‘Independent,’ ABC? So Stop Bludging Tax Dollars!

==============

Most people, in Australia or in any civilised country,would share Tony Abbott’s expectation of a straight answer when he asked the ABC “Whose side are you on” for allowing a convicted terrorist to ask a question on the Q&A program.

=============

–

–

I’d been typing this up earlier today but got distracted by the terror news.

But watching the Australian Channel on cable reminded me.

I saw that berk who runs ABC whining about his outfit’s ‘independence,’ though he was silent on when he proposes to stop depending on the tax-payers for his fat salary.

And then there was a quick comment from that twit Turnbull, saying how ‘calm’ everyone should be about the ABC’s latest bout of disloyalty to Australia.

What an A-Hole!

But it was some pinko scribbler in The Western Australian newspaper who earlier got my attention.Terror talk drowns out debate
 He does seem to grasp the idea that for any media owned by the Australian people, such an appearance by an apologist for the enemy with which Oz is at war is an affront.

But the hack doesn’t forgive the PM’s question as readily as he seems ready to let ABC subversion pass.

Let’s be clear: the ABC made a serious mistake giving a live microphone to a peanut-brained cretin such as Zaky Mallah but the use of such McCarthyist language is another instance of Abbott overreach, coming just a week after accusing the ALP of “rolling out the red carpet” for terrorists.

 oooooooooooo

McCarthyist?

—-

 Senator Joe McCarthy

—

Leave aside that the late Senator McCarthy was a patriot whose memory has been traduced by generations of ‘enemy within’ academics, journos and running-dog politicians. Treason in the White House? Bring Back Tail-Gunner Joe! 

If this were a one-off, a solitary error of judgement, maybe the head honchos at ABC would need a mere cuff on the ear, but that’s hardly the case, is it?

Way back when the Afghan War was warming up, there was the famous comment about their neutrality between jihadist scum and the soldiers of civilisation — ABC refused to allow their staff to describe the Taliban terrorists as terrorists.

Disgraceful, like the BBC’s impartiality between the Argies and the people who paid their wages!

• One honest journo remarked at the time –
• `So here I am on Channel 10. I can say that the Taliban execute women for adultery. They’ve been known to throw acid in the face of young girls who don’t wear veils and so on. I can get it off my chest on Channel 10, but I can’t say it on the ABC.’’   http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/the_abcs_trioli_farew

Then we had that flatulent ABC flunkey here in Jakarta, turning up the volume for ‘asylum’ parasites in their vilification of Australia’s Royal Navy.

 —————————-

 ——-

Fact is, the sneering smear merchant in the Western Australian cannot exculpate the object of his idolatry, so he hardly tries to, just snarls, like a mangy running-dog, at Tony Abbott.

Given the current climate, it was also unfortunate that Abbott should express his jihad on the national broadcaster yesterday by declaring that “heads should roll” over the Q&A incident…

=======

 ————–

It’s clear ABC treachery in the War on Terror is just as entrenched today as back then, when they cringed from criticising Taliban terrorists.

Their fans in the Fairfax media etc. are of course entitled to share ABC’s visceral hatred of the government Australians elected AND to blare it out noisily – because they don’t leech off the public purse!

Let the good times roll – and traitors’ heads!