Without Evidence, Media Break Suspiciously Timed ‘News!’

If a real newspaper makes sensationalist allegations, based on dishonestly obtained ‘documents….’



….then won’t publish those ‘documents’ for inspection, the ‘revelations’ must be taken with a pinch of salt.

Especially when it’s carefully timed to sway as the approaching election!

Even the BBC noticed that!

Though they promptly found a guest named David Cay Johnston, who was given free rein to rail about President Trump.



BBC chose him with exquisite care, methinks, based on his non-partisan piece in the Guardian 2 years ago, viz. –

We need tax police – and they should go after the likes of Donald Trump



…which indicates his animosity towards The Donald.

However, since the NYT recently proved its anti-American motivations with its ‘1619’ hogwash propaganda project…

   1619 Projects Fires off New Lies to Cover Up Old Lies 

See the source image


…let’s leave that to our USA friends to counter-attack, and focus on its ideological catamite in the UK.

The Guardian, naturally, has jumped into the fray….

At a White House press briefing on Sunday, Trump made wild allegations about plots against him.. 


…which shows how sober and impartial their approach to news is  – on this and on most things.



Occasionally, critics suggest I use harsh, pejorative words and phrases in my blog.


I cover lots of news and do not knowingly falsify it, but I use the news to attack those forces I regard as bad and to support those on the side of right.

That’s what political blogs are for.

Newspapers usually contain both news and opinion, but keep them separate.

Thus fanatical leftists write in the Guardian, for instance, expressing extreme intolerance e.g.

Guardian Jackboot Bigot Calls Brexit Brits “Thugs!=

Guardian’s Nick ‘Storm-Troop’ Cohen.

Guardian Bigot- “Don’t Even Acknowledge Patriot Point Of View!” 

Middle-Aged Posh Dirty-Mouth -‘Politicians Mustn’t Appeal To The People!’ 

But that is listed as Opinion.

Fair enough.

Reporters, on the other hand, are supposed to tell us the facts, without inserting their own prejudices.


Hence my dismay this week when I opened up this ‘news’ report, written by the Guardian’s ‘Bureau Chief’ in Washington DC, David Smith…




..and found this objective, impartial turn of phrase. 

His latest attempt to stoke fear and instability…

Inevitably, Smith was spewing bile at President Trump, but those bilious, bitter, bigot words belong in a Democrat ad, not a ‘news’ report.

If the Guardian insists on appending its assertion that its purpose is to provide…

…open, independent, quality news every day…

…as it does append, as a begging bowl, to every one of its online reports I read…

…best they fire Smith, whose leftist bigotry, already so overt, was visible again this week, when he summed up the 100% constitutionally legitimate Supreme Court nomination thus – 

For democracy, murder most foul.