If Bad Laws Disadvantage Honest Brits, FIX Them!
Much uproar about undesirable aliens being foisted on England’s West Midlands, understandably…
….but is it not fascinating that the noisy complainers are people who have never, so far as can be told, demanded that the incursions of fake-refugees, aka ‘asylum-seekers,’ be blocked from entering the UK…
.
…
….nor have they been often, or, probably, at all, heard calling for the expulsion of the thousands upon thousands of parasites…
.
.
…whose claims for ‘asylum’ have been rejected as baseless but whose lying snouts yet continue to root about freely in the tax-payers’ pockets!
Leeching Off Brit Tax-Payers, ‘Asylum’ Aliens Complain!
But you may read about the latest culprits via the link.
Today I want to focus on just a few sentences almost hidden away in the middle of the report.
The UK has a legal responsibility to settle anyone claiming political asylum while their cases are assessed
Firstly, if it’s a legal responsibility, there is a law somewhere on the statute book.
.
Find it, and repeal it.
Same for supranational courts…
.
Sorosoid ECHR
.
….or conventions that tie British hands! Bojo and Priti have a majority in the Commons. There is huge popular back for a clamp-down, over 70% in a poll last week. Speedy legislative action would be cheered nationwide!
Pending such overdue legal reform, interpret the existing bad law intelligently.
Never let leeches be put up in luxury.
.
…
Nigel Farage has done useful work recently, but while what’s happening is bad, it’s not really bad ‘news!’
Such outrageous misuse of public funds has been reported here and elsewhere for years, e.g. this in 2015!
Guilty Conscience? Home Office Hiding Crimmigrant Costs!
If, and I emphasise IF, Brit tax-payers have to have these mangy albatrosses hung around their necks, then the budget per ‘asylum’ slug should be pared to the most basic level.
Food? Bread and water!
No hotel-style menus from which to pick and choose.
Take it or leave it.
Any complaints, as Italy heard from similar ingrate swine there…
Crimmigrants Seize Italian Cop-Shop – Punishment? ‘Specialised African Cuisine!’
…..should be met not with appeasement, as happened there, but with a prompt withdrawal of rations – when they get hungry enough, they’ll eat.
When my six-year-old self refused to eat his asparagus, that approach worked.
Accommodation?
.
After all, containers are multi-purpose!
.
Buy or hire unused containers.
Shove ‘em in.
Such lodgings would be handy for deportation too.
Or…
…
….as suggested before, give ‘em tents and stick ‘em on those old off-shore fortifications, a patrol-boat circling to make sure nobody swims ashore!
Word would get out!
Channel incursions would dry up, tout suite!
Mack the Knife 17:16 on August 18, 2020 Permalink |
You made my day with this.
I had to think a while before I got the right word, compendiun.
A compendium of cracking good ideas and if Johnson and Patel dont get cracking on at least some of what you suggesr, it will be the end of them at the next election, if not before.
LikeLike
Vanessa Reilly 16:35 on October 1, 2020 Permalink |
The governnent is gradually catching up to your positive approach. Not containers yet but ferries.
IMHO ferries are far too nice.
The illegals must be made to regret they ever came across the channel.
But at least the government is inching towards a more sensible policy.
An uninhabited island still makes the most sense to me.
LikeLike