Tagged: ECHR Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 4:00 pm on August 2, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ECHR, Nordic Foreign Ministerss,   

    Nordic Natterjacks, Ignorant Of History! 


    Just looking back at things we should have covered last month, questions we should have asked…like…

    What do these klutzes have in common?

    Jeppe Kofod is Danish minister of foreign affairs. Pekka Haavisto is Finnish minister of foreign affairs

     

    The Nordics unite to support the Council of Europe and ECHR

    =

    Gudlaugur Thór Thórdarson is Icelandic minister for foreign affairs and international development cooperation. Ine Eriksen Søreide is Norwegian minister for foreign affairs. Ann Linde is Swedish minister for foreign affairs.

    Apart from their parallel positions, foreign ministers of their respective countries, they are all stunningly ignorant of modern history.

    I say this because they know that the Council of Europe, which we have written about before…

    Bojo Gangs Up Against ‘Our Oldest Ally? ‘ 

    …when we showed you it’s hugely expensive HQ in Strasbourg….

    • .

      Building of the Council of Europe Headquarters located in Strasbourg, France. Stock Photo - 103414864
      Council of Europe Headquarters

      .

      …a deplorable body which spawned the ECHR, now a Sorosoid tool used to bludgeon national sovereignty – was established in the aftermath of the World War Two…

      .

      oooo

      ….in Strasbourg on the basis of international law – including human rights and the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

      So it was.

      And many, if not all, of the signatory countries had capital punishment on their statute books.

      Many had corporal punishment too as a legal sanction.

      Sexual (‘gay’) perversion in many European nations was against the law – certainly in the UK, which only legalised it in the early 1960s.

      Yet the Council of Europe and its Sorosoid Court has declared capital and corporal punishment unacceptable….

      =

      ==

      …and engaging in all manner of sexual perversion, while not yet mandatory….

      =

      =

      ….is deemed as acceptable as living decently within normal relationships.

      Were those original signatories hypocrites?

      Hardly likely they would sign up, if they thought any laws in their own lands were transgressions against  human rights and the principles of democracy and the rule of law

    • So the original convention, which these Nordic Natterjacks invoke so readily, has itself been perverted by malevolent jurists.

      .

      Wise nations should withdraw.

     
    • Jim Ex Jakarta 6:17 pm on August 2, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      All very true, what you say, Ross, these foreign ministers are just air-brushing the truth about that post-war rights pact.
      What I want to know is why you are still energetically publishing all these readables after you said you were going to ease off.

      Dont get me wrong, I am always happy to read what you offer, but if this is you easing off, I am wondering what we would get ( 10 pages a day?) if you decided you had relaxed too much.

      Like

      • ross1948 7:33 pm on August 2, 2021 Permalink | Reply

        Okay, Jim, I confess. I can’t sit idly by.
        It’s not that I don’t have things both onerous and enjoyable to do, but there are gaps between them and so much in the news that I feel obliged to deride or dispute.

        Like

    • Tam Birnie 6:41 pm on August 2, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      You are absolutely right about the governments that signed up to the convention but I think you’re wrong to say the ministers who made this new statement are ignorant.
      They are just dishonest.
      It goes without saying they know the convention was never meant to stop the use of the death penalty or to etop badly behaved children getting a quick wallop with a cane or a strap in school.
      The Council of Europe and the ECHR make fools of theirselves when they contradict the intentions of the convention.

      Like

  • ross1948 6:31 pm on July 7, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Anniversary London bombings, , , , ECHR, July 7th London Bombs, London Islamist atrocity,   

    London 7/7 – 15 Years On And Still Soft On Terror! 


    Having extricated the UK from the EUSSR, the British Government flexed its new ‘muscle’ by declaring a global ‘human rights’ policy…

    …bashing a few Russians but ignoring obvious enemies of rights like Hong Kong’s Carrie the Quisling.

    Ya See Quisling Carrie? Never Go To Hong Kong Again! 

    What the UK should be doing is celebrating British deliverance from Brussels diktats by denouncing the irresponsible and immoral EU policy on capital punishment.

    .

    The European Union is the leading institutional actor and largest donor in the fight against death penalty worldwide.    https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sectors/human-rights-and

    000000

    Especially on this 7th July, the 15th anniversary of the Islamist atrocity in London…

    ..

    ….a day most of us remember where we were ( I was in a shop in Scotland when I got a call, from the anxious offspring on the other side of the world, who feared I might be in London)  and everyone I spoke to that day, that week, agreed with me…

    .

    ..

    …that ALL those involved in the sectarian mass-murder should be hunted down and put to death.

    The bombers themselves, of course, went straight to Hell, but those who incited them, with evil sermons, and those who mealy-mouthed excuses about the ‘duty’ to exalt sectarian solidarity ahead of British foreign policy?

    How many of those were put away for life, or expelled from the UK?

    Damn few, if any?

    How many MPs stood up in the House to demand the reintroduction of the death penalty?

    .

    .

    Damn few, if any?

    That latter admirable aspiration was unattainable, because British law was subjugated to Brussels.

    Now it’s not.

    Start the hangings, and soon?

    Oops!

    Not possible, because Johnson won’t deliver British justice from the Strasbourg Soros Court!

    Sauron Rules, Abetted By Strasbourg Legalice!..

    .

     
    • Edward Lamont 7:14 pm on July 7, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Johnson is a lost cause.

      Liked by 1 person

    • JazPen 7:44 pm on July 7, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      That was a horrible day.
      We probably all know somebody who lives or works in London.
      It is frustrating that Britain has failed to get real and hang terrorists.

      Liked by 1 person

  • ross1948 8:44 pm on September 30, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ECHR, , , , The Arrogant Eleven   

    If Bojo Won’t Curb That Court, Step Up, Farage! 


    From a surprising source, the far-left British media, The Independent to be precise, a useful article, which sheds light not only on how The Arrogant Eleven got into their lofty lordly positions…

    .

     

    UK Supreme Court justices are appointed by the Queen on the advice of the prime minister after being recommended by a special selection commission…

    …but also asks the question every Brit should be asking, viz.

    Should they perhaps also be subject to parliamentary scrutiny?

    Better perhaps to top up that question with an additional option, election by the people…

    …but the writer in ‘The Independent’ then reveals that she’s not on our side, by saying that ‘political fights that surround Supreme Court nominations in the United States might offer a powerful argument against this – especially in the present, highly polarised, climate.’  https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/uk-supreme-court-parliament-ruling-boris-johnson-brexit-a9121981.html

    How so?

    When the very future of a nation is at stake, that’s surely EXACTLY when ‘political fights’  – as at present between collabos and patriots locked in close quarters battle for British freedom – should be at their most fast and furious!

    .

    .

    Why she’s wary of conflict and controversy on court appointments is frankly baffling, because she very clearly understands that the UK Supreme Court, whatever else it may have ruled on, ‘has also created a new legal precedent in which parliament had no say and which has only deepened existing political divisions.’

    Spot on!

    If neither people nor parliament have any say on any issue, then democracy lies stricken, bleeding out!

    It’s time to fight back!

    ..

    We’ve seen the wrongs inflicted not just on the UK, but on every citizen of civilised Europe, by the robed rogues singing from their cultural marxist song-book in Strasbourg….

    =====

    Gambar terkait

    =

    …archetypal Enemies Within who have decreed that nation-states are banned from repatriating vile vermin, terrorists, to their homeland if that homeland might hurt them!

    We have written previously about how ISIS scum, the so-called ‘Beatles…’

    =

    El Shafee Elsheikh (left) and Alexanda Kotey

    Man Up, May! Those ISIS ‘Beatle’ Beasts Deserve To Die! 

    =

    Theresa May REFUSES to back death penalty for ISIS Beatles 

    ….were protected by Theresa the Appeaser from the death penalty the swine deserve.

    Remember, she lied, saying it was time to get Britain out from under the Euro-Court yoke, then bottled out, as of course was her wont.

    It’s no good getting Britain out of ECJ supervision if the ECHR continues to cast its evil shadow on justice in HM’s realms and territories, championing illegal undesirables…

    Let illegal migrants go free, EU court orders..

    =
    =====

      …denying police the right to arrest law-breakers known to have violated border law!

    But arguably the most outrageous crime committed by the ECHR was when it declared war on free speech, endorsing that Austrian ban on anything that might offend Islamist fanatics…

    .

    ..

    ..who set their alarm clocks every night with a note on their bedside tables reminding themselves that, when they rise in the morning, they must at once resume their quest for fresh cause to be offended.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/europe-rules-against-free-speech/574369/

    The Arrogant Eleven, many of them, undoubtedly share the sick liberal ‘values’ that guide Continental jurists.

    ( Lady Hale sure does! )

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9998887/judges-supreme-court-public-scrutiny/

    And even if they didn’t, they should never be allowed to veto people power.

    Hence my headline – if Bojo, for all his welcome attacks on the humbug of the whiners, will not commit to castrating that court, then we must look to Farage.

    .

    Nigel Farage

    .

    The Brexit Party leader has condemned the uppity judge-jerks, but we need to hear specific proposals to humble those uppities, tumble their hubris and bring that court and every court under democratic control.

     
    • Mack the Knife 9:03 pm on September 30, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      This is important and you do well to say so.
      Unless the issue is addressed very promptly, that court will destroy not just Brexit but any and every move to restore British democracy, British sovereignty and British values.

      Like

      • Lorne Marzio 11:13 pm on September 30, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Very true.
        Courts in the USA have done terrible harm and only now is President Trump putting things right.
        That is one big reason we need to re- elect him in 2020, or else the Democrats will drag us backwards again.

        Like

  • ross1948 11:02 am on February 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ECHR, , , ,   

    Euro-Court Exposed For What It is – Creeps Gang Up On Kickl! 


    We have reported on Herr Herbert Kickl, Austria’s Minister of the Interior, before…

    ..but once again he’s been telling it like it is, on the archaic ‘European Convention on Human Rights,’ which was founded by countries most of which had capital punishment embedded in their national statutes…

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =

    … but which somehow has perverted its role to the extent that signatory states are now ordered not to expel the vilest terrorists to any other country which might impose the death penalty for their atrocities.

    We saw this perversion of justice most recently when Theresa May went out of her way to say that those ISIS scum, the so-called ‘Beatles…’

    =

    El Shafee Elsheikh (left) and Alexanda Kotey

    Man Up, May! Those ISIS ‘Beatle’ Beasts Deserve To Die! 

    =

    Theresa May REFUSES to back death penalty for ISIS Beatles 

    ….must on NO account be punished as most of her citizens undoubtedly felt they should be.

    The ECHR’s directives are implemented by Euro-Court degenerates, who have also taken the side of illegal immigrants…

    Let illegal migrants go free, EU court orders..

    =
    =====

      …saying that police have no right to detain  lawless aliens who violate the sovereign borders of the country in which police have a duty to enforce the law!

    And the same court ( ‘of human rights’ remember!?!?) has outlawed free speech that might upset Islamist fanatics.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/europe-rules-against-free-speech/574369/

    So no wonder Herr Kickl has described the ECHR as consisting of “strange, legal constructs” that are “partly many many years old”. He added that these laws prevent the Austrian government from doing “what is necessary”.

    Austrian Interior Minister and far-right Freedom Party leader Herbert Kickl’s attack on European Convention on Human Rights has triggered widespread criticism in the country

    All the worst elements in Austria at once ran verbally amok, led by the President, whom patriots there regard as a ‘green fascist.’

     “The European Convention on Human Rights has been ranked in the Constitution of Austria for 59 years. Challenging this would be a termination of the basic consensus of the Second Republic,” said Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen…

    Well, we already knew whose side Bellen’s on.

    Far-Left Bellen Brays Support For Biased State Media! 

    ..   Van der Bellen

    Will Green Fascist Try To Thwart Patriot Power In Vienna? 

    And the socialist SPO party plans a ‘no-confidence’ vote in parliament.

    Austria is run by a coalition of Kickl’s FPO patriot party, led by the Vice-Chancellor, Herr Strache, with Chancellor Sebastian Kurz’s OVP. Herr Strache is standing by his straight-talking colleague.

    =

    The far-right’s attack on human rights

    Minister Kickl, Vice-Chancellor Strache, Chancellor Kurz

    One hopes Herr Kurz will do the same, but one has to wonder, in view of what the report we are looking at has to say about discussions he’s had with the Interior Minister, which have been described as “clarifying..”

    Kurz won the last election largely by presenting himself and his party as just as patriotic as the FPO.

    If he doesn’t live up to that, his OVP may pay a price.

     
  • ross1948 4:03 pm on January 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , clean Break, ECHR, , ,   

    Mama Stasi’s Ever-Wider Open Door – Abetted By Euro-Jerk Judges! 


    Some 6,000 entered on buses and trains from Austria, the border with the highest number of illegal crossings. The next highest number of illegal crossings was on the border with France and Switzerland.

    https://www.dw.com/en/germany-14000-illegal-immigrants-crossed-border-by-bus-and-train/a-47259892

    may-merkel

    Two wicked women

    ==

    Incredibly, Merkel’s federal police on duty at Germany’s borders “only refused entry to illegal migrants who crossed the Austrian-German border.”

    Please note – in 2018 “more than FOURTEEN THOUSAND people” were intercepted at the German frontier-  entering the country illegally on buses and trains…

    So a popular method among would-be crimmigrants?

    And due to become more popular, because…

    =

    evil judge

    PASSPORT CHECKS ON BUSES ARE SET TO BECOME MORE DIFFICULT AFTER THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ruled that Germany’s membership of the Schengen area prohibits bus companies from checking passenger identity papers.

    NB – that’s NOT the malevolent gang that ruled to ban free speech which offends shariah fanatics, late last year.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/europe-rules-against-free-speech/574369/

    ======

    That was the ECHR, which, admittedly, is also pro-crimmigrant.                                                                             Let illegal migrants go free, EU court orders..

    .judgingjudges_header

    THE ECJ is also a malignant growth…

    Top EU Court Sides With Dirty Old Man! 

    …but Brits this week may not need to be reminded that it’s the court which Theresa the Appeaser has authorised to rule on the terms of her treasonous FAKE BREXIT – unless there is a ‘No Deal’ i.e. CLEAN BREAK outcome.

     
    • Petra Malley 4:18 pm on January 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The courts are the greater enemy. People can wake up and vote out renegades like Merkel and May but without a plan to topple European-wide institutions, or at least get governments prepared to defy their rulings, we are lost.
      I read somewhere that in America,in the 19th century, governments often just ignored stupid judicial rulings that got in their way.
      As a short-term solution, that would be better than nothing.

      Like

    • Edward Lamont 5:21 pm on January 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The two of them will go down in their countries’ history as the most treacherous leaders ever.
      Not being sexist. Macron is up there alongside them, and there are a ton of male traitors all over Europe besides him,

      Like

    • Vanessa R 6:44 pm on January 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      No explanation why one border ( with Austria) is taken seriously but two others are left wide open, the French and Swiss.
      Very strange.
      But very telling, that the Czech and Polish borders are not mentioned.
      Those sensible countries are almost migrant-free, so their borders are probably not a danger.

      Like

  • ross1948 5:45 pm on October 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ECHR, Jair Bonsonaro, , Manuela D’Avila Communist VP candidate   

    Bolsonaro, Better All The Time! 


    Impressive!

    Jair Bolsonaro’s 46% in the first round of the Brazilian presidential election has the pinko media in a welter of weeping and wailing, because he is ‘far-right’ and/or ‘populist,’ whatever those labels mean.

    .

    Gambar terkait

    .

    I have no claim to be an expert in the politics of Brazil so have largely been reacting to the pinko media. If they hate Bolsonaro, there must logically be a lot to be said for him.

    He has only this week declared that he won’t roll back his forthright rhetoric – nice to see somebody prepared to stick to his principles!

    But even were he not as sound as the pinko shrills make him out to be, ANYONE has to be preferable to a socialist slug like Haddad, who is so indifferent to democratic principles that he has taken on a self-confessed Communist Party activist as his VP running-mate.

    Image result for manuela d'avila communist

    Manuela D’Avila, Communist wannabe VP

    A man with a rancid red on his ticket or a ‘Tropical Trump?’

    No decent voter in Brazil, or anywhere, should have to contemplate voting choices for more than a nano-second, before marking his or her ballot paper in the latter’s favour.

    anti_communism_by_leandrotr

    Fingers crossed for 28th October!

    Brazil is a very big country. If it falls into the hands of a good guy, that amounts to a major boost for the worldwide resistance.

    But exactly what is this man proposing?

    Digitalmedia.com yesterday provided a useful objective comparison of policies and proposals.

    And one from Bolsonaro that struck me as outstandingly wise,  and that should be emulated all across the Western world,has to be –

    Change the Age of Criminal Responsibility to SIXTEEN!

    In fact one report from the start of the year suggested he wanted it to be 14, but that seems not to be the case.

    Brits who remember the brutal murder of little Jamie Bulger by ‘underage’ scum might even think a lower figure is worth thinking about…

    …but one day at a time, yeah?

    Imagine if those clods in Brussels, and those degenerates styled ‘judges’ on the ‘European Court of Human Rights,’ were to come out and say there’d be no more hogwash about dastardly young alien thugs and sex-predators aged 16 and 17 being designated ‘children’ and given kid-glove treatment accordingly?

    Nine Young Women In Denmark     Swedish police warn Stockholm’s maintrain station is overrun

    Yes, imagine, cause it ain’t gonna happen.

    Real children are human beings under the age of puberty, but no chance of that reality being introduced into the sicko permissive system in Europe…

    Junior Jihadis? Merkel Has Been Blocking Surveillance! 

    …where so-called ‘unaccompanied’ so-called ‘minors’ are not hammered, corralled and promptly deported when they step out of line in someone else’s country.

    The same sensible approach, of course, should also apply to home-grown mini-vermin who have passed their 16th birthdays. Again, one wonders, why not 15th, or 14th?

    Another True Tale Of Filthy Savages In Berlin? 

    Lock ‘em up!

    But don’t throw away the key. Access required for regular floggings if they act up whilst ‘inside!’

    ==

    Not that the age of responsibility is the only issue on which Bolsonaro talks sense.

    How about this?

    Categorize invasions of property and homes as “terrorism.”

    For which, one hopes, the death penalty would be made readily available under a Bolsonaro government.

    And it’s still getting better all the time. Denouncing the Brazilian left’s stance, of cosying up to the marxist menace in Caracas, Bolsonaro is crystal clear!

     “We are going to stop hailing murderous dictatorships” — said in reference to Venezuela — “and denigrating big democracies like the United States, Italy and Israel.”

    And on a very different issue, he promises that Brazil’s schools will be directed to get on with schooling, ‘“without indoctrination or early sexualization.”

    http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/bolsonaro-haddad-hold-different-visions-of-brazil-future/article/534028

    What a contrast to his opponent, the leftist Haddad, who sounds as dementedly committed to decadent liberalism as the UK’s St. Theresa of Transgendria…

    =

    hogwashmeterred

    ….pledging lots of rot about how he ‘will strengthen an inclusive, non-sexist, non-racist and non-discriminatory view of the LGBT” community.

    Yabba-yabba-yabba!

     
    • Al Barker 7:44 pm on October 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      There has not been enough attention to the fact that Haddad is running not only with the full support of the organized Communist movement but with a red running mate who if Haddad wins would then be a heartbeat away from running Brazil.
      The mainstream ( dishonest) media tend not to mention this, possibly because it would mean that while they call Bolsonaro ‘far-right’ over and over again, the Communist link would oblige them to call Haddad ‘far-rleft’ which he must be if he’s ready to share power with dedicated marxists.

      I shall take pleasure in forwarding this to as many people as I can, because I think we won’t see CNN or CBS or NBC telling the truth about Haddad’s far-left extremist ties.

      Like

      • Maggie Jacks 9:42 pm on October 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Communism should be THE untouchable for any politician who calls himself a democrat.
        Note, for my American friends I use a small ‘d.’
        We should all hope Bolsonaro wins.
        We have seen what marxist rule does, just look at the decades of dictatorship in Cuba and the ruination of poor Venezuela.
        Brazilians do not deserve to suffer as Cubans and Venezuelans have suffered and still suffer.

        Like

  • ross1948 10:36 pm on June 1, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ECHR, , Francois Molins, , , , ,   

    More – And More – Savages Unleashed In France! 


    Is it not ever so mildly astonishing that there’s even a need for the senior French law officer in this report to point out that unleashing rabid animals constitutes a ‘major risk.’

    The outrageous terrorist crimes committed by that demonic pig in Liege last month week were hardly a novelty. Hell has prowled the Western world for years, the nightmares multiplied no end by the deliberate infusion of fresh evil into Europe by Mama Stasi Merkel.

    =

    =

    So  as always, we are forced to return to the question famously asked, in a totally different context, by Lenin.

    ‘What Is To Be Done?’

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =

    How can Francois Molins just make a little speech about ‘the major risk of seeing people who are not at all repentant at the end of their sentence come out of prison…

    https://www.rt.com/news/428162-france-radicalized-inmates-released/

    =

    =

    ….when he is about to leave his non-political post and could serve France even more by leading a crusade to put an end to the madness.

    Twenty jihadist vermin due out of jail this year, another twenty next year, he tells us? 

    =

    =

    If Macron were not afraid of the gibbering judges in Strasbourg, he’d introduce internment tomorrow.

    =

    =

    He would also order the detention of every illegal immigrant – if Devil’s Island is not available, there are numerous little rocky islets around the world…

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =

    • …remnants of France’s colonial era, where they could be kept confined, indefinitely if need be, or, better, until transport home is available.

    • But Macron IS afraid of the gibbering judges in Strasbourg.

    • Or not!

    • More probably?

    • He shares their degenerate mind-set, which puts the ‘human rights’ of satanic scum above the safety of his fellow-citizens.

    Otherwise he’d reintroduce executions tomorrow.

     
    • Mort 12:59 am on June 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I read a few weeks ago that Macron to hold a nationwide ‘consultation’ about some topic other than terrorism, not a democratic vote of course but stage-managed public meetings which would have no power to direct the government to do anything.
      He could of course do the same on terrorism but that wil not happen because no matter how he tried to choreograph his meetings, the anger of the people would be impossible to control.
      At the very least, internment of known jihadists, not only those due for release but all those currently monitored ( ineffectually, as shown by monitored jihadists murdering people!) would prevent at least some attacks and send a message that France is serious.
      It is incredibly irresponsible to let enemy aliens move freely around France while France is at war.
      The same goes for other Western countries.
      First, however, the unelected courts need to be put in their place, because the role of that ECHR has been very damaging to the fight against terrorism. Those judges are despicable.
      I have wondered out loud recently whether, if Europeans cannot quickly and easily get rid of the institution, they could not borrow from our American system, so that any new nominations have to be approved by national parliaments.

      Like

      • Edward L 2:28 pm on June 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Mort, there is not a chance of reforming the court to bring its thinking into line with normal peoples.
        The only way out is to take our countries out of its jurisdiction.
        Theresa May promised to do that but she betrayed our trust on that as she has on Brexit.

        Like

    • Gareth Davis 6:06 pm on June 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      It would not be so insane if they picked them up as soon as they stepped outside the prison gates and took them at once to the nearest airport.
      Out of jail, out of France.

      Like

  • ross1948 11:56 pm on February 15, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'compensation' for terrorist murderers, ECHR, , , Madrid airport bomb, , ,   

    Strasbourg Hands Brit Taxes To Terrorists! ‘Human Rights?’ 


    Gambar terkait

    Europe’s top rights court on Tuesday ordered Spain to compensate two ETA members convicted of the 2006 bombing of Madrid airport for the “inhuman and degrading treatment” they suffered in police custody.

    ETA airport bombers win compensation victory

    =

    Is there not one whit of conscience, no shame at all, to be found among these overpaid ( over £150,000, traditionally paid tax-free! ) robed scum?

    =

    Yes, of course we’re talking about the ‘European Court of Human Rights,’ the ECHR, ever-ready to champion vermin like these two ETA terrorists.

    Found guilty and given life (instead of the death they deserved) after their bomb killed two innocents and left 50 more defenceless people injured, these ETA beasts outrageously turned to the robed rats for ‘compensation.’

    Why?

    The pair claimed they were kicked and punched by officers following their arrest by counter-terrorism police in early 2008. 

    Pity the police didn’t beat them to death!

    Then we wouldn’t need to read how those bleeding-heart b-st-rds in Strasbourg…

    ..

    ….are now lashing out YOUR cash to ‘compensate’ the terrorists!  I say ‘your’ because, if you are reading this in Britain…

    =

    …then thanks to Theresa The Appeaser’s disgusting U-Turn, the UK is still subject to the deranged diktats of this contemptible court – not one of her Brexit u-turns; she did the dirty on this issue ages ago…

    =

    =

    …after she had previously said she would back leaving the ECHR, and replace the 1998 Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights

    =

    =

    …but suddenly, she stabbed her country in the back.

    Theresa ‘I Won’t Deliver Brits From Europe’s Robed Rogues.’ 

     

    ====

    Any money awarded by the vermin in ermine to the ETA animals should be seized and handed over to the kin of their victims.

    If I sound a little angry, aren’t you!

     

     
    • Edward 1:05 am on February 16, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Poor us, told we are facing economic challenges and everybody worrying about how to make ends meet and here’s our money paying gigantic salaries to these fools to throw financial favours to terrorists .
      Did the UK judges vote against it? Were they all pro-terrorist?

      I would like to know, and to know where they live. We should demonstrate outside their front doors to let the locals understand what’s next door.

      Like

    • Arthur Martin 2:54 pm on February 16, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Yes it does make me angry, do these fools ever do anything that might make sense to sane people?

      If you’re a terrorist, you get a hand-out, definately not from their big fat salaries but from tax-payers in one or other of the countries stupid enough to be under their control.

      As you say, not a penny do they offer to the victims’ families.
      They ARE b-stards and I wonder if they will ever get bombed by terrorists?
      God knows I wouldnt shed a tear.

      Like

  • ross1948 10:23 am on August 1, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ECHR, , , , , , ,   

    On Swiss National Day, Arrogant Elitists Fretting! 


    It’s August 1st, Switzerland’s National Day, so greetings to all our Swiss readers!

    After our recent post on how the EUSSR is threatening Swiss democracy…

    NB Team Brexit! Brussels’ Swiss Lackeys War Down Democracy! 

    …somebody sent me a link to a story which I seem to have missed last month.

    How I missed it I don’t know, because it’s from The Leftal, sorry The Local, whose often biased output I often peruse.

    It’s opening words are a stanza of hope.

    The Swiss People’s Party (SVP) proposal to put Swiss law above international law would weaken Switzerland and threaten human rights…

    Swiss government slams SVP’s self-determination initiative

    Switzerland’s had a lot to put up with in recent years.

    We’ve covered the obnoxious ingrates who migrated to the Alpine country and then told their hosts it was time to change their famous flag…Islamist Flag Demands Make Swiss – and Ross – Cross! …because it grated on their sectarian prejudices.

    oooo

    And then there was the case of that equally obnoxious backward brat!

    Swiss School Panders To Sectarian Brats! 

    ooooo

    And we have heard outrageous shrilling from the human rights agitprop gangs who fawn on undesirables, like the 19-year-old dual national who intended to join Isis, saying the SEM ( Swiss Migration Office) wanted to strip him of his Swiss nationality even though he hadn’t yet been convicted of any crime.

    https://www.thelocal.ch/20170223/amnesty-slams-switzerlands-illegal-treatment-of-migrants-at-italian-border

    What kind of ‘rights’ nut-jobs would take up the case of such a vile slug and whine at his proposed exclusion?

    Hasil gambar untuk shamnesty

    Amnesty, of course!

    =======

    So it’s high time ‘human rights’ was exposed for what it is – a slogan!

    Civic rights, constitutional rights, democratic rights – no problem.

    Those are part of the contract between government and the governed in civilised countries.

    Abstract notions about some other kind of ‘rights,’ on the other hand, are an excuse for so-called ‘NGOs’ and un-elected tribunals and worse, external, supranational sticky-beaks like the ECHR, the EUSSR and…

    ..

    UN Hypocrisy – Time To Stop Crawling To Sexist Primitives? 

    …the rancid hypocrites who sit on that disgusting ‘UN Human Rights Council,’ to intrude on national sovereignty.

    But the Swiss political in-crowd don’t see it that way!

    They’re ranting and raving at the latest SVP popular initiative – which last year gathered enough signatures to put it to a referendum…

    So what’s got the Federal Council’s left-liberal lederhosen in a twist?

    Admirably entitled ‘Swiss Law Instead of Foreign Judges (Initiative for Self-Determination,’ the SVP (Swiss People’s Party) move is not complicated.

    It’s the kind of law every patriot in every country should be proud to champion, calling for Switzerland to put Swiss law above international law and, if necessary, renegotiate or renounce international treaties it has signed, including the Convention on Human Rights.

     WUNDERBAR!

    How many Brits or Aussies, for that matter, would like to see their countries extricated from that damnable convention?

    It was drawn up after WW2 but has been bastardised since, with notions of ‘rights’ that would have made the original signatories gasp.

    When Britain signed up, for example, every school-child knew that if he or she stepped out of line the cane or the strap was within easy reach of their teacher.

    Similarly with corporal punishment for criminals.

    Similarly with capital punishment, banned yet no ban ever mentioned when the convention was formulated.

    Same goes for that Refugee Convention, subject these days to wholesale deliberate misinterpretation by so-called ‘NGOs’ and all the vilest lawyer-lice to brandish at sensible governments.

    But back to the report and the SVP’s case!

    The patriot party asserts that the ‘elites’ consider international treaties to be more important than Swiss-made legislation…

    Hasil gambar untuk svp swiss people's party

    .

    “The people and the cantons have, for example, approved the unilateral management of immigration and the expulsion of foreign criminals, but politicians refuse to apply these decisions, invoking international law…”

    And that’s ABSOLUTELY true. The establishment parties have stabbed the people in the back! Read the linked post from last week at the top of our page.

    The elite despise democracy.

    Late last year the government decided not to fully implement an SVP-led anti-immigration initiative, approved by the public in a 2014 referendum, because it would contravene its free movement agreement with the EU.
     
     

    So how does the elite feel on being told that referendum decisions should be t applied “without discussion and regardless of whether they please or do not please the ‘elites’ of federal Bern?”

     Unbelievably, the Federal RAT (German for ‘Council’) said the initiative “threatens the stability and loyalty of Switzerland…”

    HUH?

    Democracy’s THAT dangerous?

     The leftist Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga, who has in the past actually shown some sense, is an exemplar of the hostility shown towards self-determination, and she singled out that foul ‘rights’ convention.

    =

    Simonetta Sommaruga

    ======

    She finds it downright scary that a referendum, date yet to be determined, could allow the Swiss nation to define its own human rights.

     

    WHY the HELL NOT?

     Is she seriously saying it’s simply absurd to trust Swiss men and women to determine their laws and customs via the ballot box…

    …….

    …to do what’s best for their country without having to obtain approval from supranational court-cliques ready to cudgel them into line?

    Well, yes, she is saying exactly that about the European Convention!

    “…I think it’s absurd to talk about ending it,” she said.

    In other words, she trusts a panel of robed aliens in Strasbourg to defend Swiss rights more than she trusts her own fellow-countrymen and women?

    Oh, and here’s her take on the risk of mere voters deciding if and when a treaty has outlived its usefulness.

    ====

    “A Switzerland that wants to sign an agreement with another country but who says ‘maybe one day we won’t want to do this, we’ll maybe want to renegotiate but we don’t know yet’ is no longer a loyal partner.”
    GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY!

    She sounds like a UK Remoaner….once ye get in there, ye’ll never get out – as the old Ulster song about Purgatory goes!

    This socialist harpy could not be more explicit on her commitment to supranationalism.

    Once a country signs a treaty, it may NEVER reconsider if that treaty actually benefits its people?

    If one government adheres to some convention, all subsequent governments are thereby bound in perpetuity?


     

    Shove, it, Signorina!

     
    • Vicki 3:40 pm on August 3, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Every time somebody starts talking about human rights I know it will be about rights for illegal immigrants or some other kind of criminals or else the ever-moaning ‘gays’ and not much heard about our rights, rights of law-abiding people who live or try to live normal lives.
      It should be up to the Swiss to decide what rights people have in their own country and not that European Court or the UN.
      I wish we had the Swiss kind of democracy in Britain. Life would be so much better without foreign interference.

      Like

  • ross1948 1:17 am on May 21, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ECHR, , , , ,   

    Theresa ‘I Won’t Deliver Brits From Europe’s Robed Rogues.’ 


    ====

    Observant people have already noted the Tories’ willingness to betray British fishermen.

    Theresa May could waive rights to 95 per cent of British waters …

    But let’s not forget that Mrs’ May has also made it clear she will keep Britannia subjected to arrogant interference from alien judges.


    One of her most unambiguous manifesto commitments is to remain signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights for the next parliament.

    http://www.independent.ie/world-news/and-finally/here-are-all-the-key-points-from-the-conservative-manifesto-35730072.html.

    —–

    If she were honest, she’d say forever, because it is widely predicted she will have a substantial majority in the next parliament.

    So if she won’t make the most of that to restore UK sovereignty when she easily can, clearly she’s ditching real independence, for there is none when stickybeak clowns…

    …………

    —-

    ….like the ECHR can over-rule law-makers elected by the British people on almost anything -NOT least the ‘rights’ of terrorists, or of alien parasites who should have no rights at all in other people’s countries.

    ..

     
    • Martin K 1:35 pm on May 21, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      She is not to be trusted, Vote UKIP

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: