Women Harass Men? Mais Non, Say ‘Intellectual’ Snobs!
Many professors do us a lot of good, like those in the fields of medicine and engineering.
Others, in made-up subjects like ‘Sociology’ and ‘Gender Studies…’
=
The Walking Brain-Dead?- Sex-Obsessed Melissa ‘Muscle!
Dirty Knickers Joke? Middle-Aged Bat Goes Bat-Sh#t!
…are a waste of space, who’d be better put to work as street-sweepers, though, since we like our streets to be swept properly, maybe not.
Others in real subjects, like Politics or Philosophy, are known to abuse their positions shamelessly, like this freako…
Indiana’s Stasi Prof – Silencing Dissent In Class
…or this one…
Another Awful Ignorant Prof? Fire Foul-Mouth Finkelstein!
…or this one…
‘”f**k outta here with your white feminism. I said don’t at me b**ch. I’m a professor…”
Gross ‘Professor’ ( Really! ) Savours Mrs. Bush’s Death
…to indoctrinate, or even incite, their students to think and do bad things.
But today’s question –
Hypocrisy Syllabus 101
Are they as susceptible as the rest of us to sexual impulses, or, worse, as likely as Bill Clinton to sexually exploit young and attractive people in their sphere of influence?
–
…arises due to accusations against this delicious piece of hot tottie (UK slang, but I’m sure there’s no need to explain!
=
‘Avital Ronell is an American philosopher who contributes to the fields of continental philosophy, literary studies, psychoanalysis, feminist philosophy, political …’ wikipedia
=
As you can see for yourselves, Avital Ronell, who will never see her 65th birthday agan, is a dishy dame, bound to have a ‘moths-around-a-flame’ effect on scores of dashing, dapper young bucks, the sort of unshaven (aka ‘designer stubble’) leering galoots, wearing no ties but suits, who star in so many of our tv ads.
So how could she POSSIBLY be guilty of predatory Clintonism?
Yet she has been so accused.
Feminists under fire for defending scholar accused of sexual harassment https://www.rt.com/usa/431315-avital-ronell-letter-butler/
Many have leapt to her defence!
Why?
Not, apparently, because they imagine that, with looks like hers, she can get as much nookie from willing paramours as she might conceivably need.
NO! Nor even because they care about the facts, but because she’s a bloody ‘intellectual,’ who has dazzled us, sorry, them, with loadsa-bull-sh-t, like –
‘Dissecting the Concept of the Complaint’
If you want to have your mind blown, or more precisely, are addicted to stunning boredom, watch her lecture on THAT! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw9Cv_wQ4CQ
BTW, her droning Bronxy voice makes it all the worse!
But let’s be fair, she HAS contributed vastly to our store of knowledge, as per her quoted words.
She further goes to show that stupidity does not acquire the status of concept. It only reaches the level of quasi-concept.
=
That quote’s from Wikipedia again – she’s astounding!
But there’s a better quote!
It’s from the report I read on Sunday, about the case, in which a pack of prejudiced prigs have written a letter defending the weirdo.
Their ardour is not based on any evidence of whether she’s being fairly or unfairly involved in the allegation but because she’s their heroine!
“The ensuing loss for the humanities, for New York University, and for intellectual life during these times would be no less than enormous and would rightly invite widespread and intense public scrutiny,” the letter warned.
Ooops. Can we talk about ‘heroines’ any more? Are they all now gender-free ‘heroes?’
Like those daft Anglican priestesses who fought so hard to take holy orders…
…then objected when folks accurately referred to them not as ‘priests’ but priestesses?
Uptight bints!
However, back to the whining leftist academics!
Critics of the letter have dubbed this effort by the academic community, and feminists in particular, hypocritical for going against the ‘party line’, in which accusers should always be believed and the connections or achievements of the accused should be at least irrelevant, if not actually used as evidence of their power over the victim…
QUITE SO!
AND ALL THE WORSE WHEN THEY ADDUCE HER ACADEMIC ‘DISTINCTION’ – – AS IF THAT SOMEHOW EXCUSES ANYTHING SHE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE DONE!
—————
Jacko, 
Tara Minter, and 
Fred Santos are discussing. 
rossrightangle 
Fred Santos 19:31 on July 6, 2018 Permalink |
Even if she looked like Marilyn Monroe or Bardot when they were in the flower of their youth and beauty, those quotes from Ronell are enough to scare off any man, or woman.
Most men like hanging out with ladies whose conversation we can understand.
She is seriously freaky.
LikeLike
Tara Minter 21:25 on July 6, 2018 Permalink |
What is she supposed to have done?
We know what Weinstein and Clinton are accused of, although only Weinstein is facing criminal charges.
But unless the whole story is brought out into daylight, it’s impossible to form any opinion.
In fact the whole harassment issue uas been trivialized.
We have heard ridiculous accusations against guys for telling a ‘naughty’ joke or that professor in your other report about the ‘bat-sh-t bat.’ He never said or did anything wrong except to foolishly assume a gender studies academic might have a sense of humor.
My point is that what you say is true but people need to calm down and stop witch-hunting without evidence.
LikeLike
Jacko 22:48 on July 6, 2018 Permalink |
I’m half her age.
If I use big strange words like she does, you think she’ll take a fancy to me?
LikeLike