• ross1948 22:00 on September 15, 2018 Permalink Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Fake ‘Child Refugees!’ May Lets ‘Em Stay!


    So now it doesn’t matter if they were refused asylum after being brought to the UK?

    Bad enough that so many obvious fakers are granted ‘asylum!’

    But thanks to that Faker Floozy in 10 Downing Street, even those deemed unfit to gain that privilege are welcomed in and provided with freebies galore?

    =

    Theresa-May-Upset-450x270

    Is there no end to this woman’s treachery?

    =

    She’s as bad as Mama Stasi Merkel, and it’s a mark of shame that Brits are not emulating Germans in taking to the streets to protest.

    We are of course taking about the fake ‘refugees’ and fake ‘children…’

    …whom ‘Orrible Amber let in, from what the idiot scribbler in the Guardian  miscalls the ‘Calais refugee camp,‘ which of course was teeming with violent savages who by no stretch of the imagination were ‘refugees.’

    How Many Evil ‘Aid Workers’ Covered Up Calais Rape

    Female Afghan interpreter ‘raped by armed migrants’ at CalaisJungle

    Calais Women ‘Take Turns Staying Awake In Case Someone Attacks!’ 

    So what if the Guardian insists that only a small number did not qualify for refugee status under immigration rules.

    No actual number is mentioned, but no matter!

    If they failed the tests, and God knows it’s hardly an exacting test when the spineless Tory Government won’t even order a dental check to see if they ARE children, they should have been kicked out.

    =

    rascals-out

    =

    Instead, their greedy snouts have been given wide-open access to the tax-trough, and May adds insult to injury by coining a new category of sponging.

    =

    snout

    =

    …the government is to offer this group “Calais leave”, which will grant those who qualify the right to study, work, and have access to public funds and healthcare, with the option to apply for settlement after 10 years. The rule change will take effect in the autumn.

    Please note, the topsy-turvy definition applied to these youthful parasites is those ‘who were under the age of 18 at the time’ of their arrival. Oh, and who had family ties in the UK.

    In other words, spongers who arrived previously can sponsor (no financial contribution, mind!) these latest leeches.

    =

    Image result for leeches

    =

    Astoundingly, the report makes no mention of ANY MP demanding this outrageous action be overturned.

    What about Leave EU’s hero, Boris?

    What of Mr. Rees-Mogg?

    No call for an emergency debate in the Commons?

    Of course the pro-crimmigrant lobby has ‘welcomed the change but’ have at once stepped up pressure for MORE slugs to be added to the benefit burden British tax-payers already have to bear.

    One of the most bizarre parts of the report tells us that a private member’s bill, spearheaded by the Scottish National MP Angus MacNeil, going through the Commons proposes to broaden the definition of a family member under the rules.   https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/13/uk-offers-calais-leave-to-children-denied-asylum

    Please note, Mr. McNeill’s SNP separatist party has made it very clear that they do NOT regard 18 as the age at which people cease to be children.

    If you look at how old you need to be to vote in the ‘Scottish Parliament’ elections, you will see that young Scots get to vote as soon as they’re 16 years old.

    In other words, NOT a child any more once you are over 15.

    =

    Image result for double standard

    Why don’t they apply the same yard-stick to crimmigrants?

     

    Reply

    Required fields are marked *

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: