Tagged: ‘abusive!’ Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 23:00 on January 12, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ‘abusive!’, Bristol fanatic left jury, , ,   

    Carte Blanche For Mayhem In Highgate Cemetery? 

    Yes, still examining the most damaging ‘justice’ outcome in recent British history…



    …and found this completely non-political link


    … which takes us step by step through the judge’s instructions to the jury, on exactly how they had to perform their duties.

    I hadn’t realised the jury was unanimous, which makes me wonder….



    ..if Bristol should be declared a special lock-down zone, isolation as with Wuhan Bat Virus, only for Mental Pinko Plague.

    Haha – but many a true word…

    More seriously, the judge informed the jury on what grounds the defendants might deem the Colston Statue a legitimate target – yes, I was surprised too, but read that link – and it comes down to whether the sculpture is indecent or abusive.

    Exactly how a statue can be ‘abusive,’ I really can’t imagine.

    It can’t speak, not can it snarl or sneer, because even if the sculptor carved such expressions into stone, the statue can’t use them against passers-by.

    It’s stone, for God’s Sake!

    Certainly a statue can be ‘indecent!’

    But indecency is in the eye of the beholder.

    A beautiful classical, statue…


    … may be seen by backward bigots as indecent.

    Normal people would perceive a sculpture depicting bestiality or homosexuality as indecent.

    But Colston’s image was fully clothed, decent in every way.

    What the judge can only have meant was that the statue was offensive!

    To the noisome quartet, obviously…

    Little Red Rhian And The Bristolian Boys!

    …and, they claim ( to justify their havoc) to an unquantifiable number of chip-on-shoulder grumblers.

    In other words, if a few people find a statue offensive, they may vandalise it, with dumbo cops bovinely watching over the vandalism.

    I say ‘few,’ because there were hundreds present, a tiny proportion of Bristol’s population.

    Now we know that the top cop in that area is NOT even-handed in how he treats Whites and Blacks.

    Avon’s Angsty Andy! OK To Riot? But Not To Be White? 

    So if decent folk marched into town and tore down that ugly mutt thing that was put on the Colston plinth…




    -illegally, BTW, and now removed but perhaps to return, pending a decision by the lily-livered and/or collabo council! https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/15/edward-colston-statue-replaced-by-sculpture-of-black-lives-matter-protester

    Who knows what Angsty Andy might do- order a bayonet charge?

    But suppose you had a different sort  – a decent, fair-minded policeman ( or policewoman) operating a similar policy, based on the Bristol verdict, in, for example, London.

    So I could fly to UK and join patriots to smash up the Karl Marx monument?.

    • Vicki 03:15 on January 13, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      I’ll join you for that little day out!


  • ross1948 20:13 on November 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ‘abusive!’, Baggage charges passengers, , , ,   

    Brits! Be Warned If You’re Flyin’ With Ryan (Unfair) Air! 

    No patriotic Brit who knows anything about Ryanair would ever willingly buy one of their tickets.

    That Eire alien Michael O’Leary, who runs the company, has stuck his arrogant nose into UK politics once too often…

    More Reasons To Eschew Alien Remainer’s Ryanair

    Hasil gambar untuk Michael O’Leary, Chief Executive, Ryanair

    Michael O’Leary

    Let’s Ruin Ryanair – Boycott Europhiliac O’Leary! 

    …well, more than once, to be sure!

    But now, thanks to a part of the media I don’t usually like, one of those publicly-funded propaganda outlets… 

    Murdered Pole – EuroNews Smears Brexiteers!

    HAD To Be A EuroNews Headline! Invaders = ‘Victims!’ 


    EuroNews Pinko Hackette Drops All Pretence of Objectivity! 

    ‘Perhaps Understandably?’ Anti-Europe EuroNews Spews On! 

    …we learn of a non-political, entirely commercial, aspect of their operation which should make any would-be fliers think twice.

    Euronews has a longish report, but in a nutshell, a court in Spain has branded Ryanair’s ‘controversial cabin baggage policy ‘ as, wait for it…


    The court had heard how the money-grubbing airline charged a woman TWENTY euros to take aboard hand luggage weighing only 10 kilograms on an inter-city trip from Madrid to Brussels.

    Ryanair was ordered to refund the rip-off impost AND was told that their policy..

     “curtailed the rights that the passenger has recognized by law” https://www.euronews.com/2019/11/20/spanish-court-rules-ryanair-s-cabin-baggage-policy-abusive-and-invalidShared

    But here’s what made me use this story – not the rip-off, but the sheer brazen arrogance of the culprit company’s reaction to the verdict!

    In a statement on Wednesday, Ryanair said: “This ruling will not affect Ryanair’s baggage policy, either in the past or in the future, as it is an isolated case that misinterpreted our commercial freedom to determine the size of our cabin baggage.”

    How uppity can this bunch get?

    Although the report says the judgement could not be appealed, we must remember that O’Leary has friends in very high, if publicity-shy, places..

    Ryanair Rat Boards Bilderbergers’ Shrouded Ship 

    …and there may in fact be recourse to that body infamous for its iniquitous judgements!

    The European Court of Justice!

    ECJ Ruling – ‘Yellow Star’ Labels Coming To Your Shops Soon? 

    ECJ Robed Rogues Extend A Helping Hand To Red Vermin! 

    And God only knows what kind of deranged decision the ECJ might deliver!


    • Billy King 23:49 on November 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I would rather swim the Irish Sea than use Remainer Ryanair!
      That plonker should be declared an undesirable alien and kept out of our UK.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: