Who Lets Jihadist Devils Prowl A UK Campus?


Shocking indeed, the report on the University of Westminster ‘students’ who embraced the evil Islamist cause.

Good, of course, that several are now dead and others held in prison – but it would have been better had they been prevented from joining the ISIS rape-gang to inflict horror on innocents.

Or would it?

Had they been held in the UK, they would have got the full kid-glove care and slimy lawyers…

=

snout

…grubbing into the public purse to defend their ‘rights.’

At least for some of the jihadist scum, their Mid-East jaunt ended in the grave, or crippled – an infinitely fairer outcome.

However, what’s very disturbing about the prelude to the devils’ departure is the report on the BBC which reveals that one of the pigs, a particularly loathesome savage named Abukar Qasim…

for more on the pig Abukar, use that BBC link

=======

…had been spotted by the UK’s security services, and restrictions placed on his activities.

OK?

=

=

OK, except that, because the UK’s government is craven, there’s no internment. He should have been locked up indefinitely.

But far from it.

Instead,  ‘a High Court judge permitted him to interact more with fellow students, despite warnings from MI5 that it would mean “the risk of him engaging in terrorism-related activity”   https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47772772

Some High Court judges, in another context, have already been called out for what they are.

==========

Image result for enemies of the people

============

It’s easy to forget that while Theresa the Traitrix deserves all the obloquy she’s getting, there have been other rotten elements involved in sabotaging democracy.

Now we have a case of a judge who apparently decided that a jihadist swine’s “rights” take priority over public safety.

The Hell with that!

Jihadists should have NO rights at all. They are ipso facto traitors, their allegiance pledged to a supranational ideology.

(BTW, universities should require all students to sign a pledge repudiating jihadism – of course most satanic sectarians would lie…

…but once disloyal activities were revealed, it would facilitate expulsion).

=======

Brits surely have the right to know which robed and wigged exaltee exercised his judgement in such a wayward way.

Why did the BBC report not name and shame him?

Did ANY of the UK media do so?

If readers come across any such useful info, please let us know!