Wisconsin Witch-Hunt – Ditch The Snitch, Not The Patriot!
A somnolent morning here in Jakarta, until I read the news, which got me all fired up…
…about a firing!
The Far-Left management at the University of Wisconsin, La Crosse, dismissed an employee named Kim Dearman for “threatening or abusive language” and “conduct unbecoming a University employee,” according to documents obtained… http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/15/university-employee-allegedly-fired-for-defending-trumps-immigration-eo/#ixzz4bY878rZl
So what did Kim do to incur the fury of these authoritarian administrators?
Turns out she told a colleague, aka a mangy red snitch, that she supported President Trump’s position on immigration…she felt Trump was doing the correct thing by keeping terrorists out of the United States….
She felt that those immigrants should go back where they came from. She was terminated because of her political speech in support of President Trump.”
So these disloyal pinko creeps, relying on a slimy informer, fired this lady!
Obviously, the slimy informer needs to be fired.
But don’t just ditch the snitch!
He or she is not the only one who ought to be removed.
“Your last day on campus is March 13, 2017,” said Madeline S. Holzem, UW La Crosse’s Chief Human Resources Officer, in a letter sent to Ms. Dearman on the same day.
Holzem’s one character who should be fired, for her readiness to participate in this witch-hunt against an American dissenter, which smacks of the Communist Purges of the 1930s.
She should have refused to sign or send that letter.
She may not have authorised the totalitarian dismissal, but nobody with a conscience should collaborate with evil. Concentration camp guards have faced trial for their roles in the implementation of policies they did not create.
The same goes for the college king-pin, an ultra-liberal ideologue named Joe Gow, who has the title of ‘Chancellor’ but might better be styled ‘Witch-Finder-General.’
Please note, the university in-crowd publish these contact details presumably because they welcome contact.
Although they have now re-instated her, after a public outcry, and after a lawyer has taken up the case, they appear determined in their hostility to free speech.
But how can this disgraceful episode be happening at a ‘public’university?’
Why is tax-payers’ money allowed to subsidise this den of vipers?