Tagged: anti-democratic courts Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 13:44 on July 22, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , anti-democratic courts, , ,   

    Slovenia’s Sicko Legalice Spit On Democracy! 


    As the worst low-lifes in Washington organise to protect the absurdity of homo-weddings, which were imposed by the Supreme Court before that institution was to some extent cleaned up….

    ..

     

    ….now we read that in Slovenia, a pack of arrogant sickos, aka the ‘Constitutional Council…’

    .

    ..

    ….has thumbed their collective nose at democracy and ‘legalised’ so-called ‘gay’ so-called ‘marriage in that country – ‘despite Slovenian citizens rejecting same-sex marriage in three separate national referendums….

    Slovenia legalizes same-sex marriage even after citizens rejected measure in 3 national referendums

    Bad enough, to trash marriage, but infinitely more abhorrent, these decadent clowns have also approved ‘adoption’ –

    .

    .

    – in other words, defenceless children will be consigned by the authorities to whatever passes for ‘care and custody’ in households comprised of co-habiting shirt-lifters.

    .

    How sick does it get?

    Well, no sicker, I suppose, than in police-state countries, for example, the United Kingdom…

    ‘Being Offensive Is An Offence?’

    Merseyside’s Foulest! Charge Bully-Cops With ‘Wasting Police Time!

    …with its gaystapo bully cops.

     

     
  • ross1948 19:04 on September 17, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-democratic courts, , , Duncan Ouseley, ,   

    Enemy Of The People! Treat Ouseley As Leper! 


     

    That was a famous headline during the British people’s struggle for deliverance from the supranational misrule of the EUSSR.

    Now we have another example of a wigged wally in judicial robes, another judge gone rogue.

    As you see, I’m talking about that clown in fancy dress, Duncan Ouseley, below, the ‘senior high court judge’ who figuratively spat in the face of every British patriot this week…

    .

    Ouseley the Ass

    ..

    ….when he issued a court diktat preventing the departure of a charter flight, carrying a pack of Channel crimmigrants, ‘due to be forcibly removed to Spain, a country they had previously passed through..’

    The flight was 100% legit, even by the EUSSR’s own ‘Dublin III’ regulations, by which, as the gleeful Guardian scribbler has to admit, one European country can return asylum seekers to another they have previously passed through if there is evidence of this in the form of fingerprints or other proof… https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/sep/16/uk-judge-halts-home-office-flight-to-remove-asylum-seekers

    So how come Ouseley the Ass blocked the undesirables’s expulsion?

    The daft old duffer got all fretty because the fake-refugees ‘might be left destitute in the streets of Madrid…’

    .

    ..

    The Guardian has a thing about crimmigrants suffering the consequences of their illegal incursions.

    A few weeks ago they had this bleeding-heart bilge.

    We don’t know what to do’: asylum seekers flown to Spain by Home Office

    The 11 Syrians said they were sitting outside Madrid airport with no food, water or support…https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/sep/03/we-dont-know-what-to-do-asylum-seekers-flown-to-spain-by-home-office

    To answer that whine of a headline, answers come easy!

    Like…Try following the rules!

    Like…Who gives a damn!
     
    But my readership already shares my indignation.
     
    Anger is a-boil!
    Ouseley is a national disgrace!
     
    BUT…
    Anger should be an inspiration, not a flare-up.
    Violent or otherwise illegal activity does no good and is often counter-productive.
    ..

    Decent Brits should OSTRACISE OUSELEY!

    Refuse to serve him in shops.

    Cast him looks of contempt if you pass him in the street. 

    If you feel up to telling him off…

    …the old ass carefully hides any email address, but do yer best!

    …do not use coarse BLM-style language. …

    PS  

    You might wish to contact the fancy solicitors’ firm who ‘represented’ the aliens, to discuss legal fees, and how they trawl for ‘clients.’

    Duncan Lewis Solicitors —  on 033 3772 0409 or click here to send online enquiry.

    If they were doing so ‘pro bono’ ( free of charge) one might almost respect their position. If they got their snouts into legal aid i.e. the tax-payers’ pocket, maybe not so much.

    .

    .

    Their man in this particular case was Chris Buttler – be sure to ask for him by name. Tell the operator charmingly it’s about ‘asylum-seekers’ and you should get through.

     

     
    • Ned A 20:41 on September 17, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      The old fart probably lives in a country mansion or one of those luxury apartment penthouse suites where there’s never been an illegal immigrant to be seen.
      Why would he care about real British people ehose taxes get wasted on the wasters?

      Like

    • Douglas Hazelman 16:17 on September 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Judge are lawyers and while I know there are some good lawyers, as a group they stink.
      This old stinker stinks to high heaven.
      The law, even Brussels law, was clear.
      He just ignored it because the parasites might have nobody to sponge off in Madrid?
      Whose fault is that?
      They should not have entered Spain illegally, any more than entered Britain illegally.

      Like

  • ross1948 20:44 on September 30, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-democratic courts, , , , , , , The Arrogant Eleven   

    If Bojo Won’t Curb That Court, Step Up, Farage! 


    From a surprising source, the far-left British media, The Independent to be precise, a useful article, which sheds light not only on how The Arrogant Eleven got into their lofty lordly positions…

    .

     

    UK Supreme Court justices are appointed by the Queen on the advice of the prime minister after being recommended by a special selection commission…

    …but also asks the question every Brit should be asking, viz.

    Should they perhaps also be subject to parliamentary scrutiny?

    Better perhaps to top up that question with an additional option, election by the people…

    …but the writer in ‘The Independent’ then reveals that she’s not on our side, by saying that ‘political fights that surround Supreme Court nominations in the United States might offer a powerful argument against this – especially in the present, highly polarised, climate.’  https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/uk-supreme-court-parliament-ruling-boris-johnson-brexit-a9121981.html

    How so?

    When the very future of a nation is at stake, that’s surely EXACTLY when ‘political fights’  – as at present between collabos and patriots locked in close quarters battle for British freedom – should be at their most fast and furious!

    .

    .

    Why she’s wary of conflict and controversy on court appointments is frankly baffling, because she very clearly understands that the UK Supreme Court, whatever else it may have ruled on, ‘has also created a new legal precedent in which parliament had no say and which has only deepened existing political divisions.’

    Spot on!

    If neither people nor parliament have any say on any issue, then democracy lies stricken, bleeding out!

    It’s time to fight back!

    ..

    We’ve seen the wrongs inflicted not just on the UK, but on every citizen of civilised Europe, by the robed rogues singing from their cultural marxist song-book in Strasbourg….

    =====

    Gambar terkait

    =

    …archetypal Enemies Within who have decreed that nation-states are banned from repatriating vile vermin, terrorists, to their homeland if that homeland might hurt them!

    We have written previously about how ISIS scum, the so-called ‘Beatles…’

    =

    El Shafee Elsheikh (left) and Alexanda Kotey

    Man Up, May! Those ISIS ‘Beatle’ Beasts Deserve To Die! 

    =

    Theresa May REFUSES to back death penalty for ISIS Beatles 

    ….were protected by Theresa the Appeaser from the death penalty the swine deserve.

    Remember, she lied, saying it was time to get Britain out from under the Euro-Court yoke, then bottled out, as of course was her wont.

    It’s no good getting Britain out of ECJ supervision if the ECHR continues to cast its evil shadow on justice in HM’s realms and territories, championing illegal undesirables…

    Let illegal migrants go free, EU court orders..

    =
    =====

      …denying police the right to arrest law-breakers known to have violated border law!

    But arguably the most outrageous crime committed by the ECHR was when it declared war on free speech, endorsing that Austrian ban on anything that might offend Islamist fanatics…

    .

    ..

    ..who set their alarm clocks every night with a note on their bedside tables reminding themselves that, when they rise in the morning, they must at once resume their quest for fresh cause to be offended.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/europe-rules-against-free-speech/574369/

    The Arrogant Eleven, many of them, undoubtedly share the sick liberal ‘values’ that guide Continental jurists.

    ( Lady Hale sure does! )

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9998887/judges-supreme-court-public-scrutiny/

    And even if they didn’t, they should never be allowed to veto people power.

    Hence my headline – if Bojo, for all his welcome attacks on the humbug of the whiners, will not commit to castrating that court, then we must look to Farage.

    .

    Nigel Farage

    .

    The Brexit Party leader has condemned the uppity judge-jerks, but we need to hear specific proposals to humble those uppities, tumble their hubris and bring that court and every court under democratic control.

     
    • Mack the Knife 21:03 on September 30, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      This is important and you do well to say so.
      Unless the issue is addressed very promptly, that court will destroy not just Brexit but any and every move to restore British democracy, British sovereignty and British values.

      Like

      • Lorne Marzio 23:13 on September 30, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Very true.
        Courts in the USA have done terrible harm and only now is President Trump putting things right.
        That is one big reason we need to re- elect him in 2020, or else the Democrats will drag us backwards again.

        Like

  • ross1948 07:16 on August 28, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-democratic courts, , , Testicles, ,   

    “..she twice tried to cut her own testicles off…” 


     

    !Hasil gambar untuk scissors

    The sheer imbecility that afflicts the modern Western world is summed up magnificently in that segment of a sentence from the following report –

    – about a ruling, from yet another Obama judge in the USA..

    .

    evil judge

    ..

    ..and good luck to the Governor of Idaho who says he’ll fight the mad edict all the way to the Supreme Court.

    But how long must normal people, who are still the overwhelming majority of the population in every society…

    protest-front

    ….have to put up with media that insults our intelligence by pretending that any person possessing testicles can be described as ‘SHE!’

     
    • Gerard Reid 08:26 on August 28, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Unbelievable!

      Like

    • James Farner 16:31 on August 28, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I was more interested in your Prorogue thoughts but seeing this, I have to comment, but only to say yes, it is ridiculous to call somebody a woman who has male genitals.

      Like

    • Ned A 16:46 on August 28, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      When my kids were born there was none of this magic science that lets you know beforehand, a boy or a girl.i
      The parents knew what they had when the baby was born, if it had testicles you knew you had a boy.
      If these nitwits say otherwise, they need their heads examined.

      Like

  • ross1948 18:10 on June 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , anti-democratic courts, , Protest by parents   

    ‘EXCLUSION ZONE?’ Not In Icy South Atlantic But In ‘Gay’ West Midlands! 


    The term ‘Exclusion Zone’ has hitherto evoked memories of the Falklands War, when there was an aggressive violation of British rights in 1982..

    .

    …but in June 2019?

    British rights are once more being assailed, not by an Argentine junta, but by teachers’ unions promoting the gaystapo agenda- and the victims are little kids in the English Midlands, and parents who have the guts to take a stand for decency.!

    Live updates: Anderton School LGBT protest High Court hearing – new exclusion zone imposed https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/live-updates-anderton-school-lgbt-16404743

    NB – I acknowledge that most of the brave parents concerned are Muslim but as the following Guardian story admits, there are non-Muslims too.  https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/may/31/high-court-bans-birmingham-school-protests-against-lgbt-lessons

    Monstrously, the gaystapo-fan establishment has now resorted to using the courts to smash resistance to their evil agenda.

    .

    evil judge

    =

    The above link tells more about that, and also reports a judicial crack-down on social media support for protests by pro-decency parents in the UK’s West Midlands…

    =

    political-correctness_submission

    The hell with that!

     

    It seems a wee bit late –  but still timely –  to pick apart a sycophantic ‘interview’ by a Guardian Gargoyle  with a brazenly biased head teacher, a simpering pinko, named Sarah Hewitt-Clarkson, who gets it all started by bursting into convenient tears!

    If it were an interview  with Adolf by a Nazi hack employed with the Voelkischer Beobachter  in 1939: it couldn’t be more uncritically obsequious.

    ….

    Sarah Hewitt-Clarkson, headteacher at Anderton Park school.

    Simpering pinko Sarah Hewitt-Clarkson,

    It is tempting also to direct condemnation at another character, a queer who headed up the local pervert parade  – he’s the assistant head at one of the schools involved.

    His antics – showing his militant commitment to the brain-wash cause – should have got him fired.

    gaystapo

    But instead let’s turn the spotlight on Hewitt-Clarkson, the  lachrymose leftist head, portrayed as an impartial educator, a lousy lie shot down by her own quoted words, about the pro-queer indoctrination law.

    It’s a good law!’ 

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/may/26/birmingham-anderton-park-primary-muslim-protests-lgbt-teaching-rights

    As the best Tory leadership candidate ( now regrettably eliminated from that contest) Esther McVey, said the other day, parents should NOT have their right to teach their little ones about moral values usurped by the state.

    It’s a BAD law, devised and imposed by bad people, politicians and bureaucrats – and teachers – estranged from the country’s traditional values, which most normal working folk still cherish.

    But back to the blubbering bint!

    Drying her eyes between bouts of crying, she exposes the fakery of the so-called ‘consultations’ called for by the May government, which deny parents any right to safeguard their children from brain-washing.

    Oh, The Weeper will listen to parents, she says, but then she’ll no doubt make the situation crystal clear.

    =

    =

    She’ll do whatever she thinks will make the kids think differently from their parents, twisting a generation into the sick belief that ‘marriage’ between sexually maladjusted men is deserving of respect, and not only respect, but respect on the same level as the respect accorded to husbands and wives in a real marriage.

    Another Update?

    Now the West Midlands Mayor, a self-confessed queer, has played the next hand in the game of escalating authoritarianism-

    “You look at what’s being said and it’s really upsetting but it is actually ultimately homophobic and it is illegal and it has to stop now.” Birmingham LGBT row: ‘Homophobic protests must stop’

    Mayor Andy Street’s rant is the authentic voice of the gaystapo – ban free speech, because it’s “upsetting” degenerates and leftists.

    =

    =

    AND BTW – he’s a ‘CONSERVATIVE!”

    Deplorable, that what should be the party in the vanguard in the fight against cultural marxism has sunk to such a level of intolerance.

    But party lines mean little these days…

    =

    Roger Godsiff

    Roger Godsiff MP

    =

    …to his credit, Roger Godsiff, Labour MP for Hall Green, which covers Anderton Park, will be spoken to by the Labour Party’s chief whip after he told protesters “you’re right”.

    There’s a brave man whose days are numbered, at least in the party he’s in just now. We know that organised pinko homos – aka ‘The LGBT Labour Group’ -want him to lose the Labour whip.

    Might he be a possible recruit for a new party?

    ===

    Meanwhile, the injunction has been re-issued and made more comprehensive. 

    =

    What was it Churchill said?

    “For it is evil things that we shall be fighting against…” 

    He could never have guessed how his prophesy would come to pass!

     
    • Ryan Benson 19:42 on June 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      You hit hard with this and good to see somebody is.
      Those Muslim parents are giving other parents a right showing up. I see your insert that some non-Muslims are with the protest but not that many.
      All parents, race creed or colour whatever, should be out defending their children from that indoctrination.

      Like

    • Noreen Paterson 21:40 on June 15, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Well said, naturally.
      I am however mostly interested in the Labour MP supporting working-class parents unafraid to speak about traditional morality.
      There were, once upon a time, many Labour MPs like him, especially in Scotland and Wales, but until today, I believed they were an extinct species, replaced by weedy men who never held a proper job and think heterosexuality is passe. The women Labour MPs are no better.

      But I was wrong.
      Mr. Godsiff is an honest to goodness traditional decent socialist, or so he seems to be, the kind of Labour MP my grandparents regularly voted for.
      Mr. Godsiff is a national treasure, in my opinion, and if Labour does expel him, any other party would be lucky to have him.

      Like

    • Addy Joyner 00:02 on June 16, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I have read more about that ‘Conservative’ Mayor who says it’s illegal to explain why one objects to children being told that homosex unions are as respect-worthy as real marriage.
      He was something of a star turn at a Tory Party Conference.
      That’s enough! It doesn’t matter who wins the party leadership, there’s not a chance I would ever rejoin.

      Like

    • Pamela 07:27 on July 20, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      You should write again about these brave parents, Ross, because their fight is continuing and they are doing what every responsible parent in the UK should be doing.
      I read this today – https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/07/18/those-protesting-muslim-parents-are-in-the-right/ – which is why I am commenting tonight.

      Like

  • ross1948 16:03 on January 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-democratic courts, , clean Break, , , ,   

    Mama Stasi’s Ever-Wider Open Door – Abetted By Euro-Jerk Judges! 


    Some 6,000 entered on buses and trains from Austria, the border with the highest number of illegal crossings. The next highest number of illegal crossings was on the border with France and Switzerland.

    https://www.dw.com/en/germany-14000-illegal-immigrants-crossed-border-by-bus-and-train/a-47259892

    may-merkel

    Two wicked women

    ==

    Incredibly, Merkel’s federal police on duty at Germany’s borders “only refused entry to illegal migrants who crossed the Austrian-German border.”

    Please note – in 2018 “more than FOURTEEN THOUSAND people” were intercepted at the German frontier-  entering the country illegally on buses and trains…

    So a popular method among would-be crimmigrants?

    And due to become more popular, because…

    =

    evil judge

    PASSPORT CHECKS ON BUSES ARE SET TO BECOME MORE DIFFICULT AFTER THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ruled that Germany’s membership of the Schengen area prohibits bus companies from checking passenger identity papers.

    NB – that’s NOT the malevolent gang that ruled to ban free speech which offends shariah fanatics, late last year.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/europe-rules-against-free-speech/574369/

    ======

    That was the ECHR, which, admittedly, is also pro-crimmigrant.                                                                             Let illegal migrants go free, EU court orders..

    .judgingjudges_header

    THE ECJ is also a malignant growth…

    Top EU Court Sides With Dirty Old Man! 

    …but Brits this week may not need to be reminded that it’s the court which Theresa the Appeaser has authorised to rule on the terms of her treasonous FAKE BREXIT – unless there is a ‘No Deal’ i.e. CLEAN BREAK outcome.

     
    • Petra Malley 16:18 on January 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The courts are the greater enemy. People can wake up and vote out renegades like Merkel and May but without a plan to topple European-wide institutions, or at least get governments prepared to defy their rulings, we are lost.
      I read somewhere that in America,in the 19th century, governments often just ignored stupid judicial rulings that got in their way.
      As a short-term solution, that would be better than nothing.

      Like

    • Edward Lamont 17:21 on January 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The two of them will go down in their countries’ history as the most treacherous leaders ever.
      Not being sexist. Macron is up there alongside them, and there are a ton of male traitors all over Europe besides him,

      Like

    • Vanessa R 18:44 on January 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      No explanation why one border ( with Austria) is taken seriously but two others are left wide open, the French and Swiss.
      Very strange.
      But very telling, that the Czech and Polish borders are not mentioned.
      Those sensible countries are almost migrant-free, so their borders are probably not a danger.

      Like

  • ross1948 12:20 on January 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , anti-democratic courts, , , , , ,   

    ‘Violent Rampage’ Deportee Gets £100000 Flight Home! 


    ooooooooooo

    Interesting to read that a fake ‘asylumer’ who“rampaged so violently that officials had to turn back” during a previous attempt to get him out of Germany has finally been sent home to West Africa ( Ivory Coast) – at a cost to German tax-payers of €165,000, which, by my rough calculations, means about a hundred thousand pounds sterling.

    That’s not counting his lawyer’s fees, also squeezed out of the public purse.

    =

    Image result for euros

    And his second Africa-bound flight sounds notably more pleasant than the experience of most Ryanair passengers!

    To “exclude risk to other passengers” the obnoxious savage had the plane to himself, except for no less than half-a-dozen civil servants, and it’s not clear if that included, or was supplemented, by the interpreter, the doctor…

    =

    =

    ….and the psychotherapist!

    =

    Ab in den Urlaub… Asylanten fliegen für 165.000 Euro im Privatjet nach Abidjan

    I’d have thought it might be more practical, and economical, to give him an anaesthetic injection prior to boarding, or, as an alternative, have him encased in a straight-jacket and a burly cop with a cudgel and/or taser on hand –  in case the brute got free.

    =

    Image result for animal quarters on board aircraft

    =

    Or maybe suggest that if he is not of a mind to travel placidly with other human beings in the passenger section – although that is arguably not where such a primitive creature should be placed- then why not put him below, down where domestic animals are caged during flights.

    Having said that, I am hesitant about inflicting such a brute on cats and dogs – that might be deemed cruelty to decent animals.

    There is a lot more to this report, which I will not share with you of a tea-time, because it will only give you indigestion, but if you do read it, you will be outraged.

    And that makes me wonder why most German voters are not yet outraged enough to vote for the only party which will put a stop to this nonsense…

    …the AfD patriots.

    But with more state elections due this year, the necessary awakening may yet be at hand, hence Merkel’s decision that her security services, newly brought under a bureaucrat less ready to contradict her pro-crimmigrant coalition’s agenda  –https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2018/11/06/her-fake-news-exposed-again-mama-stasi-orders-patriot-purged/ –  will step up intrusive monitoring of AfD, which, NB, is a legal political party, forming the main opposition in the Bundestag.

    Germans should be on guard, but not against the patriotic and democratic AfD!

    There is a jackboot mentality alive and well in Mama Stasi Merkel’s regime, and not only among her socialist SPD comrades.

    =

    HEIL MERKEL!   – The SPD’s pro-crimmigrant Maas

    ‘Himmler’ Maas Calls On Secret Police to Undermine Patriots! 

    ..like the authoritarian Maas.

    Hitler’s SPD Heirs – ‘Media Must Gag Critics of Crimmigration!’ .

    Let’s never forget that in neighbouring Belgium, not so many years ago, a multicult-collaborationist court BANNED  the biggest party in the land – for being pro-Belgian.

    =

     Belgium’s LargestParty Banned – Nation Shocked  

    – 

    Good Germans must say loudly and often that –

    IT CAN’T HAPPEN HERE!

    =

    • Gambar terkait
     
    • Annelie Neumann 22:11 on January 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      This is very bad of course but it is only one of many.
      Merkel does not care about German people who get hurt but cares very much to be sure these criminals are comfortable.
      It is shame on our country and we must end it.

      Like

  • ross1948 20:58 on January 18, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-democratic courts, , , expenses scandals, , ,   

    Euro-Jerk Judges Exposed – For SOME Of Their Offences! 


    Are judges destroying transparency in EU institutions?
    https://euobserver.com/opinion/143735

    judgingjudges_header

    That’s the headline in one of EUObserver’s final 2018 reports, and we have to agree with the author – the answer is yes!

    The overpaid robed jerks are up to their wine-swilling necks in covering up the equally overpaid Strasbourg Slugs…

    What An Arrogant Merkelite Slug! 

    leech

    “I’m Interested In…”“Oh No You’re Not,” Say Strasbourg Slugs! 

    EU-anticorruption-060611

    …and the un-elected Euro-Commissars…

    Brussels Lush Again – Your Taxes Pay For This Bum’s Booze! 

    … the expenses of all those parasites being shrouded in mystery despite the best efforts – and I give even the Europhiliac hacks due credit for trying – to penetrate the legalistic smoke-screens put up and preserved by arrogant court rulings, which the top link tells you all about.

    =

    eurocourt

    ====

    But while greedy, bloated expense accounts are an abomination, surely there are a lot worse EuroCourt rulings, like that disgraceful one that gives alien crimmigrants a get-out-of-jail-free card…

    =

    insanityfair

    Let illegal migrants go free, EU court orders..

    …and the quite recent outrage, by those deranged swine on that same ‘European Court of Human Rights…’

    =

    evil judge

    that imposed shariah blasphemy diktats on every nation in Europe when they upheld that Austrian lady’s conviction for ‘insulting religion.’

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/europe-rules-against-free-speech/574369/

    Whether the Nuremberg Trials were judicially legitimate is open to debate, but their object was to eliminate the threat the victorious Allies saw in the remnants of the Third Reich.

    Once the political Enemy Within is routed, and we hope that this year’s European ‘Parliament’ elections will see the first Continent-wide win in a war that will take some time…

    ‘Let’s Unite Europe!’ We Should Echo That Heroic Call! 

    …it would not be unreasonable to bring a lot of the legal lice out of their collaborationist courts and put them on trial for what they have done.

     
    • William Johnston 14:41 on January 19, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Democratise the courts. These judges should chosen by the people, not beehind closed doors in obscure machinations.
      Failing that, they should be subject to recall by citizens.

      Like

  • ross1948 03:44 on November 1, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , anti-democratic courts, birthright citizenship, , , ,   

    An End To The Anchor-Brat Argument? 


    It is of course absurd to assert that because somebody is by chance, or deliberate sly plan, born in a country, then that someone is therefore entitled to citizenship of that country.

    =

    Image result for cat puppies

    A cat giving birth in a kennel does not produce puppies.

    =

    One could digress and say that even many who are born, raised, schooled and in other similar ways might seem to be in many ways British, for example, or Australian…

    =

    Behead-Prophet

    =

    …yet who embrace the most primitive and malevolent of alien mind-sets, should be deprived of citizenship and sent out to some place where blood-thirsty savages might fit in.

    But leave that aside for now.

    There will be many Americans delighted with the news from the White House this week, that, thanks to having a patriot as President, the USA may soon catch up with the more common-sense approach we have seen in other countries.

    Anchor-Babies Ruled OUT – Crimmigrant Off-Spring Are NOT Australian! 

    in .

    Hasil gambar untuk anchor babies

    Good News From Italy – Anchor-Baby Law Scuppered 

    =======

    trump

    The American president said he is preparing an executive order with White House legal staff that would reverse so-called birthright citizenship, a policy that grants automatic citizenship to those born on U.S. soil.   

    https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-us-citizenship-accidental-americans-rejoice-as-trump-seeks-to-end-birthright-citizenship/

    Sensible Americans have been waiting for years for somebody to do something about the ridiculous situation….

    Birthright Citizenship Is a Magnet for Illegal Immigrants,

    …and will cheer Trump on.

    =

    evil judge

    =

    But knowing how many Enemy Within judges there are, illegitimately exercising their powers to thwart the democratic will, as we saw with the clown court rulings against Trump’s moves to block entry of undesirables a year ago, judicial action reflecting the arrogant mentality of far-left mobs like that in Seattle…

    Spineless In Seattle? Why Don’t Cops Hammer The Scum? 

    …I’m not surprised to read the prediction below,

    aillegitimate powersholding onto theirUT

    An executive order by Trump would likely trigger judicial action. Many legal scholars argue that the policy is rooted in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. constitution, and would hence require a constitutional amendment to change.

    And THAT, as much as any other issue, is why it was SO important to beat off the lying hags and get a majority on the Supreme Court which is not disposed to make Un-American rulings.

     

     
    • Tex Shorten 17:11 on November 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      A big Texas thankyou for all the above.
      Everybody in America who is not brain-tuned to CNN agrees with everything you have said so well.

      Like

    • Vinnie F 22:50 on November 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      They have no right to cross any border without passports or without lining up at border controls.
      My friends in Canada face these kinds of formalities if they want to visit their friends in the USA. If they can’t comply with rules, they can and do get sent back.
      If I came to visit with you in Indonesia, I am sure I would be required to have a visa before leaving the airport, right?

      Like

    • Mike Yates 09:11 on November 3, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Trump is great.
      We want them out and he is doing his best to get them out and keep them out.
      If our soldiers shoot some of those violent illegals on the border, that will teach them a lesson.

      Like

  • ross1948 18:05 on June 30, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-democratic courts, , , , , separating illegals from children,   

    BBC Report Suggests Trump’s Crimmigrant Policy Works! 


    I tuned into BBC World today for their 9am news and was pleased to see the Brussels summit deal, concocted only days ago, is already falling apart…

    =

    Migrant crisis: EU leaders split over new migrant deal – BBC News

    …but it was another news item that caught my attention, an interview with one of the lawless horde ‘caught’ after violating the American border.

    =

    =

    The illegal alien, from Honduras – yes, she’d dragged the kid all the way through Mexico too – was lachrymose, because she couldn’t get to see the child, her own flesh and blood, from whom she had been separated – her own criminality the sole cause of the separation.

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk yessica bbc honduras Us. border

    Rethinking her decision to break the laws of somebody else’s country?

    =

    The interviewer asked her directly if she would now, knowing  her illegal activity has put that child into US Government care, commit her shameful and irresponsible crime again.

    Answer?

    NO!

    https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-44665112/it-s-been-50-days-since-i-heard-of-my-son

    Keep up the good work, Donald!

     
    • Dale Dannick 20:08 on June 30, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      YES!
      I wish more of our congressional representatives would make that very important point.
      THANKS!

      Like

    • Mort 20:27 on June 30, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      That is precisely why the Left is so furious. Deterring illegal immigration is the last thing the Media-Democrat Party wants.
      I am only surprised that the BBC asked that question, and that when she answered as she did, they failed to edit her answer out of their published video.
      An oversight?

      Like

      • Edward L 22:36 on June 30, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Definitely an oversight, Mort.
        They probably hoped we’d not notice.
        What a mother, complains when she’s caught red-handed breaking into somebody else’s country with never a thought for what might happen to the kid.

        Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: