Tagged: ‘asylum’ parasites Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts
The headline is my preferred paraphrase of the full quote, so to be clear, here it is in full.
…telling or showing an asylum seeker that he is not welcome in a certain public area, such as a park, can also be a violation of his fundamental rights…
Have you EVER heard such hogwash?
The quote comes from a bunch of academics, in Zurich, a report evidently paid for from the pockets of Swiss tax-payers, as it appears under the auspices of a body badly in need of abolition, the ‘Federal Commission Against Racism.’
- And here’s me always thought Switzerland was a sensible sort of place!
But leaving aside the silliness – as if any sane people anywhere in Europe should be scolded for wanting to keep alien intruders like these…
…the pinko panel criticised current policy in federal-run centres for asylum seekers which fixes certain hours during which residents may leave the premises, a measure that, although it has a legal basis, is not proportional,
A common-sense curfew not proportional?
- It would seem to be perfectly proportional (until mass deportations are under way) to the risk to innocents represented by phoney ‘refugees.’
Let’s look at the countries immediately adjacent to Switzerland, to help gauge that risk.
If these Swiss pinkos think they can make a rational case for their demand that undesirable aliens should be free to prowl day or night wherever they please, their way forward is clear enough.
Get the 100,000 signatures required to force a referendum. Better still, put the whole ‘asylum’ nonsense to a popular vote.
Let’s see what the Swiss people want?
Regional German broadcaster NDR reported on Sunday that the majority of more than 300 cases of welfare fraud in the nothern city of Braunschweig are related to Sudanese refugees. http://www.dw.com/en/braunschweig-northern-germany-uncovers-300-cases-of-welfare-fraud-by-asylum-seekers/a-36969990
- My apologies for using Brunswick rather than Braunschweig, the actual name of the city, but it’s like using Cologne rather than Koln, to talk about the scene of mass molestation by alien savages.
- Anyhow, a mere detail.
- Nice to note that the state media are easing up on their addiction to hiding the truth…
- The editor-in-chief defended her decision to suppress the rape story on public TV broadcaster ZDF: “We don’t want to inflame the situation and spread the bad mood.” http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6501/migration-crisis-germany
- …., unlike that bad bitch of whom we often remind you!
- But let’s see how much the Sudanese swine in the report have managed to gouge from German tax-payers.
Most of them succeeded by using basic disguises to create three or four different identities. “Sometimes just growing a beard, or putting on a pair of glasses, having shorter hair, but always different surnames…On average, each fraud suspect cheated authorities out of thousands of euros. In one case, one asylum seeker had 12 identities.”
- Anything they cheated from the benefit system will have been over and above their pocket-money.
- According to the Asylum Seekers Act, every asylum seeker receives 135 euros “pocket money” and 216 euros a month to cover the necessary personal needs – if they’re not completely under the care of state authorities.
- So despite that asinine largesse bestown by Mama Stasi Merkel, the dirty brutes couldn’t restrain their dishonesty and greed?
- The total fraud in the state of Lower Saxony is estimated to have cost taxpayers 3 to 5 million euros ($3.2-5.3 million).
- Oh, well, that’s not much is it?
- After all, that sum constitutes a mere drop in the bucket compared to the BILLIONS the poor German tax-payers’ face in future years thanks to Mama’s evil agenda,...next year alone roughly €10 billion ($ 11.3 billion) in extra spending for migration-related costs. Germany Plans Balanced Budget in 2017 DespiteMigration Costs‘
And compared to the suffering, the deaths, wounds and sexual violence perpetrated against innocent Germans, it’s nothing much at all.
But let’s not overlook the confirmation of the sheer irresponsible laxity on Merkel’s part when it came to identifying who were and who weren’t ‘refugees.’
In many early cases, refugees registered with no papers, with only a photograph and no fingerprints being assigned to their registration documents.
And yet they weren’t confined, detained in safe custody until it was established beyond a shadow of a doubt that they were not a threat?
These vile alien bludgers should not be jailed. They should be loaded onto trains or planes or container vessels and shipped out of the country the ingrates abuse so shamelessly.
JazPen and Pamela are discussing. Toggle Comments
So ‘aid workers’ in Calais knew about a crimmigrant rapist for eight months but kept quiet for political advantage, the most irresponsible tactic yet to keep Brits in the dark about what kind of savages could reach the UK?
…the woman never reported it to French police because of fears that her allegation might “stigmatise” refugees….
How about decent women, not ‘aid workers’ but the wives and daughters of Calaisiens, within range of a vile alien predator?
Were those French potential victims unworthy of a warning?
Those ‘aid workers’ involved in the Calais cover-up are simply….
Hard to find words to express contempt for such evil people, who mince around the media’s microphones with their lousy lies about the ‘poor, desperate migrants.’
And an illegal immigrant rape suspect from Calais is currently not only being considered by Amber Rudd ( presumably with Theresa May’s approval) for ‘asylum…’
….but she’s also allowing him to come and go freely?
Rudd should be fired, or arrested or clapped in a loony-bin!
Given my propensity for raging against collaborators, you’d think I could roll out plenty of epithets, but this case has me almost dumbfounded.
Migrant who kayaked to Britain faces rape inquiryA migrant who paddled across the Channel in an inflatable kayak is to be questioned by immigration officials over the alleged rape of a British charity worker in the Calais Jungle camp. http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/migrant-who-kayaked-to-britain-face-rape-inquiry-2089593
BTW how many of the media have covered this story?
The rape was apparently common knowledge among volunteers…the woman never reported it to French police because of fears that her allegation might “stigmatise” refugees.
And even today the alleged victim herself is understood to have told friends she still has no wish to come forward.
We have all read about victims who won’t report rape, because of misplaced shame, or because they can’t bear the thought of reocounting their ordeal in court.
We can all feel sympathy and understanding for thse in that position, even though we know it’s of paramount importance to nail the swine that did the crime.
But to cover up for a filthy savage rapist, who might strike again at any time, purely to fool the public, to protect a predator, purely to keep the pro-crimmigrant propaganda campaign running smoothly?
What a sad, sick bitch, no conscience whatsoever, leaving a bestial sex-offender on the loose, to rape again if and when the opportunity might arise.
He was evidently notorious – one ‘aid worker’ at least had enough residual decency EVENTUALLY to talk to the cops in England when she got news that the beast, who claims to be Iranian, had reached Dover.
But she wasn’t alone in knowing the score!
She’s revealed that –
…the alleged assault was “effectively covered up” by colleagues because they felt it would undermine their efforts to help refugees…
Again, there’s only one way to define these ‘aid workers.’
These verminous conspirators should be identified. If prosecution for aiding and abetting rape is possible, that should happen.
But at the very least their names and photographs should be on the front page of every newspaper in the UK, as public enemies, rape-collaborators..
Now, back to Amber the Ass?Home Office sources confirmed the man will be questioned about the rape, but stressed it was one of many factors being considered while examining his asylum claim.==Oh! Many factors? Like what Amber?Will the dim-witted cow believe whatever he tells her, as she accepts the incredible ‘unaccompanied minor’ migrant lies about their age?==========Further proof of her stupid cow status is offered in the next extract from the report.
He is currently living in a “segregated” asylum seekers’ shelter, from which he is free to come and go.
If the SOB rapes any British women, or if ANY of those given such free rein to prowl around decide to rape or otherwise harm or steal from her fellow-citizens, then Amber Rudd WILL deserve to be tarred and feathered, as we suggested last month.
And so too should the cops on the case.
Last night police said the information has been “shared with the relevant authorities” but there was “insufficient information to proceed with an investigation…”
It is thought to be the first time someone seeking asylum has attempted the 20-mile crossing in a kayak.
The crimmigrant cur was was spotted eight miles off the Kent coast by a Channel ferry. The UK Border Force took him to Dover where he was handed over to immigration officials.
WHY THE HELL WAS HE NOT FORCED BACK ACROSS THE CHANNEL?
Please note also what the sole ‘aid worker’ prepared to speak up, albeit belatedly, has to say about the poor desperate migrants whom Francis Hollande has now ‘evacuated’ and sent to dwell among innocent Frech people in towns and villaes across France.
“The camp was getting more dangerous. The THE MAJORITY OF THE MEN came from Afghanistan and weren’t used to having Western women around them.”
Hollande, like Rudd, is a disgrace to the office he holds. Neither of them give a tinker’s cuss for the safety of their own people, so eager are they to abase themselves to the EU/UN agenda.
Migrant who kayaked to Britain face rape inquiry
Sandy Loudon is discussing. Toggle Comments
Poor Austria – and getting poorer…
Another shocker from Austria, which is being bled white (can we use that phrase these days or will some pinko nincompoop start whining about racism?) by so-called ‘refugee’ bludgers.
A realistic appraisal of the impact of the alien tsunami includes several examples.
- a man who arrived with his wife and five children, who together receive €3,300 per month on benefits
- an unemployed migrant couple with 11 children who have lived in Vienna for years without working earned €5,200 per month in child benefits.
- …benefits are also being claimed for refurbishing furniture, the security deposit for rental apartments, and a building subsidy for new homes.
The report is based on a comprehensive study by the Austrian Institute of Economic Research, which was commissioned by the city of Vienna.
So it’s no scare story from the so-called ‘far-right!’
And get this, its forecast for next year – an increase of 35 percent in social benefits since 2014, the year before the outbreak of the refugee crisis. Without the newly arrived migrants the rise in social benefits would only be 15 percent according to the institute!
It would surely, on a cost-benefit analysis, be much cheaper to start wholesale deportations of those welfare bums right away.
- Still, there’s always a smile to be raised, albeit a very wry smile!
The study writes: “The prospects of employment for migrants are particularly unfavourable.”
Yeah, especially if Austrians elect a government next year which fails to turn off the welfare tap! Why would any waster from abroad contemplate taking on honest toil when they can leech off the citizens of the country which so foolishly admitted them? Maybe some of them have conscience enough to go out, find work and earn an honest living.
But how many?
And of course there’s another aspect to infestation by people raised in a barbarous so-called culture that treats women barely better than cattle.
The President’s job is largely ceremonial but if the FPO’s Herr Hofer wins in December, that victory could well push the current regime towards realism.
And if the current regime fails to stop the rot, there’s parliamentary elections not long after!
Albrecht is discussing. Toggle Comments
Exactly how much tax-subsidised accommodation is lavished on so-called ‘asylum’-seekers (aka wannabe welfare bums) in the UK?
I was brought to ask this question both by the Telegraph report…
Third of asylum claims come from illegal migrants and visa overstayers
….and by the news that the London Borough of Hackney is proposing to fine homeless Brits sleeping rough up to One Thousand Pounds for making their grotty borough more unsightly than it already is.
Evicting all those ‘asylum’ wasters would free up accommodation for Brits who genuinely need it.
More than once I have put forward a practical solution, short-term, until the phoney ‘refugees’ are deported back where they belong.
Identifying uninhabited islands on which to dump undesirable aliens should be a priority task for all governments afflicted by the crimmigrant plague.
There was an Austrian patriot, the FPO’s Herr Strache, who raised the possibility not long ago…
…though he was snubbed by the EuroCommissars, whose knee-jerk preference for the welfare of illegal immigrants over actual Europeans was entirely predictable.
Now, however, the idea is spreading, with the patriot party in Germany making a similar proposal. That fine lady named Frauke Petry has called for failed asylum seekers to be housed on islands outside Europe.
Frauke also came up with the nifty notion that the country’s refugee office should be turned into an emigration bureau.
- She’s a smart chick, but there’s no need to boot the bludgers all the way to those distant islands!
Britain has various suitable isles quite far off the northern shores of Scotland, Rockall for one.
With all those in the Med, and the Aegean, and maybe some north of Scandinavia, there’d surely be enough to take hundreds of thousands, parcelled up into congenial groups to avoid the unpleasantries that certain ‘asylumers’ have been known to engage in.
….12 Christians drowned after they were thrown overboard by their Muslim fellow refugees.
Turkish people with Austrian citizenship who recently joined protests in support of president Recep Tayyip Erdogan should be investigated with a view to stripping their Austrian nationality, far-right presidential candidate Norbert Hofer has said.
I’m still waiting for EUObserver, or any of the rotten media, to refer to Herr Hofer’s opponent…
…the hoary old Red-Green Van Belleren, as the far-left presidential candidate.’
But more to the point…
Here’s something of what happened after Erdolf’s boogeyman ‘coup!’
A young demonstrator – Austrian born of Turkish immigrant parents – explains why he’s marching behind Turkish flags.
“We are Turks, we stick together, we’re always there and we love each other.”
Austria’s Turkish community numbers around 300,000. Many came in the 1970s so now there are second and third generations along with more recent immigrants… 4,000 of them staged a spontaneous demonstration waving Turkish flags and chanting pro-Erdogan slogans…
This brought powerful protest from Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz.
“We have evidence that the pro-Erdogan demonstrations that took place in Vienna were directly ordered from Turkey to get people on the street. Of course this is untenable and we will protest.”
What surprised many Austrians was the rapid response of the Turkish community to the attempted coup.
What surprises me is that anyone in Austria was surprised!
We’ve all seen – especially Germans – the widespread disloyalty of Turks who revel in the privileges of not just residence…
,,,,but also of citizenship in European countries, yet retain allegiance to that alien country in Asia.
I’ll bet the perspicacious Hofer wasn’t surprised, nor many of the smart millions who voted for him in June and will vote the same way in October.Already there a real signs of an wakening to the folly of clasping hordes of asps to the nation’s bosom.Mayor Klaus Schneeberger of the conservative People’s Party said he did not want “current developments in Turkey to be imported” into Wiener Neustadt.========
“I therefore call on all those who have put up Turkish flags on their homes or balconies to remove them at once,” he wrote in an open letter sent to Turkish community groups and council estates.
Schneeberger said the city’s “decades-old traditions and values” had to be protected in the face of the massive migrant influx…——Time to choose.Turkey is a hostile country. Turks loyal to Turkey should live there, or be sent there.