower Hamlets, east London, it is 85 out of 90. In Haringey’s infant, junior and primary schools, 37 out of 47 serve no pork.

At Cypress Junior School, in Croydon, south London, Nicky Godetz, the head teacher, announced in this month’s newsletter that the school had opted for a pork-free menu “as a result of pupil and parental feedback”.

When are the British people going to FORCE their effete elite to stand up to alien minorites who refuse to adapt to the British way of life, of which ‘bangers and mash’ has always been an integral ingredient.

Nobody’s interested in obliging kids to eat pork sausages or bacon, but equally, if kids like those items, they should not be deprived of the chance to enjoy them because of PC nincompoopery like Nicky Godetz’s!

Nor is it only a matter of junior schools. We even had a report earlier this year of a University Vice-Chancellor in London aiming to ban beer in case some uptight bint objects.

Is anybody demanding tee-totallers swill down the amber nectar? No. It’s purely Islamist bigots saying because they don’t care for alcohol, we too must be denied partaking. Islamist intolerance par excellence!

=============

==========
  London Metropolitan University
————————————————————————————————————————————————

That most outlandish example yet of a British institution pandering to intolerance came from London Metropolitan University.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/9199759/London-Metropolitan-University-mulls-alcohol-ban-for-conservative-Muslim-students.html

Undergraduates in England, Ulster, Wales and Scotland are not forced to enjoy beer – it just comes naturally to most of them!

A game of footie in the park on a summer’s day, then repairing back to the union to celebrate winning or losing…lots of good occasions, like that final mammoth blow-out when you get your degree exam results…it’s…well, a night you WISH you could remember for the rest of your  days!

But are any students ever compelled to enter bars on campus? Carried out, now and then, but never frog-marched in!

————–

But those statements of the obvious must now be re-examined because a dhimmi don named Gillies thinks ‘a certain group‘ don’t appreciate alcohol. “It is an issue of “cultural sensitivity” to provide drink-free areas,” he reportedly declared!

=======================

Controversial: Malcolm Gillies, Vice Chancellor of London Metropolitan University
Malcolm Gillies, Vice Chancellor of London Metropolitan University
————————————

No doubt. I had several old aunties of the stern Presbyterian variety who never thought highly of what they’d term the ‘demon drink.’ Were a prohibitionist candidate available, they’d have voted for him.

But one hardly expects a 21st Century UK Vice-Chancellor to resurrect their thinking today, justifying prohibitionism on grounds of ‘cultural sensitivity.’  There’s altogether too much such ‘sensitivity,’ because certain minorities are altogether too bl##dy sensitive.

It’s about time they grew up and learned to live in the countries they’ve chosen to descend on. If they don’t like where they are, nobody forces them to stay.

Gillies actually identifies exactly the sort for whom traditional Britain is such a dreadfully unacceptable place.

Professor Gillies said that in his university ‘many of its female Muslim students “can only really go to university within four miles of home and have to be delivered and picked up by a close male relative”, he said.

For pity’s sake.‘Have to be delivered and picked up by a close male relative?”

No they don’t.

They can take buses or cycle like any young women who are not mentally or physically handicapped. If they are not yet mature enough for that, they’d be better off going back to kindergarten until they are!

Thank God for the Swiss, who don’t bend over backwards!

Here’s a report from The Local. 27th March.

A Muslim family in Basel has been fined 1,400 francs ($1,550) for refusing to let its daughters participate in mixed swimming classes. The family had sought to avoid paying the fine on the grounds that the requirement for the girls to join the swimming lesson infringed on their religious freedom, online news website Le Matin reported.

Three cheers for a judiciary with sound sense! Would that some Brit educators had the same sturdy spirit!