Strasbourg Slugs – Loud Against Brexit, Silent On Expenses!

Most people don’t even know the names of their MEPs, those vastly salaried ‘representatives’ who loll and grunt on the plush seating provided for their (often fat) asses in Strasbourg…

====

=======

….a grisly band, who have recently stirred, like gigantic sea-slugs, surfacing to belch antagonistically at Brits who chose freedom.

W are familiar with the most obnoxious, like Guy Van-Whatsit, of whom we wrote recently…

Just A Europhiliac Guy – Who Spits In Ulster’s Face! 

]

 A War-Mongering Guy – Thank God For Brexit!  

…and the arrogant Schulz  –

Schulz? Scheisse! Enoch Was Right! Strasbourg Is NO Parliament! 

–  so unimpressive that he couldn’t even beat Mama Stasi Merkel in the election last month…

Schulz is mentioned by name in the EUObs report on how most MEPS gouge huge sums from the public purse and won’t say how they spend it.

I offer you an extract, but do read it all…

No paper trail for a lot of euros

The EU parliament spends millions every year of public money on MEP allowances.

Per month they receive a lump sum of over €4,300 in general expenditure for things like office rent and phone bills. This comes to around €40 million annually for all 751 members.

Another maximum of some €24,000 is given per month to pay for staff. They receive a flat-rate subsistence allowance of €306 per day on hotels and meals.

They can claim over €4,200 per year in travel expenses between Brussels and Strasbourg, where they meet for plenary sessions. All this comes on top of a monthly pre-tax salary of €8,484.

Yet the parasitic swine point-blank refuse to account for where this money goes!

On Thursday (19 October), the top EU court will hold a hearing on whether the public has the right to know exactly how such tax-payer money is spent. A verdict is not expected this year.

https://euobserver.com/institutional/139471

You need to read it all to savour the sheer sickening arrogance.

tBut when a group of journalists from around Europe in 2015 asked to scrutinise MEPs’ monthly invoices, the parliament refused, citing data protection rules, “excessive workload” and because not all such records are held.

The journalists, represented by Natasa Pirc Musar, then took the parliament to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg.

In an interview last week with EUobserver, the lawyer said the parliament claims only the EU’s anti-fraud office Olaf and national police can investigate and ascertain MEP expenses.

“If this prevails, this is the end of investigative journalism in Europe,” she said.

She said the judges in Luxembourg will have to decide how much privacy an MEP can have for performing the task of an MEP, or if data protection (as defined under regulation 45/2001) gives them the leeway that keeps some activities secret.

Such data protection laws also cover service providers, or companies hired by the MEPs to carry out certain tasks, like an analysis or a report.

“How far can you go? I mean basically everything at the end is personal data,” she said.

But if the court decides in the favour of the journalists, then the parliament will have to hand over all the requested documents.

She says a better long term solution is to have MEPs proactively publish the documents online and have personal information like bank account details and home addresses blocked out.

Some already do. The UK’s Green MEP Jean Lambert publishes both her general expenditures and her receipts on her website.

But Musar also pointed out that extra journalistic scrutiny is needed in cases where, for example, MEPs do not spend any money. No money spent may mean that the MEP is not doing his or her job.

“I want to see them work, and if they work at all,” she said.

 

One of the biggest obstacles is that the EU parliament does not keep records of how an MEP spends his or her monthly general allowance of €4,300.

The EU Parliament does not audit office expenses because the money is given as a lump sum. No audit means little to no oversight.

Pressed by reporters, only 53 MEPs as of May agreed to disclose such information. Some have an office outside of the EU parliament but will not reveal its address.

Others refused or remained silent to their inquiries. Among them is Manfred Weber, who chairs the centre-right EPP political group.

Weber has a local office annexed to his private home in the Bavarian countryside, about a one hour drive from Munich.

He did not respond to the consortium inquiries on how he uses his general expenditures. He did not respond to this website, either.

In April, the European Parliament voted on transparency amendments that would require MEPs to create a separate account to track general monthly allowances.

But Weber, like most MEPs except some from the far-left GUE group, voted it down. The amendments never passed.