Tagged: Constitutional Court Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 15:08 on December 16, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Constitutional Court, , , , , , ,   

    New EurocRat Hate-Focus? Poland! 

    Remember that lying upstart Juncker’s grossly offensive reference to Hungry’s PM Orban as a dictator?


    • jean-claude-juncker-2006-
    • ———-

    Juncker holds his Chief Commissar position with no mandate from a democratic election, unlike Orban!


    • Viktor-Orban-006


    But such is his fury at Orban, who actually speaks up for his people, that he sank to typical Brussels gutter language. 

    Not Even Pot/Kettle – Commissar-in-Chief Slurs Orban as ‘Dictator!’ 

    Now we have another EurocRat spitting hatred against another democratic government, this time Kamerad Martin Schulz, the German Socialist whose plump physique is presumably due to long years of wallowing in Strasbourg’s juicy troughs.




    Heedless of his own country’s unfortunate history in regard to Poland, the gross Teutonic pinko has shown utter contempt for that country.

    What is happening in Poland has the character of a coup d’etat and is dramatic. I assume that this week or in January at the latest we will have to discuss this extensively in the European Parliament.”



    Poland’s internal affairs are none of this importunate schweinhund’s business.     If he has concerns about democratic propriety, he should be calling on Merkel to hold a referendum in THEIR country, on crimmigration.

    But what’s the pro-crimmigrant pinko oinking about? Are the Poles going back to the dark days when they were governed by marxists, an era of political prisoners, murdered priests, all the awful trappings of communism?

    Not hardly!

    After the conservative PiS won its big majority in October, they made changes to the Polish Constitutional Court. An amendment let the new government appoint five new judges, and this annoyed the defeated left-liberals, who had selected a different set of judicial nominees.

    Fair enough – why should the newly-elected parliament be bound by a partisan political move made by the democratically defeated party, which in fact was guilty of a sly manoeuvre, causing President Andrzej Duda to refuse to swear in the old regime’s nominees.


    Duda correctly declared that the left-libs had “violated the democratic order” – their wannabees had been nominated for the court before THEIR predecessors’ terms had even expired!

    Clearly a party political ploy, but you won’t catch squealing pinko German MEPs calling out the left-libs for any attempted dramatic coup d’etat!


    As one Polish political scientist observed, the PiS was “masterfully using techniques already used by previous governments, including the liberals — rejecting compromise and showing contempt for the opposition.”    https://in.news.yahoo.com/political-storm-poland-government-sparks-092329008.html

    • And since that Opposition had u-turned on a key moral issue, they deserved contempt. They’d promised their people that they’d not let Brussels dump crimmigrants on Poland, then caved into the EuroCommissars’ demands.
    • 00000000
    • The sort of savage swine Schulz wants dumped on Poland


    But Schulz will have plenty of supranational sticky-beaks behind him in his assault on free nations’ sovereign rights.

    The Council of Europe’s Commissioner for ‘human rights’ called on the Polish Sejm (parliament) to thwart the government, even before the changes had been effected.

    Happily, Polish legislators don’t jump through hoops for foreign apparatchiks as readily as, let’s say, David Cameron does.

  • ross1948 00:07 on July 23, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Constitutional Court, , , , , , , , , , , sectarian prejudice, , terrorist teens, , Yohana Yembise   

    Indonesia – Sexism Endorsed by Constitutional Court? 

    It can be discouraging work, following how courts in Indonesia decide cases. 

    I’m not talking about local courts, not the court in Serang, which handed out six-month sentences to the swine arraigned after  the Cikeusik Pogrom..

    Victim of Islamist Murder Mob Gets Six Months in the Slammer 

    …nor to the Temanggung court, which sentenced an eccentric evangelist to five years for criticising Islam (and that wasn’t enough for the bigot rabble present –




    – the judge had to flee from their amok-run, his failure to have the fellow executed inexcusable, in their view, despite no such penalty being on the statute book!)

    Nor even to the imprisonment, under the so-called ‘blasphemy law,’ of a Shia cleric in East Java, for preaching his own denomination’s beliefs.Outlawing Witchcraft? Outlaw Bakor Pakem! 

    These local verdicts are bizarre, to put it charitably.

    But what about the higher levels, like the Constitutional Court?

    I was scanning the Jakarta Globe over my fourth cup of kopi jawa the other day when I came upon an article by some woman named Barr, from Human Rights Watch, about child marriage.


    When I see the word ‘child,’ I tend these days to be on guard.


    There was a ludicrous item recently https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2015/07/16/600-unaccompanied-child-asylum-seekers-deported-uk-afghanistan/ about the deportation from Britain of  ‘unaccompanied  child asylum seekers,’ a catch-phrase that conjures up images of tiny tots being loaded aboard and shipped off, clutching teddy-bears, to foreign parts.

    On closer inspection, it turned out the ‘tot’ who starred in the ‘scandal’ was a 23-year-old, who’d been in the UK for years!


    And of course there’s the recurrent theme  of renegade ‘British’ ‘children’ sloping off to join rape-gangs in the Middle East, who at 16 or 17 years old are just as capable of knowing what’s right and wrong as you and I were at that age.


    evil children

    And it’s not just ‘British’ ‘children!’ 

    Australian teenager in court over terrorist bomb plot – BBC …

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-32686275 – An Australian teenager who allegedly planned a bomb plot appears in children’s court in Melbourne charged with terrorism offences.

    Montreal teen pleads not guilty to terror charges | CTV News

    http://www.ctvnews.ca – A 15-year-old Montreal teenager appeared in court Wednesday on charges of committing robbery to benefit a terrorist group, making him the first youth charged 


    Treason is a crime not too difficult to categorise as a very big wrong, and since 16-year-olds in Scotland now enjoy (with full SNP approval) full voting rights, I presume at least those 50 plus SNP MPs at Westminster are leading a chorus of demands for adult punishment for young traitors.


    Right, back to topic – those paragraphs above simply included to show that I’m not some neo-colonialist that picks on Indonesia while ignoring Western short-comings.


    The Barr article has a go at Indonesia for allowing ‘child marriage.’

    The Constitutional Court rejected a petition against the 1974 Marriage Law, which is indeed open to criticism – not least the disgusting rule that permits primitives to engage in polygamy – men, but not of course women (sex equality doesn’t figure) can take extra spouses, if the existing spouse is disabled, terminally ill or unable to bear children.  




    Any country that countenances polygamy should either outlaw the practice or legalise polyandry, but sadly, many morons here regard women as undeserving of respect as human beings. 

    ‘Immoral Activities – Sitting in Coffee Shops Laughing and Talking…’ 

    IslamoNazi Gauleiter – “Women Already Have Limitations, Let Alone Non-Muslims!” 


    But in this case the complaints were about that part which permits women and men to marry as they choose once they reach 21, but allows girls to marry at 16 with parental permission. Boys must wait until they are 19 to marry with parental permission.

    Ms Barr is agitated about the age of 16, reckoning it’s too young.

    But as noted, Scots of that age can vote and, if I’m not wrong, Scotland has traditionally let people marry at that age. And with parental consent, the same applies in various European and US jurisdictions. 

    And I have to say, in fairness to the current legal state of affairs, that, having taught teenagers in Jakarta for my first dozen or so years here, Indonesian girls DO often show significantly more mature attitudes than boys.

    Of course it’s up to Indonesians to decide on the appropriate age for marriage.

    But in this day and age, surely there can be no sensible excuse for discriminating between boys and girls.


    • jokowi
    •  —————————

    However, if President Jokowi seriously wants to apply his ‘Mental Revolution’ to this archipelago, he will surely expedite his Minister of Women’s Employment, Yohana Yembise, who has pledged to reform that 1974 act.


     Minister Yembise


    Unfortunately, the present parliament seems submissive to sectarian prejudice…

    Creeping Shariah,’ Warns Prof. Muhammed, As Jakarta Dims! 

      …so she may have her work cut out for her. 

    • Prita 14:55 on July 23, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Hi Ross. We are all back in Jakarta now and happy to read this too.
      It is very bad for polygamy to be in Indonesia. How many of these politician are polygamying? I think PKS is worst but maybe you can tell us who beside them is guilty.

      The discrimination on marriage against girls is bad also. It is not because like you think, the girl is more mature. It is so some bad parents can easily make marriage for daughter to help the fathers business.

      You must also tell about the discrimination of religion, a girl who loves a man and a man who loves a girl of different religion must one of them convert, I think this is wrong.
      Marriage law is intolerant.


    • Santi 15:02 on July 23, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Happy holiday Ross?
      Soon be finished for us but you have written much for us to enjoy and say thanks to you for.
      This about the marriage laws is very true, so many stupid rules when all should be free to marry at same age, without parent permission.
      If women and men are needing parents to agree before they can marry, they should not be able to marry.
      Not until old enough to be of own free choice..
      We are talking about this right now and all want to make this comment.


    • Ati 10:06 on July 28, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Hi Ross
      I am so sorry no commenting for so long a time, been away busy but now I say I like this wrtiing you do about sexism.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: