‘Protection of Unaccompanied Minor Migrants?’

…the European Union should formulate minimal standards for the protection of unaccompanied minor migrants…

I don’t know how much of the billions Brussels rakes in from tax-payers actually went to this mysterious Daphne Funding Programme, to finance that particular exhortation on behalf of poor little ‘minors’ like the Afghan axe-man.

And all those others…

Crimmigrant Rape Gangs Get Green Light in Sweden! 

Innocents Endangered, But Calais Curs Go Free – Aw, They’re Just Kids! 

German Girls Forced Into Shariah Dress-Code By Sex-Pest Syrian Ingrates! 

More Good Reasons For Austrians to VOTE HOFER! 

More ‘Poor Migrant Children!’ Yet EuroNews Talks of YOUR ‘Shame?’ 

. Swedish police warn Stockholm’s main train station is overrun

  ——————————————————

I suppose I could dig around and find out.

But what matters is the principle, that the EuroCommissars are lavishing your money on this when clearly the top priority should be YOUR protection FROM unaccompanied minors..

——————

DAPHNE TOOLKIT

Projects funded under the Daphne Funding Programme

http://ec.europa.eu/justice/grants/results/daphne-toolkit/en/content/unaccompanied-minor-migrants-development-protection-mechanisms

ooooooooooooooo

But my initial digging into this matter unearthed a prime example of the Big Remainiac Lie..

……..

…that British recipients of EU funds are somehow advantaged thereby.

RB Kensington and Chelsea awarded a grant under the EU DAPHNE programme

 

The Royal Borough Kensington and Chelsea awarded €607,500 (£473,201 GBP) under the EU’s DAPHNE funding programme.

http://www.accesseurope.org.uk/content/rb-kensington-and-chelsea-awarded-grant-under-eu-daphne-programme

 

The ‘Action for Change’ project will run for two years from January 2015 and will develop services to meet the needs of women who are exposed to domestic violence (DV) to prevent the repeat removal of children from their care

——–

Now that objective may be all well and good.

BUT……just reflect one where that money ‘given’ to the Royal Borough came from…

——–

 

 —————-

…yes, that would be from the pockets of the tax-payers of the Royal Borough, and every other UK city, county and town, filched by Brussels, then graciously handed back, after the bloated, over-paid Eurocracy has skimmed off its percentage.

---

—–

Projects like the one mentioned, if deemed worthy, can be financed more efficiently and economically without going back and forth through supranational bureaucracies.  

Britain has always paid in more than it gets out.

What possible advantage to Brits did the EUSSR ever offer?