Tagged: anti-racist nitwits Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 09:00 on August 10, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , anti-racist nitwits, chocolate skin, , ,   

    Another Word Hi-Jacked! Update=Censor! 


    I’m talking about the pathetic plonkers who run the publishing house Picador, spineless collabos who have knuckled under to PC bullies.

    .
    ..

    They are currently “discussing the best way to update the book for future editions”.

    ‘The book‘ is not facing an ‘update‘ but vicious wokestapo censorship.

    .00000000
    00000
    .
    Various uptight clowns have taken exception to ‘racist‘ content, like ‘almond-shaped eyes!’
    When the public were allowed to use public transport here in Jakarta, I would often find myself sitting opposite somebody with almond-shaped eyes

    0000

    Eyeshadow Tips for Almond Eyes

    000
    If set in a pretty face, not at all a dire experience. 
    Another phrase up for obliteration is ‘chocolate-coloured,‘ when applied to skin.
    What is wrong with that? 

    Chocolate is brown. 

    It’s also nice. 

    Nothing racist about it. 

    000000
    The authoress, Kate Clanchy, who is grovelling –
    “I will also take time to reflect upon views of the many readers of colour who have responded to my writing to put these learnings into practice in my work as both teacher and writer.”
    .
    .

    – does not deserve support, but…

    ….

    ..

    …..we need to be vocal on her behalf nevertheless, because loads of whining uppities are putting the boot in. 

    .

    .

     

    Picador is part of Pan Macmillan

    Picador
    Picador logo.jpg

    Parent company

    https://www.panmacmillan.com/help-is-at-hand

     
  • ross1948 15:34 on February 4, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-racist nitwits, Rich girl, rich leftist American women   

    Hilarious! Dimwit Rich Bitches Paying For Their Sins! 


    When I saw the headline adorning this Guardian report…

    Why liberal white women pay a lot of money to learn over dinner how they’re racist

    ….I knew it was bound to be a real doozy! And the sub-heading that follows on..

    A growing number of women are paying to confront their privilege – and racism – at dinners that cost $2,500

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/03/race-to-dinner-party-racism-women

    …rapidly confirmed my initial impression.

    Poor Little Rich Girl (New Wave Readers) by…

    I have to suppress my chortling, briefly, to congratulate, in all seriousness, the two American coloured ladies who came up with this clever way of separating stupid, left-liberal, poor-little-rich-girls (actually women way more than old enough to know better!) from substantial sums of cash.

    Though it’s fair to say one of the entrepreneuses is repulsive – she says she hates her country’s flag.

    .

    But then I have to let rip again, uproarious, uncontrollable belly-laughs at the asininity of dumbo dames who could surely contribute $2500 to help somebody needy, of any colour, rather than pay such a sum to listen to laughable lefty gunk over a fancy dinner.

     

     
  • ross1948 10:28 on December 19, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-racist nitwits, Bing Crosby, University College London,   

    Loondon Calling- Bing Facing Posthumous Witch-Hunt? 


    ===

    Tempted though I am to skip the imbecility of those University College London gnat-brained undergrads and alumni who got their pinko knickers in a twist over the invocation of the long-dead Bing Crosby’s greatest hit ‘White Christmas….

    ===========Gambar terkait=========

    …and the yellow-bellied skunks who run the college, who kow-towed to the clowns with a slack-jawed ‘apology…’

    Gambar terkait

    …I really can’t ignore it, mainly because the Evening Standard surely got it wrong when they reported that UCL was ‘forced to apologise.

    HOGWASH!

    ===

    Nobody ‘FORCED’ UCL to apologise!

    Question – What possible means of coercion do the ‘offended’ asses possess, that they might ‘force‘ those who run the college to bow to their sad little displays of pique?

    Answer? NONE!

    Except maybe to return degrees and diplomas they inexplicably received from UCL, requests that should be readily agreed, removal of cretins’ names from the roll of graduates surely a boon to UCL’s presently battered reputation!

    Universities tell their student what’s what.

    Students either accept what’s what or find somewhere else to study.

    ====

    Immature brats do NOT get to run the kindergarten.

    =====

    Given English winter weather, there’s nothing remotely offensive about this first tweet….

     …but the second?

    It disgraces the college, grovelling to chip-on-the-shoulder shrills with too little useful work to do, like some jerk named Aman Thakar who had yelped back at his alma mater:

    “This UCL Alumni is not dreaming of a white campus, thanks.”

    ==

    ===

    An alumnus, please note, not a student, so theoretically educated to a high level, yet as quick to tantrum as an ill-disciplined tot.

    Nor was Thakar the only such whiner.

    00000

     

    A proper response would be to tell race-obsessed freakos to get a life!

    But not in the loony lissom groves of UCL!

    =

    The university tweeted an apology, saying that it chose its words “very poorly” and that it was “sorry” for the tweet.

    Change of management required – find personnel with backbones, to replace the incumbent pusillanimous creeps!

    Thanks be, there are still pockets of resistance to PC pukery in the UK.

    Many people said the university was bowing to political correctness and the tweet was not offensive.

     “Comment section is practically a blizzard of people choosing to be offended by an innocent tweet. Why apologise?”

    “What? Are you mad? Who has managed to convince you that they were offended? It cannot be true.”

    “You guys know they’re talking about SNOW right? Good grief.”

     “Oh Lord! What cry babies complained about this? Perfectly clear what you meant! People are getting lost in this PC culture!”

    UCL forced to apologise after ‘dreaming of a white campus’ tweet 

    But I have to wonder.

    Will Bing’s song now be blacklisted by the far-left management of the BBC?

    =

     ?

    ……………..

    And having asked that, will the word ‘blacklisting,’ with its negative overtones, itself be subject to revisionism?

     

    PS Ban Bing is a city in Thailand!

     
    • Mack the Knife 20:12 on December 19, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Vera Lynn would be in deep sh-t, all those offensive White Cliffs of Dover.
      Even the Sixties song, Whiter Shade of Pale, just begging for prosecution.
      Nujobs, like you say.

      Like

    • Lydia Blaine 22:12 on December 19, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Lunatics running the asylum, forcing the college to bow to their anti-white bigotry?
      Could the management not have told the fools to grow up, or must ‘university authorities’ now dance to every simple simon racist alumnus’ tune?

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: