Tagged: Biased BBC Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 18:00 on June 28, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Biased BBC, , meaningless BBC reprimand   

    NewsNight’s Night-Hag, Unpunished Again! 


    How many UK media reports on Hancock’s disgrace referred to the canoodling ex-Secretary of State as ‘Matt? ‘

    Or to Labour’s Starmer as ‘Keith?’

    Or for that matter to GBN’s Mr. Neil as ‘Andy?’

    Yet when that hard-faced leftist hag Maitlis, caught out YET AGAIN…

    .

    Don’t Gag My Black Voice! Stacy Calls Out BBC’s Mannerless Maitlis

    These UK Pravda Scum Forget They’re Public Servants! 

    Emily has reportedly been reprimanded by BBC bosses after she was told she breached impartiality rules.

    https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1455347/Emily-Maitlis-breach-BBC-guidelines-Tory-Twitter-jibe-Piers-Morgan-latest-news

    ….flaunting her politically partisan prejudices, it’s “Emily?”

    And how many ‘reprimands’ ( which don’t get her pay docked for even a day!) will it take before the UK Pravda mandarins put her in her place….

     

    …which ought to be a garbage-bag?

     
    • Vanessa Reilly 18:42 on June 28, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      They are all bad but Maitlis is the worst. She practically sweats arrogance.
      NewsNight Hag is good.
      It describes both her looks and her nature!

      Like

  • ross1948 17:40 on September 10, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Biased BBC, , , ,   

    BBC Don’t Think Pelosi Meddling’s “Incredibly Provocative?” 


    Incredibly provocative!’

    That was BBC’s Vicky Young giving her impartial verdict on the British Government’s perfectly legitimate move on Ulster.

    But whom did it provoke?

    Britain’s adversaries, of course.

    .

    .

    The Brussels Empire does not like any challenge to its arrogance.

    The Remainers of the Labour, LibDem and SNP separatist parties, undoubtedly.

    But even Ms.Young had to admit that many a Brit will find no fault with the remedial legislation.

    Curiously, no BBC hack or hackette described Plastic Pelosi’s meddling in British affair ‘incredibly provocative!’

    .

    ..

    But young Vicky Young’s senior UK Pravda comrade Eades…

    .

    David Eades - David Eades Photos - SportAccord 2018 - Day 5 - Zimbio

    ( yes, him again!  So NOBODY Objects To Toppling Robert E Lee? BBC Censorship! )

    ……

    …was back on the screen at 11.30, quoting that old has-been John Major, ever-ready to jump through Europhiliac hoops as required…

    amajor

    …the PM who pled ignorance while his henchman Mayhew was up to his snobby neck in plotting sell-out with Sinn Fein/IRA…

    UKIP Un-British? Look At Major’s Record! 

    …then turning to John Fitzgerald, a Dublin professor, a typical BBC ‘expert,’ who waxed and wailed about how ‘serious’ the issue was, invoking Plastic Pelosi as one justification for his rant.

    Eades did the usual BBC trick, one ‘expert’ tearing into the proposed British legislation, and another…ooops, no other expert, with or without inverted commas, no balance at all!

    Their next guest was Nick Beak, BBC’s own Brussels correspondent, who told us how wounded were the feelings of the Euro-Commissars.

    Big deal!

    PS

    At that point, happy deliverance, a welcome visitor came to brighten my day, so no more BBC till nearly 3pm.

    When I switched the tv back on, another BBC hackette named Philippa Thomas was providing a platform for one of the X-Stinko gang, a man named Todd.

    She never once challenged his eulogy of that green lout outfit…

    ….never even tried to put him on the spot over the recent assault on press freedom.

     
    • meadowlark 22:47 on September 10, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      You’re mentally ill, cucktard.

      Like

      • ross1948 23:05 on September 10, 2020 Permalink | Reply

        Thanks for your considered opinions, most of which were incoherent, so I am simply affording you the chance to get your main point across.
        You also seem to lack patience as well as courtesy.
        Many commenters wait 24 hours or more before I get round to reading them.
        Have a nice day.

        Like

    • meadowlark 22:55 on September 10, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Why is my comment awaiting moderation? Why do you moderate comments if you are a terrorist-sympathizer who traffics in Neo-Nazi rhetoric and hate speech? How is that pro-Free speech?

      Approve my comments and you allow your hermit kingdom to collapse under the weight of democracy, fauxnarch, hide my comment and you admit you are a coward who fails to even pretend to have principles, and I have evidence of your cowardice that you cannot suppress.

      It is your choice, terrorist. Either way, keep up That Zaney Hatespeech, or your prison buddies will be dropping you like the Whites-Only soap you’ve forcibly inserted in your rabble-rousing trouser-flap, eh too, brute who is not U.S.?

      Like

      • ross1948 23:08 on September 10, 2020 Permalink | Reply

        I am publishing this latest outburst so normal people will appreciate why I cut much of the drivel out of your previous comment.
        Please take your meds and be calm.

        Like

      • Keith Milner 09:45 on September 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

        I would say that this comment comes from somebody who is seriously disturbed, bordering on criminally dangerous.
        If Meadow-Lurch is American, the FBI should be keeping an eye on him.

        Like

      • Amanda Adams 16:25 on September 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

        Why was your comment delayed? Because you are rude and stupid, but I think Ross looked it over and decided showing everyone what a twisted twit you are would do our cause no harm.

        Like

    • Mel Henderson 10:12 on September 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      If Antifa want to start commenting here, they should get somebody who can write in English, not an idiot who can’t even quote Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar correctly.
      Meadowlark must have skipped a lot of school.
      I think he has to understand that all bloggers have a purpose and Ross uses his to push causes he supports.
      When psychotics comment offering nothing but insults, no reason to publish those.

      Like

  • ross1948 21:49 on November 4, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Biased BBC, , , , loggers, murdered Indian, Sarah Shenker, Survival International   

    ‘NGO’ Pinko Slurs Bolsonaro, Carefully Cued By BBC’s Clever Maryam! 


    Some Indian ‘activist’ in Brazil was murdered last week, and the BBC duly reported the crime.

    But the slanted ‘news’ report on Sunday was a crime against the impartiality which the BBC is bound by its charter to observe.

    .

    ..

    The news-reader was named Maryam Moshiri, and very surprisingly  (not!) Maryam had invited an obscure far-left ‘NGO’ flunkey to comment – but clever old Maryam carefully sought to cover for her own typical BBC bias…

    Image result for maryam BBC"

    Maryam Moshiri

    =

    ….with that handy get-out clause –  ‘a lot of people saying’ – that the ‘rhetoric of President Bolsonaro’ was to blame!

    Very objective – NOT!

    After all, since Bolsonaro was elected by a majority of Brazilians this year…

    =

    Jair Bolsonaro

    ==

    …it could equally have been possible for ever-so-clever Maryam to interject that ‘a lot of people deny’ that their President is at fault…

    =

    ..

    …but Hell, this is the BBC we’re talking about!

    =

    Sure enough, the lefty shrilled back, picking up Maryam’s cue just like Little Miss Echo.

    ….it’s a genocide…..the racist rhetoric of Bolsonaro and his ugly business colleagues…encouraging, almost giving the greenlight…

    =

    Image result for sarah shenker survival international"

    The shrill was identified as one Sarah Shenker, as said an ‘NGO’ flunkey, of course, and to be fair to her, a check on her ‘NGO’ reveals that her rant is par for the course…

    =

    STOP BRAZIL’S GENOCIDE

    President Bolsonaro has “declared war” on Brazil’s indigenous peoples

    =

    Shenker and her ‘NGO’ are entitled to their opinions.

    BUT there was, of course, no chance, it being the BBC, of anybody appearing on a live link or in the studio who could exercise a right of reply to her rabid anti-Bolsonaro diatribe.

    =

    =

    That would surely be what ANY media purporting to be objective and even-handed would ensure.

    Who knows what the full story is?

    So it was loggers who did it?

    The murdered man had had a few run-ins with loggers, apparently, but that quarrel is essentially economic.

    Nothing to do with ‘racism!’

    BBC bias stinks.

     
    • Rusty Rollins 22:32 on November 4, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I know next to nothing about Brazil but I have to hand it to you, Ross, the way you catch them out in their dirty bias tricks.
      It shouldn’t need to be said that if this leftwinger gets to attack the Brazilian President so ferociously, he or one of his spokesmen get to answer back.
      I don’t know anyone who trusts the BBC to report fairly.
      The trouble is, there are a lot of people I don’t know and who don’t have the benefit of your eagle eye.

      Like

    • Nick Pryce 23:42 on November 4, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The bad media do that a lot – “‘a lot of people say’ ‘ – ‘widespread protests’ – ‘outrage around the world’

      Then you realise that it’s only ‘a lot’ of lefties, and the ‘world outrage’ is only to be found among journalists and politicals and unbalanced millennials!

      Most people never see through the dishonesty.
      Well done for drawing attention to it!

      Like

    • Uncle Oz 10:48 on November 5, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The BBC is as bad as Australia’s ABC.

      Like

    • Fiona F 15:43 on November 5, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Another very good example of how the BBC bias squad never takes a break from its mission.

      Like

  • ross1948 09:26 on March 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Biased BBC, data scandal, , , , Virgin trains,   

    Behind BBC’s Cover-Up Curtain – The Obama/Zuckwit Deal! 


    Just up and on the third black coffee, and already engaged in masochistic practices.

    =

    =

    Yes, watching the BBC!

    Big story, this Facebook ‘scandal,’ and whilst a certain schadenfreude is tempting ( due to my personal grudge against the ‘social media’ suppression of truths – Bare-Naked Girl? More Fun With Zuckwit’s Geekstapo! ) no real fun to dwell on it…

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =

    … because slimy little Zuckerberg, Obama’s ideological catamite, will still, like Obama, be rolling in cash, living a wealthier life-style than you or I can ever imagine.

    The REAL story is being more or less buried, not only by the BBC, but by most of the big media in Britain (apart from the Daily Mail)

    The hacks are giving it little or no prominence, instead turning their guns – surprise, surprise – on Donald Trump.

    =

    =

    So if you want to catch a glimpse of the truth behind the carefully-crafted controversy, try this.

    So where was the outcry when Obama mined Facebook?

    ==

    ==

    …or you prefer, pick up a copy of the Daily Mail.

    ‘They were on our side’: Obama campaign director reveals …

    Unless of course, you can’t!

    Which will be the case if you’re travelling by train, on any of the rail services operated by the infamously bigoted plutocrat…

    .

    Hasil gambar untuk richard branson brexit

    Hypocrisy! Boycott Vacuous Branson’s Virgin Products 

    Richard Branson, censor supreme and fanatic foe of Brexit, who, you may recall, has BANNED the Mail from his Virgin railways.

    Why Virgin Trains really wanted to stop selling the Daily Mail
    Spectator.co.uk 

     
    • Keith Milner 11:11 on March 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      The ABC in Australia is just as bad as the BBC in UK.
      Keep pushing their buttons, mate.
      It will get you tons of outrage from the left but a lot of people appreciate the way you goad these biased media and the politicians they support.

      Like

    • Lorne Marzio 15:20 on March 22, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      All this makes sense to those of us who expected ‘Zuckwit’ and the geekstapo ( did you invent that word. if so well done) to be using their power to help the bad guys. I hope millions of people will quit Facebook after this!

      Here’s a good link that suggests what ought to happen now.
      http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/21/zuckerbergs-fatal-error-not-leaving-everyone-hell-alone

      Like

  • ross1948 21:33 on December 5, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Auntie BBC, , Biased BBC, Destroy Trump, , , Mother Jones leftist magazine   

    A Leftist Lesbian Love Affair – ‘Auntie’ And ‘Mother Jones?’ 


    Further to our previous post around half an hour ago…

    …I regret having to go back to BBC bias once more but needs must.

    Do many people still remember how Brits used to refer to ‘Auntie’ BBC? I think the affectionate and slightly mocking term must have died out in the 1960s.

    Prior to then, the publicly-funded UK broadcaster, not having fallen under cultural marxist control, tended to be very respectable….

    =

    ======

    ….with its notables, like Lord Reith, and later Richard Dimbleby, regarded as avuncular, respectable figures – though the BBC was never addressed as ‘Uncle!’

    =============

    But these days?

    Is it ever called ‘Auntie?’

    The BBC is certainly not respected by Brit patriots…

    Katty Kay – One Bare-Faced BBC Liar! 

    Will the BBC EVER Be Pro-British?

    =

    In view of recent events it seems to be the case that, far from being respectable, ‘Auntie’ is locked in a sort of platonic lesbian love affair with Mother Jones.

    Mother Jones, as we noted in a previous post, is the dissimulative title of a far-left rag based in California, or as wikipedia says, a progressive American magazine!

    ===

    Gambar terkait

    We covered the ‘interview’ with its Mark Follman a while ago, a BBC hackette egging the pinko on by spouting her own bias –

    ‘It beggars belief that he (Trump) has nothing better to do.’    Bigoted, Biased BBC – ‘It Beggars Belief…” 

    ….and yesterday the BBC was at it again, hiding the true character of ‘Mother Jones’ – as they so often do.

    BBC At It Again, Hides Far-Left Guest’s Background! 

    What can one say?

    Follman was in free-flow prejudice mode yesterday, gabbling that Trump’s behaviour was ‘quite troubling‘ and salivating that, at ‘a certain point‘  it would be ‘untenable’ for Trump to be left in place at the White House.

    Yes, we know that lots of leftists in the USA hold such opinions.

    But if the BBC is going to give such Trump-haters a platform, it should not pretend the purveyors of anti-Trump prejudice are simply guests from a normal ‘news and views’ magazine…

    /

    Gambar terkait

    =

    …but admit the  truth, that Follmann, and his rag, are  fully-fledged members of the ‘Destroy-Trump’ movement.

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =

    Yet the BBC doesn’t do that, and won’t do that, because they are determined to exercise a malignant influence on their audience.

    Donald Trump has low ratings in UK polls. People don’t like him very much.

    Why?

    The grotesque bias of the BBC, kept in funds by the British people, and with a charter mandate to be fair, is one reason for that skewed view among the public.

     

     
    • Newman 00:07 on December 6, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Your brief analysis of why POTUS is unpopular in Britain, and in other Western European countries, may be brief but is certainly accurate.
      If people are fed a diet of prejudice, then, as one leftist said in a different context, they are what they eat, or become what they eat.

      Like

  • ross1948 11:40 on November 5, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Begdahl, Biased BBC, Eugene Fidell, ,   

    BBC Lets Scumbag Bergdahl’s Lawyer Rail At Trump! 


    Just had to sit through the BBC news…

    =

    =====

    …and no surprise that they allowed a rant from that filthy swine Bergdahl’s lawyer, Eugene Fidell, who accuses POTUS of ‘some of the worst misconduct.’

    =

    Gambar terkait

    Fidell

    =====

    Fidell was clearly delighted with the leading questions from the biased BBC, like how the loss of health benefits would impact the dishonourable dog!

    =

    How come he could don a clean shirt for his hero, but not shave off that mangy beard, which so resembles those of the evil scum below?

    ==

    =

    Oh, dear, dear ,dear, it was going to have such a tough effect on the poor cur, since he’s in a bad way.

    Who gives a sh-t? I’d say what Bergdahl did was a lot ‘worse conduct’ than any words of the President!

    Swanning off from your post?

    =

    ===

    And thereby causing decent soldiers to go in search, serious injury to real Americans thereby incurred?

    That hardly got a look-in on today’s BBC charade, with their need to get so much vitriol crammed in against President Trump…

    ===

    ====

    …for saying what all normal people, on both sides of the Atlantic, actually think!

    =

    =

    DEATH was the proper penalty, and it was not meted out.

    That court failed the USA by not sentencing Bergdahl to hang.

     
    • Ben Baniek 12:36 on November 5, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      I dont get why you Brits pay for this leftwing junk.
      We have terrible leftwing bias on CNN and most of the other channels but they are private businesses and nobody forces us to pay for them.
      There is the public broadcasting like NPR and that needs to go but its small fry and only egg-heads like to use it, unless theres a kids program.,

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: