‘Liberal?’ ‘Democrats?’ – Who Wants A Ban On UK Freedom-Fest?

Thanks again to the Europhiliac TNE site, for telling us that the acting LibDem leader, Ed Davey wants a BAN on the plan by Nigel Farage’s plan to hold a grand freedom party at the end of the month to celebrate the restoration of British independence.

.

.

In the true liberal spirit of UK democratic traditions, Davey wants his fellow-Remainiac, the Labour Mayor of London…

.

.

….to ‘reject the plans because it would not help bring the country back together.  “I don’t think it’s very unifying… We want to unify the country to learn the lessons…”

This twerp has clearly NOT learned the lesson he and his comrades should have…

.

 

.

….that seeking contemptuously to overturn the ballot-box decision by the British majority was NOT the action of anyone interested in ‘unifying’ the country.

The jackboot jerk has the nerve to cite “VE Day when we defeated Nazi Germany… “

.

.

.

….as an example of when Brits might be entitled to “come out in our public spaces and celebrate together.”

So it’s okay to demonstrate national joy at the defeat of the Third Reich…

.

.

….but not the Fourth Reich?

‘Quite right,’ shrills Mr. Ed.

“The idea that a party in Parliament Square will be a way of bringing the country together is quite literally nonsense.” https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/ed-davey-on-january-31st-brexit-celebrations-1-6453576

What is actually nonsense is this LibDem louse’s belief that his defeat should not be celebrated by those who defeated his disloyalty to Queen and Country!

C’mon, Guardian – Name The Collabos!

I detest The Guardian, as some of you may have noticed, but it does purport to be factual, despite its notorious pro-EUSSR prejudice.

.

So when it splashes a story, as it did this weekend…

MPs ‘checked with EU chiefs over Brexit delay’ before passing bill

…its duty is to tell as much of the truth as it knows.

Senior MPs opposing  a no-deal Brexit sought assurances from the EU their bid for a three-month delay would be granted, it has emerged.

European leaders were sounded out before MPs, including the  “rebel alliance”, passed a bill, which is expected to receive royal assent on Monday, forcing Boris Johnson to ask for an extension.

The very least any newspaper should do, when reporting a scandalous act of collaboration such as the above, is give us the names of the guilty.

It matters not a tinker’s cuss whether ‘those involved said there were no guarantees…’

—

The swine should be named and shamed!

Any Briton worth his or her salt will surely agree with Tory MP David Jones –

“Senior EU figures gave private assurances to British MPs, as a consequence of which they supported the surrender bill. This confirms the level of EU interference in our internal affairs and makes the need for Brexit all the more pressing.”

If some ‘senior’ – or any – MPs had ‘checked with German chiefs’ about making a surrender deal during the Battle of Britain, and such treasonous activity had been exposed, would they not have been dragged into the streets and given summary justice?

….

The very least the sly swine described in the Guardian story deserve is exposure to righteous obloquy.

As for Britain’s enemies in Brussels…

.

…it is said, no doubt correctly, that any offer of an extension to the 31st October deadline on the part of the Brussels Empire has to have unanimous consent of the 27 governments.

So could Boris not make use of Britain’s continuing right as head of a government which is ( regrettably) still in membership, and show up – simply to veto any extension?

Or veto every move the Euro-Commissars want to make, on anything, including their Budget, until they agree to call it quits?

Or pick up the phone and call the Prime Minister’s office in Budapest?

.

The Hungarian Government owes Brussels no favours.

Viktor Orban might just be disgusted enough with EUSSR bullying to do Britain a big favour!