Channel Crimmigrants – Guardian Spews Fake News!
So the Guardian report (rant) is about ‘refugees?’
Record refugee evictions at camps in France to halt Channel crossings
Perhaps not, because…
…without taking a breath, it suddenly becomes about ‘asylum-Seekers?’
Calais-based human rights observers report ‘relentless harassment’ of asylum seekers
Eventually, further down the page, it’s back to ‘refugees’ again, briefly, before the Guardian scribbler –
…identified as Mark Townsend, Home Affairs Editor –
…who evidently is ignorant of the difference between ‘asylum-seekers’ and ‘refugees…’
=
An asylum seeker is someone who is seeking international protection but whose claim for refugee status has not yet been determined. In contrast, a refugee is someone who has been recognised under the 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees to be a refugee. Asylum seekers and refugees – Parliament of Australia
– takes ‘refuge’ in the cop-out catch-all term ‘migrants,’ much favoured by the media…
Charities argue that the increasing tempo of evictions, a strategy backed by UK border authorities, is forcing the 1,300 refugees currently in northern France to risk the dangerous Channel crossing. Last month the number of crossings by migrants from France hit record levels.
=
….because it facilitates their ideological agenda, confusing readers who are denied the truth about whether these persons are illegal or not.
Frankly, I doubt very much that anyone among the Guardian editorial clique doesn’t know the diff between the two categories of alien intruders mentioned above.
So why does Townsend put his name to a piece where they’re muddled up?
He certainly doesn’t clarify this.
Nor does he make any attempt to correct the Big Lie propagated by those ‘charities!’
…
…that anyone is ‘forcing‘ any of the aliens in northern France to ‘risk the Channel crossing.’
If they were genuinely ‘asylum-seekers,’ which means people who want to find a safe haven, then there’s absolutely NOTHING to stop them from applying for ‘asylum’ in France.
Perhaps they reckon that French adjudicators are not the soft touch that UK adjudicators are.
Or perhaps they have reason to believe that rejection of their ‘asylum’ applications in France would mean deportation back to where they belong.
=
=====
I don’t know if the French are that good, but they cannot be worse than their UK counterparts. https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/697136/missing-asylum-seekers-britain
…three times as many failed asylum seekers are still here more than two years after all appeals against their removal were exhausted.
That terrible truth was part of a news item that revealed either shocking incompetence, irresponsibility or downright subversion on the part of UK ‘border security’ when ‘5 Iranians were caught entering Britain illegally, arrested and told to “report in regularly,’ then turned loose!
Anybody seen them since?
==========
Anyway, apart from the fakery, the report is a mixture of good and bad news.
The good news is that the authorities are doing an excellent job pushing the parasites off the areas they’re illegally occupying.
One Pakistani crimmigrant is quoted whining thus –
“Today police came. They take my tent. In two days, I sleep maximum two hours. It’s too much difficult. The mind is not working, the brain stops working. All the refugees are so afraid now.”
But as so often, the court-clowns are stabbing their country in the back.
Some dumb magistrates have issued a ruling that means the state must provide water, showers and toilets…
.
…which of course means the wasters will be even less inclined to disentanglement from their leech-like infestation of France’s coastal region.
Hell, which didn’t the numbskulls add an order to supply the swine with cakes and ale?
They should get NOTHING, though on second thoughts, water, in the form of hosing down….
….might nudge their thoughts towards applying for repatriation.
rossrightangle 
Reply