How Rare! Welcome Sense Talked In Guardian!

Actually, in the Observer – but that is just the weekend version…

…of the Guardian.

The BBC gets a mention, but the writer takes down all the dorks who mangle the English language.

.

He focuses on the iimbecilc use of the word ‘journey.’

I don’t think he tackles the way the word ‘conversation’ has been similarly subverted, used as an entirely inaccurate substitute for ‘debate’ and/or ‘discussion.’

As for ‘inappropriate,’ what a cruel fate has befallen that poor word, now bandied about as if it means ‘disgusting,’ or ‘obnoxious.’

‘Inappropriate?’ Surely Emma Told Groper – ‘Drop Dead, Sleaze-Ball…’

00000000000

But I’ve discussed that previously.

Read the short article

It’s a treat!

ooooo
https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/commentisfree/2022/aug/28/may-i-have-a-word-about-why-is-everyone-on-a-journey

 

Sent from 

Hateful Left Hacks Demonise ‘Question-Time’ Heroine!

The global version of the globalist BBC does not include Question Time, so I didn’t see the show last week, never can.

But the hoo-ha of hate in the rest of the media means that the patriot lady has come to my attention.

.

An audience member on Question Time calls for government to close all the borders.

(Couldn’t get a photo of the QT heroine to put here, so there’s a picture of the spirit she represents!)

……

She who dared say what millions think.

The sheer vicious intolerance, in character of course for the likes of…  

Patriots Abused As ‘Gammon?’ But That’s A Compliment, You Dimwit Pinkos! 

…the queer Owen Jones, and that BBC frequent Dateline Trumpophobic guest Steve Richard…

.

=

…and others, only confirmed what we know of the engrained anti-patriot prejudices among hacks.

That ghastly ‘New European’ seems to think their vilification of the lady’s love of country is so commendable that it lists the two ratbags and others almost as if vitriol merited awards.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/bbc-question-time-border-rant-1-6525047

Curiously, the wrath of hate-freaks like Jones is more stoked by the BBC affording viewers a glimpse of patriot resistance than by the courageous gal herself!

The hateful media hacks are well aware of the popularity of her views.

.

.

…they don’t want more people getting up the nerve to say out loud what’s in their hearts!

A measured response by the editor of spiked.com is a refreshing change, though even Brendan O’Neill chides her as being unrepresentative, part of his proof being that nobody clapped.

https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/02/21/why-they-hate-that-question-time-woman/

Wrong, Brendan!

That lady undoubtedly spoke for the majority of non-imported residents of the United Kingdom.

The absence of clapping no more reflects disagreement than it represents the adoption by the populace of the imbecilic moves by leftists…

Clap Hands, Here Come Inadequates! 

….to replace normal means of applause by Al Jolson-style ‘jazz-handing!’

Al Jolson

00000000000

Despite the win for the patriotic majority in the Battle for Brexit, the plain fact is that British people have been subjected to state intimidation for decades, at least since 1965.

That year’s Race Relations Act, and its various successive amplifications, ludicrously made It an offence to give preference on grounds not just of race or colour but of NATIONALITY!

.

.

Thus British people, British businesses, and even elected British local authorities, were forbidden to put British people first.

Such negation of normal patriotic feelings was thereby normalised.

 

.

Dire, draconian  punishments were authorised for those who dared pride themselves in loyalty to their own countrymen and women.

In any discussion on the impact of immigration, in any place they might be overheard…

.

.

….Brits almost invariably prefaced their input with the phrase-

‘I’m not being racist, but…’

After all, what is there NOT to be agreed with in her call to close the borders?

And what not to applaud in her condemnation of the vast waste of public funds on providing multilingual services for people too stupid, lazy…

.

.

…or, more likely, just uppity, to learn English before migrating to an English-speaking country?

Meanwhile, if a real patriot party is to rise from the ashes of UKIP and the Brexit Party, the ideal leader would surely be

‘That Question Time Woman!’

 

Porn-Flix! Why Do Media Call Them ‘Adult Movies?’

As usual, I had the tv on in the background whilst sunbathing in my front yard awaiting for today’s guest ot drop by, when I heard one of France24’s female newscasters describe that incipiently middle-aged American publicity-seeker as an ‘adult movie’ star.

Trump lawyer Michael Cohen tries to silence adult–film star Stormy …

One expects that sort of crass euphemism from CNN’s queers, desperately doing down The Donald, and clearly NBC whose link I show above. But Fox too has described her works of art thus!

=

=

It strikes me as an all-too-common phenomenon, and really rather offensive to all genuine adults.

The description ‘adult movie’ – if it meant what it said – would surely include films like this…

=

=

Or this…

–

or this

…

…two of which I’ve seen more than once.

An adult film, properly defined, is a film which requires a mature interest in the subject and ipso facto does not appeal to children.

In complete contrast…

=

…a porn film basically requires little or no brain-usage  on the part of those who watch it. That’s not being prudish, simply recognising reality. Kids in their early teens are often collectors of porn, precisely because they are immature.

Normal adult males enjoy seeing girls in bikinis or miniskirts or – in Jakarta at least…

=

=

…the dancers (invariably called the ‘sexy dancers,’ whether or not they are sexy!) who jump about on the bar while we’re having a beer or ten with our pals.

Men who watch porno films? That suggests they are mentally still in their early teens.

Which brings me back to the subversion of the English language.

How come so much of the media is trying to dumb down their audience by categorising that sad woman as an ‘adult movie’ star.

 

British Thought Likely Doomed? Soviet Echoes in UK!

A somewhat sad article in the UK’s Telegraph, recounting how the ‘th‘ sound is likely to vanish from the English language in a generation or so.

The “th” sound – also called the voiced dental nonsibliant fricative – is likely to change to be replaced an “f”, “d”, or “v” meaning “mother” will be pronounced “muvver” and “thick” will be voiced as “fick.” 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/09/28/th-sound-to-vanish-from-english-language-by-2066-because-of-mult/

=

 

=

If I remember correctly, the abolition of  ‘th’ letter was one ‘reform’ quickly imposed on Russia when the Bolsheviks seized power in their 1917 coup.  Anything – like a softly aspirated consonant directly descended from the Greek ‘theta’  – that preserved refinement in the Cyrillic alphabet was clearly anathema to the Communist nation-killers.

The impending change in the British Isles is not however driven by latter-day Red terror.

=

=

It is is said to be yet another blight inflicted by multicult migration, importing aliens who find it beyond their abilities to assimilate to the linguistic standards of their host nation, just as many of them cannot adapt to civilised norms.

Wot will da BBC make of dis?

=

=

To be fair, I can remember how even in the 1960s there were BBC news readers inexplicably mispronouncing ‘India’ as ‘Indiar!‘

And failing repeatedly to aspirate that W in ‘what.’

Now I’ll sit back and let the experts assail my analysis.