Updates from ross1948 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 7:33 pm on September 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: American border, , , , Luke Baker,   

    Reuters Rotters Spread Crimmigrant Sob-Story -Albeit ‘Unverified!’ 


    ‘It was not immediately possible for Reuters to verify the details of the apparent kidnapping.’

    So bang goes one tear-jerking chunk of a Reuters’ yarn, pumped out by the lick-spittle Yahoo hacks…

    .

    .

    …all about a pair of illegals whose ‘dream’ of gate-crashing somebody else’s country in order to marry there was thwarted, not by  bandits bent on kidnap but by the laws of the wicked old United States!

    ..

    ..

    At least the pap-mongers admit that the eventual ‘wedding’ ceremony ( outside the United States) …

    .

    .

    ….which they also describe (in about as much detail as they dish out about the unverified ‘kidnap’ story) was not much more legitimate than their intended illegal entry into the USA.

    The coverage of any story spun by asylumers should always have a ‘health-warning’ appended, derived perhaps from this quote from (surprisingly) the leftwing ABC –

    ….arrivals tended to exaggerate their stories so they could get permanent residence….

    =======

    We have noted Reuters’ rotters’ standards of accurate journalism before….

    No, Reuters Rotters! Crimmigrants CAN Be Deported! 

    …and we have also spotlighted the bigoted left intolerance of one of their hacks-in-chief.

    .

    Luke Baker, Reuters’ Paris Bureau Chief, is a leftist who claims to know what the rest of us want to have reported.

    ‘The rhetoric that’s coming out of Poland and Hungary is not what anybody wants to hear.’

    ….

    Thanks just the same, you arrogant dork, but millions DO want to hear what the Poles and Hungarians are saying, because our own governments refuse to speak up!

    Then there was their inexcusable reticence in the matter of identifying an evil imam, even when other liberal-run media named the swine.

    ….

    So please just treat this a just another reminder!

     
    • Mel Henderson 7:56 pm on September 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      They are criminals.
      Of course they’ll lie if it suits their criminal purposes.

      Like

  • ross1948 3:28 pm on September 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Lucia Lamorgese,   

    Italy’s Moral Compass, Awry Without Salvini! 


    There was some small consolation in reading that Italian ‘authorities refused to allow the landing, citing the security decree drafted by Salvini,’ of yet another crimmigrant cargo.

    But this didn’t last.

    =

    Image result for lamorgese luciana

    The new interior minister, Luciana Lamorgese, a career civil servant and specialist in migration policy, has promised to revise Salvini’s hardline immigration measures.

    And today we saw how the moral imperative that ought to govern every nation’s affairs –

    – priority of the people’s safety –

    – has been cast aside.

    Another ship-load of illegals has been dumped, without hindrance, on poor Lampedusa.

    =

    lampedusa

    Truth Told – Threatening, Thieving…Migrant Molestation! 

    My God, has that little island not suffered enough?

    For years and years.

    It’s bad news for every Italian who has suffered at the hands of the illegal aliens already admitted into their country…

    Retired Couple ‘Slaughtered Like Goats!’ 

    …so many wrongs at the hands of evil ingrates.

    What today must be the feelings among all those aware of these outrages against their fellow-citizens.

    .

     

    But what’s equally, if not more, disturbing is that the woman guaranteeing a revision, aka a weakening, of Salvini’s admirable edicts, is not some pinko agitator from Red Renzi’s party, now embedded in power with the M5S fake-‘populists,’ now exposed as mere opportunists -but a

    …a career civil servant…

    …also decribed in the rotten media as an ‘expert.’

    Salvini was expert – at safeguarding Italians.

    Sure, he made a big mistake recently, against which we warned him.

    Beware! The President Is No Friend To Democracy! 

    But we never said he was perfect. Even heroes are human!

    He erred by his premature action, but his expertise in office was indisputable. He did all he could to keep crimmigrant cargo boats from landing.

    What manner of expertise does Signora Lamorgese have to offer? How many will she round up for deportation?

    We hear the Five Star spokesman, now comfortably in bed with Red Renzi’s political heirs, trying to deflect the torrent of condemnation, saying most of this new batch of bludgers will be passed on to France (25%) and Germany (25%) and other countries.

    But aside from his shameless confession, that some ofthe unwelcome aliens will be allowed to loiter in Italy, soaking up resources…

    =

    (and perhaps whining about all the freebies they get, like those swine we noticed a few years back – Crimmigrants Seize Italian Cop-Shop – Punishment? ‘Specialised African Cuisine!’  )

    …why are the gate-crashers not dispersed as they ought to be…

    …back to whence they came?

    What do Mama Stasi’s victims, the Germans assaulted and raped by aliens, think of this dirty deal?

    What do Muppet Macron’s victims…

    More Blood On Macron’s Hands! 

    …those bereaved French folk whose families and friends have been murdered by aliens, in Toulon and Carcassonne and Nice and Paris, think of this repugnant carve-up?

    We won’t know because neither lousy leader will put their polices on ‘migrants’ to the people in a free and fair referendum.

    Liberalism is the cancer. Democracy is the cure.

    NB – notice how both in Italy and in the UK, the Enemy Within has desperately avoided letting the people vote!

    ,

     
  • ross1948 8:17 am on September 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Justrin Bieber, ,   

    Canada’s Justin Should Clean Up His Act! 


    Surprise, surprise!

    My sling-shot today is aimed, not at Pro-Crimmigrant Pretty Boy..

    RCMP has spent more than $6.6M to process migrants at Canada’s busiest illegal crossing….The bulk of the money is for overtime and maintaining a satellite office, but funds have also been spent on buses, diapers, baby food and car seats..  https://vancouversun.com/news/canada/rcmp-has-spent-more-than-6-6m-to-process-migrants-at-canadas-busiest-illegal-crossing

    ….

    Image result for stratford canada

    ==

    …but at a certain Mr. Bieber, from Stratford, Ontario.

    ==============================

    Justin Turdo is an unspeakably awful person, and a worse prime minister, but most of you already know my views on the bad son of a bad father already.

    Turdo/Castro Axis – Still Cosy After All These Years 

    KHADR-10.5-Million-Cheque-ALREADY-CASHED

    Ten Million Bucks For Killer Khadr? Canadian Petition!

    Canada’s Enemy Within – Will Turdeau “Have To Look at The Root Causes?” 

    In Turdistan, Decent Muslims Protest Junior’s Jihad Jaunt! 

    ===================

    Justin Bieber, on the other hand, has been on my radar hitherto only because he comes from a city I have always loved…

    .

    Related image

    .

    …beautiful Stratford, Ontario, with its splendid Shakespearean Gardens and its river Avon, where I caught a cat-fish as a boy.

    Like most Stratford citizens and those who have ever spent time there, I welcomed JB’s rise to fame and the spin-off benefits accruing to his home town.

    Stratford has long had a reputation for civility and the common decency of the people who live there and up till now, the young star has not notably marred the little city’s good name.

    Until now, as I say. Suddenly, he has lowered himself to the level of that gutter grub Beto O’Rourke..

    Image result for wash your mouth out with soap

    Memo To Foulmouth Beto – “Yes, This Is F**ked Up!”

    …responding to a rather crass photo of a kissing couple on twitter or somewhere, not by simply saying he liked it or disliked it, but by quite needlessly inserting an obscenity in his comment.

    foulmouth

    “U guys are fuckin weird. And I like it,” Justin Bieber wrote.

    For what possible reason did this grown man, who undoubtedly exerts influece on countless adolescents…

    =

    Image result for bieber concert

    =====

    …many of whom have parents trying their best to raise them as civilised children, feel obliged to display his gutter-gob globally in this manner?

     

     
  • ross1948 7:52 am on September 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Kimberley Chen, ,   

    Asian Uptights Bleat Against Beauty! 


    One might expect such uptight bleating in some sexist cess-pool like Iran or Saudi Arabia…

    =

    burka-1

    =

    …but NOT in Singapore, Taiwan or Australia!

    =====

    Singer Kimberly Chen was frowned upon by those who said the beige colour of her clothing made it seem as though she was naked.

    Yummy Kimberley

    =

    As you can see, Kimberley Chen is delightful to behold.

    Not only she herself, but we too, wherever we are, ought to give thanks today for the beauty bestown on her by her Maker, which she has been gracious enough to share on the internet.

    I only wish some similar vision would take morning strolls, with or without the dog, in my pleasant but unexciting Jakarta neighbourhood.

    Yet a swarm of whining keyboard killjoys has been berating her, aghast at her beige bikini – https://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/netizens-bark-at-singer-kimberley-chen-after-she-wore-bikini – which, they complain, might be taken to suggest that she is absolutely unclad.

    ‘Complain!?!’ 

    =kidding

    =

    Although the story about Ms Chen is in a Singapore newspaper, and she’s said to be based in Taiwan, she’s apparently Australian.

    I hope to visit Oz in a few months. I’ll be watching out for her.

    If I miss out on a sighting, perhaps I should take a trip to Taiwan.

     
    • Mel Henderson 7:58 pm on September 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The cheek of her!

      Like

  • ross1948 5:35 am on September 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: documentary film, , , , The Trayvon Martin Hoax book/film, , Washington screening   

    ‘Trayvon Martin Hoax’ – Will Exposure Spark Attack By BLM Racists? 


    About three years ago, I think it was, I was having a few beers in downtown Jakarta with some old friends.

    ===

    OldiesButGoodies-1

    ====

    Not an unusual event, you may say, if you know my habits.

    But that night, one of the friends had brought along a couple of visitors to Indonesia, one of whom turned out to be an Australian pinko.

    Since it was just about the time of America’s presidential election, talk turned that way. Unsurprisingly, my own and the pinko’s views differed ever so slightly.

    From there, it expanded onto Obama’s racism, and when I quoted the most jarring example thereof…

    =

    obama-trayvon

    =

    …the racist president’s reference to the juvenile delinquent Trayvon Martin as somebody who might have been the son he’d never had, the pinko began visibly to froth.

    Image result for hysteria

    It was very gratifying to observe his near-hysteria on hearing that anybody could thus diss Obama.

    =======

    I offer these remarks as a prelude, because I’ve just been reading an article about the court case which ended with the undoubtedly just acquittal of the man the race-baiters tried to crucify for Trayvon Martin’s ‘murder’ and it’s a revelation!

    I am genuinely shocked at what an attempt at a lynch-mob it was.

    Please read the article from Townhall.com…

    https://townhall.com/columnists/williammarshall/2019/09/13/exposing-the-trayvon-martin-hoax-

    …and be as astounded as I was by the sheer gall of the accused’s persecutors.

    The article is about both a book AND a documentary film which investigates that trial.

    =

    Image result for trayvon hoax film

    ….A trailer for the documentary is available here and copies of both the book and movie are available at the film’s website. The film will be screened at the National Press Club in Washington on September 16 at 1 PM with free admission to all.

    I have neither the time nor the money to get to Washington but no doubt many people will be going along.

    I do have to wonder, though, if, in view of the mayhem industry which has been carefully constructed on top of the mythical ‘murder,’ the screening on Monday will be subject to malevolent attention from the racists of the BLM…

    =

    antifanaz

    …and/or gangster groups like the Red Nazis of Antifa..

    I’m sure we shall see how it goes.

     
    • Ben Beniak 11:58 am on September 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I would say it is very possible the red antifa gang will be somewhere around. Truth is something they really hate.

      Like

  • ross1948 9:16 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: broken referendum pledge, , ideological purge of conservatives,   

    Who ‘Behaved Appallingly,’ Cast-Iron? Cameron The Liar’s New Book! 


    0d8e4-kingcameronarrogant

    Does David ‘Cast-Iron’ Cameron think Brits are immersed in collective amnesia?

    I saw on the news today that the notorious ex-PM has been hard at work defaming the present British government.

    His rant – motivated at least in part by the removal of the party seal of approval from the Remainer renegades, despite his own record of purging patriots…

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/tory-in-enoch-powell-race-row-i-could-have-survived-if-i-had-signed-gagging-order-6688097.html.…

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/171936/Tory-candidate-sacked-for-branding-gays-not-normal

    ..

    3 Nov 2009 – …his decision to abandon a “cast-iron guarantee” to hold a referendum ...David Cameron to shed ‘cast iron’ pledge on Lisbon treaty |.

    ====

    ….requires a quick review of Cast-Iron’s own appalling record of total sell-out of democracy – the referendum he pledged and then reneged on shamelessly, until EIGHT years later he was forced by UKIP’s rise to keep his word.

    Nor was that the only issue on which he showed what a weasel he was.

    The Spectre Of Cast-Iron Cameron’s Deceit Looms Up! 

    For more, just put ‘Cast-Iron’ into the Search-Box.

    PS I won’t be wasting money on his book. If you need a good read, try this.

    What Next

     
    • Petra Malley 9:59 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Cameron is an abominable individual, no principles, no honour, no place in history except as the liar who promised a referendum on ‘Europe’ ten years ago and then as you say broke his word.
      Now he’s like a corpse climbing out of his political grave to scare us, but it isn’t working very well.

      Like

  • ross1948 3:18 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Judge Martin Griffiths, , , suspended sentences,   

    Not Just Scots Judges Merit Dismissal – These Scum Deserve LIFE! 


    A group of people behind the UK’s biggest ever visa scam have been spared jail.

    =

    After my disgust at reading how a haggard, super-rich American bitch got a mere 14 days for despicable behaviour…

    ===

    Image result for felicity 14 days

    https://www.npr.org/2019/09/13/759256335/actress-felicity-huffman-sentenced-to-14-days-in-college-admissions-scandal

    …I had to go into hyper-indignation mode over some wigged, witless wally, going by the name and title of Judge Martin Griffiths…

    ….

    ….

    ….who evidently thinks a gang of dirty scum convicted of collaboration in the importation of 900 illegal aliens into the UK ( at huge profit to themselves ) should be able to walk free, no doubt laughing their evil heads off.

    .

    ‘Heads off?’

    That’s how these swine…

    Gang spared jail for visa scam that let 900 illegal immigrants stay in UK

    …taxi driver Jillur Rahman Khan, 43, married couple Mazharul Haque, 46, and Maksuda Begum, 45, and Shaheda Roxsanna, 47…

    ….should be punished, but in the absence of the much-missed death penalty, at least life without parole would be acceptable.

    I can’t see any info in the report – https://metro.co.uk/2019/09/13/gang-spared-jail-visa-scam-let-900-illegal-immigrants-stay-uk   – on how many of the 900 crimmigrants they imported have been captured and deported.

    Not a lot, I’d say.

    Will Home Secretary Priti Patel MP, who talks tough, match her words with actions?

    =

    She needs to order police ( and authorised support teams of citizen volunteers) to launch a nationwide operation, serious saturation raids on likely infested areas, and round up all those illegals – in fact, ALL illegals!

    Don’t hold your breath.

     

     
    • Diana 6:57 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      If they can’t be hanged, they should be flogged, but that’s another thing Britain’s not allowed to do, thanks to ‘Europe.’

      Like

  • ross1948 12:39 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC gaystapo bias, , penis or not, Sam Smith, singer   

    Just Call Sam Smith ‘IT!’ 


    One can only feel sorry for the person called Sam Smith, of whom I’ve never heard till today but is apparently a singer.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/14/sam-smith-asks-called-theythem-coming-non-binary/

    He looks like a he, more or less…

    =

    Image result for sam smith

    ==========

    …but has now issued a pronoun ultimatum, requiring people to call him ‘them,’ because he lacks the self-confidence to decide if he’s male or female.

    He could go to the nearest toilet for a pee.

    That ought to clarify the dilemma.

    =

    penis

    =

    If Sam is male, he’s a he.

    If he, unlikely, is a female, call him ‘she.’

    If Sam is neither, it’s “IT!”

    Not ‘them,’  unless IT’s beside itself…

    ===

    Image result for sam smithImage result for sam smith

    …with indignation at the ridicule it’s bound to get from normal people.

    =========

    Why am I wasting time over this sad maladjusted man?

    Because the BBC has featured the ‘story’ on every hourly news bulletin so far today.

    They have had at least two mincing ninnies pontificating on how ‘respect’ obliges us to bow to the whims of aberrants.

    Not ‘respect,’ mincers.

    The appropriate emotion is pity, and, while one does sometimes feel sorry for such specimens, such pity does not justify queering the English language.

    =

    bbc--shameful-dont-pay-the-license

    Especially not by the tax-funded BBC, merely to boost its (their?) gaystapo credentials.

     
    • Keith Milner 1:42 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Poor Sammy is only the latest in a long line of dubious ‘men’ who refuse to believe the evidence of their own eyes when they look downwards.

      Like

  • ross1948 10:00 am on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , respect for the electorate   

    Memo To Foulmouth Beto – “Yes, This Is F**ked Up!” 


    While British Remainutters etc. are by no means guiltless in the matter of dragging public discourse down into the gutter…

    ========

    Related image

    These can’t be Englishwomen surely – maybe transfreaks?

    =======

    … most of the culprits we bump into during our internet trawling expeditions turn out to be American.

    Or North American – don’t forget Coarse Kim Campbell!

    ==

    Gambar terkait

    Morgan Freeman, Another Foul-Mouth..Or Not?

    Foul-Mouths Menace 77-Year-Old, Screaming ‘F His Wife!’ 

    ……

    Foul-Mouthed Freak Attacks Feminist! 

    freak_show

    Rotten Big Apple – Chumps Cheer Foul-Mouth Sow!

    Were YOUR Professors Racist Foul-Mouths? 

     

     ‘”f**k outta here with your white feminism. I said don’t at me b**ch. I’m a professor…”

    Gross ‘Professor’ ( Really! ) Savours Mrs. Bush’s Death 

    Don’t Let Foul-Mouths Rule! Kavanaugh OK! 

     =

    I can’t imagine how unpleasant it must be to be married to a coarse cow who gabbles gutter-mouth garbage every day, not least the stress one must suffer in shielding one’s children from such a base brutess.

    =====

    foulmouth

    But now it’s a bigger issue than that.

    It’s not simply my personal distaste for noisy women who cheapen themselves.

    Men too, who cheapen the very nature of public life, are abhorrent.

    I can swear rather splendidly, among guys at a bar, or at soccer game, or if a bus departs just as I get through the ticket barrier.

    BUT…

    I have spoken from the back of a truck in the heart of London (to a cheering crowd, of course, numbering at least a thousand!)…

    ==========

    protest-front

    ==

    …and to more modest gatherings, in open air protests on green fields and on streets, at public meetings, in local authority council sessions, and, before all that, at school and university debates.

    I can guarantee that NEVER, even when expressing and exhorting indignation…

    …never have I ‘dropped an F-Bomb,’ https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/09/01/beto-on-live-tv-we-dont-know-anything-about-the-texas-shooter-but-things-are-f- …

    …to repeat the expression used in a town hall article.

    WHY?

    ..

    Image result for r e s p e c t

    ..

    Because I treat every audience with respect.

    ==============

    In this, as in so much else, I am more than content to be totally different from ‘Beto’ O’Rourke!

    =

    Image result for beto

    Whoa: Beto Goes On An F-Bomb Filled Media Blitz About Mass Shootings

    =

    This man wants to be President?

    Image result for wash your mouth out with soap

    When speaking to the entire nation, via a big (albeit bad) broadcaster, he stoops to the language of the lout…

    =

    Beto O’Rourke starts selling ‘this is f*cked up’ T-shirts after Texas shooting

    ==

    …and he’s selling t-shirts with the ‘F’ word emblazoned on them?

    In March, O’Rourke promised to stop swearing after being chastised by a Wisconsin voter, saying: “Great point. And I don’t intend to use the F-word going forward. Point taken, and very strongly made. … We’re going to keep it clean.” But he broke his pledge the following month and appears to have ignored it ever since.   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/beto-campaign-releases-vulgar-shirt-to-raise-money-for-gun-control-advocates

    He’s unfit to run for dog-catcher!.

     

     

     
    • Mort 12:33 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I used to like watching the debates with my kids but when you have Tourettes Syndrome O’Rourke on the platform this year, I would prefer not to risk kiddies getting a blast of obscenity. Mine are grown up but many parents must worry.
      I didn’t know he had promised to clean it up but am not surprised he lied about that too.
      Dog-catchers?
      I don’t think there are many around these days but if O’Rourke shows up in our town, I would try to find one.

      Like

      • Ken Kasic 8:27 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        When Beto gets past his adolescent ‘Ain’t I something?’ phase, he might be fit for office but for now he is just an embarrassment to himself and what you say is true, Mort.
        Nobody should let him within ear-shot of children.

        Like

  • ross1948 9:10 pm on September 13, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ‘Asylum liars go home for holidays, , , SVP Swiss Peoples Party   

    Swiss Sense On Lying ‘Asylum’ Vacationers! 


    I see Switzerland has a ‘draft law,’ by which, if passed, some 40,000 fake refugees ( “people who have had their bid for asylum rejected but cannot be deported because they may, for example, face danger in their home country”) will be banned from leaving the country.

    About time!

    This has been a law a long time in the making!

    Swiss Tell Fakers – If You Go Home, Stay Home! 

    gobackyouarenotwelcome

    ….

    Splendid Swiss decision, this, ‘to strip asylum from those travelling to their home

    In fact, there are a number of fake-refugees who thoroughly deserve to face a bit of ‘danger.’

    The Swiss have quite a few scumbags who would be none the worse for a firing squad.

    Evil ‘Asylum’ Imam Gets ‘Non-Custodial’ 18 Months! 

    The Evil Within

    The Evil Within

     Deport Brutal Bigots Who Beat Up Righteous Muslims! 

    Just to clarify, of course it’s good if they go. But too many go and come back!

    If the fakers did go back to wherever ‘home’ might be, they’d ‘automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland…’

    That makes sense.

    We’ve seen a lot of lying no-goods who claim to be ‘fleeing conflict’ but suddenly opt for a nice holiday back in the old country.

    =

    snout

    Disgusting parasites!

    Like Canada’s Tamils, ‘German’ Syrians Exposed -‘Fake Refugees!’ 

    Those examples of dishonest dirt-bags are not even ‘failed asylum-seekers’ but mendacious migrants who got through the process –

     – clearly under false pretences, if they suddenly feel free to head home to the ‘perilous’ places they lied about.

    Though it’s a sensible enough move, as far as it goes, the report strangely calls it the ‘government’s tough new stance‘ – why?

    Well, partly because the report is in The Leftal, sorry The Local, whose hacks and hackettes are notoriously pro-crimmigrant.

    media-bias-in-action

    But also because the soppy majority on the Federal Council ‘had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban’ on such travel.

    You may read all the details but let’s take note of the parliamentarians who are mentioned.

    First, a good gal!

    =================

    Image result for karin keller-sutter

     Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter…has a reputation for toughness on migration issues..very welcome although surprising, since she belongs to the FDP, the ‘liberal’ party!

    ===================

    Image result for gerhard pfister

    =

    Then there’s the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister,who welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement.

    Herr Pfister has a sharp eye, because he has spotted that too many of the sly liars often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home.

    Good point – these undesirables may be nasty and parasitic but they’re also sneaky.

    And of course, no show without Punch…

    .

    green party red

    …. a GREEN!

    =

    Image result for balthasar green party swiss

    Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”.

    These Green creeps always make one want to throw up.

    Freedom?

    They have been proven unworthy, their claims mendacious. They should have no right to do anything in Switzerland!

    Balthasar knows who to blame, though!

    He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers.

    =

    16-SVP-Stop-JA

    =========

    The SVP is a patriot party and deserves applause for its frequent calls for common-sense, notably its repeated demands that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland.

    Currently, there’s an election campaign going on in Switzerland.

    We should all be rooting for the SVP.

     

     

     

     

    Under the draft law, the around 40,000 holders of ‘F’ permits in Switzerland – a group made up of people who have had their bid for asylum rejected but cannot be deported because they may, for example, face danger in their home country – would not be allowed to travel overseas. People who travelled to their home country would automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland, while exceptions would only be made in cases where short-term trips home were being used to prepare for a future definitive return, according the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) website. ‘A surprise move’ The Swiss government’s tough new stance on travel for F permit holders comes as something of a surprise, according to Swiss daily NZZ. The Federal Council, as the Swiss government is known, had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban on F permit holders travelling to their home country. In its original response to the motion from 2015, the government argued travel rules for people in this group were already very strict. It also stated a blanket ban would not allow for any exceptions to be made. Currently F permit holders can travel home with special permission such as in cases of personal hardship including death or serious illness in the family. Are you an F permit holder? Want to tell your story to The Local? Contact us here. But the Federal Council, and its new Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, who has a reputation for toughness on migration issues, have now gone a step further than even the Swiss parliament. A shift to the right? If the draft law is passed, F permit holders would only be able to travel to their home county when preparing for a definitive return. The SEM confirmed to The Local via email that the proposed law (here in German) made no provision for exceptions including the serious illness of family members as is currently the case. Critically, holders of F permits would also be banned from travelling to any other third countries. Only a very few exceptions would be made to this second rule, with the specifics of these to be drawn up in future. The parliamentarian behind the original parliamentary motion, the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister, welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement on Thursday. He noted that F Permit holders often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home. But Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”. He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers. The SVP has repeatedly stated that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland. The law has now gone out for consultation before final approval from the parliament. F permit holders in difficult position Holders of F permits in Switzerland in Switzerland find themselves in a difficult position. They are legally entitled to work, but their permission to stay in the country is only granted 12 months at a time. Many Swiss employers are reluctant to hire F permit holders because of their provisional nature of their residence, while their qualifications are often not recognized. There is a small silver lining though. Under the plans, F permit holders would in future be able to move to another canton if they find work or educational opportunities there. Currently, this is not the case.

    Under the draft law, the around 40,000 holders of ‘F’ permits in Switzerland – a group made up of people who have had their bid for asylum rejected but cannot be deported because they may, for example, face danger in their home country – would not be allowed to travel overseas.

    People who travelled to their home country would automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland, while exceptions would only be made in cases where short-term trips home were being used to prepare for a future definitive return, according the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) website.

    ‘A surprise move’

    The Swiss government’s tough new stance on travel for F permit holders comes as something of a surprise, according to Swiss daily NZZ.

    The Federal Council, as the Swiss government is known, had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban on F permit holders travelling to their home country.

    In its original response to the motion from 2015, the government argued travel rules for people in this group were already very strict. It also stated a blanket ban would not allow for any exceptions to be made.

    Currently F permit holders can travel home with special permission such as in cases of personal hardship including death or serious illness in the family.

    Are you an F permit holder? Want to tell your story to The Local? Contact us here.

    But the Federal Council, and its new Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, who has a reputation for toughness on migration issues, have now gone a step further than even the Swiss parliament.

    A shift to the right?

    If the draft law is passed, F permit holders would only be able to travel to their home county when preparing for a definitive return.

    The SEM confirmed to The Local via email that the proposed law (here in German) made no provision for exceptions including the serious illness of family members as is currently the case.

    Critically, holders of F permits would also be banned from travelling to any other third countries. Only a very few exceptions would be made to this second rule, with the specifics of these to be drawn up in future.

    The parliamentarian behind the original parliamentary motion, the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister, welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement on Thursday.

    He noted that F Permit holders often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home.

    But Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”.

    He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers. The SVP has repeatedly stated that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland.

    The law has now gone out for consultation before final approval from the parliament.

    F permit holders in difficult position

    Holders of F permits in Switzerland in Switzerland find themselves in a difficult position. They are legally entitled to work, but their permission to stay in the country is only granted 12 months at a time.

    Many Swiss employers are reluctant to hire F permit holders because of their provisional nature of their residence, while their qualifications are often not recognized.

    There is a small silver lining though. Under the plans, F permit holders would in future be able to move to another canton if they find work or educational opportunities there. Currently, this is not the case.

    Under the draft law, the around 40,000 holders of ‘F’ permits in Switzerland – a group made up of people who have had their bid for asylum rejected but cannot be deported because they may, for example, face danger in their home country – would not be allowed to travel overseas.

    People who travelled to their home country would automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland, while exceptions would only be made in cases where short-term trips home were being used to prepare for a future definitive return, according the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) website.

    ‘A surprise move’

    The Swiss government’s tough new stance on travel for F permit holders comes as something of a surprise, according to Swiss daily NZZ.

    The Federal Council, as the Swiss government is known, had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban on F permit holders travelling to their home country.

    In its original response to the motion from 2015, the government argued travel rules for people in this group were already very strict. It also stated a blanket ban would not allow for any exceptions to be made.

    Currently F permit holders can travel home with special permission such as in cases of personal hardship including death or serious illness in the family.

    Are you an F permit holder? Want to tell your story to The Local? Contact us here.

    But the Federal Council, and its new Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, who has a reputation for toughness on migration issues, have now gone a step further than even the Swiss parliament.

    A shift to the right?

    If the draft law is passed, F permit holders would only be able to travel to their home county when preparing for a definitive return.

    The SEM confirmed to The Local via email that the proposed law (here in German) made no provision for exceptions including the serious illness of family members as is currently the case.

    Critically, holders of F permits would also be banned from travelling to any other third countries. Only a very few exceptions would be made to this second rule, with the specifics of these to be drawn up in future.

    The parliamentarian behind the original parliamentary motion, the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister, welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement on Thursday.

    He noted that F Permit holders often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home.

    But Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”.

    He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers. The SVP has repeatedly stated that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland.

    The law has now gone out for consultation before final approval from the parliament.

    F permit holders in difficult position

    Holders of F permits in Switzerland in Switzerland find themselves in a difficult position. They are legally entitled to work, but their permission to stay in the country is only granted 12 months at a time.

    Many Swiss employers are reluctant to hire F permit holders because of their provisional nature of their residence, while their qualifications are often not recognized.

    There is a small silver lining though. Under the plans, F permit holders would in future be able to move to another canton if they find work or educational opportunities there. Currently, this is not the case.

    People who travelled to their home country would automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland, while exceptions would only be made in cases where short-term trips home were being used to prepare for a future definitive return, according the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) website.

    ‘A surprise move’

    The Swiss government’s tough new stance on travel for F permit holders comes as something of a surprise, according to Swiss daily NZZ.

    The Federal Council, as the Swiss government is known, had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban on F permit holders travelling to their home country.

    In its original response to the motion from 2015, the government argued travel rules for people in this group were already very strict. It also stated a blanket ban would not allow for any exceptions to be made.

    Currently F permit holders can travel home with special permission such as in cases of personal hardship including death or serious illness in the family.

    Are you an F permit holder? Want to tell your story to The Local? Contact us here.

    But the Federal Council, and its new Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, who has a reputation for toughness on migration issues, have now gone a step further than even the Swiss parliament.

    A shift to the right?

    If the draft law is passed, F permit holders would only be able to travel to their home county when preparing for a definitive return.

    The SEM confirmed to The Local via email that the proposed law (here in German) made no provision for exceptions including the serious illness of family members as is currently the case.

    Critically, holders of F permits would also be banned from travelling to any other third countries. Only a very few exceptions would be made to this second rule, with the specifics of these to be drawn up in future.

    The parliamentarian behind the original parliamentary motion, the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister, welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement on Thursday.

    He noted that F Permit holders often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home.

    But Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”.

    He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers. The SVP has repeatedly stated that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland.

    The law has now gone out for consultation before final approval from the parliament.

    F permit holders in difficult position

    Holders of F permits in Switzerland in Switzerland find themselves in a difficult position. They are legally entitled to work, but their permission to stay in the country is only granted 12 months at a time.

    Many Swiss employers are reluctant to hire F permit holders because of their provisional nature of their residence, while their qualifications are often not recognized.

    There is a small silver lining though. Under the plans, F permit holders would in future be able to move to another canton if they find work or educational opportunities there. Currently, this is not the case.

     
    • Vicki 2:10 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Why do these Greens and other far left people always take the side of the crimmigrants?
      I saw in the paper this week that the High Court in England has upheld a Home Office plan to give migrants ‘72 hours’ notice of deportation.’
      Ten minutes would be better but since the plan was being challenged by leftwingers who wanted the illegals to have more time to hire lawyers ( paid from our taxes of course) then we have to be thankful to the High Court!

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: