In L A, Invoking Constitution =’‘Poking A Hornets’ Nest!’’
We shall be looking soon at the brave patriots of Oregon, OFIR, who have won a battle for democracy, with a successful referendum petition. They gathered enough signatures to force the elitists to give every citizen a chance to vote on the scandalous ‘sanctuary’ laws so adored by the Media Democrat party there, and all over America.
Sanctuary state repeal initiative makes November ballot
But how about a bit further south, in California, where another, similar drive for people-power is under way.
One of the key figures behind the petition there is a man named Don Rosenberg.
Unlike many of those working with him, he has a deeply personal reason for his commitment to curb crimmigrant sanctuary in the Golden State. One of his sons was knocked down and killed by an illegal immigrant in 2010 –
https://ktla.com/2018/07/10/california-ballot-initiative-to-reverse-sanctuary-state-undocumented-immigrant-drivers-license-laws-cleared-to-collect-signatures/
To be precise, Mr. Rosenberg, is focusing on the scheme to grant crimmigrants driving license, which the left-liberal legislature approved a year or so ago.
But at least as important is his parallel plan to ‘prohibit automatic voter registration in the state, something Rosenberg thinks can help prevent voter fraud.’
All good stuff. We should cheer Don on.
Yet what is striking is the callous, and ever so slightly menacing, riposte from a far-left Los Angeles City Councilman called Gil Cedillo.
=========
Cedillo
=========
Cedillo dismisses the tragic death of Rosenberg’s son as ‘unfortunate.’
Then he swings into absolute hypocrisy.
“We must stop politicizing immigration issues for political gain, like we have done with DACA, DAPA and the separation of families.”
Oh yeah?
So the Media Democrat party does’t use crimmigrant issues to wage political war on President Trump?
But then…what are we to make of this ominous outburst?
“It is Mr. Rosenberg’s right to collect signatures for this initiative, but I advise him not to poke the hornet’s nest.”
–
=
We all know very well that poking a hornet’s nest is physically dangerous, even, on occasion, fatal, if enough of the nasty creatures retaliate.
Is there a suggestion here that larger nasty creatures, aka the illegal aliens who currently wallow in the protective embrace of liberals like Cedillo, might similarly retaliate?
Against what?
Against loyal Americans who merely wish to give the decent people of California their constitutional right to vote?
Is this how elites react when their disdain for common folk attracts democratic blow-back?
NB Californian patriots have until December 19th to get the required number of signatures to put the measure to a referendum.
Mort, 
Noreen Paterson, and 
Al Gorland are discussing. 
rossrightangle 
Al Gorland 20:28 on August 31, 2018 Permalink |
You have turned a bright light on a dark place and good work for doing that.
These LA bums dote on illegals.
I hope that Rosenberg and his people get their proposition on the ballot paper.
Incidentally, here’s another news item, just out today in the Examiner.
…..
Illegal immigrant, previously deported 10 times, sentenced to nearly 10 years in prison
Jose Alfonso Rodriguez-Garcia was arrested in North Carolina’s Wake County on a charge of second-degree forcible rape in 2017. Once in federal custody, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents learned he had previously been removed from the country 10 times
…….
That kind of alien animal is what these California liberals care about, not the innocent Americans killed by illegals.
LikeLike
Noreen Paterson 22:40 on August 31, 2018 Permalink |
At least Californians have a chance of getting a vote on something.
I wish those ‘People’s Vote’ agitators would demand that we British get to have our say on immigration, capital punishment, ‘gay’ marriage and all the other things pushed through by politicians against our will.
But leftists are only interested in democracy if they think they can use it to their advantage.
LikeLike
Mort 21:18 on September 1, 2018 Permalink |
Even if the anti-illegal immigration campaigners get the proposal on the ballot and even if the voters back it, they could face the same kind of anti-democratic obstruction as happened before.
When the pro-marriage campaigners won a clear victory, they had their victory over-turned by a queer judge who favoured his own kind and ruled democracy invalid.
LikeLike