Voter Fraud Reform – Guarded Optimism On Bojo’s First Steps!

It’s nearly Christmas and in the spirit of the Season of Goodwill, I offer a welcome to a few of Johnson’s sensible first steps…

Thanks, Bojo – Overseas Brits Get Rights Restored! 

…one of which we mentioned earlier but equally welcome is the proposed introduction of photo-ID at polling stations.

The lunatic irresponsibility – or dare we say self-interest? – of the useful reform’s opponents is stunning.

Campaigners accused the prime minister of taking action on an “imaginary” problem… 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-queens-speech-voter-id-polling-station-a9253386.html

Imaginary?!?

“Very Tall Figure – Full Islamic Burka – Voted 3 Times!” 

..

It would of course be better to ban the burka altogether, and not only for reasons of honest electoral practice.

But meantime, let’s be cheerful about this!

---

 

 

Swiss Feds Subverting Democracy!

There’s a rank smell coming out of those Alpine valleys, and it’s not some goat-cheese that’s gone off.

It’s subversion, and brazen subversion at that, the Swiss Federal Council showing contempt for the country’s democratic practices and principles, trying to ‘take the wind out of the sails of a popular initiative calling for a nationwide burqa ban.’

Patriots in Switzerland are up in arms over these arrogant elitists, because the duty of that Council is to implement a popular initiative which got significantly more than the 100,000 signatures needed to require a nationwide referendum on the issue.

Instead?

The in-crowd in Berne the Swiss ‘has rejected the initiative!’

The political establishment has dredged up a counterproposal, which was first mooted in late 2017 and is now up for consultation.

In a statement on that consultation process published on Wednesday, the Federal Council said it was “aware that covering the face can be problematic”. 

=

‘Problematic?’ Putting it mildly!

=

But the Council said it wanted “targeted action instead of a general ban on face coverings”.

In its statement, the government criticised the popular initiative for a nationwide burqa ban by saying it would see federal authorities overstepping their powers and entering into an area that was traditionally a matter for individual cantons.

But they added a few revealing comments to that defence of their antics, such as the feeble assertion that ‘Switzerland is a liberal society and the introduction of such a ban goes against that.’

Au contraire!

=

Switzerland, some Swiss might suggest, is a civilised European society!

Many, if not most, people, there as in much of Europe, have little time for ‘liberal’ nonsense, and cannot see how any coherent case can be made that masked primitives, or indeed  masked antifa red nazis, have some inexplicable ‘right’ to walk the streets alarming decent citizens.

Good people are speaking up…

…like Walter Wobmann, an MP for the patriot party, the SVP ( Swiss People’s Party) – he’s rightly denounced the plotters as ‘shameful’ and ‘slammed the Swiss government for failing to take account of the fact that the popular initiative would also address the problem of violent demonstrators and football hooligans who covered their faces.’

Good point! Red Nazi Antifa should certainly be included!

“In our culture, you show your face. The fact that you do this in front of the authorities is nothing new,” he said. https://www.thelocal.ch/20180628/swiss-government-outlines-counterproposal-to-burqa-ban,

 

More UN ‘Rights’ Rot! Naughty France Must End Bag-Head Ban!

Hey, It’s United Nations Day again…United Nations Day? Scrap That Organised Hypocrisy! …

…so let’s take look at another aspect of that evil entity.

===========

The UN committee is comprised of independent experts who ensure that countries comply with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The thing about the ‘rights experts’ whom the United Nations uses as anti-sovereignty hit-men is that the media reports their self-righteous and self-important hectoring of countries as if their opinions are any more worth listening to than a rat’s fart…

==

=

…but at the same time the media never seem too eager to report how much money these uppity flunkeys cost us.

It must be a pretty penny.

American readers will be a tad relieved that many of their pennies are now,  thanks to Donald Trump, no longer poured into the UN ‘rights’ sewer…

///

===

…but all you British and Canadian and Australian tax-payers are still stumping up, not only for the latest scandalous insults hurled at France…

==

=

…UN has ruled that France’s ban on the niqab – the Islamic veil that covers the face – is in breach of human rights and has ordered the country to review its legislation.

….but at similar previous nosey-parker nonsense against your own countries…

Hats Off to Larry! UN-Common Sense, After UN Backs Taliban Terrorist Khadr. 

UN Apparatchiks Champion ‘Asylum’ Bludgers – NAUGHTY Oz! 

The committee has given France 180 days to report back with an outline of what action it is going to take.

Yes, France, take your time, and wait and see, if Muppet Macron bends the knee.

====

“In particular, the Committee was not persuaded by France’s claim that a ban on face covering was necessary and proportionate from a security standpoint or for attaining the goal of ‘living together’ in society…” 

……..

Does the UN advertise these ‘independent rights expert’ jobs?

I have yet to see such an ad in the Situations Vacant columns of the Jakarta Post, but then…

A  . I don’t read the jobs section, being agreeably retired, and

B  . It is likely UN sticky-beak posts will be advertised in the larger Left media, the Guardian, NYT, Deutsche Welle, etc..

What qualifications are expected?

An endless capacity for sanctimonious bluster, obviously, as well as either innate or intensively self-taught double-standards, as with the demand just made on France to undo its bag-head ban.

Until the same committee declares for a worldwide ban on the shariah sexism which blights the lives of women in Dark Age dumps like Iran, civilised countries like France should tell the UN to take its diktat and…

 

Danes Get It Right – Burka Ban Hits Red Nazi Antifa Too!

Trust The Leftal, sorry The Local…

…to trivialise the burka ban coming before the Danish parliament by using a photo of some Danes wearing false leprechaun beards during a past St, Patrick’s Day event in Copenhagen.

=====

Or rather NEVER trust that leftist pro-crimmigrant web-rag, because even in their report under the photo, they are forced to acknowledge that the ban – aimed at all “comprehensively masking items” – including masks, helmets and false beards – in its current draft form names scarves and hats in cold weather and costumes as exclusions from proscription.

So the leprechaun costume beards are totally irrelevant at best, or deliberately obfuscating the true nature of the ban, at worst.

What The Leftal does NOT mention is the obvious plus to the inclusion of masks – that the evil Red Nazi gang that calls itself ‘Antifa’ would be covered.

==

 

 

Their cowardly thuggery is, more often than not, waged from behind masks and balaclavas, so any such affront in future would render them liable to immediate arrest.

A pity that the penalties are not tougher thana fine of 1,000 kroner or up to three months in prison.

The arguments against the ban appear to be that there are not that many primitive bag-heads in Denmark, so why bother…

=

One example surely suffices!

==

…..while a former Venstre (Liberal) Party minister, Eva Kjer Hansen, claims that ‘banning specific items of clothing is against fundamental liberal values!’

https://www.thelocal.dk/20180126/denmarks-burka-ban-could-also-forbid-masks-and-fake-beards

=

Ms. Hansen is entitled to her opinion, but most sensible people have surely had more than enough of ‘liberal values,’ which are what has got the Western world into the mess it’s in.

Nor can I see how having these pathetic creatures flaunting their backward mentality in the streets of a civilised country accords with ‘liberal values.’

—

Their appearance is grossly offensive to normal people, especially, I’d suggest, normal women, since it clearly affirms the second-class status of the wearers, toddling along behind men who feel free to dress like people. .

It will go before parliament in due course.

Fingers crossed it passes.

Offensive London Hijab ‘Victim’ Should Apologise NOW!

Much ado about a woman in a jilbab ( which is what we in Indonesia call the hijab) being told to remove it by a Mcdonald’s security guard.

I find his action surprising, because a head-scarf is not an uncommon thing for women in Britain to wear.

====

=

Whilst burka bag-heads should of course be excluded from as many places as possible, not least every civilised country, a hijab is a mere head-scarf, and in no way a security risk.

=

=

Would the security man bar HM Elizabeth, By the Grace of God, Defender of the Faith, from entering the Golden Arches?

The man seems to have made a mistake, obviously, but for reasons not yet obvious.

Nevertheless, his face has been plastered all over the media, he’s been suspended and the local idiot council is pondering a licensing witch-hunt against every Mcdonalds in their borough….

/

/

…wittering that they will also rally more people and companies to sign up to its anti-hate crime pledge.

Hate-crime?

Grow up, for God’s sake!

AND the vengeful scarfy – who is desperate not to identify herself and whom the media are obliging by hiding exactly what she looked like when the incident occurred – is also ranting that-

 ‘It’s not enough.’ 

“If you want to dress modestly, you should have the right to dress modestly and it shouldn’t be politicised,” said the 19-year-old.    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-42242272

Ignore the leftist councillors’ blatantly politicised witch-hunt plotting.

Focus on what that ‘victim’-bint said about….

MODESTY!

It’s NOT about ‘modesty!‘

=

Who would refuse entry to this honey?

=

It’s about head-scarfing.

To equate head-scarfing with ‘modesty‘ is to insult every normal British woman, Muslim, Christian or whatever. It’s a grossly offensive assertion to suggest that, if a girl goes out with her God-given crowning glory uncovered, she’s somehow being immodest.

The whiner bint is talking obnoxious tommy-rot.

As to the babbling rabble of ‘Londoners’ demonstrating at the Mcdonalds, where were they when that ignoramus Tesco employee…

‘He pointed at the ham and wine in my basket and said “I can’t serve you that because I’m fasting. When I told him he should be serving customers not turning them away he still refused telling me to go to the self-service. I was furious.’

Tesco Covers for Bigot Staff After Sectarian Snub to Shopper!

…refused to do his job and invoked sectarian bigotry as an excuse.

Those shrills in Holloway Road have a legal right to protest, but it would be a welcome sign that they are genuinely interested in religious tolerance…

=======

• 

• …if they simultaneously made it clear that in a free society, women, Muslim or not, are absolutely free to wear AND NOT to wear scarves, and that it is downright obnoxious to suggest that the absence of a scarf indicates an absence of ‘modesty.’

• That teenage shrill should be told to make a public appearance and APOLOGISE!

Yes! Swiss Bag-Head Ban To Include Red Nazi Antifa!

Hurrah for the Swiss in St Gallen, where regional legislators earlier this month approved a bag-head ban, which not only slaps down  primitive burka-bints…

=

=

….but also prohibits anyone from covering their face in public if they present a security risk or threaten social or religious peace

So that can be used to hammer Red Nazi Antifa scum, internationally infamous for launching attacks on patriots whilst concealing their cowardly countenances…

=

…as our selection of photos confirms!

What is truly shocking about the Swiss canton’s admirable action, however, is the slim majority by which it passed, a mere 57 to 55 vote on second reading.

Even Switzerland, it seems, has a large Enemy Within element among its own citizens!

As usual, liberal media hacks have expressed indignation, one local editor whining that it’s wrong for cops to have to make an “instant assessment” as to whether a person who covers their face is a threat. 

What’s wrong with that?

Cops are trained to assess situations where trouble is likely. An arrogant bag-head, flaunting her sectarian triumphalism, is not hard to spot.

=

 

Nor are louts like those in our photos!

Meanwhile, better still, that citizens’ initiative rolls on, having got enough support to force a nationwide referendum, on a proposal which, delightfully, goes further than St Gallen’s new rule in that there is no assessment of risk — instead it proposes a general ban on covering the face in public, apart from certain exceptions for health, safety or the weather.

That’s what all civilised countries should be doing, and also looking at the sexist shairah aspect, the subjugation of women.

=

The potential new law would also ban anyone from forcing another person to cover their face because of their gender.

 

https://www.thelocal.ch/20171129/st-gallen-approves-conditional-ban-on-face-coverings-burqa

Skol! Danes Plan Ban On Shariah Shrouding!

Less than a quarter of Danes oppose a ban on the burqa and niqab, according to a new survey. 

That’s shocking. One-fifth of the populace unwilling to impose such a common-sense prohibition on such a primitive practice?

What on earth is wrong with those people?

Surely sane citizens in every civilised country want to see this sexist degradation, whereby women shroud their heads while men do not, stamped out.

Most Danes are sane, however.

———

 A majority of the population support banning the two types of Islamic veil in public, according to an opinion poll carried out by Epinion on behalf of broadcaster DR.

https://www.thelocal.dk/20170929/majority-of-danes-want-to-ban-burqa-survey

The key question is, will the government, the elected representatives of the Danish people, ACT to implement the 62 percent who support a full ban on wearing the burqa and niqab in public?

The patriot party, the Danish People’s Party (DF) plans to renew moves to get head-shrouding outlawed.

But they need votes from other parties, which is by no means guaranteed, although, surprisingly, the Social Democrats may do the right thing.

Their Mattias Tesfaye made encouraging noises on the subject. “I am provoked myself when I see a woman in a burqa. Not so much by the woman, but by what it stands for. I actually perceive it as a form of prison.

WELL SAID!

oooo

Tesfaye

oooo

Yet Tesfaye went on to admit that his party “had not clarified its position in regard to whether it supports a general ban…”

But now we read that ALL the likely partners in the new government coalition have listened to the people. “Everyone agrees that the burqa is an expression of extreme oppression of women..”

https://www.thelocal.dk/20171006/denmark-government-announces-support-for-burqa-ban

So says Liberal Alliance party leader Anders Samuelsen.

=

=

Austria and France have gone ahead and done the right thing.

Maybe if Denmark follows suit, Theresa May ( if she’s still PM! )will be shamed into renouncing her support for shariah law…Theresa May hails ‘benefits’ of Sharia as inquiry set up …at least in this respect.

Grüß Gott, Oesterreich, A Blessedly Burqa-Free Land!

Glad tidings today, from Vienna, where the long-awaited burqa ban comes into effect.

ooooooooooo.

=

There are appropriate exemptions to the new rule, such as  clown disguises “at cultural events”, work wear such as medical masks, and scarves in cold weather, but the good thing is that the sensible move is not merely based on security concerns, important though those may be.

Nor even on the risk of voter fraud, as has happened in other countries like the UK.

=======

“Very Tall Figure – Full Islamic Burka – Voted 3 Times!” 

“Acceptance and respect of Austrian values are basic conditions for successful cohabitation between the majority Austrian population and people from third countries living in Austria…”  

Austria claims new burqa ban promotes ‘acceptance and respect of Austrian values’

Good!

Uncivilised behaviour should not be acceptable in civilised societies.

But it’s a pity that violations will be punished with a fine of up to €150 ($177).,which is a ridiculously soft sentence.

=

=

A spell behind bars might better sharpen up the dull wits of any backward bint who chooses to prowl the streets of Vienna resembling an animated bin-bag.

 

Long Live Erwin Lötscher, Oldy But Goody!

[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[

If you’re retired and miss the structure that work used to give you, or just wake up some mornings feeling that your best days are behind you…

=

=

…, as happens to the best of us, though usually only the morning after a dashed fine party, think again.

In fact think of the admirable gent in the photo above,  Herr Erwin Lötscher, aged 76, who single-handedly got over 9000 signatures for the Swiss citizens’ initiative that should give his fellow-countrymen and women a chance to ban the burqa by referendum.

=

=

The organisers had to reach a total of 100,000 within a specified time limit and were still short as the deadline drew nigh.

But any gloating leftists, salivating at what they devoutly hoped would be the demise of the democratic exercise, had reckoned without the commitment and determination of the septuagenarian patriot.

==

Now it goes to the Federal Council to ensure all paper-work is in order and, if that works out, soon every Swiss will be able to determine whether or not primitive bag-heads will be free to prowl their streets.

Good for you, Erwin!

http://www.luzernerzeitung.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/mit-sammelwut-zum-burkaaverbot;

How Dare Germany Be German? Left-Lib Nut-Jobs Rant!

Mein Gott!

What audacity, for a German politician to be heard calling for a “German dominant culture,” or “leitkultur.”

Next we’ll be hearing Chinese politicians making brazen demands for China to have a Chinese dominant culture, or some outrageous call in Egypt for an Egyptian dominant culture.

Then some Nepalese will get the arrogant notion that the idea of a Nepalese dominant culture is worthy of consideration!

========

======

Such monstrous violations of the multicult ideology will, as in Germany this month, surely provoke fierce criticism!

NOT!

It’s only in the historic nations of Christendom that uppity exhortations to preserve national identity could possibly provoke rabid rants from lawmakers across the political spectrum.

What actually does reflect audacity is the the identity of the man whose words are being condemned .

==========

“We say our names,” de Maiziere wrote. “We shake hands. We are an open society. We show our face. We are not the burqa.”

 

000000

Admirable sentiments indeed!

But the sentiments come ill from one of Mama Stasi Merkel’s head honchos, a champion of the Lugenpresse, the lying media who cover up crimmigrant atrocities.

Merkel’s Muppet ‘Warns’ Germans -“Lay Off Our Lying Press!” 

Maiziere has collaborated with HMV from the moment she violated German and European law by throwing their country open to a horde of aliens…

…….

…….

…and he must share responsibility for the rape, murder and mayhem inflicted by so many of the savages on innocent Germans, especially German women and girls.

• 

The criticism he’s getting ranges from idiotic rants to ill-informed sniping, like this from a liberal politician likely to be in Mama Stasi’s  coalition if she wins the parliamentary election this year.

---

“Once again, it’s about religion,” Christian Lindner, the leader of the Free Democrats,  told the public broadcaster ARD in response.

 http://www.dw.com/en/german-interior-ministers-call-for-leitkultur-draws-fierce-criticism/a-38655517

Religion?

Because he mentions the burqa?

I spend most of my days going to and fro around the capital of the world’s largest Muslim majority nation. I rarely see a burqa in Jakarta, and then it’s almost always shrouding the head of some wretched Arab’s spouse!

Only primitives wear burqas!

Or at least, the wives of primitives, whom really we should pity, subjugated thus at the whim of their bigot husbands.

True, these sad creatures, if asked, will blame their sexist subordination on their ‘religion.’

Just as the obnoxious brats we’ve reported on, in schools in Germany…

Another Brat Exposes Mama Stasi’s Folly! 

……….

…and Switzerland –Swiss School Panders To Sectarian Brats!    try to justify their ignorant, ill-mannered refusal to shake a lady teacher’s hand by invoking their ‘religion.’

Again, I shake hands with loads of Muslim women here, and often do the cheek-to-cheek mini-kiss, and I can think only of a handful of churlish bints – one a Canadian ‘convert,’ sadly – who declined to touch my perfectly clean hand.

So it AIN’T ‘religion.’

It’s barbarous, backward and anti-social, and those who insist on importing such practices should be told they’re unwelcome in civilised countries.

But you’ll be six feet under if you hold your breath waiting for Maiziere to declare that deportation of these undesirables is due to commence.

======

 Frauke

——————

AfD’s Frauke Petry puts it perfectly.

“De Maiziere’s model: Torpedo German leitkultur in the legislature, play the big defender of culture two weeks before the election…”

Actually, we have a few months still before the election, but otherwise she’s right – this is all about Mama’s cabal trying to con the voters on the issue of crimmigration.