Peter Tauber – Modern Germany’s Stauffenberg?

-=========

‘If one in two asylum claims is rejected on average, the states have a duty to deport 1,000 rejected asylum seekers a day.’ Peter Tauber
================

Merkel’s cultural marxist junta is facing increasing opposition from her own party. Another CDU MP, Christian von Stetten, is demanding internal party democracy instead of the current diktat system.
—–
“If so many of our party speak out in favour of partial refusal at the border, we should all be able to vote on it.” Von Stetten
========================
Interestingly, I see the petition also offers critics of Britain’s craven Cameron some useful ammunition, reminding us all that ‘asylum’ is not legally available crimmigrants, those “who wish to enter Germany illegally via a safe third country”.
As the Express writer notes, refugees must claim asylum in the first member state they reach.
And THAT puts Cur Cameron right on the spot, since he has done NOTHING to kick out Calais savages who have oozed through the Chunnel.
We learned late last year he’d been using secretive flunkeys to house the scum in tax-paid English hotels.
—————————-
- ————
- Now he’s not lifting a finger to overturn a ridiculous ruling that some Sudanese parasite – arrested and charged after waltzing illegally through – be granted ‘asylum’ in the UK.
- This green light will be seen and followed, like a satanic inversion of the Bethlehem Star, by hordes of Jungle brutes lurking on the French coast. And this despite an outrageously fallacious interpretation of asylum rules.
- —————
- The ‘lawyers’ who made the crimmigrant’s case in court argued his ‘refugee rights’ required the UK to grant him ‘asylum…’
- BUT he never sought ‘asylum’ in the equally ‘safe’ country he entered the UK from. Failing to apply in France surely should invalidate his claim altogether.
–
–
Oh, for your information, his case was put by –Kent Defence, 14 The Centre, Margate, Kent CT9 1JG Phone: 01843 227631 Email: info@kentdefence.co.uk – you might want to ask them, since it’s a matter of public interest, who paid their fees?.
–
Reply