Cockatoo Vote Fraud Bad – Human Vote Safeguards…Bad Too?

The Guardian is a God-Awful newspaper…

Guardian Jackboot Bigot Calls Brexit Brits “Thugs!=

Guardian’s Nick ‘Storm-Troop’ Cohen.

Guardian Bigot- “Don’t Even Acknowledge Patriot Point Of View!” 

….a bastion of intolerant leftism…

Middle-Aged Posh Dirty-Mouth -‘Politicians Mustn’t Appeal To The People!’ 

…..as well as home to gibbering blue-blood pinkolettes.

But it can usually be relied on to be consistent in its cacophonous caterwauling.

 This week, however, its various editions ( it is globalist but has regional issues) take interestingly different tones on the problem of voting fraud.

In the USA, there’s a long rambling diatribe about how the wise moves in various states to ensure that votes are cast only by those properly entitled to vote are, in fact, cruelly calculated schemes aimed at “suppressing the votes of the poor, the young and the non-white..

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/10/the-guardian-view-on-voter-suppression-the-battle-for-democracy

That’s hogwash, of course.

There is much legitimate concern in America about illegal aliens getting to vote ( no doubt for those candidates who despicably pander to such parasites) …

UK Labour Joins US Dems Voter Fraud Fan-Club! 

  U.S Elections – Citizens Out-Voted by Obama’s Illegals? 

–

…as has been known to happen even in Merry England!

“Very Tall Figure – Full Islamic Burka – Voted 3 Times!” 

….and sensible state legislatures have drawn up measures to prevent the crime.

None of the measures, needless to say, singles out poor people, nor young people, nor non-white people.

Yet what a different sort of shrilling we hear from Guardian Australia!

Fierce concern all over the page about fraudulent activity in respect of ‘The Australian Bird Of The Year.’

Why any such contest exists baffles me.

Who cares which of the many fine feathered friends is best, and what qualities are counted?

=

=

Cockatoos flying by the house at sun-down impressed me but not my hosts, who dissed them as ‘noisy buggers,’ a year ago when last I visited.

My admiration for the ibis, which abound in Aussie public parks, was also not shared. The birds so prominently glorified…

….in Egyptian mythology were disparaged as ‘bin-chickens!’

But the contest seems, inexplicably, to be a big thing in Oz!

The Guardian’s own devices have apparently ‘detected and addressed significant vote-tampering..’

….and last Sunday alarm increased when ‘a spike in the vote count for the cockatoo was observed by readers and flagged with us…’

https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2019/nov/11/voter-detected-in-guardians-australian-bird-of-the-year-poll

Who would be so lame-brained as to commit voter fraud in a bird contest?

 

But good the Guardian wants it to be a fair fight, without fraud.

So why are their American counterparts dead set against keeping American elections clean?

/ –

UK Labour Joins US Dems Voter Fraud Fan-Club!

Corbyn’s comrades can’t even be original!

They’ve started carbon-copy cribbing from the USA Media-Democrat phrase-book

– “voter suppression”.    U.S Elections – Citizens Out-Voted by Obama’s Illegals? 

– as they carp about the proposed new law requiring voters to present photo ID.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/13/conservatives-accused-of-election-rigging-leaked-id-plans-voter-fraud

Labour lay themselves wide-open to accusations of indifference to grotesque voting fraud…

.

…as has been known to happen!

“Very Tall Figure – Full Islamic Burka – Voted 3 Times!” 

Corbyn is either blind to or happy about the prospect of any number of such bogus electors showing up at polling  stations, shrouded like primitive aliens, claiming to be whomsoever.

The government’s reform is well-intentioned and may well do some good.

But would it not be all the better were Boris Johnson to act positively, on his own stated recognition that burkas are an affront to civilised society?

=

 

Ban them.

 

Lucky London Ontario’s Excellent Muslim Man!

Canadian readers, focused on the national election coming up soon, may remember how the so-called ‘Conservative’ leader, Ed ‘Shifty’ Scheer, infamous for his supine stance on more than a few issues…

Petition To Shifty Scheer – Defend Free Speech From Turdo! 

Scheer

Conservative leader’s free speech pledge wouldn’t apply in U of T ..

….issued a diktat to his membership in London Ontario.

The Tory Party told them to purge their candidate, one of the best-known Muslim voices in the land.

…

Professor Salim Mansur   

The Wrong Kind Of Muslim? Salim Vetoed By Truthophobic Tories! 

Professor Mansur is a distinguished academic as well as a patriotic, principled Muslim, so the jelly-fish Tories’ loss is the PPC’s gain.

Maxime Bernier welcomed Mansur aboard the fledgling People’s Party of Canada, and what a great candidate this guy’s turned out to be.

.

The professor speaks for millions of Canadian.

====

The ‘protecting freedoms’ pillar of Mansur’s platform declares “any garment covering the full face to be un-Canadian, requiring its removal in public spaces.”

Other proposals call for “more stringent vetting” of immigrants and for increased border security to stop “the flow of illegal migrantS

shttps://westerngazette.ca/news/emeritus-prof-brings-controversy-with-new-political-bid/article_d8b64964-b94b-11e9-99ce-23de62f2c6fc.html

That’s exactly what Canada needs.

Swiss Judges Rule Against Democracy!

=====

So now we read that another court in another country has ruled democracy out of order.

…

The Swiss Supreme Court has interdicted a referendum in Valais Canton on the burqa issue, despite the Swiss People’s Party (SVP) having followed constitutional rules and gathered enough signatures (over 4,000) to give citizens a vote on ‘head coverings’ in schools.

…

…

But it’s not just the court to blame – the SVP’s opponents in the cantonal legislature also rejected any right by the people to have a vote.

Every Swiss patriot should descend on the Federal Court headquarters to  show their solidarity with the voters of Valais…

..

What is most offensive about the ruling, and most disturbing, is that one of the reasons the high court gave for ruling against the people was ‘international law!’

No international statute should be permitted to supersede the rights of a sovereign nation.

.

No citizenry should be jackbooted out of their democratic rights because of some supranational convention!

Even less so when the court confuses a right to religious liberty with the ‘right’ to flaunt one’s ( or some parent’s! ) sectarianism.

Listen to this.

.’..the Federal Supreme Court said that the wearing of headscarves indicated a religious conviction and that the Swiss constitution enshrines religious freedom.’

OMG

We have been making the truth known time and again over the years, that there’s NO obligation on Muslim girls to cover either their hair or their faces! 

An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

When will they ever learn?

The good news is that ‘another popular initiative calling for a nationwide ban on such garments is due to be voted on in a referendum.’

Unfortunately, there’s no date yet named for the national ballot…

…but unless some Alpine version of Project Fear is unleashed against the electorate, it should be a clear victory over imported alien customs.

The report tells us that a poll a couple of years ago showed more than SEVENTY PER CENT will vote to approve a ban on face coverings.

 

Another Muslim Voice of Reason, In Denmark!

It may well be that Denmark’s ‘integration advisor,’ Uzma Ahmed, a Muslim, was “sad” to find herself in agreement with the Danish People’s Party, but she has earned respect and applause from good people everywhere by her recent uncompromising statement.

“As a woman, I know that the burqa is suppressive. It is a misogynist method to suppress the function of women in society,” she said, adding that there is a need to stop “that kind of radical thinking” within Muslim society.

BBC cross-examines Danes on integration policy

…

Women like Uzma Ahmed are the best weapons to overcome ‘Islamophobia,’ and I wish there were there more like them…

 

As Top Tories Grovel – UK Muslim Woman Talks Sense

As Theresa May’s running-dogs, not least that liberal klutz Brandon Lewis…

——

• ooooooooooo

• ….maintain their witch-hunt against Boris Johnson because of the latter’s entirely rational criticism of the offensive baghead phenomenon, launching ‘investigations….’

• 

• ….and planning indoctrination sessions for grass-roots party members who might dare find something amiss about certain aspects of an imported creed…

]]]]]]]]

oooooooo

…suddenly we come across a stout declaration of good sense from a former Deputy Mayor of London, a Muslim lady!

Munira Mirza: Critiquing Islamist fundamentalist practice is not an ‘attack on Muslim women’

Writing about Boris Johnson, she says….

‘…what he refused to do was pretend to be neutral about the burka itself. He didn’t use clever words to avoid expressing his views, as politicians often do. He said what he believed, and in doing so, expressed what many people – including crucially, many Muslim women – believe…’

https://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2018/08/munira-mirza-critiquing-islamist-fundamentalist-practice-is-not-an-attack-on-muslim-women.html

This woman understands that free speech on religion is important.

[[[[[

———

A lot of aliens in the UK do not share that view, and they should be deported to some more congenial country, where they can hate to their hearts content.

Brilliant Exposure Of Burqa Hypocrisy!

I have to hand it to Leave EU  ( to whom serious freedom-fighters should donate –  www.leave.eu    info@leave.eu ) for their latest bulletin on the Boris/Burqa shock/horror story.

Apart from the obviously objectionable aspects, like media indifference to the fact that most Brits favour a bag-head ban, the bulletin spotlights examples of Remainiacs, like Kenneth Clarke and that Thornberry woman…

=

=

…making equally critical comments on head-shrouders, and in Clarke’s case, the ghastly shrew Anna Soubry mounting her broomstick….

=

Soubry defended fellow Remainer Ken Clarke

——-

…and leaping to the defence of Clarke when he called out the awful alien garb…

=

=

Such a stunning contrast with her shariah-grovel shrilling over Boris Johnson’s perfectly reasonable comments!

=

I do not share Leave EU’s admiration for Mr. Johnson. He has, to say the least, shown a lack of consistency on various issues in the past…

=

Boris – A Worm Who’s Turned Every Which Way But Right…

…but on the current controversy, artificially stimulated by a biased media, he deserves support.

Normal people shudder when these primitives parade their backwardness…

=

…and it’s high time, for ALL kinds of reasons…

“Very Tall Figure – Full Islamic Burka – Voted 3 Times!” 

…that Britain followed the French and Danish examples and told them to enter the 21st century or exit the UK.

Wooden Shoes Good, Bag-heads Bad – Bravo, Holland!

Nice one, The Netherlands!

• 

=

Following on from the French ban on the ugly alien head-shroud, and don’t forget the Belgians, now Dutch legislators have imposed a ban…

=

• 

=

….not complete enough…

Dutch parliament approves partial burqa ban in public places 

…but it’s a start, on the burka.

We’d like to think Britain would follow suit, but given Theresa the Appeaser’s enthusiasm for shariah law, I suppose we have to wait a while.

Sorry, Barnaby Joyce – Appeasement Is No Argument!

A narrow defeat for common sense in Australia, where federal conference of the National Party voted by 55-51 not to support a burqa ban.

=

=

Although George Christensen MP pointed out the obvious security risks of allowing head-shrouded undesirables to roam about ‘in government buildings and other public spaces,‘

It seems the delegates in Canberra preferred to follow their party leader, Barnaby Joyce, whom, in the past, I have defended, when he was insulted by that hideous ABC leftist Triola…

Just Asking- Does Red Vixen Trioli Yet Leech Off ABC’s Public Purse? 

Virginia Trioli 

===

…but henceforth I may be reluctant to take up bloggy cudgels on his behalf.

I quote the Deputy Prime Minister’s deeply principled ‘hands-off-the-bag-heads’ argument.

=

====

Barnaby Joyce says banning the burka could damage Australia’s trade relations with Islamic countries, including Saudi Arabia And Indonesia..

.http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-09/joyce-slaps-down-burka-ban-push-citing-trade-relations/

I’m tempted to observe that it’s a bit offensive to bracket Indonesia  (where I’ve lived happily for nearly two decades, and where perhaps 1 or 2% of women wear the revolting head-gear) with an absolute sectarian monarchy where women are such second-class citizens that, last I heard, they’re not allowed to drive a car!

So Saudi Women CAN Look Like Women!?! 

But let’s move on.

Since when do Australians tailor their domestic laws and customs to keep in with foreign countries?

If Joyce had come out openly saying he thinks that shariah sexism is just jim-dandy…

=

=

…I’d be disgusted, but somehow muster a modicum of respect for his candour.

But he doesn’t say that. He’s quoted in another newspaper as opposing a ban ‘despite disliking the burqa.’

So for Barnaby it’s not about security or about rescuing women from a barbaric dress-code, but merely a matter of dollars and cents?

One is obliged to ask just how low Australia’s Deputy PM is prepared to sink to appease Saudi Arabia.

Please note the Saudis have a bad record of arrogant intrusion into the internal affairs of more civilised countries.

=

=

Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries accused Norway of doing too little to protect its Muslim minority, with Saudi Arabia calling for all criticism of religions or their prophets to be made illegal.

 https://www.thelocal.no/20140429/saudi-arabia-asks-norway-to-ban-slurs-on-prohets

What next, Barnaby?

 

Bag-Head Ban Includes Red Nazi Antifa! But Why Only Schools?

Excellent news, at first sight, that Norway’s government on Monday proposed a bill to ban the full-face Muslim veil…

=

=

Nobody wants primitives roaming the cities of any civilised country. Women committed to backward sexism may adhere to such a way of life if they so wish –  in backward sexist countries!

———-

But there’s more – the ban includes balaclavas, the coward-garb of choice for the red nazi scum who call themselves Antifa!

=

Antifa red nazi scum in Dover, UK

=

These marxist vermin, familiar foul features in Europe and Australia, have recently been prominent in assaults on free speech in the USA.

Anti-Trump? Flag-Burning Antifa Scum Are ANTI-AMERICAN! 

High time their thuggery was curbed, and given their yellow-belly need to hide behind balaclavas and similar gear, we might see less of them if their masks are outlawed.

Mind you, banning Antifa altogether has its merits! Designate Red Nazi ‘Antifa’ As Terrorists! Petition! 

But the bag-head ban only applies in schools, from nurseries to universities, and the rationale is merely that  it hinders communication between students and teachers….

“We do not want clothes covering the face in nurseries, schools and universities,” said Minister of Education and Research Torbjørn Røe Isaksen.

==

=======

“These clothes prevent good communication, which is important for students to receive a good education.”

And three cheers too for Per Sandberg, Immigration/Integration Minister – “Clothes covering the face, like the niqab and the burqa, have no place in Norwegian schools.“

=

Per Sandberg

=

No doubt.

But communication counts for a lot in society as a whole. Moreover, it’s not JUST communication that’s at stake.

There’s absolutely no argument to be made for allowing fanatic freakos or Antifa animals to prowl about behind masks of any kind,anywhere, for any reason.

========

=

AND it’s a major security risk.

Meanwhile, there’s a way to go, not just in the legislative time-table, whereby it’ll be next year before it’s law. There’s also the odd fact that at this stage, the bill does not lay out consequences for disregarding the proposed law. https://www.thelocal.no/20170612/norway-to-ban-full-face-muslim-veil-in-all-schools

How about ten years behind bars – with the option, for those convicted, of deportation?.