Tagged: far-left Greens Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 6:24 am on January 13, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Dungay far-left, far-left Greens, McCormack,   

    Red Nazi Fever Outbreak In Australia! 


    So it’s ‘beyond disgusting….’

    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/jan/12/australian-acting-pm-michael-mccormack-all-lives-matter-comment-labelled-beyond-disgusting

    ….for Aussies to believe, and, even more so, to say, that ‘all lives matter?’

    The fulminations of a far-left freako might be dismissed as simply that, a rabid rant best ignored by people who adhere to the Christian ethic and to principles of free speech.

    The same goes for a notorious Enemy Within gang like Shamnesty.

    One expects such scumbags to flock to the banner of the racist BLM, which shares with Red Nazi Antifa its abhorrence of placing equal value on human lives regardless of colour.

    .

    .

    But is it not shocking that parliamentarians from both Labor and the Greens are equally eager to put the boot into Mr. McCormack?

    .

    Fight Back, Aussies!

     
  • ross1948 5:24 am on August 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Andrea Carey Fuller, , far-left Greens, Green trans-freak election issue, , Shahrar Ali   

    Wow! Not All Greens Are Brain-Dead! 


    Wow!

    I was idly scavenging for blog material earlier this week, and stumbled on a story about a topic I would normally regard with sublime indifference.

    It’s about the ghastly Green Party.

    There are various parties around the world that use that name, all left, of course…

    .

    ..

    …but each a little different in its reprehensibility.

    In Australia, the gargoyle Sarah Hanson-Young typifies its ideology…

    .

    Sociopath’ – Hanson-Young’s New Insult Sums Up ‘Asylum’ Crimmgrants! 

    …pro-crimmigrant and whiney.

    In Germany, it has some scary people in its upper echelons…

    Hasil gambar untuk cohn bendit daniel

    Cohn-Bendit – From revolutionary marxist in France, to ‘elder statesman’ in Germany!

    ====

    Daniel CohnBendit and the German Greens’ pedophile problem 

    …and a somewhat scary history!

    But in the UK?

    Actually, there are both a Scottish Green Party and another one for England and Wales!

    We know how awful the Scots Greens are…

    Greens Fear Scots May Hear Both Sides On Climate!  

    But their English comrades have in the past been just as bad as could be…

    Britain’s Sleazy Greens – Pervert Polygamy Next? 

    000

    …yet now we hear, after perusing a report about shrill vexation among the odd-balls, there are voices of sanity, glimmers of rational thought – even heard in the party’s leadership contest!

    A Mr. Ali and a Ms. Fuller are under attack for recognising biological reality!

    ..

    ..

    Ahead of the election on December 12 2019, Ladywell Live asked all candidates standing in the Lewisham Deptford

    Currently two of the eight candidates are making a very clear pitch for the “gender critical” vote. Both Shahrar Ali and Andrea Carey Fuller have embraced definitions of women that exclude trans women from womanhood.

    Well, good for them!

    But will they win?

    After all, telling the truth in modern Britain….

    .

    Pro-Freak English Judge Rules -Truth Is ‘Offensive, Exclusionary!’ 

    Harry Potter Was Fun But Freak-Fan Thespians? NOT!

    …is a dangerous thing to do!

    And trans-freaks won’t be happy!

    Transphobia in the Green Party leadership election is harming the party’s reputation

     
    • Ozzie Kander 11:48 am on August 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Eat your greens, my mum used to say.
      She must of never met such an indigestible lot

      Like

  • ross1948 10:04 pm on March 13, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , far-left Greens, , , ,   

    Even Greens Can See The Iniquity Of Head-Shrouding! 


    May you live in interesting times!

    Said to be a Chinese curse, those words came to mind yesterday when I read about how a ‘tribunal’ in the German city of Hamburg…

    ….had struck down a ban on school-girls wearing the sexist sectarian head-shrouds variously called burqas or niqabs ( there’s a slight difference but they both make the wearers look like scary spectres) on the imbecilic grounds of ‘religious freedom…

    .

    .

    ‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

    It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

    Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

    …which is hogwash, as Muslim women are NOT obliged by their creed to hide behind primitive masks, nor even to don head-scarves!

    (Pity some sicko Swedes haven’t figured that out! https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15509/sweden-hijab)

    The fact that un-elected quasi-judicial jerks are empowered to stick their noses into matters on which they are as ignorant as they are irresponsible comes as little surprise.

    .

    Crimmigrant Arson In Calais! Savages Still Amok! Thanks Again, Euro-Court! 

    We read about wilful and or malevolent judge-jerks all the time.

    What did amaze me, and, I need to say it, pleased me, was the rest of the report in The Leftal, sorry The Local, an often very biased part of the media…

    …namely, that both the leftist parties on Hamburg’s state council are proposing to outflank the tribunal twats and pass a local law to reinstate the rule!

    The Socialists are usually bad news…

    Hitler’s SPD Heirs – ‘Media Must Gag Critics of Crimmigratio

    …but their state education minister, Ties Rabe, (SPD), said –

    At school, it is appropriate for teachers and students to have an open and free face, that is the only way school and teaching can function. That’s why we will now swiftly amend the school law, so that this is also guaranteed in the future.”

    The other party in the ruling local coalition, the Greens, have a girl named Katharina Fegebank on their front-bench, and since she’s got a not unattractive smile  (thus differing from Australia’s grotty Green hag Hanson-Young!) I will show you what she looks like along with her words-

    oo

    View image on Twitter
    =====

    ..the burqa and niqab were “symbols of oppression” for her. For a successful school education, she said, “good communication at eye level” was needed.

    Wow!

    Not the sort of nonsense Greens usually talk! 

    She obviously mixes with normal people from time to time!

    oooo

    Of course it’s a case of ‘better late than never!’

    Local opposition legislators, even Mama Stasi Merkel’s Christian Democrats, and the ‘liberal’ Free Democrats and of course the AfD patriot party, have all urged the coalition to prohibit school head-shrouds. They are not overly impressed by such a belated conversion to commonsense.

    However, I’m more sanguine.

    The same report describes how, in nearby Schleswig Holstein state, moves to ban such sectarian and misogynist maskng were frustrated by the Greens. Now it seems a re-think is taking place!

    And equally welcome is a statement from the German Teachers’ Association.

     “I advocate a nationwide ban on the niqab in all educational institutions,” said association president Heinz-Peter Meidinger. “This does not fit with the open-mindedness we want to cultivate in the classroom.” https://www.thelocal.de/20200204/what-you-need-to-know-about-calls-to-ban-full-face-veils-in-german-classrooms

    If sense is breaking out even among Greens and teachers, there must be hope for Germany yet!

     

     
  • ross1948 10:00 pm on February 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , far-left Greens, ,   

    Merkel Ready To Collaborate With Far-Left! 


    Any collaboration with the ‘far-right’ is ‘unforgiveable,’ yelped Mama Stasi a week or two ago, but it seems she will now happily collaborate with the far-left!

    Given the long-standing debate on her links with the Communist secret police in East Germany, many will be unsurprised.

    .

    Image result for stasi erika"

    Did Kim Philby Advise Merkel On Treason Skills? 

    Not that her state-funded propaganda media will use the words ‘far-left’ to describe the far-left party.

    The rabidly biased DW relentlessly calls the AfD patriot party ‘far-right’ but, in a land where the spectrum includes not only the increasingly leftwing Socialists (SPD) and the indubitably leftwing Greens…

    .

    .

    …then the only logical description of Die Linke (The Left) is far-left!

    They are the heirs of the Soviet puppet party which served the Kremlin as quislings in East Germany, but DW’s hacks won’t admit they are far left?!?

    And after years of refusal by Mama Stasi Merkel’s CDU to make deals with either the ‘far-left’ or ‘far-right,’ there’s suddenly a major lurch towards collaboration!

    ‘ …the CDU representative rejected “active support” for Ramelow in case of a new vote in the parliament, but did not rule out the possibility of his party abstaining in the vote.’

    .

    A rat by any other name smells just as rancid!

    .

    Rambelow is the Die Linke leader in Thuringia, whose defeat, thanks to a clever manoeuvre by the AfD, put Mama Stasi in tantrum mode a week or two ago.

    Fuhrerin Merkel – I Don’t Like The Result, So Annul The Vote! 

    Now her minion is ready to abet a marxist take-over?

    However, there’s many a slip twixt cup and lip!

    The AfD has threatened a tactical move of supporting Ramelow in a future vote, and so force him to step down, as he is expected to reject a new term if it were given to him by the populist party.

    https://www.dw.com/en/germany-thuringias-ex-premier-makes-offer-after-afd-debacle/a-52399909

    Watch this space!

     

     
    • Annelie Neumann 12:32 am on February 19, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Of course she will collaborate with Die Linke. They are like her originated from the East German stasi regime and we expect them step by step to come together.
      She has done so much to hurt us.
      I send you information about her faker refugees and what happens now even to German girl children.

      Like

  • ross1948 4:19 pm on February 10, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Christian Hirte, far-left Greens, ,   

    Courtesy – Collateral Damage In Merkel’s War On Democracy 


    Schade

    .

    The chancellor has today proposed to the federal president the dismissal of Secretary of State Christian Hirte.”

    ….or, in English, ‘it’s a shame,’ that Herr Christian Hirte was fired by Mama Stasi Merkel simply because he tweeted congratulations to Thuringia’s Herr Kemmerich:

    Your election as a candidate of the middle shows once again that the Thuringian [left-wing] red-green alliance has been voted out for good.”

    The Fuhrerin demonstrated yet again her lock-step solidarity with the far-left, with fanatic smear-mongers like the Green Party’s Sven Kindler…

    .

    ….who spat his fury against Hirte thus-

    Forming pacts with Nazis and also giving your congratulations, what a shame.”

    The AfD is of course not at all ‘Nazi’ – the patriot party is the largest opposition party in the Bundestag, freely and fairly elected by German voters, and despite all those votes is treated in that parliament with manifest unfairness….

    German Collabo Parties Trample Fair Play! 

    AfD accuses Bundestag rivals of Nazi-era tactics

    …and in fact the AfD has a better claim to being democratic than Mama Stasi…

    Image result for stasi erika"

    Did Kim Philby Advise Merkel On Treason Skills? 

    …whose past links with the East German red gestapo were always cause for concern, but whose reckless importation of a million unvetted aliens…

    .

     

    .

    ….with no democratic mandate has made her a symbol of multikulti elitist arrogance.

    Good luck, AfD!

     
    • Kristin M 5:23 pm on February 10, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      The perfect picture.
      She thinks she is a sultan or a caliph.
      ‘Christian Democrat?’
      She is the enemy of democracy and beloved by the jihadists she took in and allows to stay in Germany.

      Like

  • ross1948 7:05 pm on January 25, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , far-left Greens,   

    Hamburg’s Red/Green Gang – Don’t They Ever Think Of Victims? 


    So the Red/Green ruling clique in Hamburg have proclaimed their intention to import HOW many ‘unaccompanied minor refugees’ from the Greek islands?

     
  • ross1948 4:08 pm on January 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , false accusation, far-left Greens, Minister Alma Zadic, , Zadic   

    Scurrilous Abuse? Green ‘Hate’ Biter Bitten! 


    Interesting case of the biter bit in Austria, where a minister in the new coalition government got the whine chorus stirred up about ‘hate speech’ against her on ‘social media.’

    Unfortunately, the BBC fails completely to offer examples of what’s got her so alarmed.

    One hopes it’s not just an excuse for self-serving publicity, like the now thankfully almost forgotten Fourth Reich Fan…

    Shrill Soubry Should Get Out Of The Kitchen!

    Image result for soubry

    Brexit – Shrill Soubry Pants For Stalin-Style Purge! 

    ….Shrill Soubry, in the UK.

    The woman, Ms. Zadic by name, should not be targetted merely for her country of origin.

    That kind of malice is unreasonable!

    If an immigrant to a country makes clear her, or his, unconditional allegiance to her new homeland, she or he is qualified to serve her new homeland.

    End of story?

    Not quite!

    Zadic is described as both a Green and a lawyer, ‘specialising in human rights.’ the latter alone being grounds for distaste…

    ..


    …and the former no better.

    But on the question of her indivisible loyalty to Austria…

    .

    .

    …that basic requirement certainly seems compromised by her own words.

    She rejects the notion that individuals should choose a single identity. “It was diverse New York that showed me I could be simultaneously a female Austrian, Bosnian and European,” she told the news.at website.’

    Not good enough!

    If she’s a minister in the Austrian government, she should be absolutely crystal clear that her days of being Bosnian are behind her.

    As for ‘European,’ that may be construed as a cultural reference, but does she mean that her allegiance is not just to her country but to the EUSSR?

    .

    ..

    We can’t say for sure, but if her outlook was formed  – as she herself said – ‘in diverse New York,’ a milieu notorious for decadence, cosmopolitanism and multicult, then patriotic Austrians would be wise to beware.

    But my headline today refers to her yelps about being the victim of scurrilous abuse, while at the same time owing – what?

    damages of €700 (£595; $777), which a court ordered her to pay over a photo she had posted on the internet. A young man in the photo denied that he was pictured giving a Nazi salute – he said he had simply been waving to fraternity friends. Ms Zadic had captioned it: “no tolerance for neo-Nazis, fascists and racists.”

    A hateful slur against an innocent young man?

    She’s appealing – the court case, that is.

    Her whines,however, are NOT appealing to a lot of Austrians!

     

     
    • Blaine Cliffe 5:22 pm on January 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      If she’s serious about saying she’s not just Austrian but also Bosnian, she should not be a minister in the Austrian Government.
      No room for dual loyalties.
      From my reading of the BBC story, she is another of these intolerant liberals and Chancellor Kurz will have cause to regret getting in bed with the Greens.

      Like

  • ross1948 5:35 pm on November 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Angela Ditchfield, , , , far-left Greens,   

    Stinko Vandalism = ‘Protecting Property?’ Fire The Cambridge Clowns! 


    You must have read about this, but we can’t let the outrageous ruling go unremarked.

    The Stinkos may face righteous public revulsion…

    Bravo, London Commuters! One Dirty Stinko Gets Taught A Lesson

    …but clearly they have powerful fans on Cambridge magistrates’ benches!

    Angela Ditchfield was arrested after defacing the headquarters of Cambridgeshire County Council during a protest last December painting two XR symbols onto the building.

    However, Friday the 41-year-old was found not guilty at Cambridge Magistrates’ Court as the bench said she was acting “on the spur of moment to protect land and homes…”.

    That demented vandal deserves to have her ugly mug plastered all over the internet…

    =

    Image result for angela ditchfield cambridge"

    ….

    ..so decent folk in Cambridge – and there are many, some of them friends of mine, for I lived there very happily when I was a younger fellow – can easily identify her and tell her, to her pudgy, self-righteous face, what they think of her.

    She shouldn’t be hard to track down, having stood as a Green Party candidate locally…

    .

    .

    …and we know she lives in the King’s Hedges area. I would certainly not urge indignant tax-payers to daub grafitti on the walls of her home, not least because for decent Cambridge people, unlike her, the laws on vandalism presumably still apply.

    But the implications of this numbskull ruling as far-reaching!

    Delivering their verdict, magistrates said: “We find that you have a very strong and honestly held belief that we are facing a climate emergency.

    So how about the millions of decent Brits who have ‘a very strong and honestly held belief that we are facing’ an asylum-parasite emergency.

    UK encouraging illegal immigrants by not deporting bogus refugees in the tens of thousands, bombshell report claims – The Sun
    Jan 10, 2019 ·
    OF 80813 applications for UK asylum refused or withdrawn from 2010 to 2016, only 26659 ended in … BRITAIN is encouraging illegal immigrants by failing to deport tens of thousands  …

    .

    .

    Are they now entitled to splash paint on government buildings demanding that the parasites who get into the UK illegally…

    .

    …and are then allowed to sponge off the public purse voraciously, sometimes for years, with even so-called ‘Conservative’ ministers hiding behind garbage ‘human rights’ and Euro-Commissar excuses?

    challenged by Sir Edward Leigh, a former Conservative minister, who said: “What people can’t understand is where someone has palpably come through perfectly safe countries and they’ve arrived here …they’ve arrived here … why can’t they be sent back to France and claim asylum there?”

    One of May’s mealy-mouth ministers, a wet wally named Richard Harrington, replied:

    “Actually, without going into the complexities of the Dublin Convention, it just isn’t possible in many cases.” 

    Christopher Chope MP,who introduced the Bill, insisted migrants are given a “perverse incentive” to head to Britain as they are only given a “slap on the wrist” if caught.  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/12183475/Asylum-seekers-arriving-in-Europe-doubled-to-1.2-million-last-year.html

    .

    .

    Of course crimmigrants can be kicked out, IF the government cared more about Brits than about undesirable aliens.

    BUT…

    I betcha any patriot who tried to use paint or any method to protest against the this scandal of alien leeching would not be given free rein by morons in the local magidtrates’ court but would be hammered viciously, fines and or jail-time.

    British justice is a sick joke.

    Fire the pinko creep clowns who delivered that vile verdict.

     
    • Mack The Knife 6:10 pm on November 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      A very interesting story and it’s a brilliant extrapolation, is that the right word?
      If that Ms Pudgy Green get’s a free pass to express herself on climate by defacing public buildings, then there is no reason at all that some of us cant go out tomorrow and spray paint slogans against the illegals slurping up our taxes.
      No reason in logic but with the rulers of our land almost all pro-alien, every reason to expect a double standard.

      Like

    • Vanessa Reilly 6:21 pm on November 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Oh, no, no, not at all, Ross.
      Your argument is very good, pro-Stinko daubing allowed by the courts, so anti-crimmigrant daubers also entitled to show their feelings in the same way.
      You have not lived in Britain for ages, but if you had, you would know that speaking up against asylum parasites earns a real police state response.
      That old bag in Kings Hedges ( I lived in Cambridge once too) should have been jailed and the fools who let her walk should be fired, you are quite right, but if we tried anything anywhere near as disorderly,, we would be banged up faster than a speeding bullet!

      Like

    • Amanda Adams 6:44 pm on November 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Rest assured, one law for Greens, nice n easy, pat on the head, but anybody with true Red, White and Blue patriotic principles protesting against the asylum parasites wouldn’t get a fair trial.
      Off to prison we would go.

      Like

    • Jacko 10:39 pm on November 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      It’s not fair that she got away with vandalism.
      We never would.

      Like

    • Petra Malley 11:04 pm on November 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I hope a lot of people in Cambridge tell her she’s a disgrace to her city. If the law is an ass, at least the public should shame her.

      Like

  • ross1948 9:10 pm on September 13, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ‘Asylum liars go home for holidays, , far-left Greens,   

    Swiss Sense On Lying ‘Asylum’ Vacationers! 


    I see Switzerland has a ‘draft law,’ by which, if passed, some 40,000 fake refugees ( “people who have had their bid for asylum rejected but cannot be deported because they may, for example, face danger in their home country”) will be banned from leaving the country.

    About time!

    This has been a law a long time in the making!

    Swiss Tell Fakers – If You Go Home, Stay Home! 

    gobackyouarenotwelcome

    ….

    Splendid Swiss decision, this, ‘to strip asylum from those travelling to their home

    In fact, there are a number of fake-refugees who thoroughly deserve to face a bit of ‘danger.’

    The Swiss have quite a few scumbags who would be none the worse for a firing squad.

    Evil ‘Asylum’ Imam Gets ‘Non-Custodial’ 18 Months! 

    The Evil Within

    The Evil Within

     Deport Brutal Bigots Who Beat Up Righteous Muslims! 

    Just to clarify, of course it’s good if they go. But too many go and come back!

    If the fakers did go back to wherever ‘home’ might be, they’d ‘automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland…’

    That makes sense.

    We’ve seen a lot of lying no-goods who claim to be ‘fleeing conflict’ but suddenly opt for a nice holiday back in the old country.

    =

    snout

    Disgusting parasites!

    Like Canada’s Tamils, ‘German’ Syrians Exposed -‘Fake Refugees!’ 

    Those examples of dishonest dirt-bags are not even ‘failed asylum-seekers’ but mendacious migrants who got through the process –

     – clearly under false pretences, if they suddenly feel free to head home to the ‘perilous’ places they lied about.

    Though it’s a sensible enough move, as far as it goes, the report strangely calls it the ‘government’s tough new stance‘ – why?

    Well, partly because the report is in The Leftal, sorry The Local, whose hacks and hackettes are notoriously pro-crimmigrant.

    media-bias-in-action

    But also because the soppy majority on the Federal Council ‘had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban’ on such travel.

    You may read all the details but let’s take note of the parliamentarians who are mentioned.

    First, a good gal!

    =================

    Image result for karin keller-sutter

     Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter…has a reputation for toughness on migration issues..very welcome although surprising, since she belongs to the FDP, the ‘liberal’ party!

    ===================

    Image result for gerhard pfister

    =

    Then there’s the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister,who welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement.

    Herr Pfister has a sharp eye, because he has spotted that too many of the sly liars often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home.

    Good point – these undesirables may be nasty and parasitic but they’re also sneaky.

    And of course, no show without Punch…

    .

    green party red

    …. a GREEN!

    =

    Image result for balthasar green party swiss

    Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”.

    These Green creeps always make one want to throw up.

    Freedom?

    They have been proven unworthy, their claims mendacious. They should have no right to do anything in Switzerland!

    Balthasar knows who to blame, though!

    He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers.

    =

    16-SVP-Stop-JA

    =========

    The SVP is a patriot party and deserves applause for its frequent calls for common-sense, notably its repeated demands that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland.

    Currently, there’s an election campaign going on in Switzerland.

    We should all be rooting for the SVP.

     

     

     

     

    Under the draft law, the around 40,000 holders of ‘F’ permits in Switzerland – a group made up of people who have had their bid for asylum rejected but cannot be deported because they may, for example, face danger in their home country – would not be allowed to travel overseas. People who travelled to their home country would automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland, while exceptions would only be made in cases where short-term trips home were being used to prepare for a future definitive return, according the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) website. ‘A surprise move’ The Swiss government’s tough new stance on travel for F permit holders comes as something of a surprise, according to Swiss daily NZZ. The Federal Council, as the Swiss government is known, had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban on F permit holders travelling to their home country. In its original response to the motion from 2015, the government argued travel rules for people in this group were already very strict. It also stated a blanket ban would not allow for any exceptions to be made. Currently F permit holders can travel home with special permission such as in cases of personal hardship including death or serious illness in the family. Are you an F permit holder? Want to tell your story to The Local? Contact us here. But the Federal Council, and its new Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, who has a reputation for toughness on migration issues, have now gone a step further than even the Swiss parliament. A shift to the right? If the draft law is passed, F permit holders would only be able to travel to their home county when preparing for a definitive return. The SEM confirmed to The Local via email that the proposed law (here in German) made no provision for exceptions including the serious illness of family members as is currently the case. Critically, holders of F permits would also be banned from travelling to any other third countries. Only a very few exceptions would be made to this second rule, with the specifics of these to be drawn up in future. The parliamentarian behind the original parliamentary motion, the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister, welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement on Thursday. He noted that F Permit holders often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home. But Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”. He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers. The SVP has repeatedly stated that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland. The law has now gone out for consultation before final approval from the parliament. F permit holders in difficult position Holders of F permits in Switzerland in Switzerland find themselves in a difficult position. They are legally entitled to work, but their permission to stay in the country is only granted 12 months at a time. Many Swiss employers are reluctant to hire F permit holders because of their provisional nature of their residence, while their qualifications are often not recognized. There is a small silver lining though. Under the plans, F permit holders would in future be able to move to another canton if they find work or educational opportunities there. Currently, this is not the case.

    Under the draft law, the around 40,000 holders of ‘F’ permits in Switzerland – a group made up of people who have had their bid for asylum rejected but cannot be deported because they may, for example, face danger in their home country – would not be allowed to travel overseas.

    People who travelled to their home country would automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland, while exceptions would only be made in cases where short-term trips home were being used to prepare for a future definitive return, according the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) website.

    ‘A surprise move’

    The Swiss government’s tough new stance on travel for F permit holders comes as something of a surprise, according to Swiss daily NZZ.

    The Federal Council, as the Swiss government is known, had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban on F permit holders travelling to their home country.

    In its original response to the motion from 2015, the government argued travel rules for people in this group were already very strict. It also stated a blanket ban would not allow for any exceptions to be made.

    Currently F permit holders can travel home with special permission such as in cases of personal hardship including death or serious illness in the family.

    Are you an F permit holder? Want to tell your story to The Local? Contact us here.

    But the Federal Council, and its new Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, who has a reputation for toughness on migration issues, have now gone a step further than even the Swiss parliament.

    A shift to the right?

    If the draft law is passed, F permit holders would only be able to travel to their home county when preparing for a definitive return.

    The SEM confirmed to The Local via email that the proposed law (here in German) made no provision for exceptions including the serious illness of family members as is currently the case.

    Critically, holders of F permits would also be banned from travelling to any other third countries. Only a very few exceptions would be made to this second rule, with the specifics of these to be drawn up in future.

    The parliamentarian behind the original parliamentary motion, the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister, welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement on Thursday.

    He noted that F Permit holders often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home.

    But Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”.

    He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers. The SVP has repeatedly stated that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland.

    The law has now gone out for consultation before final approval from the parliament.

    F permit holders in difficult position

    Holders of F permits in Switzerland in Switzerland find themselves in a difficult position. They are legally entitled to work, but their permission to stay in the country is only granted 12 months at a time.

    Many Swiss employers are reluctant to hire F permit holders because of their provisional nature of their residence, while their qualifications are often not recognized.

    There is a small silver lining though. Under the plans, F permit holders would in future be able to move to another canton if they find work or educational opportunities there. Currently, this is not the case.

    Under the draft law, the around 40,000 holders of ‘F’ permits in Switzerland – a group made up of people who have had their bid for asylum rejected but cannot be deported because they may, for example, face danger in their home country – would not be allowed to travel overseas.

    People who travelled to their home country would automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland, while exceptions would only be made in cases where short-term trips home were being used to prepare for a future definitive return, according the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) website.

    ‘A surprise move’

    The Swiss government’s tough new stance on travel for F permit holders comes as something of a surprise, according to Swiss daily NZZ.

    The Federal Council, as the Swiss government is known, had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban on F permit holders travelling to their home country.

    In its original response to the motion from 2015, the government argued travel rules for people in this group were already very strict. It also stated a blanket ban would not allow for any exceptions to be made.

    Currently F permit holders can travel home with special permission such as in cases of personal hardship including death or serious illness in the family.

    Are you an F permit holder? Want to tell your story to The Local? Contact us here.

    But the Federal Council, and its new Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, who has a reputation for toughness on migration issues, have now gone a step further than even the Swiss parliament.

    A shift to the right?

    If the draft law is passed, F permit holders would only be able to travel to their home county when preparing for a definitive return.

    The SEM confirmed to The Local via email that the proposed law (here in German) made no provision for exceptions including the serious illness of family members as is currently the case.

    Critically, holders of F permits would also be banned from travelling to any other third countries. Only a very few exceptions would be made to this second rule, with the specifics of these to be drawn up in future.

    The parliamentarian behind the original parliamentary motion, the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister, welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement on Thursday.

    He noted that F Permit holders often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home.

    But Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”.

    He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers. The SVP has repeatedly stated that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland.

    The law has now gone out for consultation before final approval from the parliament.

    F permit holders in difficult position

    Holders of F permits in Switzerland in Switzerland find themselves in a difficult position. They are legally entitled to work, but their permission to stay in the country is only granted 12 months at a time.

    Many Swiss employers are reluctant to hire F permit holders because of their provisional nature of their residence, while their qualifications are often not recognized.

    There is a small silver lining though. Under the plans, F permit holders would in future be able to move to another canton if they find work or educational opportunities there. Currently, this is not the case.

    People who travelled to their home country would automatically lose their right to live in Switzerland, while exceptions would only be made in cases where short-term trips home were being used to prepare for a future definitive return, according the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) website.

    ‘A surprise move’

    The Swiss government’s tough new stance on travel for F permit holders comes as something of a surprise, according to Swiss daily NZZ.

    The Federal Council, as the Swiss government is known, had previously rejected a parliamentary motion calling for a blanket ban on F permit holders travelling to their home country.

    In its original response to the motion from 2015, the government argued travel rules for people in this group were already very strict. It also stated a blanket ban would not allow for any exceptions to be made.

    Currently F permit holders can travel home with special permission such as in cases of personal hardship including death or serious illness in the family.

    Are you an F permit holder? Want to tell your story to The Local? Contact us here.

    But the Federal Council, and its new Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter, who has a reputation for toughness on migration issues, have now gone a step further than even the Swiss parliament.

    A shift to the right?

    If the draft law is passed, F permit holders would only be able to travel to their home county when preparing for a definitive return.

    The SEM confirmed to The Local via email that the proposed law (here in German) made no provision for exceptions including the serious illness of family members as is currently the case.

    Critically, holders of F permits would also be banned from travelling to any other third countries. Only a very few exceptions would be made to this second rule, with the specifics of these to be drawn up in future.

    The parliamentarian behind the original parliamentary motion, the President of the centre-right Christian Democrats, Gerhard Pfister, welcomed the Federal Council’s announcement on Thursday.

    He noted that F Permit holders often transit in a third country before travelling on to their home country as a way of getting around the current ban on trips home.

    But Greens MP Balthasar Glättli said the ban was unnecessary and an “unjustified limit on the freedom to travel”.

    He said the draft law was a nod to the anti-immigration Swiss People’s Party (SVP) which has argued for years that Switzerland is too easy on asylum seekers. The SVP has repeatedly stated that asylum seekers who ‘take holidays’ at home should be deported on their return to Switzerland.

    The law has now gone out for consultation before final approval from the parliament.

    F permit holders in difficult position

    Holders of F permits in Switzerland in Switzerland find themselves in a difficult position. They are legally entitled to work, but their permission to stay in the country is only granted 12 months at a time.

    Many Swiss employers are reluctant to hire F permit holders because of their provisional nature of their residence, while their qualifications are often not recognized.

    There is a small silver lining though. Under the plans, F permit holders would in future be able to move to another canton if they find work or educational opportunities there. Currently, this is not the case.

     
    • Vicki 2:10 pm on September 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Why do these Greens and other far left people always take the side of the crimmigrants?
      I saw in the paper this week that the High Court in England has upheld a Home Office plan to give migrants ‘72 hours’ notice of deportation.’
      Ten minutes would be better but since the plan was being challenged by leftwingers who wanted the illegals to have more time to hire lawyers ( paid from our taxes of course) then we have to be thankful to the High Court!

      Like

  • ross1948 5:11 pm on July 31, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , far-left Greens, Gernan police, , ,   

    Exposed! High-Level German Support For Hitler’s Heirs! 


    It has been said that political divides are not measured by a straight line but by more of an almost circular definition, where both extremes almost meet.

    .

    Hammer_sickle_svastika

    If you look at Communism and Nazism, for example, they are not that dissimilar – both laid claim to a ‘socialist’ ideology, both were totalitarian, both used secret police and both consigned their opponents to concentration camps – as we have noted before…

    ‘Human Rights’ Expert Exposes Merkel -A Deliberate Plot! 

    …in at least one case, they both used the same camp, Sachsenhausen.

    In Germany today, the anti-democratic tendency which Hitler exemplified (as did the quisling regime in the Communist DDR!) often comes from the left.

    Hitler’s SPD Heirs – ‘Media Must Gag Critics of Crimmigration!’ 

    .

    HEIL MERKEL!   – Heiko Maas

    Himmler’ Maas Calls On Secret Police to Undermine Patriots! 

    Hence we should not be at all surprised at the outburst of fury among the German leftist Schweinerei over Donald Trump’s call for political action against Red Nazi Antifa.

    .

    Sven Lehmann, a Greens MP and the party’s spokesperson for social and queer policy, wrote on Twitter that he supports Antifa because the group “often looked closely when people were devalued or attacked, where others looked away.

    Looked closely?

    =

    View image on Twitter

    ….punched and hit several times, chemically sprayed by protesters while live-streaming antifaprotest in Portland
    ….

    Is THAT the Green homo’s idea of being ‘looked at closely?’

    Or THIS…?

    =

    Gambar terkait

    Crack-Down Time In Canada – Smash The Red Nazis! 

    ….

    Queer indeed, if he is unaware of the savage violence unleashed by Antifa’s masked Red Nazi hoodlums as part of their overt mission to deny free speech to anyone of whom they disapprove.

    The DW hack who reported on this upsurge of pro-Red Nazi indignation notes calmly that Antifa louts have been criticized for believing violence is justified to combat racist or fascist groups.

    .

     

    Liberal Hypocrisy Alert: Google Censors Conservative Figures – Labels Them ‘Nazis’

    .

    As we said, anyone THEY  – or Google, as above! – decide to categorise as ‘racist or fascist groups’ – and if marxist parties that base their policies on class hatred are allowed to exist, why should not parties of any kind be free to present their programmes to the electorate?

    ==

    ==

    Needless to say, the vermin party, Die Linke, the modern successor to the collabos who ran the DDR, are singing from the same song-sheet as the Green queer.

    “I am Antifa always and every time. German history compels us to stand up against racism and fascism. On the street and in parliament,” wrote Bernd Riexinger, co-chairman of the Left party.

    Bernd Riexinger

    …..

     

    antifanaz

    If Antifa is finally classified as a terrorist organization in this country as well, then the currently popular hashtag ‘I am Antifa’ offers up a very rich pool of investigative leads in the fight against terrorism,” AfD parliamentarian Jürgen Braun wrote on Twitter.

    “Donald Trump is making it possible, thank you very much!”

    And it’s not just the patriot party, frequent victims of Red Nazi thuggery, who see sense in Trump’s suggestion.

    =======

    The Hamburg branch of Germany’s police union also criticized Antifa, posting pictures of black-clad protesters holding signs calling for violence against police.

    “Violence as a means of political conflict must be prohibited and criminally prosecuted — this must be a democratic consensus that transcends party and ideological boundaries,” the union wrote.

    Arnd Diringer@Arnd_Diringer

    DPolG Hamburg@DPolGHH

    Gewalt als Mittel der politischen Auseinandersetzung ist zu ächten & strafrechtlich zu verfolgen – das muss demokratischer, partei- & weltanschaulich übergreifender Konsens sein

    https://www.dw.com/en/trumps-threat-to-label-antifa-terrorist-group-triggers-row-in-germany

     
    • Jonnes G 9:01 pm on July 31, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Stauffenberg was a hero.
      Where are his likes today?

      Like

    • Mr. Pike 3:05 am on August 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I have read that approach before, the semi or even 3/4 citcle that brings extremes of left and right near each other and not far apart.
      It makes sense.

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: