• ross1948 17:20 on May 11, 2022 Permalink Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Twitter left bias, Unidentified 'EU diplomats'   

    Why Does BBC Cover For Nameless Fourth Reich Flunkeys?

    After the BBC World News hack David Eades…..

    .BBC’s Awful Eades Has Another ‘Expert’ Guest! 

    David ‘Some’ Eades – BBC Bigot! 

    …at 9.10am 11/5, Jakarta time, failed to challenge the hogwash of a shrill American guest who called Elon Musk ‘ignorant’ then let her own ignorance gush forth, her Big Lie that Twitter is ‘not leftwing…’


    Didn’t Twitter suppress the Hunter Biden laptop revelation?

    Oh, and don’t forget that Project Veritas scandal…..

    Did Dorsey’s ‘ChinaDoll’ Veto Veritas?

    …and hasn’t Twitter been waging a woke war on people who refuse to kow-tow to pronoun pukes?

    Truth and Twitter are words that don’t go well together.


    • =

    Twitter claimed that the tweet about Levine, a biological man who claims to be a woman, violates its policy against “hateful conduct.” READ


    So I had a look at the BBC news website, and lo, UK Pravda is into cover-up mode again….


    …a report on Brussels V Britain, quoting unidentified Fourth Reich flunkeys, ‘EU diplomats,’no less.

    But why should we be expected to believe anything said by those quoted, if they lack the guts, the integrity, to put their names to their anti-British rants.

    More to the point, how do we know they even exist!

    But UK Pravda nevertheless gaily spotlights their anti-British snarling.


    From all her meetings with the EU and member states she knows exactly that this is a no-go for all of them,” said one EU diplomat. 

    “So this can only be about catering to a domestic audience.” 

    Another senior diplomat warned that such a move by the UK would only serve to “delight” Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

    “Contemplating to break international law and undermining Western unity at a time when Western democracies have come together to defend international law against Russia would be an utterly irresponsible move,” they said.



    Rabid rot, or not?

    If Kaiserin Ursula ranted like that, or Le Muppet, we should not be surprised. 
    They are mere politicians, still furious that Britannia extricated herself from the EUSSR.


    It’s their job to spout bombastic bilge.

    But the flunkeys?
    They are no more entitled to fume and foam about Britain’s ‘utterly irresponsible’ efforts to prevent intrusion by partisan ECJ judges into UK affairs than social security clerks in Ipswich are entitled to rant to claimants.
    They can hold any views they like, but if they go sneaking off to media sympathisers…


    Dismissal looms, surely?

    Oh, and BTW, note those quotes!

    ‘One EU diplomat’ said one thing, then ‘another senior diplomat‘ said something else.

    Clear enough, but for the final, most bilious, part of the rant, that cr-p about Putin? Suddenly it’s ‘they said!’

    Did the two flunkeys stand side by side, reading aloud from a shared Euro-Commissar song-sheet?

    Or, scarily, are we dealing with one of those deluded pronoun pukes?



    • Mack the Knife 21:31 on May 11, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      The BBC has always been hostile to Brexit.
      But even if they were pro-Brexit, there is no justification for them using unsubstantiable unprovable sources.
      So unless they have the honesty to tell us who these nameless flunkeys really are, they should not use them.
      But well-spotted, Ross, that give-away ‘they’ that suggests something very staged.
      Who is manipulating who?



    Required fields are marked *

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: