Tagged: BBC censorship Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 15:47 on November 11, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC censorship, , , Tuffers and Vaughan,   

    Pandering To Whiners, BBC Suppresses Cricket Show! 

    Brazenly collaborating with BLM whiners…



    …the BBC has suppressed a popular radio show.

    Michael Vaughan’s regular BBC show was pulled from the air on Monday night amid an ongoing row over Azeem Rafiq’s accusation England’s 2005 Ashes-winning captain made racially-insensitive comments at Yorkshire….


    So Mr. Vaughan is cancelled because of some uptight’s allegations over a disputed bit of banter years ago?



    Has that old historian bat been cancelled…

    Professor Mary Beard described the toppling of statues as “a noble tradition” and voiced her support for the protesters who tore down the sculpture of Colston in Bristol.. 

    …after she glorified criminal vandalism?

    Answer NO – she was on BBC, warmly chatting with Crooked Hillary, this very morning!


    Did the BBC cancel its BLM propaganda month…

    Black Power’ Play At BBC? 

    …because plenty of people found it divisive and offensive?


    That month may be over, but we still get BLM-friendly bilge almost daily!


    Did UK Pravda ‘Pride’ month…

    https://www.bbc.com › news › worl…
    Pride month: Five stories from around the world – BBC News
    Jun 27, 2021 — From Canada to Uganda, people are celebrating Pride

    ..get pulled because millions of Brits are sick and tired of their ‘gay’ garbage?

    Obviously not!
    They’d have upset too many of their own maladjusted staff.

    But a guy talking about a sport in which he was a star, talking to people about nothing more offensive than the game he loves!



    It’s BBC Jackboot Time!

  • ross1948 06:30 on July 5, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC censorship, , ,   

    UK Pravda’s Bite-Size Bias! 

    BBC Bitesize has removed references to the “benefits” of climate change on its website, following complaints online.

    The most prominent ‘complainer’ is a leftist Guardian hack named Montbiot who got terribly fretty at the thought of schoolchildren having access to an alternative view of a big issue….

    …such as “healthier outdoor lifestyles” being  ‘one of the pluses of having warmer temperatures.

    Others included easier access to oil in Alaska and Siberia, new shipping routes created by melting ice, and more tourist destinations.

    We should not be surprised at this censorship, only that the tax-funded propaganda channel had overlooked a pocket of dissent.



    After all, it’s been three years since UK Pravda issued an edict, telling staff: “You do not need a denier to balance the debate


    Much like BBC coverage of BLM evil.

    BLM Savages – BBC, Typically, Buries Aftermath Of LA Ambush! 

    BBC Covers Up Latest BLM Hate-Gang Outrage! 

    Zeinab Welcomes Red Cop-Killer’s Fan

    BBC Ignores BLM Brutality, Again! 

  • ross1948 12:34 on August 1, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC censorship, bbc pro-clinton bias, , , revelations, young girls   

    Shocker…Not! BBC Suppresses New Clinton Link To Epstein! 

    Everybody knows that Bill Clinton, even in middle age, was a dirty old man.



    He has also become notorious for his association with the unlamented Epstein.

    So when more news dramatically surfaced this week, needless to say it was headlined in many media.

    Bill Clinton Went to Jeffrey Epstein’s Island With 2 ‘Young Girls’, Virginia Giuffre Says

    But NOT on the BBC World News, today, at 1.20pm Jakarta time, which certainly gave the Epstein stuff a mention…



    ….but carefully, deliberately,  excluded any mention whatsoever of Billy Boy!



    Draw your own conclusions.



    Meanwhile we must wait and see, wondering if the girls in the latest revelation were even younger than that White House intern!

    • Mort 13:39 on August 1, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      BBC is as bad as the Clinton News Network in America, though I believe even CNN gave a tiny little reference to to the ex-President’s fun and games with Epstein.


  • ross1948 21:00 on July 13, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , BBC censorship, , ,   

    Exquisite Irony, Sicko Photo – BBC Concedes Victory To Duda! 

    Despite BBC’s singular talent for covering up news that undermines their propaganda agenda…

    ….they had to report President Duda’s re-election, and even had to try to explain it.


    Hence their reference to the government’s popular and generous welfare scheme. It is symbolised by the 500+ programme, under which families receive 500 zloty (£100; €110; $125) per month for each child until the age of 18.

    Many Polish families have been lifted out of poverty as a result of the government’s policies



    The common folk of Poland ‘feel there is a party that cares about their needs.’

    But the Tax-Funded Propaganda Channel just couldn’t hide its ideological hang-ups…



    ….because, obliged to report on something few would dispute is good, the TFPC continued thus-

    On the other hand, he has vowed to protect Polish families from what he calls an imported “LGBT ideology” that he says is aggressively trying to sexualise Polish children.

    Before we all clap and echo Duda’s recognition of a menace which looms not just in his country but in many of our countries too..

    …ponder, please, that sly intro.

    On The Other Hand!

    You don’t need to be a retired English teacher to know that if you talk about ‘on the one hand’ this and ‘on the other hand’ that, you are contrasting!

    So the subtle BBC message?

    Lifting Poles out of poverty, ‘on the one hand’ is GOOD, but opposing the gaystapo’s goals ‘on the other hand’ is NOT good at all.


    I will spare you the revolting photo the BBC felt it necessary, for some reason, to include, of two queers smooching.

    Instead, here’s a nice big pic of President Duda…


    Andrzej Duda

    …but we’re not done with the TFPC’s twisted notion of fair and balanced journalism yet.

    Get this!

    In practice, sex education classes in Polish state schools do not exist.’

    So the BBC would have us believe!

    Yet then they admit that schools DO have “family life education” classes, which may include sex education, often led by priests or nuns.

    So there IS sex education, just not the sort that decent British parents were up in arms about last year…

    Birmingham Brain-Wash – Another Judges V People Confrontation! 

    …or like that which caused uproar in Spain…

    Vox Battles School ‘Gay’ Brain-Wash – Spain’s Reds Rage! 

    ….also last year.

    And one final point the TFPC makes, which almost has one admiring the BBC for their sheer bloody impudence!

    They actually include a bit of belly-aching about the Polish state media, with which the current government in Warsaw has done a great job..

    Kruk, herself a former chair of the National Broadcasting Council, said that public media “falsely presented as public opinion” ideologies and political orientations that were not supported by the majority of voters….


    “The ethos rooted in Christianity and Polish traditions of freedom and independence is marginalised or discredited, while an ideological and moral fashion unacceptable to the majority of the population is ennobled,” she said.  https://euobserver.com/political/131689

    ….cleansing it of left-liberal creeps as described by Ms. Kruk, above, who were infamous for presenting biased hogwash.



    ….and who does that remind you of!

    And why is the BBC coven indignant?

    Because, they say, with no apparent sense of irony…

    Poland’s public broadcaster, Polish TV, is funded by the taxpayer and is bound by its charter to present balanced coverage of political events.  


    So may we ask why the BBC, for years and years…

    …but this year with almost manic escalation…

    ….has turned itself into a pinko pulpit, contemptuous of balance and aggressivly supporting every imaginable Enemy Within?

    • Tyler 22:55 on July 13, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      You took satisfying news and cooked up an enjoyable dish which I have savoured and will share with friends.
      Our old people are now being threatened by the BBC. British pensioners got a break over the licence fee for a while but now the BBC wants to make thempay.
      That’s despite GIANT salaries handed out to Maitlis and Embley and an even huger sum spent on that idiot sports commentator who drags his left opinions even into what he’s meant to be talking about.
      He’s supposed to be famous, but I have temporarily forgotten the fool’s name!

      Anybody not Left now hates the BBC with a burhing rage.
      Please keep your attacks going.


  • ross1948 20:47 on June 12, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , BBC censorship, Bill arkin, , , , stanley nelson jnr.   

    Endless BBC Dissimulation – ‘Military Analyst’ Arkin! 

    We had a look at CNN and its erratic attack-dog Fredo Cuomo earlier today.



    However, CNN’s Hate-Trump garbage is not funded by tax-payers, unlike…


    …we all know who!

    Driven by some masochistic impulse, back to BBC, in time to catch their ‘Sports’ section, little sport, alas, mostly ‘sports’ personalities whining BLM propaganda!



    Then their ‘film/documentary’ section, with more berks bleating about BLM, the worst being a bearded anti-polce bigot, the director the 2015 documentary The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution, one Stanley Nelson Jnr., a real nasty, whom I had already heard yesterday, ranting that the cops were seen as an ‘army of occupation’ in certain areas.


    Stanley Nelson Jr 2017.jpg

    Stanley Nelson Jr. 

    Guess which areas?

    Yes, those infested by gangs!

    Speaking of old brutes, Lewis Vaughan Jones, whose bias we observed a few days ago, had another ‘guest,’ identified on the screen only as a ‘military analyst!’


    Bill Arkin at University of Denver.jpg

    In actuality, William Arkin, according to a quick check, has fulfilled that role with the three most leftwing print media in the USA, the Los Angeles TimesThe Washington Post, and The New York Times.

    And if you take a look at the rest of Wikipedia’s outline of his antics, antics that go back to when Ronald Reagan was in the White House, you’ll soon see why the BBC wanted Arkin, rather than a non-politically partisan analyst.

    Arkin is viscerally hostile to Trump.

    As he made clear to LVJ, who of course expressed not a whiff of disagreement, no tough questions on his “guest’s” blatant bias!


    Nor any hope any analyst who likes Trump will ever get a similar, or any, hearing on the Bias Bleat Channel.

  • ross1948 20:43 on June 5, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , BBC censorship, , , ,   

    So NOBODY Objects To Toppling Robert E Lee? BBC Censorship! 

    That balding leftist bigot David Eades had a busy day Friday, slanted news oozing from every pore, near enough.


    As a history graduate (MA, Hons.,2.1, Politics and Modern History) I was maybe more interested than most in the official vandalism Eades described, in between his sycophantic inter-action with BLM ranting…



    ….the removal of the statue of the South’s great hero, General Robert E Lee, from its pedestal, done on the diktat by the Democrat Governor.

    We got to hear from that pathetic governor, we got to see callow buffoons capering around the statue’s base…


    The statue, unveiled in 1890, has become a gathering point for demonstrations over the past week, where protesters demanded justice for the police killing of George Floyd and the end of police brutality.  Protesters pictured waving signs at the base of the statue on Tuesday

    …we even got to see an ‘ordained minister’- ( yes, another one!)- a descendant of the hero, a real little lefty…

    …condoning the disrespect enacted against the great man’s memory.

    So NOBODY in Virginia dissented from this squalid betrayal of the state’s history?

    I don’t believe that!

    I firmly believe Eades and his bias-bigot comrades at the BBC were fully aware of opposition to the left-liberal desecration of Lee’s statue and deliberately suppressed it.


    Typical BBC indifference to every standard of impartial reporting.


    • Mort 21:07 on June 5, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Your guess is good.
      The BBC is a very dishonest broadcaster.
      They censored the anger of most Virginians not part of the Democrat governor’s squad.
      The state’s leading Republicans are up in arms.
      So much furious opposition to the removal of Lee’s statue and the BBC refuses to report it?
      Guilty as charged.
      Bias as bad as Pravda’s.


      • ross1948 21:14 on June 5, 2020 Permalink | Reply

        Thanks for the confirmation, Mort.
        I could have researched that on my own but much better if American readers show the swine up!
        The BBC has lost any shred of credibility this past week, not they have ever had much.


      • Fleur Charles 23:28 on June 5, 2020 Permalink | Reply

        To support what you say, Mort, nobody in Virginia except the far left Democrats and the BLM, who are mostly the same people, want that statue pulled down.


    • Ken Kasic 21:19 on June 5, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Check this out, Ross.


      Damning evidence of BBC censoring the true facts of the story.
      BBC = Fake News!


    • Harold Vincent 09:57 on June 6, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Well you know, you have me persuaded.
      If the BBC will go that far to slant their news, they are not to be trusted on anything.


  • ross1948 20:29 on October 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BBC censorship, , munchetty whiner, , , refusal to face critics   

    BBC Defines 'Racism' – With Dazzling Clarity…NOT! 

    So what, we must first ask, does the BBC mean by ‘minority?’

    Does it refer to us left-handed folks, or chess-players, or middle-aged white males…

    ( who are undoubtedly a minority – and one often subjected to bigot insults  – like that foul ‘Tory’ Claire Perry’s rant on behalf of Theresa the Appeaser –Ms Perry also backed the Prime Minister, who she said was “killing herself” to deliver a Brexit deal, while the “bunch of old white men no doubt are enjoying their morning coffee…”.  https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/101738/senior-minister-blasts-tory-backbench-  )

    …or does it just mean coloured people, aka ( in pinko-speak) ‘people of colour?’

    I was tempted to suggest the BBC might also mean sexual deviants.….

    Courtesy Of All You Brits – Special Bogs

    ….but that sort are probably near enough a MAJORITY of non-manual BBC employees by now!


    Minority staff and presenters at the BBC have been told by the corporation not to join in any form of protest supporting presenter Naga Munchetty…

    Fair enough! Best they shut their gobs and earn their excessive pay!

    But the way that assertion is framed makes it sound as if the majority staff were not so instructed.


    How long must we put up with the self-pity of this uptight leftist Munchetty, who’s both privileged and very well-paid?

    (over-paid? you decide; if you are a UK tax-payer, it’s you that’s paying her, whether you are a ‘minority’ or not! )

    I fear we must put up with her whining a while yet, if the half-baked wittering of the ‘BBC’s executive committee’ is any indication.

    The message said in part:

    “The BBC is not impartial on racism.”

    What the Hell?

    If they mean incitement to injure or kill innocent people because of their race, then fair enough.

    Equally, such incitement against innocents for ANY reasons should not be acceptable.

    But you all know how  ‘racism’ is imputed against anyone who calls for the law to been forced against illegal immigration…



    …AND against anyone who calls on alien settlers to shape up and adapt to the ways, embrace the identity, of those whose land they come into.

    Telling primitive aliens that they need to shape up, abandon backward beliefs…

     – e.g. about shrouding women’s heads in burqas and that their inability to exorcise the urge to remove anyone’s head who commits ‘blasphemy…’



    … is also categorised as ‘racism,’ especially since plain English has been so twisted by effete authorities that criticism of religion…




    …or at least one religion, is now reckoned also to be ‘racism!’

    So a precise definition is essential.

    And what do we get in the way of definition from the mush-noggins of the BBC’s ‘executive committee?’

    “Racism is not an opinion and it is not a matter for debate…. 


    Well, you’ll be waiting till Hell freezes over before anyone at the BBC will say the same about the poisonous ideologies of multiculturalism…




    …or cultural marxism, or marxism in general!

    But meanwhile, stand by for the anointed elite’s dazzling clarification about what may never be debated.

    Racism is racism.

    Aaah, now that that’s understood, speak freely!

    PS – You’d think after The Arrogant Eleven’s antics at the Supreme Court last week that we had heard quite enough from lousy lords.

    Not so, alas, because another un-elected upstart, Lord Hall, whom some eejit appointed to be big BBC boss…

    Tony Hall, Baron Hall of Birkenhead - Global Conference for Media Freedom (48256794687) (cropped).jpg

    Hall – BBC Director General,  ex Channel Four, AND since 2018, President of the European Broadcasting Union

    …has chosen to meddle in uppity Munchie’s case.

    He’s overturned the guilty verdict, so now she’s free to rant and whine as much as she likes.

    Hubristic Hall is known for his condescending contempt for critics.

    He refused no less than three times to face MPs who wanted to question him about the BBC’s vicious pro-EUSSR bias – why?

    Because he’s a lord!


    Eventually he was shamed into responsibility.

    Watch the belated hearing here…

    https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/a2aa652a-168b-4899-95ee-=”red”>BBC journalists to “express their concern at a climate of fear” at the organisation.

    • Diana 21:22 on October 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Was that fool of a lord appointed during Cameron’s time, or May’s?
      Who ever was running the country then was negligent in allowing him to take over our state broadcasting corporation.
      It’s time we took it back.


  • ross1948 16:47 on August 20, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , BBC censorship, pro-pervert Songs of Praise   

    Again, BBC Perverts ‘Songs Of Praise’ To Boost Their Bigot Bias! 

    I see no strong need to comment on this, from CfM. But I have to observe that the BBC is a disgraceful institution, a stranger to impartiality…


    bbc propag


    ….and venomously hostile to traditional values.

    Same-sex marriage remains a highly contentious issue, especially for Christians and those of other faiths. Around 1 in 200 places of worship in England and Wales is registered to hold same-sex weddings. So that’s 99.5% that aren’t.

    When it deals with controversial subjects, the BBC is supposed to “ensure a wide range of significant views and perspectives are given due weight and prominence”.

    Yesterday’s Songs of Praise focused on faith and marriage, and celebrated same-sex marriage. Though the presenter briefly mentioned that some people disagree, air time was only given to those who endorse it.

    Viewers were even told by one of the gay couples that those who don’t support same-sex marriage “just need to think about it, and they’ll get there one day”.

    Will the BBC now allow the alternative view to be aired “in output of a similar type and weight and in an appropriate timeframe”? No, I don’t think so either.

    Too bloody true, mate.

    And this perversion of the purpose of what should be a Sunday worship show is nothing new for what we used to refer to as the Bum Boys Club.



    After all, they could also be described as the Bludger-Boat-Cheerleaders!

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: