‘Diversity’ Cabal Dictates UK Reporting? Expose Them!


Skipping one chunk of imbecility does not mean UK Pravda’s on the mend.

The fact that a complaint about Laura Kuenssberg using the phrase ‘nitty-gritty’ has been rejected by the BBC – after inordinately long-drawn-out brow-furrowing at the highest level – is no indication of a return to honest reporting by the BBC.

=

Only complete morons would find ‘nitty-gritty’ objectionable, morons or cultural marxists out to flex their malevolent muscles.

But it seems, from the Evening Standard report, that an obscure cabal of self-appointed far-left censors have placed ‘nitty-gritty’ out of bounds to hundreds of journalists…

That diktat was laid down last year, at a ‘diversity briefing’ when sports commentators not just with the BBC but also at Sky, BT Sport and ITV….

=

…were TOLD to use alternatives…

….such as “the basic facts” on the grounds that nitty-gritty is thought to have referred to the detritus found in the bottom of transatlantic slave ships

Two questions arise –

Did not one of those hacks on the receiving end of the leftist diktat have enough self-respect, never mind enough professional pride, to stand up and tell the stinking pinkos to sod off?

=

=

Were they really ALL too spineless to call out the creeps?

Oh, and the second question?

Have any of you ever heard such crass idiocy…

=

….as that ‘thought to have referred‘ excuse for censorship?

NITTY-GRITTY?

It was included on a list of phrases to be avoided by sports commentators at a diversity briefing…

/

…last summer.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/bbc-laura-kuenssberg-nitty-gritty-b900886.html

But let’s not forget the third question, to which the Evening Standard reporter must have known the answer, yet declined to share it with all us readers?

=

=

WHO ARE THE SWINE, who ran that ‘diversity briefing!’

=

=

Okay, let’s make it four questions!

WHO PAID FOR THEM TO SPOUT THEIR SUBVERSIVE GARBAGE!