Tagged: BBC anti-Trump hate-show Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 3:31 pm on October 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Ana Navarro, BBC anti-Trump hate-show, , , ,   

    Lefty Nutjob Navarro – BBC’s ‘Republican’ Blogger? 


    I hadn’t heard of Ana Navarro till last week, when a strange fat woman appeared on BBC, which called her a ‘Republican Blogger!’

    .

    Ana Navarro.png
    Ana Navarro

    ……

    I thought for a moment they were redressing their usual Trumpophobic bias.

    Nasty Nabila Stars In BBC’s Hate-Trump Show! 

    ..

    Hasil gambar untuk gavin esler dateline

    Dateline’s Extremist Esler

    ‘We DO Try To Get Trump Supporters On Our Show’ -BBC 

    But suddenly she got into a rant, excoriating the US President!

    Typical lousy BBC dissimulation!

    Navarro is as truly ‘Republican’ as I am a champion of temperance!

    .

    ..

    Then today I read about her, recognised her snarly fizzog, and am not at all surprised at her extreme left yammering.

    I think Venezuela’s red ruler, Maduro, will also be surprised, at her ignorant claim that he’s NOT a socialist.

    .

    Gambar terkait

    Maduro with the Evil Old Man of Havana

    =

    If there’s one thing his friends and foes generally agree on, it’s his dogmatic commitment to ‘Chavezist’ socialist ideology.

    Please read the linked report, which exposes both her ignorance and her poor manners.

    https://www.theblaze.com/newsletters/ana-navarro-maduro-is-not-a-socialist

     
    • Elmore Edison 8:30 pm on October 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      She keeps calling herself a Republican but as the article in The Blaze shows you, she is unstable and doesn’t know what she’s talking about. A natural for your BBC, yeah?

      Like

  • ross1948 7:04 pm on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC anti-Trump hate-show, , Bojo, , defunding state broadcasters, Emily Maitlis, Naga Murchetty, uptight whiners   

    Sneer-Minx Maitlis – No Charm School Grad, She! 


    That snotty sneer-minx Emily Maitlis, having just been slapped down herself a week or so ago, for her own crass lack of professionalism…

    .Image result for maitlis

    …has some nerve to coming rushing to the defence of her BBC comrade Naga Munchetty.

    We have noticed this phenomenon before, in connection with BBC bigots urging as ban on free speech on televised discussions.

    censorship

    BBC Flunkeys Getting Above Themselves? Fire Them! 

    =======================================

    The insolent vixen ( Maitlis, not Munchetty, though they are both arrogant upstarts!) is now all a-whine about how the BBC is “massively out of touch with the real world.”

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/28/emily-maitlis-joins-condemnation-bbcs-treatment-naga-munchetty/

    Why?

    The BBC is certainly out of touch with millions of British people…

    =

    bbc propag

    =

    …as viewers can see for themselves every day.

    But Maitlis thinks her employers – the broadcasting mandarins, not the tax-payers from whom both these women get their huge salaries…

    =

    bbc--shameful-dont-pay-the-license

    =

    …are out of touch because the BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) told Munchetty to stop mouthing off, after an ugly, uptight rant against President Donald Trump.

    Well, Maitlin would take Munchetty’s side, after all, one uppity lefty backing up another.

    And that Complaints Unit is certainly open to criticism.

    Neither of the bleating Beebettes was suspended, nor even lost a day’s pay, nor even got a final warning.

    =

    Image result for slap on the wrist

    =

    Instead a feeble reproof, despite no sign of any serious apology from either offender against the principle of impartial state broadcasting.

    The two shrews ought to be tamed.

    =

    41ac4-shape-up-or-ship-out

    =======

    Better still fired!

    I know any call to discipline these delinquent dames will fall on deaf ears at Broadcasting House.

    But we need to make BBC bias an election issue.

    If Bojo won’t batter the broadcasters into doing their job in accordance with the rules of objectivity, one hopes the Brexit Party will.

     
    • Petra Malley 8:03 pm on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      None of your readers will disagree with you about those abysmally biased BBC women, and there are as many abysmally biased men there too.
      Notwithstanding that, I seriously doubt the Brexit Party is coherent enough about anything, except Brexit, to achieve real reforms, in the BBC or the courts or whatever.
      Farage wanted a broad range of candidates, but when he recruited apologists for republican terrorism, he crossed a line for many of us.
      I am still trying to make up my mind what to do for the best.

      Like

      • Fiona F 8:55 pm on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Petra, in the absence of any other party that is wholly committed to a clean break, I can’t see how we have much choice.
        i still find it hard to trust Boris Johnson.

        Like

    • Penny 8:08 pm on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      We have been sitting around discussing this and we all think the ideal solution would be a firing….
      What?
      Think about it!

      Like

    • Vanessa Reilly 9:19 pm on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Who do they think they are?
      They are our paid servants, paid to report what’s going on, paid to interview people without sneering at them offensively, paid to be impartial and objective and to keep their mouths shut whenever they feel like spraying us with their own opinions.
      They get paid more than I have ever been paid in any of my jobs since I left school.
      If they don’t like the work, they can quit, the sooner the better in my view.

      Like

    • Noreen Paterson 11:08 pm on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The Anti-British Broadcasting Collaborators.
      The BBC is left through and through and it never misses a chance to use the tell-tale tag ‘despite Brexit’ when anything hopeful is reported.
      These two women are symptoms only.
      The disease must be eradicated by abolition or privatisation.
      Who suggested selling it to Soros? It does his propaganda work already so he should pay their salaries, not UK tax-payers.

      Like

  • ross1948 7:08 pm on September 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC anti-Trump hate-show, , pro-homo BBC   

    BBC Flunkeys Getting Above Themselves? Fire Them! 


    It’s thanks to one of my commenters that I came across this latest example of uppity flunkeys who don’t seem to know their place.

    bbc propag

    ===

    We’ve often used that illustration, above, to indicate the BBC’s cultural marxist bias but the Guardian report confirms that the words ‘that fits our agenda’ do indeed reflect the bigoted mentality that pervades Broadcasting House.

    Fanatic staff, mere employees, with no conceivable right to dictate, or even to influence, what’s said, seen and/or done on TV channels funded by the British people, are now actually seeking to suppress dissenting voices on issues of great moment.

    =

    Image result for naga munchetty

    Naga ‘Bias’ Munchetty

    ==

    The article starts with a yelp about the BBC’s limp-wristed admonition of an uptight bint named Naga Munchetty – the Trumophobic vixen should have been fired, as my commenter suggests.

    Apparently (according to the Guardian, the state broadcaster’s ideological soul-mate, which ought to know!) this has sparked something of an uprising among the flunkeys, NOT because of the slap-on-the-wrist scolding but because they think she should have been allowed to get off Scot-free.

    These insolent toe-rags evidently don’t understand that they’re hired to work, not wield editorial power.

    Editorial staff, indeed, are obviously unsatisfactory, but that’s because they are serious unprofessional, often unable to recognise how bigoted their own attitudes are.

    .

    .

    A recent article by a recently retired BBC man confirms this.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/08/08/the-brexit-bashing-corporation/

    However, what ALL BBC employees should know, and if they can’t grasp it, out they should go, is that a fundamental principle for a state-funded broadcasting operation is fair debate, equal time for both sides of any issue.

    We saw that cast aside last week, when the horrid brat was lionised (or should that be lionessed?) and unbelievably excessive attention given to climate-panic merchants.

    Yet it could get even worse – worse even than all the slanted news, and the non-level playing fields, it’s a fact that the BBC is infested by  a significant number of rabidly intolerant leftists who are ABSOLUTELY against free and fair debate on a major controversy raging in Britain today.

    .

    .

    At the same time the BBC management is increasingly facing internal clashes with its own journalists who are publicly calling out the corporation when they feel it is falling short on issues relating to diversity – both internally and on-screen.

    This then causes clashes over which topics are legitimate topics of discussion for the corporation’s television and radio shows ….

    political-correctness_submission

    Wait for it!

    …and which are not up for debate.

    Since when are free-born Brits told which issues they may speak freely on.

    Yes, I know, since the degenerates at Westminster started passing gag laws on race, religion and perversion, the bias on the last issue obviously motivated by self-interest..

    ..

    gayhitler

    Earlier this year, the BBC reminded staff not to tweet their personal views, after employees publicly objected to BBC programmes hosting discussions that debated the rights and wrongs of teaching children about tolerance for LGBT people.

    https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/sep/26/bbc-staff-complain-after-colleague-reprimanded-over-trump-remarks#img-

    …that it should make it all the easier for a responsible government to  clean them out and hire people, left or right or centre, who believe in free speech and not in censoring the voices of millions of British people who are NOT prepared to buckle and bow down to the gaystapo agenda. 

     
    • Amanda Adams 10:07 pm on September 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      These little BBC nazis are now telling the people who pay their salaries what we can and can’t debate?
      It’s true what you say, many of them are queer, so they hate it when people say they should not be free to brainwash children into their life style.
      All the more reason why we should be supporting those Muslim and Christian parents in Birmingham.

      Like

  • ross1948 4:25 pm on September 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 9th congressional district, BBC anti-Trump hate-show, Dan Bishop GOP, Dan McCready Dem, Mother Jones far-left, , ,   

    GOP Beats BBC In North Carolina! 


    Nice to see a win for a pro-Trump Republican in North Carolina.

    https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/election/article234890702.html

    In normal circumstances, I’d notice, nod with approval and write about something else.

    But a day or two ago, the British Bias Claptrap tv news had a look at the contest.

    ….

    bbc propag

    ….

    I’m pretty sure they mentioned the GOP candidate’s name, but their left prejudice, their infatuation, with the Democrat that they even went so far as to call him ‘charismatic.’

    Evidently the voters felt differently, though what I read about the loser suggested that he wasn’t a nutjob leftist of the AOC variety.

    So how come the BBC made a big thing about a minor congressional race in NC?

    I am an inquisitive fellow, and if they had no obvious interest in boosting the Dem, Dan McCready,  the obvious conclusion was that they had it in for the Republican, Dan Bishop.

    Why?

    Aha!

    It seems Mr. Bishop had said and done some things that would enrage any BBC queer, and rest assured the BBC is the broadcasting wing of the UK gaystapo.

    And the BBC’s best beloved American far-left rag..

    A Leftist Lesbian Love Affair – ‘Auntie’ And ‘Mother Jones?’ 

    ….the deceptively named Mother Jones ( not a cookery journal!) really and truly hates Mr. Bishop.

    The depth of their rabid hostility can be measured by a pre-election article excoriating the Republican.

    It’s not a hit-piece confined to Bishop’s patriotic, conservative politics or his stand for decency against the ‘bathroom bill,’ the sicko legislation designed to let male trans-freaks use women’s toilets.

    freak_show

    That sordid controversy is indeed dear to the BBC’s heart….

    Courtesy Of All You Brits – Special Bogs For BBC Queers! 

    …but the weirdo MJ scribbler, a klutz named Rosenberg, has a much bigger axe to grind!

    He HATES the fact that Dan Bishop is called Dan.

    kidding

    Seriously!

    Despite the fact that the congressman was christened James Daniel Bishop, the frothing lefty MJ hack blames the man for beginning his political life as ‘J Daniel Bishop’ but latterly preferring the easier ‘Dan’ to use in campaigning.

    It’s unclear if Dan Bishop thinks it’s confusing that two people can be named Dan in a single election. Or maybe this is a misplaced attempt to conquer his lifelong regret of ever having James as a name at all. Whatever the case: A man named James is going to talk a lot about being named Dan for the next few months in North Carolina. 

    The pinko , perhaps, enjoyed The Dandy comic as a child, which would explain why he seems to reckon that ‘Dan’ has a more folksy ring to it.

    Is James therefore a wimpy name?

    I’m acquainted with a few Dans, and a few guys named James. Most are not notably wimpy, nor outstandingly tough.

    Questions arise!

    Are ALL MJ hacks retarded?

    Is the BBC so left-run that they’d follow Mother Jones to the Funny Farm?

     

     

     

     

     
    • Vinnie F 7:22 pm on September 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Red Mother Jones is a fanatical rag as you say.
      Natural ally of BBC.

      Like

    • Val Goodman 10:58 pm on September 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Extremely interesting look at these extremist media.
      That Rosenberg requires psychotherapy. As if the man baptised James Daniel should be abused because he prefers to use one his names over another!
      What’s Rosenberg’s full names?

      Like

    • Barb Cassaln 12:13 pm on September 13, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Mother Jones does sound like a harmless housewives mag but it serves up a diet of poisonous offal.

      Like

  • ross1948 10:25 pm on August 10, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC anti-Trump hate-show, , Epstein   

    For God’s Sake, BBC! At Least Try SUBTLE Smear! 


    Just sat through the 10pm AND 11pm BBC news (Jakarta time) and on the subject of Epstein’s murder/suicide/mystery death in prison, references by the UK state broadcaster’s hacks were dramatically illustrated with old news-reel of the deceased with, guess who, Donald Trump.

    ..

    Not a SINGLE mention of Bill Clinton’s name, despite so much attention paid in recent weeks and months to a most definite Clinton Connection.

    Jeffrey Epstein Visited Clinton White House Multiple Times in Early ’90s

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstein-visited-clinton-white-house-multiple-times-in-early-90s

    PS

    ……

    ======

    And how about this?

     

    According to a report in NBC News,  #Clintonbodycount began to trend with just over 70,000 tweets out by August 8 afternoon. This also resulted in Twitter users criticizing the microblogging platform for including the hashtag on the sidebar. A Twitter spokesperson responded to the criticism and said, “Trends are determined by velocity, not volume.https://meaww.com/jeffrey-epstein-reported-death-conspiracy-theory-clinton-body-count-resurfaces

     

     
    • Petra Malley 11:30 pm on August 10, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Top marks for this, a very short but very sharp comment.
      Good idea to quote from the leftwing Daily Beast, and I just saw this in the Guardian.
      ‘Flight logs have revealed the former US president took trips on Epstein’s private plane, reportedly nicknamed the “Lolita Express”. Clinton has denied any close relations…’

      Like

    • Peter Fresnell 3:30 pm on August 11, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Britain is a democracy!
      Why don’t the British people stop their state broadcaster doing all this biased broadcasting?

      Like

    • Tina Thorne 5:15 pm on August 11, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I used to quite fancy him when I was a teen.
      Now I despise him.
      You and Salvini hsve it right. Gere has the money and the house ( or two) to take all these illegals home and look after them for the rest of their lives.
      He could give them money to go home and start a business if they really want honest work.
      He has a cheek to expect long-suffering Italians to bow down to his insults.

      Like

    • June Lawson 11:26 am on August 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      They have continued to link Trump and now we have media blaming Trump for retweeting references to the Clintons.

      Like

  • ross1948 9:42 pm on March 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC anti-Trump hate-show, , berkeley university of california, Professor. Steve Fish,   

    BBC’s Trump-Hate Bias – Again! 


    If you hear some rabid left-liberal millenial moron ranting that ‘Republicans have sided with Ttump rather than protect the American public,’ then you just assume it’s one of CNN’s propagandists, the queer Don Bitter Lemon, or Kermit Cuomo, pretending to be impartial journalists.

    But this afternoon, 2pm Jakarta time, that was what we got on BBC World News.

    After the news that the Mueller mess was drawing to a conclusion, they had an ‘expert’ guest on, to ‘explain’ the issues involved in  what he elegantly called ‘the political crime of the the century.”.. “by a foreign autocrat.”…”with the encouragement’ of  –

    – guess who..?

    =

    …..Trump, of course!

    They told us their American ‘guest’ was Steve Fish, a professor, no less, located at the notorious University of California’s Berkely campus, a place that has stunk of left extremism since the 1960s…

    Donald Warns Colleges, As Red Nazi Arrested! 

    California Screaming – Outlaw Red Nazi Antifa! 

    Berkeley Antifa? Or Extras For ‘The Walking Dead?’ 

    =\

    …and WOW, whay a surprise, when…

    =

    Related image

    =

    …Fish lived up to what were surely the BBC’s fondest expectations with that line we quoted above,  part of a vicious anti-Trump, and anti-Republican diatribe which also included his ever-so-exquisite example of academic objectivity, viz. –

    …that the Republicans had a choice, to be, ‘loyal to the country or loyal to Trump.’

    No suggestion, no recognition on Fish’s part at all, that one might, like millions of Americans, be both.

    If the UK state-broadcaster had invited a Democrat politician aboard, Schumer, maybe, or Pocahontas Warren, fair enough, as long as they had a Republican to offer less rabid imbalance.

    But to introduce Professor Fish as an American academic, as if we were about to hear a dispassionate discourse on the ins and outs of the investigation/witch-hunt…

    =

    …was a deliberate attempt to hoodwink viewers.

    The man was among the most partian US leftists I’ve encountered on the box.

    The BBC is infamous for the way it chooses ‘guests’ who detest Trump, Trump voters and Republicans in general.

    We DO Try To Get Trump Supporters On Our Show’ –BBC

    BBC Trump-Bashers Again Break Their Word! 

    Bloomberger Tells BBC – Trump’s People Live ‘In The Middle Of Nowhere!’  

    It should be closed down, or privatised.

    There’s no excuse for any public money to be poured into this Trumpophobic trough.

     

     
    • M. Gordon 11:02 pm on March 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Abolish the license fee or abolish the BBC.
      It is not just anti-Trump, but also anti-British and there is no democratic control; the editors seem to think they are entitled to impose their own views and load that dice by selective guest-choice.
      They are in fact out of control and since there is no sign anyone’s trying to bring them to heel, let them go into the private sector.
      At least that would mean viewers overseas could see that they were representing themselves and their ideology and not reflecting the British people in any way at all.

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: