Prince Andrew, Corbyn, Sturgeon – The Key Question!

The last thing I feel like doing on Sunday mornings is watch an interview about sexploitation, alleged or fictional.


Image result for prince andrew


But since the BBC made the HRH interview its top news, ‘twas hard to escape at least some of the ‘story!’

Skip the question of who did what and which way and to whom.

I leave that to the limerick fans, as in –

There was a young man from Khartoum, took a lesbian up to his room…they argued all night, as to who had the right…

No, it’s this business about the chick in the Epstein story being 17 when, or if, the deed was done.

It used to be that young English lovers would elope to Gretna Green, across the Scottish border, because Scots law allowed marriage at 16.

Nobody railed at Scotland over ‘child marriage’ back then!

Nor do Scots these days  view persons aged 16 or over as ‘children’ – they get to vote!




The SNP separatists, led by Nicola Sturgeon, and Corbyn’s Labour Party, are all for it!




And if you can decide who’s to govern your country, then, surely, you can decide with whom to copulate?!

However, if these parties are definitely of the opinion that persons are entitled to be regarded as responsible adults from the day they celebrate their 16th birthday…

Image result for happy birthday sweet 16

…then WHAT steps are they taking to stop the imbecilic UN/EU policy by which such adults are categorised as ‘children’ if they happen to be ‘unaccompanied illegal aliens….’



…of the sort we saw when Amber Rudd, as Home Secretary, imported these hulking brutes into the UK…

Arrest Amber Rudd? Calais Crimmigrant “Age Checks Not Carried Out! “ 

…without taking any scientific steps to verify their claim to be ‘under-age?’

My view is that the biological definition of children as pre-pubescent human beings is appropriate.

‘Robbery, Attempted Rape?’ Spain’s ‘Youngster’ Migrant Blight! 

If any formal age-limit has to be applied, then 12 is fair enough.

What do you think?