Amnesty ‘Only’ Use Tax-Payers’ Money For Propaganda?
While Giorgia Meloni is a great girl…A Violent Red Nazi Assault On A Lovely Patriot Lady! …Matteo Salvini is one of the good guys in Italy, a more reliable man than his other coalition partner Berlusconi.
But I must say I think he’s wasting his time offering to talk to his country’s Enemy Within.
Salvini asks to meet Amnesty
http://www.ansa.it/english/news/politics/2018/02/22/salvini-asks-to-meet-amnesty-
Turning the other cheek is not a virtue I rate highly, and after the politically partisan ‘charity’ Amnesty International viciously attacked his Lega party, claiming that Italy was steeped in xenophobia and racism and 50% of Internet hate speech came from… where?
=
Salvini’s party!
Of course, Italy is NOT by any means the only country subjected to this far-left clique’s election meddling.
==========
Trump’s campaign is a good example of this, Amnesty said.
“His poisoned election campaign was the example of a global trend that leads to anger and divisiveness.”
Far Left fanatics have been ranting along these lines for the past year, or more.
=
-
We know what to expect from rabid extremists like Castro-crawling Michael Moore…
….and CNN’s pinko propagandists, like Lemon, and Jones and Tapper.
But the source of that drivel at the top of our page is not some clapped out Media Democrat shrill.
It’s from a so-called charity!
The charity number for Amnesty International UK Section Charitable Trust is 1051681. Amnesty International UK Charitable Trust
And it’s not just Italian and American party politics into which Amnesty’s sticky-beaks intrude.
They rant against the Fides Party government in Hungary, and the Law and Justice Party government in Poland, inevitably, but they even lecture the Dutch pro-Brussels coalition in The Netherlands!
Other human rights issues Amnesty raised about the Netherlands specifically includes ethnic profiling by the police, temporarily keeping asylum seekers locked up in asylum centers and the introduction of a partial burka ban.
Amnesty Int. critical of Netherlands in anti-populism report | NL Times:
—
“Ethnic profiling?”
If a significant proportion of muggings in Amsterdam turns out to be committed by fair-haired Swiss grannies, is it unreasonable for Dutch cops to watch out for them?
=
“They were all asylum seekers!” Told You So!
Or a significant proportion of those who commit another form of crime – – share a common and identifiable characteristic, should police ignore that fact?
=
=
If illegal aliens know they risk deportation, and are thus likely to do a runner, it’s plain common sense to keep them under lock and key.
As for a ‘burka ban?’
Nuff said.
Sure, politicians can and will argue about all such issues. But a ‘charity?’
The perpetrators of those shamelessly political outbursts collect funds by calling themselves ‘charitable?’
More interestingly, whence come those funds?
…we do not seek or accept money from governments or political parties for our work in documenting and campaigning against human rights abuses…
OK! EXCEPT THAT, as we read the rest of that sentence, we learn that they don’t take tax-payers’ money or politicians’ hand-outs for that part of their ‘work’ but…
.
…only for our human rights education work.
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/our-finances
—
Incidentally, even the most democratic country in Europe has provoked the pro-crimmigrant charity.
Switzerland has been taken to task by the human rights group Amnesty International for its tough treatment of asylum seekers and migrants.
Amnesty also said concerns remained “regarding the use of disproportionate force during the deportation of migrants” while several asylum seekers had been returned to other Schengen countries under the Dublin regulation
Switzerland’s tough stance on migrants criticized by Amnesty
Deportation?
Are the Swiss meant to just tell undesirable illegals ‘go on home, now, pretty please.’\
They are liars, found to have no basis for the ‘asylum’ yarns they spun, so why not kick the brutes, no messing about. At the very least, it will discourage others of their unpleasant sort from resistance to orderly expulsion.
Returned to other Schengen countries under the Dublin regulation…?
Even The Leftal has to acknowledge that according to EU rules enshrined in the Dublin Convention, their applications for asylum should therefore be processed in the first EU country in which they arrive…
…
Otto J D is discussing. 
rossrightangle 
Otto J D 21:56 on March 1, 2018 Permalink |
Between Oxfam and Amnesty, the word ‘charity’ has surely been rendered meaningless.
The charity commissioners have plenty of evidence that there are so-called ‘charities’ which are intent on interfering in the functioning of Western countries’ democratic elections .
By engaging in propaganda activity against Trump in America and patriotic parties in Europe, like Salvini’s, they are openly political.
As for illegal immigrants, including violent ones like that one you have shown Oxfam supporting, charities encouraging them are not charities at all but fifth columnists. , .
LikeLike