‘Without Evidence?’ ‘Unsubstantiated?’ BBC Guilty!
‘Without Evidence!’
‘Unsubstantiated!’
How many times have we seen BBC stick those words into a story about the stolen election in the USA?
The BBC’s aim is to discredit those who dissent from their political agenda.
But in their headline about Hillary Clinton’s forgetful sometime side-kick?
=
Huma Abedin: Clinton aide details unwanted kiss by US senator
Not even quotation marks?
No inverted commas around that ‘unwanted kiss…’
=
No, this is NOT a photo of the alleged kiss, merely an illustration for any drongo who’s never had one!
===
…to which there’s not even ONE witness?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59059289
UK Pravda just publishes a controversial claim by a woman with a troubled past – not only a dodgy husband but links to Islamist extremism….
Bachmann Nails USA’s Enemy Within – McCain n Boehner Let ‘Em Off the Hook!
….under a headline which affirms Abedin’s rather Blasey-like assertion…Dodgy Doorways Into Blasey’s Blurry Brain …which leaves all 100 senators in office at the time open to suspicion.
Naturally, our friends in the USA are drawing their own conclusions about….
…
…or if it happened at all!
—————————–
So, That’s Why a Top Clinton Aide Hid the Identity of the Person Who Allegedly Sexually Assaulted Her
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2021/10/29/top-clinton-aide-says-a-us-senator-sexually-assaulted-her-but-theres-a-catch-n2598241?
Sure, later down the BBC page, the word ‘claims’ makes an appearance.
=
Fiona and 
Jim Ex Jakarta are discussing. 
rossrightangle 
Jim Ex Jakarta 16:02 on November 1, 2021 Permalink |
Typical sloppy BBC bias.
At least Bill Clinton’s off the hook.
He was never a senator, just a governor.
LikeLike
Fiona 20:09 on November 1, 2021 Permalink |
If the BBC put quotation marks around those words, it would indicate there’s doubt about how true the accusation might be.
The whole thing reeks of a hidden agenda.
Why else is she hiding the identity of the ‘culprit?’
LikeLike