Tagged: Crooked Hillary Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 8:00 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Chelsea Clinton, Crooked Hillary, NHS hospitals UK,   

    Clinton Interview Exposes NHS Betrayal Of UK Women 

    When the two were asked whether someone with a beard and a penis could ever be a woman, Chelsea did not hesitate in saying 




    Only by comparison with her deranged daughter could Deplorable Hillary be defined as sensible!




    I don’t read the Sunday Times but the Free Press article on the interview the Clinton women gave that UK newspaper startled me, NOT because of the vacuous opinions the younger one spouted…


    ….but the revelation that the NHS, which Brit politicians exalt as a wondrous example of a state health-care system, forces real women to share hospital wards with precisely the beard-and-penis possessing freaks mentioned above. For God’s sake!

    Imagine if your old mum had to sleep in such a ward, her bed between two others, both occupied by such trans sickos?


    Or your school-age daughter?

    It’s more than deplorable – it’s   simply disgusting.

    Any such mentally disordered creatures should be in solitary confinement in a mental hospital!

    PS – I almost hesitate to enquire about the possibility (probability?) of transfreak fake ‘women’ working as nurses in female wards.


    • Pamela 10:23 pm on October 17, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The NHS is a twisted parody of its former self, Ross, nothing like when you had tough but cheery nurses who looked like angels in their traditional uniforms.
      A lot of them in hospitals I’ve had to visit lately look more like SWAT squad members.
      Now it’s run as a politically correct machine.
      The careless attitude towards women’s privacy and safety described above is all too real


  • ross1948 7:57 am on November 18, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Crooked Hillary, groping scandals, , Nina Burleigh, ,   

    Will Sex-Predator Clinton Finally Pay The Price? 

    I note that this month a few Democrat media fellow-travellers finally took time off shrilling unproven allegations at Roy Moore to focus on the most notorious sex-predator in American politics.


    Liberals finally hold Bill Clinton accountable for sexual misconduct

    It’s good to see a glimmer of conscience appear in left-liberal ranks.

    Some of them have much to atone for, like that old pinko bag Gloria Steinem…



    …whose response to the plight of Clinton’s victims was to see them “slut-shamed, victim-blamed, and age-shamed,” says one honest lefty critic, adding that Steinem helped transform “contemporary feminism as a weaponized auxiliary of the Democratic Party.”

    Another notorious media hack-hag is named too!


    Hasil gambar untuk nina burleigh


    Newsweek’s Nina Burleigh was famously quoted in 1998 saying that she would be “happy to give him [oral sex] just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.”


    Hell’s teeth!

    I think I might be tempted to sign up with Amnesty International rather than have that pot-ugly brute doing anything with or to me.

    But what took the lefties so long?

    Did somebody just tell them about Ole Horny’s record?



    Is it a rather belated crisis of conscience?

    Or Clinton’s wife’s spectacular defeat by Donald Trump? With the temperature rising after the Frankenstein revelations…


    Hasil gambar untuk al frankenstein

    …this show could run and run!




    • Frankie Tanato 4:55 pm on November 19, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Pay the price? Clinton never liked to pay for anything he could force from a woman.
      I can understand why he has to stray. Its gotta be horrible being married to the monster.
      But he had power and money and could of got plenty of women.
      Thats why so many of us look down on him as a bully and a predator.
      He should be indicted.
      An honest jury would do better than the corrupt politicians in Washington who wouldn’t impeach him.


  • ross1948 9:45 am on October 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Crooked Hillary, , Edward Heath, , , , , Tom Driberg   

    Weinstein’s Woes And Democrat Double Standards! 

    For a few days now I’ve been looking at the controversy over Weinstein’s generosity to various Democrat politicians…

    Clinton Ridiculed for Calling Out Weinstein Five Days Late | Vanity Fair

    …and wondering if their belated ( ?) awareness of his proclivities – an alleged enthusiasm for taking sexual advantage of ambitious young women – would result in their repudiation of his support and the repayment of his large cash contributions.

    I use that question mark after ‘belated’ because a glance at a cross-section of the American media suggests his unwholesome activities were something akin to an open secret.

     George Clooney ‘heard rumors’ for years about Harvey Weinstein’s .

    It’s hardly unique in the history of the Anglo-Saxon World that the political/media in-crowd have known about scandalous behaviour among powerful notables and yet continued to interact happily with those involved, whilst collaborating to keep the common people in the dark.

    Weinstein is unluckier than others, in that his variety of ‘outreach’ has gone public during his lifetime.

    In the UK, it’s only recently that Brits have been allowed by the media to learn of what many in politics and the press undoubtedly knew about Heath The Homo.

    Ted Heath would be interviewed over sex abuse allegations – Daily Mail

    Same cover-up applied years before in the case of Labour Party Chairman Tom Driberg, a vile queer predator.

    ‘Sleaziest, Most Disreputable’ Media in the World? Britain’s! 

    But reverting to today’s scandal, let’s just ask the obvious question, or that which should be obvious.

    If Ms. Clinton is, quite correctly, disavowing the support of Weinstein for his sexual exploits…



    …will she follow the logical – and honourable – path and disavow the support of even more prominent people with a proven, not alleged, record of similarly scandalous activity?


  • ross1948 12:20 am on September 5, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Crooked Hillary, , , RINO McCain, ,   

    Crack-Down Time In Canada – Smash The Red Nazis! 

    A good article in  the Sun last week, by Candice Malcolm, but although she makes plenty of useful points, there’s one sentence, admittedly a quote from one of her colleagues, that needs to be challenged –

     “…the ‘Antifa’ movement has always had at its core a group of masked violent thugs who delight in assaulting innocent people and destroying property.”


    The problem with that assertion is not in its description of the storm-troop mentality and the consequently outrageous behaviour of the hoodlums…



    …but the suggestion that the evil in Antifa  is limited to its core.

    Antifa is entirely rotten, not only at its core but in its entirety.

    And it’s nothing new.

    Anyone who went to university in the Sixties – certainly in the UK, where I was a student, but, I suspect, in North America too – will remember the so-called ‘No Platform’ censorship movement, not something restricted to fringe marxist cliques but fully endorsed by the official representative student organisation, the National Union of  Students.


    Hasil gambar untuk nus no platform list


    Not only was anyone deemed ‘far-right’ to be denied the right to speak but even denied the right to stand for election to NUS office.

    And despite continuous opposition from students who understand that democracy requires all opinions to be heard and debated, that intolerant policy is still in place today.

    One NUS ratbag even ordered fellow-students to ban a speaker, with these ominous words –

    “…if any students are hurt in and around this event responsibility will lie with you..”

    – and that wasn’t in the ‘revolutionary’ Sixties, but just a couple of years ago!

    What made the 1960s adoption of ‘No Platform’ most outlandish was the composition of  the NUS leadership back then. Most of those who said ‘fascists and racists’ had to be silenced were in fact active in parties utterly hostile to freedom.

    The nearest thing to ‘moderates’ then were leftist Labour Party members (some of whom rose to high government office) but Communists were riding high.



    At least one activist in the CPGB, Digby Jacks, became NUS President – yes, a leading light of the Communist Party, which had acted as the handmaiden of a foreign totalitarian power since its foundation…


    Gambar terkait

    Violence cannot be a principle that we oppose or support. It is a tactic, a tool that can be used by anyone. In order to be for or against a tactic, we need to examine who is using it and, most importantly, to what end….

    What do socialists say about violence? – Socialist Worker

    …and Trotskyists,the Socialist Workers’ Party, who openly despised British democracy, abounded.

    Like Jeremy Corbyn, they were fans of the Sinn Fein/IRA murder gang. SWP was in fact simply a new name for the group known previously as IS (International Socialism Group) –

    IS’s position was always one of unconditional support for the IRA in the struggle against imperialism..”


    So the readiness of the far-left – the cultural marxists – to resort to vicious violence when they – as they invariably do – lack the wit or the courage to defeat nationalists or conservatives in free and fair debate is nothing new.



    What is new is the eager embrace of people in the media and major political parties to excuse these scum, exalt their violence even, as a means of suppressing opposition to the multicult agenda.

    We saw it in the USA, with the disgraceful RINO bleating…

    McCain claimed they were simply “Americans standing up to defy hate and bigotry.”

    Hillary Clinton’s campaign spokesman attempted to legitimize Antifa, comparing these masked radicals to Allied soldiers who fought against the Nazis during WWII.

    And we know that Turdo, who took such strong exception to alien barbaric practices being called barbaric practices…


    Turdistanada Nixes Condemnation Of Barbaric Practices! 

    …is of a like mind to those guilty of such pathetic pronouncements.

    If the problem had been tackled back when it surfaced, the nasty elements expelled from universities and those convicted given meaningful sentences by courts, it might have been stamped out.

    Unfortunately, ‘occupations’ by uppity undergrads of college property were usually allowed to go unpunished, as a rule. Much as the ‘Occupy’ movement, a year or so back…

    ‘Occupy’ Vagrants Cling on in Glasgow, Crime Rampant in US Counterparts 

    Proof Positive – OCCUPY is What We Knew It Was! 

    …. was not dealt with promptly and forcefully, by armed police with clear authorisation, where necessary, to use lethal force against the filthy savages.

    Politicians like Scheer in Canada have made noises about free speech, but shown little appetite for putting their words into action, double standards on display on the media…


    Hasil gambar untuk scheer the rebel

    Scheer says he’ll reject interviews with The Rebel until it changes 

    …and the right of ALL Canadians to demonstrate peacefully…

    Take away federal funding if universities don’t protect free speech ..

    Brave words, but what a difference a few months were to make!

    Conservative leader’s free speech pledge wouldn’t apply in U of T ...

    No wonder the cowardly Red Nazis of Antifa, hiding behind their masks…


    Gambar terkait


    ….are emboldened to extend their onslaught on the foundations of Canadian democracy!

    Who’s next?

    Alt-Left Warns Antifa Will Attack Canadian Journalists At Protests


    • Leslie Nimmo 2:27 am on September 5, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      I too attended an English university in the 1960s into the 1970s and I saw with my own eyes the RSSF and the RSA and the Communists all out to shout down and silence conservative speakers and the occupations they organised.
      They would hold what they called mass meetings to support their actions and many students never bothered to attend because they wanted to study.
      It was the fault of the majority of the students who did not care enough to oppose the left. I was one of the the ones who did attend and speak and vote against the left but we were outvoted most of the time.
      There was violence sometimes but it is so much worse now.


  • ross1948 9:40 pm on November 19, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Benghazi, Clinton petition, Crooked Hillary, , emails, special prosecutor,   

    Lock Her Up? Best To Prosecute First! Sign the Petition! 


    Whereas, Donald Trump, during the second presidential debate on Oct. 9, said to Hillary Clinton, “If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation, because there has never been so many lies, so much deception. There has never been anything like it, and we’re going to have a special prosecutor”;

    Whereas, Trump added that not only are Americans “furious” over Clinton’s crimes, but the FBI as well, stating, “In my opinion, the people that have been long-time workers at the FBI are furious. There has never been anything like this, where … you get a subpoena, and after getting the subpoena you delete 33,000 emails and then you acid wash them or bleach them … So we’re going to get a special prosecutor and we’re going to look into it”;

    Whereas, even the left-leaning PolitiFact website confirms 33,000 emails were indeed deleted from Hillary’s unsecure private server three weeks aftershe received a congressional subpoena demanding the production of her emails – an act that normally would result in being held in contempt of Congress;

    Whereas, news reports confirm that “FBI agents are ready to revolt” over Director James Comey’s “cowardly” whitewash of Hillary Clinton’s long-term mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private email server, with Dennis V. Hughes, former chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, saying, “The FBI has politicized itself and its reputation will suffer for a long time – I hold Director Comey responsible,” and retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello adding, “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization”;

    Whereas, fully 56 percent of Americans, including many Democrats, say FBI Director James Comey should have recommended that Hillary Clinton be indicted over her intentional mishandling of classified emails while secretary of state, according to an ABC News/Washington Post survey;

    Whereas, legal expert Judge Andrew Napolitano says, “the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming” and that “it was obviously a policy decision by the White House not to investigate her,” and moreover agrees that Trump, as president, “could have his own attorney general reopen the investigation and assign a new team of people to examine the same evidence” – that is, Trump could have the Justice Department reopen the closed investigation into Clinton’s private email server, even without appointing a special prosecutor;

    Whereas, when during the second debate Hillary Clinton’s said it was “awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country,” Trump quipped, “… because you’d be in jail”;

    Whereas, in response, the left has hysterically complained that “threatening to jail a political opponent is anti-democratic and anti-American,” with leftwing Harvard law professor Lawrence Tribe (who in 2008 was a judicial adviser to the Obama presidential campaign) claiming, “some of the political leaders who’ve jailed their political opponents have been Hugo Chávez, Recep Erdoğan, Robert Mugabe, Manuel Noriega, Augusto Pinochet and, of course, Vladimir Putin”;

    Whereas, Trump obviously did not threaten to investigate Clinton because she is a political opponent, but because she has blatantly violated U.S. espionage laws, mishandled top-secret information, destroyed government files and obstructed justice – criminal misconduct that has nothing to do with being a political adversary of Trump’s;

    Whereas, it is, in reality, Democrats, not Republicans, who routinely target political adversaries for prison – such as the Obama administration’s criminal prosecution of high-profile Obama critic Dinesh D’Souza (for which the Justice Department demanded a severe jail sentence, which the judge declined to impose) for a campaign-finance violation of the petty sort that the DOJ routinely allows to be settled by a civil fine; also Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, producer of the anti-Muslim video the Obama administration falsely and scandalously blamed for the Benghazi massacre, was subjected to a scapegoat prosecution and imprisonment (under the guise of a supervised-release violation) intended to bolster Obama and Clinton’s shameful “blame the video” narrative;

    Whereas, Barack Obama, when running for president in 2008, promised an investigation of the Bush administration’s waterboarding (which Obama and the left insist on referring to as “torture”) of a total of three terrorists, including 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. As Obama said in April 2008: “What I would want to do is to have my Justice Department and my attorney general immediately review the information that’s already there and to find out are there inquiries that need to be pursued. … If crimes have been committed, they should be investigated”;

    Whereas, many Americans have been convicted and imprisoned for violations of the same federal statutes Hillary Clinton has far more egregiously violated – or as Trump put it during the second debate, many people’s “lives have been destroyed for doing one-fifth of what you have done. And it’s a disgrace, and honestly, you ought to be ashamed of yourself”;

    Whereas, despite the ludicrously biased behavior of the establishment news media on behalf of Clinton’s candidacy, tens of millions of honest, hardworking, law-abiding, patriotic Americans – or as Hillary Clinton describes them, “deplorables” – know full well that Bill and Hillary Clinton have a long, sordid history of crimes and corruption, for which they have escaped consequence and prosecution decade after decade – and they are, as Trump rightly said, “furious” over it:


    Therefore, we hereby add our names to this petition calling on Congress to hold Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for purposely destroying evidence three weeks after it was subpoenaed, and we likewise encourage Donald J. Trump, if he is elected president, to appoint a special prosecutor to conduct a complete and fair investigation – one not compromised by craven political loyalties – into Hillary Clinton’s egregious abuse of America’s state secrets.

    One of America’s core principles, first expressed by President John Adams, is that ours is “a government of laws, and not of men.” In plain language, America is not a monarchy and no one is above the law – not even the Clintons. Holding Hillary Clinton legally accountable, at long last, for at least some of her many criminal misdeeds by applying the same legal standard to them as to any other citizen would go a long way toward restoring citizens’ flagging faith in America as a just, moral and great nation.


    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/wnd_petition/petition-urging-special-prosecutor-to-investigate-hillary-clintons-crimes/#7e5WFst69uHoMirr.99


    • Pamela 9:51 pm on November 19, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Ross, I do agree with Americans who want this grisly granny prosecuted, but you are very much focused on America just now, to the detriment of British affairs.
      Please turn your binoculars back to what you endearingly call The Old Country.


      • ross1948 10:15 pm on November 19, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        Gosh, Pamela.
        You must have hit the ‘send’ key hard. Comments often take all day to pop up here.
        Yes, I have paid lots of attention to America, appalled by the left and the savages there after Trump’s great victory.
        But I’ve not ignored Blighty, and have one coming up that mentions T May by name again.
        I get told I’m ignoring Indonesia too.
        So if I can’t please everyone…well, at least I hope I’m stirring most of you up.


  • ross1948 8:30 pm on November 13, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Crooked Hillary, , , ,   

    S.N.L. Exploits Leonard Cohen’s Death To Exalt Clinton 

    Leonard Cohen, a genius whose music transcended politics, had barely been buried –  RIP Leonard Cohen –when the sicko media creeps in America…


    ….decided to exploit his music to extol one of the most disgraceful and corrupt creatures in modern political history.


    Hasil gambar untuk snl cohen



    Some soppy blonde bint named McKinnon sat down at their piano and, purporting to be the repulsive Hillary Clinton, sang one of LC’s greatest songs, Hallelujah.




    I just liked the man’s music. I have no idea what the late cultural icon’s politics were.

    I doubt they were conservative, but he was a man who thought deeply about things (and retained a sense of humour – perhaps the two aspects go together!)

    For these dumbo media apparatchiks to express their frustration at the defeat of their hypocritical idol with a rendering of his deeply spiritual song is extremely offensive.

    Saturday Night Live kept Trump out of the spotlight, focusing on Kate McKinnon’s Hillary Clinton and a performance of “Hallelujah.”

    Saturday Night Live opens with Hillary Clinton, Leonard Cohen tribute

    Clinton has turned her coat enough times…

    Hasil gambar untuk clinton gay marriage

    …and turned her back on decent American values dramatically.

    She deserved her defeat and should crawl off-stage into a well-merited obscurity.

    For the far-left freaks of SNL to hold her up as some sort of saint is bad enough.

    To rob the newly dead for a song to exalt her is odious.

  • ross1948 11:12 am on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Crooked Hillary, , , ,   

    Trump At Bay, As RINOs Circle For the Kill… 

    As regular readers know, Donald Trump was not my fave pick as Republican Presidential nominee but for all his short-comings, he is infinitely preferable to that ghastly Clinton woman.


    There are very few men, outside of vicarages and ‘gay clubs,’ who have not made vulgar comments to their pals from time to time about passing cuties.

    To use words spoken ten years back as an excuse for a classic political execution is pathetic.

    It’s RINO payback time.

    As for Clinton’s response, what a nerve.

    We have no evidence that she ever ‘played away from home’ as Cigar-Store Billy did, and apparently still does.

    While one can see why Bill prefers almost any female to his horrible wife, his predatory activities have notoriously been based on abuse of his positions of power to force himself on women.



    He’s a total sh-t.

    As the beleaguered Trump observed last night, Hillary Clinton is well-known to have “bullied, attacked, shamed, and intimidated his victims.”

    Hasil gambar untuk hillary versus bill's rape victims

    There’s no way that truth can be gainsaid.

    The Trashing of Bill’s Accusers: What Did Hillary Do — and Why …

    7 Times Hillary Clinton Threatened, Smeared and Targeted Women .

    The real issues remain. The Democrats are in Soros’ pocket, eager to open the gates to a crimmigrant tsunami, and undermine all that made America an admirable nation.

    • Dan Kempel 12:19 pm on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Well said, Ross.
      In terms of morality, a skunk has both Clintons beat.
      Trump is a rough diamond and that’s why people have turned out for him. He can still win this, if he goes for the jugular in the debate this week.
      But with CNN’s Anderson Cooper ‘moderating’ that debate, it’ll be hard work for Trump to get a fair hearing.


    • JD Harlinger 12:46 pm on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Like, what are the RINOs going to do, draft Pence into the top spot, or give the nomination to the runner up, Ted Cruz?
      Much too late, even if Trump deserved to be removed, and i agree with you, he doesn’t.
      What does it matter what he said ten years ago, joking with his pals. He is not going to amnesty all the illegals and bring in jihadist refugees. We need to be focused on those real issues, where Clinton is criminally dangerous


    • Diana 1:17 pm on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Like you, I am not American and cannot vote for Mr Trump.
      But this media-stoked bonfire they’e building to burn his chances is ridiculous.
      We women know very well that men make crude comments about us, if we are even vaguely interesting to them.
      It’s part of men’s nature and as you say, Bill Clinton doesn’t just talk, he rapes.
      And Hillary Clinton covers for his crimes.


    • Alia Nur 1:52 pm on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      No wonder you are on Trump side, not any kind of surprise after seeing all the blogging porno you publish with almost naked women, and your constant moan about Indonesia’s censorship of aurat, which you call breasts and bottoms.
      You are a usual Blok M man, always looking at and looking for women.
      In Jakarta we know what you foreigner are like.
      Americans like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump and people like you are depraved.


    • Joey Jesnik 4:31 pm on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      The RINO crowd know that overthrowing Trump now will doom us to four or even eight years of Democrat comtrol, and Democrat nomination of constitution-wreckers to the Supreme Court, but still they put their hatred of Trump before what’s best for the USA.
      Obama has driven freedom so far down, Clinton would finish us off.


    • Leo Cozijn 8:20 pm on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      *Don’t be a hypocrite. As a president Trump would be an embarrassment to any banana republic! You are extremely selective with your criticism of any subject or person. All you do is cherry-picking. You’re never objective and always negative about almost anything. Here in Europe we really have to research every obscure newspaper or whatever publisher to find the crap your commenting on!*


    • Phil Filmore 10:28 pm on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Good to see somebody who doesn’t rat on the guy when he’s in trouble, I wish some of our Republicans In Name Only would stop whining about some silly comments Trump made that you can hear in every canteen or construction site in New York any day of the week.
      These RINO renegades like McCain and the rest are quite prepared to let that corrupt Clinton couple back into the White House again for no good reason except to keep in the PC medias good books.
      It’s all wrong what they’re doing.
      Thanks, Ross, whoever and wherever you are!.


    • Jess Towner 11:07 pm on October 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Paul Ryan has never been a real conservative. Same goes for McCain, who showed his true colors when he linked up to try and do a deal that would have given illegal amnesty.
      Maybe Donald Trump speaks crudely but he does speak for Americans who want their country cleaned up and the illegals cleaned out.,
      I will be voting for him and cheering him on when he faces up to Crooked Hilary in the next debate. With his back to the wall, Trump will probably be at his best now that he’s been let down by the phoneys. The RINOs are back-stabbing not just him but all of us who don’t want four more years of UnAmerican rule.


  • ross1948 10:22 am on September 1, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Crooked Hillary, , , , , , Paris Pravda,   

    France 24’s Brazen Bias – Trump’s ‘Infamous’ Wall! 

    Just typing something before feeding the cat, with France 24’s live broadcast of Trump’s immigration speech.

    The Donald talked sense at length, blasting Obama and Crooked for their obvious indifference to the evil ‘sanctuary cities’ and to the outrageous failure to endorse prompt deportation of illegals who commit crimes against Americans.


    • trump
    • ===================
    • Okay, we are well aware that American leftists and liberals see nothing wrong with crimmigrants, and that….




    ….being the standard view in the Democratic Party, has to be given an airing during the US presidential election.

    But we have a right to expect impartial presentation of the news by people purporting to be journalists.


    • liberal-media-bias
    • oooooooooooooooooooo
    • NOT ON FRANCE 23, whose beautifully coiffed blonde ‘news’ presenter immediately began her comments with a reference to Donald Trump’s ‘INFAMOUS‘ wall.
    • —————–
    • Hasil gambar untuk france 24
    • ———
    • This word has no place in a news broadcast.

    As I illustrated its meaning yesterday, I do so again today, in case anyone thinks it belongs in the vocabulary of a news presenter.


    Dictionary definition – well-known for being bad : known for evil acts or crimes. : causing people to think you are bad or evil. Definition of Infamous by Merriam-Webster

    ‘The Leftal’ – Pro-Crimmigrant Bias Against Danes! 

    So France 24 is telling us, impartially, as befits a news provider, to believe that Trump’s best-known policy is ‘EVIL.’

    Let’s rename that channel.


    Hasil gambar untuk pravda


    ‘Paris Pravda?’

    Or can any French readers suggest something with a little more finesse?

    • Charles Gaines 1:51 pm on September 2, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      The media lies all the time, things like that are in most ‘mainstream’ media again and again.


  • ross1948 8:59 pm on August 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Crooked Hillary, Nude photos,   

    A New Nightmare – Could ANYTHING Be Worse? 




    Hasil gambar untuk blindfolded men

    But already many smart people are preparing for the horrid ordeal!



Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: