BBC Portrays Climate Sceptic As Zombie! Hidden Agenda?
=
Does the BBC deliberately choose the most unflattering file photos for people of whose views it disapproves?
=
Former Chancellor Lawson – auditioning for The Walking Dead?
=
I am obliged to ask after reeling back in near terror at that huge picture of Lord Lawson, who dared suggest that the Climate Panic Crew might not be entirely reliable.
As a Walking Dead fan, I should be used to observing zombies…
=
Meskipun Busuk Banget, Zombi2 Masih Bisa Hot, Ya?
…but that Lawson photograph?
Wow!
I tend to look for nice pics for folks I like, and less impressive likenesses for those whom I detest, like the ghastly Sinn Feiner Martina Anderson MEP….…
France 24’s “Debate” Features Jew-Bashing Convicted Terrorist!
Found this via Google Search – which one’s Evil Anderson?
…….…
But a minor quibble, and I’m sure nobody will ever find proof of this BBC photo bias.
More important is the zeal with which the mandarins at Broadcasting House rushed to appease outraged Panickers.
The BBC admitted it had breached its “guidelines on accuracy and impartiality….”
Enter stage left, BBC media editor Amol Rajan, who says..
…the BBC’s complaints department ruled that a lack of scrutiny of Lord Lawson’s claims meant the interview fell short of editorial standards. It ruled that the peer’s statements “were, at the least, contestable and should have been challenged.”
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41744344
Oh yeah.
======
========
Like Hard Talk, when not that long ago, it was their Mr. Sacker who intruded his own ‘contestable’ pro-crimmigrant bias quite blatantly, telling his guest that no matter what the American people may wish, ‘practical politicians know they can’t deport millions and millions of people.‘
Eric Cantor Uses Biased BBC Talk-Show To Blast Tea-Party
Of course they can!
But we are nevertheless told that BBC interviewers have a duty to challenge ‘contestable’ statements?
That’s news, to us and, I’d guess, to the pathetic leftist hacks the BBC employs to interview fellow-leftists, like that Beeb bint who didn’t even explain to viewers that her guest’s media domain was a far-left American propaganda pulpit, with a name so duplicitously crafted…
Mother Jones?-Mama Hillary might be more accurate!
=========
…that the average Brit would imagine it to be a recipe magazine.
I quote my own comment at the time!
So unprofessional was Blondie that she not only kept viewers in the dark about Follman’s ideological motivation to slur Trump but failed utterly in her duty to challenge his bias. Astoundingly, the Beeb-Bint chimed in!
‘It beggars belief that he (Trump) has nothing better to do.’ Bigoted, Biased BBC – ‘It Beggars Belief…”
….and the BBC is a repeat offender…
BBC At It Again, Hides Far-Left Guest’s Background!
What can one say?
That’ll do!
Jane are discussing. 
rossrightangle 
Jane 23:13 on October 25, 2017 Permalink |
Ross, I have been trying to comment for hours but my comments keep disappearing instead of being sent. Are you having technical trouble?
I do like this post on the BBC’s photos.
It wouldn’t be at all surprising if they pick and choose as you suggest.
Their interviewers are the worst in the world, no professionalism at all, only ever challenging people who are not on the BBC’s leftwing, pro-illegal immigrant, anti-Brexit wave-length.
I’ll try sending this once more then leave it until tomorrow, as I am a little busy today.
LikeLike
ross1948 00:19 on October 26, 2017 Permalink |
Some gremlin must have got onto the comments column, Jane.
I was wondering if people were having a comment-free day, because we got a very high level of readership today, but now I understand what was wrong.
I hope anybody whose comments went astray will resubmit them.
LikeLike