‘Unsubstantiated?’ BBC Hacks With Nelson’s Eyes!


Without evidence?’

‘Unfounded?’

‘Unsubstantiated?’

Have you watched those videos, of people, to all intents and purposes perfectly normal people, ordinary citizens with stories of highly suspicious…

.

..

…if not downright dishonest goings-on in respect of votes, or maybe ‘votes,’ that have made or could make, a difference in the USA’s election.

https://youtu.be/7bo0lB1e_RI

If you have watched them, good.

But it won’t have been on UK Pravda!

https://www.theepochtimes.com/election-fraud-allegations-infographic_3605589.html

.

Consider their ways!

  • Late on election night, many swing states stopped counting ballots. Observers were then removed from the counting facilities and counting CONTINUED without the observers
  • Statistically abnormal vote counts were the new normal when counting resumed. They were unusually large in size (hundreds of thousands) and had an unusually high (90 percent and above) Biden-to-Trump ratio.
  • Late arriving ballots were counted. In Pennsylvania, 23,000 absentee ballots have IMPOSSIBLE postal return dates and another 86,000 have such extraordinary return dates they raise serious questions
  • The failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots. The destruction of mail-in ballot envelopes, which must contain signatures
  • Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.
  • Missing votes. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 50,000 votes held on 47 USB cards are missing.
  • 20,312 people who no longer met residency requirements cast ballots in Georgia. Biden’s margin is 12,670 votes.
  • Invalid residential addresses. Record numbers of dead people voting. Ballots in pristine condition without creases, that is, they had not been mailed in envelopes as required by law.
  • In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch
  • …..
  • NB – the BBC and other left media are headlinng the US Supreme Court’s refusal to consider the request by Texas to invalidate election result in four other states.
  • It is important to note that the ruling was NOT about the facts of the case but on the grounds that Texas did not have legal standing to bring the case.
  • UK Pravda’s woman in Washington, a bint named Nomia Iqbal, whom we have had cause to mention before….

    Debates! BBC’s Iqbal Claims, Without Evidence…. 

     …decided she knew better than two dissenting justices, dismissing their austere dissenting opinions as ‘quirky.’
  • .
  • Nomia Iqbal

………..

  • I’m sure Justices Alito and Thomas will now go back to law school so they can iron out any quirkiness in their understanding of constitutional law!
  • Or they could just call in Comrade Iqbal as a private tutor!