Facebook's Status – Enemy Within – Exposed Again!
You may remember my indignation over my expulsion from Facebook without explanation last year. One assumes the FB geekstapo responded to a number of people who complained about my posts.
How many? Two, ten, twenty – no idea – FB won’t keep their promise to explain.
But an indication of their bias can be gleaned from the way they erased my posting of the video, on my personal page, some time previously, showing the Cikeusik Pogrom of February 6th 2011, when those three innocent Ahmadis were martyred by barbarous Islamists.
(see it here – https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2012/08/30/free-speech-for-the-time-being-will-facebook-scrap-dog-page-to-appease-islamists/
=
==
Too graphic an exposition of what we’re all up against?
==========================
Well, Facebook’s Islamist appeasement has been nailed to the ground for sure, because just read this extract and the link.
==============
Despite Facebook‘s rules prohibiting violent content, a page that openly advocates beheading anyone who disrespects the prophet Mohammed does not violate the site’s terms of service, Facebook spokesman Fred Wolens told Examiner on Wednesday.
The page, “Behead Those Who Disrespect Our Prophet P.B.U.H,” does not violate the rules, Wolens said, because Facebook has “different standards around images versus text.”
“Under our terms, this Page does not credibly threaten a specific person or target a protected category,” he explained in an email. http://www.examiner.com/article/facebook-page-advocating-the-beheading-of-infidels-does-not-violate-rules
Clearly the damfool Wolens can’t read.
‘Those who disrespect our Prophet‘ is a fairly clear category, which probably includes millions of innocent people worldwide, who are therefore exposed to savage threat by that Page’s authors.
So in Wollens’ opinion, in Facebook’s rules, those intended victims are not a ‘protected category?’
Much as the Ahmadi in the photo above was left to his grim fate by cowardly cops, the murder of anyone who criticises Islam’s Prophet seems to be a matter of indifference to Wolsen and to that Obamanoid appeaser who owns Facebook.
Wandi 11:52 on June 28, 2013 Permalink |
Hi Ross, I just ring you to ask why poll closed, now i read this post and me too,
I want to put that video on my page then Facebook block me.
But they happy with behading? Such bad people they are.
LikeLike
ross1948 12:00 on June 28, 2013 Permalink |
Hello, and thanks for the alarm call, Wandi. I had no idea the poll had closed, no idea why, because that hasn’t happened with other polls on RRA.
But I have now re-opened it, I hope, and it should run for the next month.
Yes, Facebook is a very one-sided medium, but I gather another friend of mine is still active, so they haven’t eliminated ALL the pro-freedom of religion voices yet.
Give me a call soon and we’ll have lunch at the old favourite place.
LikeLike