Tagged: ‘DIVISIVE’ Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 13:49 on June 16, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'DIVISIVE', , Larissa Waters Green Party, , , totalitarian mind-set green   

    Oz Intolerance – Greens Detest Dissent! 


    Anyone who ever takes a close look at Green parties tends to recoil in horror as the reality of Green extremism becomes clear.

    .

    We have examined their affinity with censorious aversion to free and fair democratic practices, and how they share the cultural marxist agenda of decadence, long before this latest episode…

    Greens Fear Scots May Hear Both Sides On Climate!  

    Debate With AfD Patriots? Red/Green Comrades Bottle Out! 

    Daniel Cohn-Bendit and the German Greens

    Britain’s Sleazy Greens – Pervert Polygamy Next? 

    000

    000

    ….but their sheer jackboot intolerance has rarely been expressed so brazenly as last week, in Australia’s Senate, when their spokesperson, Larissa Waters, hurled this telling barb at Pauline Hanson.

    ..

    The One Nation leader was, railed Waters –

    “a regular bringer of dissent into this place”

    Well, so much for democracy!

    If Greens ever gain power, no more nonsense about disagreement with the powers-that-be!

    .

    Senator Larissa Waters has come under fire for a controversial Instagram post. Picture: Gary Ramage

    Larissa Waters .

    .

    I don’t know a lot about Comrade Waters but she is presumably literate and must understand the meaning of the crime she imputes to Ms. Hanson...

    dis·sent. /dəˈsent/ noun

    the expression or holding of opinions at variance with those previously, commonly, or officially held.
    “there was no dissent from this view…
    ……

    Hell, Waters isn’t so much a cultural marxist as a bloody Stalinist!

    Nor was Labor’s notorious lesbian much better.

    Penny Wong said her party agreed with denying formality to the Hanson motion because it was “not appropriate to spend this Senate’s time inciting division”.

    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jun/11/senators-unite-to-block-pauline-hansons-all-lives-matter-motion

    Wong is unspeakable but she’s not unintelligent. She is fully aware that when there is a vote taken in parliament, it’s done by a formal division.

    If there is no division, then it’s hardly a parliament at all – just legislative lock-step!

    .

    So Labor’s Senate leader, like Comrade Waters, believes legislators must be unanimous.

    Like the good old Supreme Soviet, nobody daring to challenge the ruling class’s ideology? But Comrade Wong does seem to have a problem with plain English.

    Asserting black lives matter isn’t saying that other lives do not matter…”

    In which case, why not say so?

    PS – in fairness, Wong warbled along with an outburst of the cultural marxist verbiage taken from the same song-sheet used by the rabble mob orchestrators around the world since last month,

    It is responding to a systemic structural problem where black lives are not given equal value….”

    And that is a bare-faced lie.

    What individual haters think, bitter bigots like the American Don Lemon, who denies real racism when it stares him in the face…

    “F*** White People!” But We Don’t Know If It’s Hate Crime? 

    …is up to them.

    …..

    But there are no built-in racist structures in Australia, no racist system – if anything, Oz errs in the opposite direction…

    …with that ruinous multicult ideology used by malevolent misfits, as well as marxists, to alleviate the weight of the numerous chips on their shoulders.

     

     
    • Keith Milner 15:11 on June 16, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I prefer when you publish Australia material early in the day, Ross, so I can let my pals in Adelaide know. No worries, this is good.
      Greens are all for free speech, as long it is what they want to hear.

      Like

  • ross1948 23:17 on February 8, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'DIVISIVE', , , , racist Diane Abbott,   

    Rees-Mogg Rumble- Who Really Is ‘Divisive?’ 


    So Jacob Rees-Mogg stepped in to stop a scuffle between a pack of masked cowards and someone else.

    =

    • Jacob Rees-Mogg with mangy red scumbag

    Jacob ReesMogg involved in scuffle during university campus protest

    ——-

    News, I suppose, and had there been more than half-a-dozen Red Nazis hiding behind their dark glasses and/or masks, it might have been more serious.

     

    • However, what interested me more than the incident was the Guardian’s sly attempt to insert its own anti-conservative prejudice, with these fatuous words.

    Rees-Mogg, the hack warns us, is seen as a divisive figure because of his rightwing views.

    No, hack, he’s not!

    Except by a minority of left-liberals, and of course the Red Nazis who by their own admission were not up to arguing with the man, only in shouting him down,

    We’ve noticed this use of the word ‘divisive‘ before as a sly way to slant the news.

    Prick Up Your Ears When You Hear ‘Divisive!’ 

    Who gets to be labelled ‘divisive?’

    Corbyn’s pro-terrorist views are not shared by anything like a majority of Brits…

    =

       –

    Corbyn smiles with Sinn Fein/IRA’s Blood-Beast Adams

    ———-

    …but does the Guardian insert in its reports of his activities any assertions that he is seen as a divisive figure because of his LEFTWING views?

    0000000000000000000000000000

    What about Corbyn’s ex, that ghastly racist Diane Abbott?

    oooo

      

    The ugly face of racism

    =====

    Watch Her Racist Arrogance as she cowers from serious questions  -‘I’ve got nothing more to say’https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lUNSNNPlLk

    Does the Guardian include references to the fact that Ms. Abbott is seen as a divisive figure because of her RACIST views?

    Not that I’ve seen!

     

     

     
    • Tammy 15:23 on February 9, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Short and to the point, Ross and all the more effective.
      The Guardian is incapable of impartial reporting.

      Like

    • Gail Manners 18:14 on February 9, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      That video link really opens your eyes to Diane Abbot’s racism but even more to her arrogance and cowardice.
      No wonder Corbyn’s such a mental mess after all those nights sleeping with such a repulsive woman, repulsive not just in appearance but to the depth of her soul. On the other hand, maybe he’s always been a mental mess and that’s why he was attracted to her in the first place.

      Like

  • ross1948 09:27 on October 4, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'DIVISIVE', , , , , , ,   

    Prick Up Your Ears When You Hear ‘Divisive!’ 


    The Equality Campaign has attacked a “divisive” advertisement that attempts to cast marriage equality supporters as intolerant by citing comments on social media labelling opponents “bigots.” 

    The poor little dears don’t want to divide Australians but warned the no campaign’s tactics could harm the country…

    Harm the country? .

    So the repellent witch-hunt waged against honourable Australians who won’t knuckle under, like Margaret Court, is not harmful?

    MARGARET COURT SAYS SHE WON’T BE ‘INTIMIDATED’ ON GAY MARRIAGE STANCE

    Margaret Court gay marriage controversy

    And the ‘gay’ threats and thuggery against Christians is not harmful?

    ========

    Christians threatened by same-sex hate-preachers | Herald Sun

    The pro-decency Coalition for Marriage apparently has an ad which offers screenshots of abuse on social media from people it suggests are marriage equality supporters including calling opponents “homophobic maggots,” “bigots” and expressing hope that “someone kicks your teeth in.”

    That’s a neat Guardian trick that, people it suggests are marriage equality supporters,  as if it wasn’t gaystapo bullies engaged in intimidation!

    Then we have a queer twit named Tim Wilson, one of Turnbull’s Liberal MPs…

    Gambar terkait

    ….who takes terrible exception to the Coalition for Marriage’s ad, because to feature the abuse in an ad “seeks to inflame discussion.”

    So the clown reckons gaystapo abuse should go unremarked, when we know that cowardly, vicious bullying is the hall-mark of the militant homo agenda?Incredibly, he claims the pro-decency  campaign is “trying to bait people into being ferocious in the debate, and that’s not what we should be doing.”

    At least we get a bit of sense from another MP, Eric Abetz..

    “Once again, this commentary is all one-way traffic, suggesting that the no campaign is inflaming a situation when it is exposing what is occurring and will occur in the event of the yes campaign being successful.”

    Oh, so that mangy thug said so, did he, and that’s the end of it?

    Get real, gaystapo bint.

    But let’s get real about and get rid of, that ridiculous word DIVISIVE!

    Here’s another, unrelated report.

    Swiss voters rejected on Sunday a divisive pension reform plan that the government proposed to address the needs of an ageing population.

    https://www.thelocal.ch/20170924/swiss-vote-against-plan-to-save-pensions

    Fear not!

    =

    =

    Although I write about a lot of events all over the world, my aim today is NOT to debate the rights and wrongs of how Switzerland treats its oldsters.

    It’s that word ‘divisive!’

    Here’s a few instances, just from a casual surf round Google, of its use and misuse.

    The most obvious current example of the latter is the controversy raging about some scum in America.

    ==

    Foto Cynthia Marie.

    ,

    It Was Just Divisive.’ Tom Brady Speaks Out After Trump Slams NFL …

    For months now we have seen one oaf after another squatting instead of standing proudly for the Star-Spangled Banner at American sports events.

    There can be few forms of behaviour more divisive, reminiscent of the racist BLM, a gang motivated by sheer hate…

    – Black Lives Matter co-founder tweets about killing “men and white folks”

    ….which seeks to elevate one race above others!

    Yet klutzes like this Big-Mouth Brady and his running dogs 0n CNN etc. DARE call President Trump ‘divisive’ when he urges Americans to behave as good citizens always have done!

    ——–

    Now an example of the word’s proper use.

    SIS: Launderette’s ‘Muslim only’ policy divisive

    A vicious sectarian bigot in Malaysia, backed by his malignant ‘mufti,’ thinks it’s AOK to turn customers away from his launderette if they don’t worship the way he does.

    THAT is quintessentially ‘divisive,’ yes, and primitive!

    (As you probably expect, I have more to say on this, and will publish on the issue in the next ten minutes!)

    But many of the cases of misuse, indeed, abuse, of the word tend to crop up as complaints against democracy.

    That Swiss pension issue had a lot of people taking one side or the other in the debate.

    I hold no views, nor am I much interested, but when public opinion is divided, then the obvious, and honourable, way forward is debate and then vote.

    That’s the opposite of being ‘divisive.’

    Yet according to those dissatisfied with the outcome, or even with what they think may be the likely outcome, it’s democracy that’s divisive.

    Chaos at new airport pushes Berlin into divisive vote

    Government urges Sturgeon to drop ‘divisive‘ referendum plans

     Oh, and here’s a classic!

    However, given the experience that I have I can tell you that referendums are, by nature, divisive…When Can I Vote ‘No’ To More Referendums?

    I have never quite understood why democratic decision-making might be regarded as ‘divisive.’

    Again, the whole point of democracy is that when opinions are divided, as on most issues, in most countries, they usually are…

    .

    …a free and fair vote is the proper way to settle the argument.

    Then we accept that we lost the argument, and unite behind the people’s decision, which, by having participated in the debate and the democratic process, we are morally obliged to do.

    In a free country,  it’s only divisive when the losers on the vote won’t accept the result.

    Of course, in due course, ten years or so, then a debate can be revived, and a campaign for another vote undertaken.

    Life will go on meantime…

    =

    ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

    …but please note, ten years or so is a rational gap, surely, NOT the four decades plus ( 1975 – 2016) it took to get a re-run for Brits on the EUSSR.

     
    • Keith Milner 12:30 on October 4, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      A good read, Ross. Thanks.
      It is a shame the doctors were bullied into this.

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: