Slimy Hain – ‘Let Stinkos Run Amok With Impunity’

Remember that obnoxious brute Peter Hain?

Once a scofflaw with the Young Liberals, after scuttling out of South Africa…

In July 1964 John Harris, a close friend of Hain’s family, left a time bomb in Johannesburg railway station. It killed one person; a grandmother out for the day with her grand-daughter (she was Welsh as it happens: ironic since Hain represents a Welsh constituency).

They had to shovel granny into a sack; her granddaughter had her face blown off; 20 others were seriously injured.


peter-hain-$7007015$300Peter Hain


Harris was hanged for the crime. Peter Hain spoke at the funeral eulogising this act and soon afterwards Hain and his parents left South Africa to continue their mischief here.

The horribly injured child travelled to England to see Hain; he refused to see her.

Hain is an inveterate and bitter enemy of Britain and always has been.

He is also a moral coward….

He pollutes British politics by his oily presence.

…then a Labour MP, who, urged on by B. Liar, tried to do a dirty back-room deal with Madrid to sell out Gibraltar, much as he had slimed around to let loose Sinn Fein/IRA terrorists…. 

‘Let My People Go!’ Says Terrorist Mourner Hain 

…but now, we might have hoped, retired and dreaming of gory glory days?

Not a chance.

The nasty old swine is now demanding that deliberate malicious acts of vandalism go unpunished.

X-Stinko Revulsion. Green Nazis Make War On Press Freedom! 

Arrogant Stinko Scoff-Laws, Egged On By Big-Name Berks! 

Yes, you guessed it – we’re talking about the filth!

Hain has declared, in the ghastly Guardian, of course, that Stinko Revulsion scum should not be prosecuted for what would be crimes if committed by you or me.

This comes after a jury, composed by ill-chance of leftist vermin…



…let a pack of filthy Stinkos walk free…



…even though they did not dispute the facts of the mayhem they’d revelled in.

Their action was reportedly designed to create more than £5,000 worth of damage, to ensure the case would be escalated to the crown court and heard by a jury, rather than in a magistrates court. 

If Hain thinks real or pretended ‘righteous indignation’ justifies malicious damage to property, perhaps he won’t mind if somebody publicises his car’s number plate?



Or his home address?