Arrogant Stinko Scoff-Laws, Egged On By Big-Name Berks!
I had a quick look at the late-night news before I turned in, and, having been impressed by a much more serious approach on the part of the Met Police, as I had urged…
London Has Fallen? No Way! Get the Stinkos!
…towards the Stinko Revulsion climate-panic anarchists, I was appalled to see some demented middle-aged bat with a ring in her nose climbing all over some government building in central London, astride the place’s portal, ranting like an inebriate fishwife.
Why was the anti-social cow not lassoed and brought down?
Answer?
The failure of the cops to drag the bitch down is possibly not unconnected to the outbreak of shrilling from not only undesirable mouthy ‘human rights’ lawyers, but also Corbyn’s ugly ex, Diane Abbott…
.
.
…who had sent out a pig-ignorant tweet:
“This ban is completely contrary to Britain’s long-held traditions of policing by consent, freedom of speech, and the right to protest.”
‘Policing by consent?’
Please, trespassing louts, stop it. Please, agitators, stop blocking the highway and let people go to work.
That fanatic London Mayor was grizzling too.
Needless to say, another total berk, Allan Hogarth, of Amnesty International…
…chimed in, a rant about how the ban was “an unlawful restriction on the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly…”
But there’s no right to mobilise mobs to block streets, nor to invade private property or government buildings.
The Public Order Act affords authorities the right to stop trouble-makers organising to prevent decent citizens going to and fro on London’s streets.
The Stinko scum are deliberately obstructing honest folk.
The Stinkos openly boast that such is their purpose,
Tear-gas. Water-cannon.
Do your job, cops!
…
rossrightangle 
Reply