Tagged: C4M Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 13:52 on October 7, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , C4M, ,   

    PayPal Further Exposed As Enemy Of Decency – Boycott! 


    Thanks to C4M, a bit more about the fanatic left record of PayPal, adding to our argument that their tactical retreat….

    PayPal Wolverines Back Off – But Remain Rabid! 

    ….is only that, and they should be subjected to a total and permanent boycott.

    PayPal is well known for taking sides on marriage and transgenderism, with critics of transgender ideology among those summarily demonetised by the company, and the company having donated $50,000 to the campaign for same-sex marriage in Australia.

    PayPal has teamed up with censorious American outfits like the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, which routinely call for the closing down of viewpoints expressing support for real marriage or opposing transgender ideology, smearing them as ‘extremist’ and ‘hateful’.

    Those two Enemy Within groups have featured here often enough…

    Chicago Witch-Hunt – ADL Schmucks Smear Jews

    SPLC – A Hate Group Extraordinaire 

    …and it’s time that good citizens helped make known that ‘southern poverty’ is not a big concern for the SPLC, whilst the ADL is more into defamation than ‘anti-defamation.

    PS

    As always when I use C4M as a source, I append their appeal for funds to help their good work.

    …you can do so using the button below.

    PLEASE DONATE
     
  • ross1948 14:38 on July 30, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: C4M, , L&Q Housing, Lewisham mayor candidate, Maureen Martin,   

    UK Gaystapo War On Free Speech 


    Maureen Martin, running as a candidate for mayor in the London Borough of Lewisham, included in her campaign a pledge to…

     “….cut through political correctness and simply state the truth that natural marriage between a man and a woman is the fundamental building block for a successful society, and the safest environment for raising children  ‘

    Former Lewisham mayoral candidate Maureen Martin

    Maureen Martin

    She didn’t win the election, but she did get fired from her job.

    I’ll let you read the story for yourselves, but first, here’s the contact information for the vindictive collabo company that fired her.

    BTW, they seem to have hidden their main email address, but determined search uncovered a few other options, including what appears to be their big boss, Fiona Fletcher-Smith

    ffletcher-smith@lqgroup.org.uk
    Telephone 020 8852 9181
    Website https://www.lqgroup.org.uk

    Get in touch ; 0300 456 9996. (020 8189 9996) ·

    Outside these hours, we operate an emergency only service ; 0300 456 9997. (020 8189 9997). Monday to Friday

     

     You may wish to remind them, ever so politely, of course, that free speech is part of Britain’s way of life.

    Or was…

    .

    ....until low-life freakos came to rule the roost.

    Now please read on, and if you appreciate the well written report  donate to C4M, who are steadfast in defence of decency.

    You may think that in a democracy a candidate for election is well within her rights to state her support for a view which the courts have repeatedly held is “worthy of respect in a democratic society”.

    But Maureen’s employer, the London & Quadrant Housing Trust (L&Q), disagreed. Following the usual fuss on Twitter among activists, two days after she published the leaflet Maureen was summoned by her employer for an “investigation meeting” because managers had received three complaints.

    An L&Q manager claimed during the investigation meeting that for Maureen to air her views “so publicly when you’re clearly linked to L&Q” could bring the trust into “disrepute”.

    Miss Martin told the Mail she was “shocked” by the “brutal” interrogation, and asked what has happened to free speech in Britain:

    “If we don’t have it in this country, we are in big trouble. Are we going to turn into a totalitarian country? Are we a free country, or aren’t we? We have to make our minds up.”

    L&Q, which houses over 250,000 people in the south east, states that it aims to maintain a high ranking in Stonewall’s Equality index…and has also recently been nominated for an award from LGBT website Pink News.

    After the disciplinary meeting on May 6th, L&Q fired Maureen and claimed that she aired her opinions in an “inappropriate manner” and that it was “reasonable to conclude that they will have caused upset, hurt and offence”.

    Simply for stating her support for real marriage?

    It’s hard to know what these inquisitors would regard as an ‘appropriate’ manner to disagree with them. They also seem unconcerned about bringing themselves into “disrepute” with anyone outside a narrow band of LGBT activists.

    With the help of the Christian Legal Centre, Maureen is suing L&Q for unfair dismissal, harassment and discrimination, on the grounds that the courts have repeatedly held that belief in real marriage is worthy of respect in a democratic society and thus a protected belief under equality law.

    On behalf of supporters of real marriage across the country, C4M wishes her all the best with her legal action.

    If you would like to support us financially, you can do so using the button below.

    DONATE

    00000

     

    000

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     


     “00

     
  • ross1948 15:35 on May 12, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: C4M, ,   

    Queering Marriage In Scotland! 


    Nauseating that the Church of Scotland, which many previous generations of my family attended, is about to sink into the cess-pool of sodomite ‘marriage,’ with at least 29 presbyteries…

    ….in favour of bringing forward the legislation while 12 have said they are opposed. 

    …..

    The less I say about Rev Shuna Dicks, from the Presbytery of Aberdeen and Shetland, the better, perhaps.

    “….I’m just delighted that I will be able to apply to become an official celebrant for same-sex marriages….”

    Yuk!
    Seems a bit sick that an ordained minister would want to participate in ‘weddings’ between sexual deviants.

    Will she next be heard delighting in the possibility of brother-sister ‘weddings’ or owner-dachshund ‘weddings?’

    Would this ‘reverend’ woman say to practitioners of incest or pedophilia what she says to queers?

    “There will be people from the LGBT community who will rejoice because finally, the church that they belong to will able to celebrate their love that they have found in each other in a Christian ceremony and that, I think, is good news,” Rev Dicks said.

    https://premierchristian.news/en/news/article/church-scotland-moves-step-closer-to-officiating-same-sex-marriages

    I imagine a schism will take place, sooner rather than later.

    A final vote will take place in the Church of Scotland’s General Assembly next month.

    Thanks to C4M for letting people overseas know…

    .


    .

    …how rancid the land of St. Andrew has become.

    Give them a donation…

    DONATE

    …for they do good work.

     
  • ross1948 15:46 on April 11, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , C4M,   

    The War On Woke – A Great British Soldier Speaks Up! 


    C4M do a good job fighting for decent values, and I found this video of theirs useful to watch.

    It’s an interview with Major General Tim Cross, who was the UK’s senior soldier in post-war Iraq.

    =

    ==

    He’s not afraid of standing up to the Enemy Within, which in this context means resisting those who want to turn Britain’s Armed Forces…

    ….into a freak-show.

    People should support C4M and here’s how.

    Donate
    You can watch the hard hitting interview by clicking here.

    Watch: Major General Tim Cross Interview
    WATCH VIDEO

     

     

     
  • ross1948 14:44 on January 21, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: C4M, , Fiona Bruce MP, humanist hypocrites   

    Horrid Humanist Hypocrites, Paragons of Intolerance! 


    C4M has sent this out – it’s very good!

    I’ve not amended or edited it. If you agree with C4M, you should help them. 

    …you can do so using the button below.

    Donate

     

    Humanists UK has criticised the appointment of Conservative MP Fiona Bruce as the Prime Minister’s new Special Envoy on the Human Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief because she is an opponent of same-sex marriage.
    The non-religious organisation, which was founded in 1896 and known as the British Humanist Association until 2017, expressed “alarm” and “disappointment” at her appointment.
    It presented a lengthy charge sheet that included her being “a strong opponent” of “the human rights of LGBT people”.
    “Ms Bruce also voted numerous times in Parliament in 2013, 2014, and 2019 against extending the civil right to marriage to same-sex couples, both in England and Wales, and in Northern Ireland”, it added.
    The organisation says it aims to represent “people who seek to live good lives without religious or superstitious beliefs” and is currently claims to have around 100,000 members and supporters.
    Long an advocate of liberal social policy, its effort to discredit a well-regarded MP because it disagrees with her stances on various matters including marriage does its ‘humanist’ credentials no credit.
    It talks a good game on human rights, stating: “As humanists, we support the right of every person to be treated with dignity and respect, and to be allowed to speak, and believe, as they wish.”
    Where, then, is its respect for Mrs Bruce and its support for her right to speak and believe according to her conscience?
    Or does it reserve this support for those with whom it agrees?
    It is all too common today for opponents of same-sex marriage to be denied positions and opportunities because their beliefs do not conform to the fashionable orthodoxy.
    It is a pity that Humanists UK fails to appreciate the irony of joining in with the crowd baying for the scalp of one more ‘heretic’.
     
  • ross1948 15:33 on September 25, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , C4M, , , , ,   

    ‘Freedom!’ Shouted Braveheart – But Not On Sturgeon’s Watch! 


               

    Remember him?

    No, not Mel Gibson, but the Scottish hero he played so well in ‘Braveheart,’ a film I am always happy to watch whenever it returns to the tv screen.

    Sir William Wallace’s war-cry was ‘FREEDOM,’ and it’s being stomped by the leftist separatist SNP leader…

    No “People’s Vote” For Scots Parents! The Separatist ‘Brat-Charter! 

    Separatist Socialist Sturgeon – Biden’s Trans-Atlantic Twin? 

    “I believe passionately in free speech but..” she said.

    Nicola Sturgeon quits BBC event over Steve Bannon invitation …https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/oct/20/nicola-sturgeon-quits-bbc-event-over-steve-bannon-invitation

    ==========

     ….Nicola Sturgeon, whose record on almost everything stinks!

    Please read on, especially our doughty band of readers in Scotland, who should FIGHT Sturgeon’s gaystapo agenda..

    /

    …and heed the C4M appeal.

    AND please check out the petition I have appended at the bottom of the page!

    It’s going to be more difficult to disagree with same-sex marriage in Scotland – and in the rest of the UK. ”

    The new hate crime Bill there seems to confuse disagreement with hatred.

    C4M is particularly concerned as there is no free speech clause on marriage (unlike England, Wales and Northern Ireland). Our sister organisation, Scotland for Marriage, has circulated the following:“The proposals, currently making their way through the Scottish Parliament, have drawn strident criticism from every corner of Scottish society because of the potential to shut down freedom of expression.

    This is because the Bill:

    ‘has no free speech clause on marriage – unlike England, Wales and NI;has thresholds so low that you could even commit a criminal offence without intending to;could see people prosecuted for things said in the privacy of their own home;

    has no free speech clause protecting discussion of transgenderism – a controversial issue which totally undermines a ‘one man, one woman’ definition of marriage; 

    has no backstop to prevent misuse of the law – unlike England and Wales where the Attorney General (or in Northern Ireland the DPP) must give permission to prosecute.”

    Judges, police, lawyers, actors, comedians, academics, feminists, secularists, Christians, left and right wing commentators, civil liberties groups and politicians from almost every party have raised concerns about the hate crime Bill’s impact on free speech.

     

    ”The law covers all publications distributed in Scotland.

    If Police Scotland believe an English newspaper on sale in Edinburgh “is likely” to “stir up hatred”, they could get a warrant from a Scottish Court, drive down to London and arrest the editor. 

    ”C4M defends the freedom to speak out in defence of marriage.We know that marriage can be a contentious subject and some activists would do anything to shut down the debate.

    That’s why, when same-sex marriage was going through the Westminster Parliament, C4M fought hard to get a marriage clause into the law on hate speech.“In this Part, for the avoidance of doubt, any discussion or criticism of marriage which concerns the sex of the parties to marriage shall not be taken of itself to be threatening or intended to stir up hatred.”Section 29JA, Public Order Act 1986 (as amended)This important protection, which applies in England and Wales and is duplicated in Northern Ireland, allows people to speak freely about traditional marriage without fear of the criminal law.

    It is troubling that this essential provision is missing from Scotland’s hate crime Bill, and C4M will be making representations to Scottish politicians to ensure this is addressed.

    DONATE

    Oh, and BTW, here’s a petition, begun by a fellow with whom I have almost nothing in common, but targetting that Sturgeon.

    https://www.change.org/p/petition-vote-of-no-confidence-in-nicola-sturgeon-and-the-scottish-government-resignsturgeon

    Any readers in Scotland should have a look and add their names to the rapidly increasing number of signatures!

     
    • Tam Birnie 17:10 on September 25, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      She makes a lot of Scots squirm every time she opens her naggy wee mooth.

      Like

  • ross1948 18:03 on October 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , C4M, , , , , Wycombe Conservative Association   

    May Extols ‘Gay’ Agenda – Now Her Fans Back Polygamy! 


    If ever we had hopes, and let’s face it, some of us did, that Theresa May might shape up and return to the conservative principles she once espoused, that pitiful party conference speech dashed those hopes irreparably.

    Same sex marriage on the statute book, so that two people who love each other can get married, no matter what their gender

    Theresa May Just Delivered the Worst Political Speech of All Time

    YUK!

    And THAT gaystapo sloganising got her a standing ovation?

    Next year she’ll be winning cheers from her fatuous flock by extolling incest, or bestiality.

    Or not.

    Her performance was so pathetic that she’ll likely be out of office by next year. Or next month.

    Or next week!

    But will any likely successor be better?

    =

    Who’s going to miss her?

    =

    Yes, it’s true, as the email sent by Leave.EU this morning says –

     …the concessions Mrs May has made thus far to Remainers…and the prospect of deeper surrender to Brussels now that the conference has been and gone, it is becoming less clear what Brexiteers have to lose from a change in leadership…

    ==

    Gambar terkait

    ====

    And yes, I believe Rees-Mogg is a decent and principled man!

    But I don’t believe he’ll succeed her, because the poisonous decadence May represents has spread throughout her party.

    Here’s a clip from the C4M newsletter sent to me this week, about an exchange between them and one of her rat-packs, the Wycombe Conservative Association –  using its official Twitter account,

    ….the Association went on to say that in respect of polygamy it had, “no objection at all.” If that’s how people want to live their lives… who am I or who is anyone to judge?”

    Wycombe Tories

     

    That certainly reflects the ‘liberal values’ May adores.

    Okay, you say, but it’s just some dumb local bum of no significance at all.

    Or not.

    Would you trust a party that doesn’t act to expel those irresponsible ignoramuses in Wycombe?

    May was VERY quick to remove an honourable MP for defending decency.

    ======

    Tory Purge – Theresa May Dances To Gaystapo Tune! 

    As the C4M man says, May’s implication that supporters of traditional marriage lack compassion is deeply unjust.

    But who’d expect justice, or conservatism, from the likes of Theresa May.

    If such concepts existed in today’s Downing Street, that sicko pro-polygamy pinko ‘Tory’ in Wycombe would long since have been purged from public life, instead of that Isle of Wight MP whose only crime was being normal.

     0000

    If you want to help C4M, press that ‘donate’ button below.

    DONATE
     
    • Pamela 19:24 on October 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      She has supported ‘liberal values’ AND shariah law.
      You are of course right to condemn her but you should not be in the least surprised, Ross.

      Like

    • Mel Henderson 20:13 on October 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      All in favour of getting rid of her but like you I don’t see her replacement being any better. The Tory Party is a lost cause.
      We need a UKIP revival..

      Like

    • Diana 20:23 on October 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Those Tories!
      Churchill must be looking down from on high in fury. Margaret too.
      I will only add that I am overjoyed I don’t live in Wycombe.

      Like

    • Planter 22:05 on October 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      She is as bad as Cameron and for me that is as bad as I can say about anybody.
      I think the DUP should pull the plug on the deal they did with May.
      She is a symbol of all that’s sick in our kingdom.

      Like

      • Billy King 20:17 on October 8, 2017 Permalink | Reply

        Right you are Planter. She has to go.
        If the DUP keep supporting her they do themselves no favours.
        Corbyn is IRA all the way and if he gets in then it means we in Ulster may have to fall back on direct action but May is a millstone round the whole UK’s neck and the longer she hangs on then the more danger there is that Corbyn will win the next election. .
        The Tories need somebody who will take a stand. That Rees Mogg seems to know what he’s talking about

        Like

  • ross1948 17:36 on August 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , C4M, , ,   

    Today, 16/8, In UK, BBC Evil On Display! 


    I just got this from C4M, and am passing it on to readers in Britain, with no need for any comment, except to say that the BBC is sick and evil and should be dismantled and its foul regime tarred and feathered.

    .=

    ======================

    ======================

    This coming Wednesday, August 16th, BBC2 will screen a documentary titled No More Boys And Girls: Can Our Kids Go Gender Free?

    In the programme, Dr Javid Abdelmoneim sets out to prove that there are no significant physical or psychological differences between young boys and girls.

    To this end a classroom of seven-year-olds is subjected to an experiment in which books with characters “squarely aimed at boys” are thrown away, distinct male and female toilets abolished, and a male make-up artist is brought in to persuade boys to aim for less masculine careers.

    Girls vulnerable

    The children themselves are horrified at having to share lavatories, with Dr Abdelmoneim admitting that girls feel particularly uncomfortable as a result of the new arrangement.

    This is the latest in a series of programmes by the BBC which appear determined to promote transgenderism as a positive, natural development in children.

    Last week the Victoria Derbyshire programme renewed its coverage of two pre-pubescent children living as members of the opposite gender.

    A nine-year-old boy who uses the name ‘Lily’ is featured along with his friend ‘Jessica’ who is a ten-year-old boy, and ‘Jessica’s’ step-mother who has decided to live as a member of the opposite sex named ‘Alex’.

    Sorry, must comment here…

    ….

    “When dealing with ‘controversial subjects’, we must ensure a wide range of significant views and perspectives are given due weight and prominence, particularly when the controversy is active. Opinion should be clearly distinguished from fact.”

    ======

    ========

    Raising pre-pubescent children to have no gender or to believe that they are members of the opposite sex is clearly controversial but there is no discernible effort to balance any of the Corporation’s output on the subject.

    We believe the BBC’s decision to dispense with editorial impartiality on this issue is a breach of its legal duty. In the coming weeks, the Coalition for Marriage will continue to do all that it can to push the Corporation to demonstrate the balance and neutrality required of it by law.

    =====

    C4M do useful work.

    Help them, please and donate to Coalition for Marriage

      DONATE  

     
  • ross1948 22:58 on August 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: C4M, , , , , Pride and Prejudice homo-propaganda stunt   

    Brits Can’t Trust The National Trust’s Gaystapo Collabos! 


    When I was a keen young amateur archaeologist, I took part in a few digs in Northumberland, along Hadrian’s Wall.

    =

    =

    Some of those sites were in the care of the National Trust, so I formed a good opinion of that organisation, for its role in taking care of important parts of the British people’s heritage.

    No more.

    The NT stinks!

    They brazenly attempted to coerce volunteer helpers in Norfolk to sport pro-homo gear…

    …rainbow badges etc.,as part of  ‘Prejudice & Pride’, a season of events promoting LGBT lifestyles.

    =

    In a display of typical gaystapo bullying, the NT then victimised anyone who would not comply. Resisters were removed from their roles and banned from meeting the public.

    =

    =

    Now we hear from C4M that the National Trust’s gay-crawl creepos have quailed before a storm of protest.

    Thanks to a public outcry, the Trust has now backed down. Volunteers will be able to resume their duties without being forced to wear the badges.

    Apparently something like 250 N T members tore up their subscriptions to show their disgust at the nazi-style antics of what used to be a respected organisation.

    But do any of you readers seriously believe those pulling the NT strings woke up one day and realised they’d been collaborating with evil against British values, and – consumed with remorse – reversed their nastiness?

    =

    No way.

    The yellow-bellied swine merely felt the heat and scuttled out of the kitchen, a tactical withdrawal.  .

    C4M also warns Brits that later this year, the Government will open two public consultations where similar issues of fundamental importance to our supporters are at stake.

    =

    The public will be consulted on proposals to allow people to choose their gender. Subsequent legislation could end up compelling people to act and speak against their conscience by requiring them to call a biological man a woman and vice-versa.

    =

    =

    • And this is said to be a ‘conservative government?’

    We will also be separately consulted on relationships education for primary schools in England, which could see children as young as five taught about same-sex marriage and transgenderism with no parental right of withdrawal.

    No more conservative than some callow, college-based, cultural marxist freak show!

     

    I strongly urge Brits to prepare for battle on these ‘consultations,’ which will probably be mere charades before the pro-perv lobby in Theresa May’s Cabinet hammers their aberrant agenda through…

    =

    =

    ….just like Cast-Iron Cameron’s ‘consultation’ on homo-weddings.

    C4M will let you know when it’s time to respond to May’s maladjust consulations if you register with their mailing list, and that can be found via this link.
    =====
    SEND THEM A TENNER!

    C4M logo
    Facebook shim.gif Twitter shim.gif YouTube
    shim.gif
    Donate button
    shim.gif
      DONATE  

     

    ,

     
  • ross1948 10:29 on July 31, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , C4M,   

    Decent Brits,Tell Boris – Bring FCO Flunkeys To Heel! 


    Since when is it the job of the FCO to affront citizens of foreign countries where decent values still prevail?

    I’m impelled to ask after reading last week’s bulletins from C4M.

    • The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) putting our diplomacy at risk: the FCO recently announced that over the last year 202 same-sex marriage ceremonies have been performed in British embassies and high commissions worldwide in countries which still adhere to traditional marriage.
    • By flouting the wishes of the people and governments of 12 countries including Australia, China, Cyprus, Japan, Mozambique and Vietnam, the FCO puts our bilateral relationships in peril at just the time when our diplomats are pursuing post-Brexit trade deals.
    • Coalition for Marriage

        DONATE  

      C4M does a good job so deserves support.

    • ===============

    • But the Foreign Office is NOT doing a good job!

    • ……..
    • In fact, it’s quite appalling, but given Boris Johnson’s record of crawling to sexual maladjusts…

    • ===
    • …I suppose not surprising.

    • If you Brits back in the Old Country have time, you should make representations to your MP.

    • It’s bad enough that UK FCO flunkeys interfere in other countries internal affairs by acting as hand-maidens for the EUSSR’s ‘gay’ agenda…

    • Cameron’s ‘Gay Pride’ Imperialism – Britannia’s Shame 

    • ..but allowing formal ‘solemnisation’ of maladjust menages as if they were real marriages?

    • WAY TOO FAR OTT!

     
    • Jim in Jakarta 11:35 on July 31, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      A few years ago, a guy I know here wanted to marry his girl-friend, but because she was Muslim and he wasn’t, it was proving hard to do.
      So he contacted his embassy, it was one of your British Commonwealth countries, I think Britain itself. He asked if they held weddings on their premises because that would protect them from interference by the prohibitive restrictions here.

      He was told very bluntly, No, they would not do anything like that.
      He finally flew her out to Singapore and they are living happily ever after.

      From what you say, England now allows weddings in its embassies that would be illegal outside the diplomatic protection.
      So as you would say, I’m sure, are they only ‘promoting same-sex marriage’ or do they ‘stand up to sharia’ too?

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: