OK, Erna! Norse Leader Tells Trump-Truth!

        

====

 “Right wing extremists and neo-Nazis have a lot in common with the extreme left or religious extremism. They seek to whip up hate, division and conflict…

….

 .

Not a lot of difference!

=======

Both Communism and Nazism are destructive ideologies, although the Communists have undoubtedly murdered more innocent people.

‘Bitter Harvest – Red Evil Exposed- And A Lugenpresse Reminder! 

Yet still we have moronic millennials  – and many other people who, unlike a lot of the ignorant ‘student’ population, actually know very well of marxism’s history of  satanic evil – trying to maintain there’s no moral equivalence between the two hate-creeds.

=

=

This denialism would have us forget the Reds’ concentration camps/death camps, like Belene in Bulgaria, the Gulag in Russia and the infamous ‘re-education centres’ in Vietnam.

And the rest…

….

.

….

Some of the deniers do so just because they don’t like Donald Trump, but many because they are ardent marxists, of course.

Antifa is an obvious example!

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/20/antifa-rise-after-charlottesville-alarms-free-spee/

=

=

Like all marxists, these deniers are skilled in lying, a skill all the easier to exercise when their mendacity is aided and abetted by media creeps like Fox News’  Melissa and CNN in America and the Guardian/BBC axis of bias in the UK.

But hark, truth has found a new champion in Norway!

===

==

Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg has come in for sharp criticism after being quoted as saying the Nazis and the extreme left had “much in common…”

Norway’s PM criticised for comparing neo-Nazis to far left

Aaah, but from whom does the ‘sharp criticism’ emanate?

 

 

The comments have been strongly criticised by some of Norway’s left-wing politicians.

Snorre Valen of the Socialist Left Party (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) called Solberg’s comments “completely irresponsible and amateur…” 

The PM should condemn Nazism clearly, Valen wrote.

But obviously not the much more blood-stained Communism?

Absolutely not!

“We need you to say ‘we’ve fought Nazism before and we’ll fight it again’, not weak distractions like ‘the others are also bad’,” he wrote.

As we know, those of us who have read any modern history beyond the first page or two of junior high school textbooks…

=

the others are also VERY bad!

…

…in response to Valen, Solberg cited violence by protesters at July’s G20 summit in Hamburg as an example of left wing extremism. She also wrote that her comments were not intended to draw equivalence between the left wing and neo-Nazis.

Okay, there are left-wingers who do not advocate violence as an instrument of policy, or murder, but there are many who do.

‘I hope Trump is assassinated,’ Missouri lawmaker writes

..and not just in politics, but among the cretin-celebs…

Don’t Blame The Bard, Blame The Bad – Like Allyn Burrows! 

But although that vile Missouri Democrat slag has been forced now to offer an apology of highly dubious sincerity, among the Danish reds, apologies should be forthcoming from truthful PM Stolberg.

=====

Bjørnar Moxnes, leader of the far-left Red Party, which does not hold any seats in parliament, said Solberg should apologise for her comments.

Oh yeah?

Why?

“This is bringing Trump rhetoric into the Norwegian election campaign. Being extreme against racism is not the same as wanting to wipe out minorities….” 

The Red leader said that his party “naturally rejects terror of any kind.”

Yes indeed. They always say that, whilst making herculean efforts to obstruct effective action to curb terrorism.

And any comment they make to condemn assaults on free speech by red thug gangs like Antifa?

Must been whispered.

Good though to hear from more mature politicians, like Henrik Asheim, who observed that-

“It is completely uncontroversial to point out common characteristics between right wing extremists and left wing radicals in this context.” 

Wilders Currently A Close Second, Yet He’s ‘Out In The Cold?’

Sunday morning with a mild dose of Jakarta Flu, which comes and goes here for no obvious reason, but in terms of suffering, I’d say a hefty dose of Guardian bias is infinitely worse.

=

With Holland in the news…

Turkey Sat Out WW2, Now Slanders Dutch Who Fought! 

 …most of you may know that Netherlands voters go to the polls on Wednesday and the Guardian dutifully mentions, way down its page, that the Freedom Party, in first place till last month, has slipped back a couple of percentage points.

 Rutte’s liberal VVD party has a narrow lead of around 25 seats with Wilders’s PVV on 22.

Geert Wilder’s party is therefore in second place for the time being, in a field which has NINE parties running.  Not too bad, surely, but the Guardian portrays this strong showing thus –

Geert Wilders out in the cold in Dutch election scrum

——–

Wilders campaigning

—

In contrast, although the report admits that the Dutch Labour Party’s 38 MPs,  may be reduced to single figures…

…there’s no harsh assessment on the Guardian’s part that Labour is ‘out in the cold.’ Emotive slanted headlines are obviously reserved for parties that speak up against crimmigrants and actually mean what they say.

————-

The Guardian salivates over its hope that the chasing pack are closing in: the Christian Democrats and progressive liberal D66 group are on 19, followed by GroenLinks with 16.

Parties with 19 percent, or 16 per cent, might, arguably, be seen as more ‘out in the cold’ than a party with 21 percent.

So how come Wilders is ‘out in the cold‘ in this story.

It must be because the Guardian, one charitably assumes, is less concerned about the electorate and more with the paranoid siege mentality of the Dutch political establishment  – even if he wins most seats, he has no hope of going into government, as all his main rivals have ruled out forming a coalition with him.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/12/geert-wilders-out-in-cold-netherlands-election

But that eternal bias shines on through, elsewhere, with the lamentation that the Dutch are turning away from their tradition of liberal, progressive politics.

Since when does ‘liberal’ = progress?

Progress, as I have said before but need to say again, is universally used to indicate positive development.

 A businessman is making progress with his sales campaign.              

A child’s report card is better than last term’s – making progress.      

Scientists are making progress in finding a cure for cancer.

Liberalism, on the other hand, IS a cancer, soft on crime, cool with crimmigrants, subversive of traditional values.

Oh, you disagree?

Up to you, but kindly don’t hi-jack the good word ‘progress’ to serve as a synonym for your own political ideology.

PS

Good to see that Geert Wilders shares every decent person’s outrage over Erdogan. Wilders has been calling for parliament to be recalled to debate the Turkish government’s attempts to hold campaign rallies in  his country.

What a contrast to Mama Stasi Merkel’s sick appeasement bleating.

Some rallies have gone ahead, and Merkel’s government has emphasized it wasn’t involved in blocking the others, but must respect the decisions of local authorities.

Contemptible craven cow!

No wonder Erdogan’s Foreign Minister Cavusoglu  sang Merkel’s praises, saying that all of Europe looked to her for leadership on the continent’s refugee crisis.

=======

Oh Yeah?

“Not only for Germany but for all of Europe, Mrs. Merkel is a very courageous person…”    http://www.cp24.com/world/turkish-comments-about-nazis-must-stop-merkel-says-1.3317476

PPS A late news flash, which warms the heart.

Mounted police disperse pro-Erdoğan crowd in Rotterdam after family affairs minister was barred from rally and escorted to German border

The War of The Austrian Succession? Let’s Wait And See!

In December, it may take one or two additional days to count all ballots, the Interior Ministry‘s top election official, Matthias Vogel, told public radio Oe1.

http://en.europeonline-magazine.eu/austria-braces-for-drawn-out-vote-count-of-presidential-election_497143.html

———-

——–

Well, we didn’t have long to wait, our fingers crossed, for what’s turned out to be a grave disappointment. Herr Hofer didn’t win in Austria. After Brexit and Trump, a Triple Tap against the forces of darkness would have been just grand. 

But it’s not as if there wasn’t other news to keep us energised.

Italy – Red Renzi Out, But More Crimmigrants Pour In! 

• But let’s stick with Austria!
• As noted in our intro, in Austria, the Freedom Party’s Herr Hofer wasn’t successful in his bid to become Europe’s first patriot party President-Elect…

---

—————-

 … but just because he lost to the far-left Van Bellen, who had the entire Europhiliac establishment, including the so-called  ‘conservative’ OVP behind him –  Vienna’s Phoney ‘Conservatives’ Urge Vote For Far-Left!  – it certainly doesn’t mean his country’s a lost cause.

00000000000000

Though its dire plight —Austrians Face Rising Tide Of ‘Asylum’ Crime!  — will now get worse before it gets better.

==============

Even the pinko media are admitting, in near lachrymose fashion…

Van der Bellen, however, may have scored a Pyrrhic victory…The FPO is strongly positioned for victory, with opinion polls consistently showing it far ahead of any other party.   https://euobserver.com/beyond-brussels/136143

…that the FPO patriot party is on track to come out in first place in the two rounds of elections.

Hofer’s 47% is a proportion of the electorate never reached by the FPO before.

The rotten cronyist parties in the current coalition are up against it.  They didn’t win the presidency. They had to get Bellen, a red/green who cleverly chose to run as an ‘independent,’ to do the job for them.

If the FPO does win the next parliamentary elections, don’t forget that the Europhiliac ratbag publicly vowed he would NOT acknowledge the will of the sovereign people.

–

–

He would NOT accept an FPO Chancellor, no matter how the people of Austria vote.

Now the old red rat is saying he didn’t really mean his dictatorial pledge – In a post-victory interview, Van der Bellen pointedly refused to repeat his earlier campaign assertion that he would make use of his presidential powers to deny a potentially victorious FPO the opportunity to form a government.

So how come he made that assertion? Let’s wait and see if he dares defy democracy. 

THEN watch how such a constitutional crisis unfolds.

We’ll see if Austria’s Armed Forces – whose oath of allegiance is surely to Austria rather than to a jumped-up jackanapes like Bellen – allow their fellow-citizens to be treated with contempt by the man whom Hofer perfectly defined as a ‘green fascist.’.