NewsNight’s Night-Hag, Unpunished Again!

How many UK media reports on Hancock’s disgrace referred to the canoodling ex-Secretary of State as ‘Matt? ‘

Or to Labour’s Starmer as ‘Keith?’

Or for that matter to GBN’s Mr. Neil as ‘Andy?’

Yet when that hard-faced leftist hag Maitlis, caught out YET AGAIN…

.

Don’t Gag My Black Voice! Stacy Calls Out BBC’s Mannerless Maitlis! 

These UK Pravda Scum Forget They’re Public Servants! 

Emily has reportedly been reprimanded by BBC bosses after she was told she breached impartiality rules.

https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1455347/Emily-Maitlis-breach-BBC-guidelines-Tory-Twitter-jibe-Piers-Morgan-latest-news

….flaunting her politically partisan prejudices, it’s “Emily?”

And how many ‘reprimands’ ( which don’t get her pay docked for even a day!) will it take before the UK Pravda mandarins put her in her place….

 

—

…which ought to be a garbage-bag?

BBC Don’t Think Pelosi Meddling’s “Incredibly Provocative?”

’Incredibly provocative!’

That was BBC’s Vicky Young giving her impartial verdict on the British Government’s perfectly legitimate move on Ulster.

But whom did it provoke?

Britain’s adversaries, of course.

.

.

The Brussels Empire does not like any challenge to its arrogance.

The Remainers of the Labour, LibDem and SNP separatist parties, undoubtedly.

But even Ms.Young had to admit that many a Brit will find no fault with the remedial legislation.

Curiously, no BBC hack or hackette described Plastic Pelosi’s meddling in British affair ‘incredibly provocative!’

.

..

But young Vicky Young’s senior UK Pravda comrade Eades…

.

( yes, him again!  So NOBODY Objects To Toppling Robert E Lee? BBC Censorship! )

……

…was back on the screen at 11.30, quoting that old has-been John Major, ever-ready to jump through Europhiliac hoops as required…

…the PM who pled ignorance while his henchman Mayhew was up to his snobby neck in plotting sell-out with Sinn Fein/IRA…

UKIP Un-British? Look At Major’s Record! 

…then turning to John Fitzgerald, a Dublin professor, a typical BBC ‘expert,’ who waxed and wailed about how ‘serious’ the issue was, invoking Plastic Pelosi as one justification for his rant.

Eades did the usual BBC trick, one ‘expert’ tearing into the proposed British legislation, and another…ooops, no other expert, with or without inverted commas, no balance at all!

Their next guest was Nick Beak, BBC’s own Brussels correspondent, who told us how wounded were the feelings of the Euro-Commissars.

Big deal!

PS

At that point, happy deliverance, a welcome visitor came to brighten my day, so no more BBC till nearly 3pm.

When I switched the tv back on, another BBC hackette named Philippa Thomas was providing a platform for one of the X-Stinko gang, a man named Todd.

She never once challenged his eulogy of that green lout outfit…

• No Baton Charge? Herts Cops Need Chief With Cojones!

….never even tried to put him on the spot over the recent assault on press freedom.

‘NGO’ Pinko Slurs Bolsonaro, Carefully Cued By BBC’s Clever Maryam!

Some Indian ‘activist’ in Brazil was murdered last week, and the BBC duly reported the crime.

But the slanted ‘news’ report on Sunday was a crime against the impartiality which the BBC is bound by its charter to observe.

.

..

The news-reader was named Maryam Moshiri, and very surprisingly  (not!) Maryam had invited an obscure far-left ‘NGO’ flunkey to comment – but clever old Maryam carefully sought to cover for her own typical BBC bias…

…

Maryam Moshiri

=

….with that handy get-out clause –  ‘a lot of people saying’ – that the ‘rhetoric of President Bolsonaro’ was to blame!

Very objective – NOT!

After all, since Bolsonaro was elected by a majority of Brazilians this year…

=

Jair Bolsonaro

==

…it could equally have been possible for ever-so-clever Maryam to interject that ‘a lot of people deny’ that their President is at fault…

=

..

…but Hell, this is the BBC we’re talking about!

=

Sure enough, the lefty shrilled back, picking up Maryam’s cue just like Little Miss Echo.

….it’s a genocide…..the racist rhetoric of Bolsonaro and his ugly business colleagues…encouraging, almost giving the greenlight…

=

…

The shrill was identified as one Sarah Shenker, as said an ‘NGO’ flunkey, of course, and to be fair to her, a check on her ‘NGO’ reveals that her rant is par for the course…

=

STOP BRAZIL’S GENOCIDE

President Bolsonaro has “declared war” on Brazil’s indigenous peoples

=

Shenker and her ‘NGO’ are entitled to their opinions.

BUT there was, of course, no chance, it being the BBC, of anybody appearing on a live link or in the studio who could exercise a right of reply to her rabid anti-Bolsonaro diatribe.

=

=

That would surely be what ANY media purporting to be objective and even-handed would ensure.

Who knows what the full story is?

So it was loggers who did it?

The murdered man had had a few run-ins with loggers, apparently, but that quarrel is essentially economic.

Nothing to do with ‘racism!’

BBC bias stinks.

Behind BBC’s Cover-Up Curtain – The Obama/Zuckwit Deal!

Just up and on the third black coffee, and already engaged in masochistic practices.

=

=

Yes, watching the BBC!

Big story, this Facebook ‘scandal,’ and whilst a certain schadenfreude is tempting ( due to my personal grudge against the ‘social media’ suppression of truths – Bare-Naked Girl? More Fun With Zuckwit’s Geekstapo! ) no real fun to dwell on it…

=

=

… because slimy little Zuckerberg, Obama’s ideological catamite, will still, like Obama, be rolling in cash, living a wealthier life-style than you or I can ever imagine.

The REAL story is being more or less buried, not only by the BBC, but by most of the big media in Britain (apart from the Daily Mail)

The hacks are giving it little or no prominence, instead turning their guns – surprise, surprise – on Donald Trump.

=

=

So if you want to catch a glimpse of the truth behind the carefully-crafted controversy, try this.

So where was the outcry when Obama mined Facebook?

==

==

…or you prefer, pick up a copy of the Daily Mail.

‘They were on our side’: Obama campaign director reveals …

Unless of course, you can’t!

Which will be the case if you’re travelling by train, on any of the rail services operated by the infamously bigoted plutocrat…

.

Hypocrisy! Boycott Vacuous Branson’s Virgin Products 

…Richard Branson, censor supreme and fanatic foe of Brexit, who, you may recall, has BANNED the Mail from his Virgin railways.

Why Virgin Trains really wanted to stop selling the Daily Mail
Spectator.co.uk 

A Leftist Lesbian Love Affair – ‘Auntie’ And ‘Mother Jones?’

Further to our previous post around half an hour ago…

	Nasty Nabila Stars In BBC’s Hate-Trump Show!

…I regret having to go back to BBC bias once more but needs must.

Do many people still remember how Brits used to refer to ‘Auntie’ BBC? I think the affectionate and slightly mocking term must have died out in the 1960s.

Prior to then, the publicly-funded UK broadcaster, not having fallen under cultural marxist control, tended to be very respectable….

=

======

….with its notables, like Lord Reith, and later Richard Dimbleby, regarded as avuncular, respectable figures – though the BBC was never addressed as ‘Uncle!’

=============

But these days?

Is it ever called ‘Auntie?’

The BBC is certainly not respected by Brit patriots…

Katty Kay – One Bare-Faced BBC Liar! 

Will the BBC EVER Be Pro-British?

=

In view of recent events it seems to be the case that, far from being respectable, ‘Auntie’ is locked in a sort of platonic lesbian love affair with Mother Jones.

Mother Jones, as we noted in a previous post, is the dissimulative title of a far-left rag based in California, or as wikipedia says, a progressive American magazine!

===

We covered the ‘interview’ with its Mark Follman a while ago, a BBC hackette egging the pinko on by spouting her own bias –

‘It beggars belief that he (Trump) has nothing better to do.’    Bigoted, Biased BBC – ‘It Beggars Belief…” 

….and yesterday the BBC was at it again, hiding the true character of ‘Mother Jones’ – as they so often do.

BBC At It Again, Hides Far-Left Guest’s Background! 

What can one say?

Follman was in free-flow prejudice mode yesterday, gabbling that Trump’s behaviour was ‘quite troubling‘ and salivating that, at ‘a certain point‘  it would be ‘untenable’ for Trump to be left in place at the White House.

Yes, we know that lots of leftists in the USA hold such opinions.

But if the BBC is going to give such Trump-haters a platform, it should not pretend the purveyors of anti-Trump prejudice are simply guests from a normal ‘news and views’ magazine…

/

=

…but admit the  truth, that Follmann, and his rag, are  fully-fledged members of the ‘Destroy-Trump’ movement.

=

=

Yet the BBC doesn’t do that, and won’t do that, because they are determined to exercise a malignant influence on their audience.

Donald Trump has low ratings in UK polls. People don’t like him very much.

Why?

The grotesque bias of the BBC, kept in funds by the British people, and with a charter mandate to be fair, is one reason for that skewed view among the public.

 

BBC Lets Scumbag Bergdahl’s Lawyer Rail At Trump!

Just had to sit through the BBC news…

=

=====

…and no surprise that they allowed a rant from that filthy swine Bergdahl’s lawyer, Eugene Fidell, who accuses POTUS of ‘some of the worst misconduct.’

=

Fidell

=====

Fidell was clearly delighted with the leading questions from the biased BBC, like how the loss of health benefits would impact the dishonourable dog!

=

How come he could don a clean shirt for his hero, but not shave off that mangy beard, which so resembles those of the evil scum below?

==

=

Oh, dear, dear ,dear, it was going to have such a tough effect on the poor cur, since he’s in a bad way.

Who gives a sh-t? I’d say what Bergdahl did was a lot ‘worse conduct’ than any words of the President!

Swanning off from your post?

=

===

And thereby causing decent soldiers to go in search, serious injury to real Americans thereby incurred?

That hardly got a look-in on today’s BBC charade, with their need to get so much vitriol crammed in against President Trump…

===

====

…for saying what all normal people, on both sides of the Atlantic, actually think!

=

=

DEATH was the proper penalty, and it was not meted out.

That court failed the USA by not sentencing Bergdahl to hang.