Does BBC Disown The ‘B’ In LGBTQI?

Till recently, the wretch in the photo below, now convicted of “possessing extreme animal porn..”

00000

Stephen Kish ….
. 0000

    …was a ‘BBC children’s presenter!’

The creep reportedly ‘sobbed in the dock…’

Former CBBC presenter pleads guilty to possessing extreme animal porn

…but apparently had nothing to say by way of explanation.

After a quick glance through other media coverage on this example of sexual maladjustment, it seems the BBC has made no comment either…

.

.

…despite their record of splurging funds…

• Courtesy Of All You Brits – Special Bogs For BBC Queers

.

.

…..on making maladjusts happy.

BBC also spends a lot of time and money on fawning coverage of maladjusts, both home…

BBC’s Nauseating Dutch Breakfast! 

.. and away.

We are all too familiar with those loathesome letters, LGBTQI..

( Lesbian, Gay, Bestiality, Transfreak, Queer and Incest)

….and we have long assumed that the BBC saw nothing wrong with any kind of ‘consensual’ sexual inter-action.

Just as well the newly convicted creep no longer works for them, because, were he still in UK Pravda employ….

.

.

…the tax-funded propaganda channel would have to clarify its position on a ‘man’ with a depraved attraction to animal pornography!

 

Former CBBC presenter pleads guilty to possessing extreme animal porn

We Know BBC’s Infested But School Collabos MUST Be Fired!

The BBC said the programme is aimed at teachers for use in classes and is not directly aimed at children.

In the clip an expert can be seen telling young children that she has come across more than 100 different terms used to describe gender

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1388597/bbc-news-latest-defund-the-bbc-campaign-staff-workshop-drink-water-tv-licence-uk

‘An Expert?’

…

A poisonous propagandist, or a polluter, perhaps, might be a more precise description of that individual.

And of course the BBC cannot shrug off its share of guilt – to collaborate with such evil is damnable, especially for UK Pravda…

.

.

…which leeches of tax-payers coerced by a law which Jellyfish Johnson shows no interest in reforming.

However, what more urgently needs to be done is name and shame those ‘teachers…..’

.

.

….as well, of course, any local education authorities, known to have subjected those children seen in the ‘clip’ to the perverted indoctrination caught on camera.

 

What has HM Secretary of State for Education had to say on this?

It’s child abuse, moreover, so why has the Home Secretary Priti Patel not asked for a police investigation?