Wanna See How A Weirdo ‘Prof’ Becomes Brainless?

Today I read about a ‘professor’ in the UK who thinks ‘ who thinks ‘we can solve climate change by deciding to not have any more babies and simply letting the human race die out…’

CambridgeshireLive reported.

First, to my readers in Oz, I’m sorry, but I have to reveal that she’s Australian!

Having studied the photo of Patricia MacCormack, I can’t imagine why any normal man would even WANT to couple with such a bizarre-looking bint!

.

Patricia MacCormack was the co-editor of ‘Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Cinema’ (2008) – oh, a definite must-read for my next bus journey!

..

It looks like she is suffering from chronic mental diarrhoea, with a steady (presumably diminishing!) trickle of brain matter dribbling out of her nostrils!

But having read the entire article, as you really must – but not…

https://www.theblaze.com/news/professor-we-can-fight-climate-change-by-not-having-any-more-babies–then-letting-human-race-become-extinct

…. if you’re hungover – I am wondering if there are any professorships at ‘Anglia Ruskin University,’ in Merry England, in subjects like toe-nail trimming, toilet-cleaning…

.

…

…bum-wiping, or maybe how to avoid finding oneself seated beside nut-jobs like Pin-Up Patricia on long-distance flights.

All such subjects are more useful and MUCH more academically respectable than the kooky gunk that this weirdo woman gets paid to ‘research!’

“feminism, queer theory, posthuman theory, horror film, body modification, animal rights/abolitionism, cinesexuality,…“

What a load of rubbish.

Professorships can be established in various areas of knowledge that command respect, but while I like ‘horror movies’ – and may have seen horror films with characters resembling Pin-Up Patricia –

.

‘Kuntilanak’ films are popular here in Indonesia!

.

– scary movies do not require ‘professors’ to ‘research’ them for us.

Especially if such ‘professors’ get paid from the public purse!

As for anyone who wastes time and money ‘researching’ degenerate drivel like ‘queer studies,’ or ‘cinesexuality…’

.

 

Breaking – English Cops To Nab Shariah Preachers?

So wolf-whistling is a hate crime…

Wolf whistling can now be reported as a hate crime

BBC News–20 Jul 2016

OR NOT?

00000000000000000000000000000000

Let’s look at The Guardian!

One police force (Nottinghamshire) has expanded its definition of hate crime to include misogyny and harassment of women.

Wolf-whistling is no crime – but it is part of our misogynist culture

Hate Crime to include misogyny?

If this were true, then it would mean that anyone advocating shariah law  would, ipso facto, be guilty of a ‘hate crime.’

Shariah is an iniquitous code that imposes mean-spirited and absurd misogynistic discrimination on women.

Not only the misogynistic ‘aurat’ stuff, whereby every woman is coerced into shrouding her God-given crowning glory, the lovely hair on her head, not to mention her knees, mid-riff, thighs and even those soft smooth shoulders on which her hair ideally cascades…

——-

‘Fathers and Husbands, their aurat (private parts) are your responsibility!’

………………………

…..a nonsense that would degrade all girls until they resemble the famous Michelin Man advert…

………

……..

…but also the grossly discriminatory inheritance laws, which denies daughters equal inheritance rights.

Utterly misogynistic.

And let’s not even discuss the grotesque concept of polygamy…

………

………..

….how can anyone seriously maintain that men can have multiple spouses while women may one have one?

As misogynistic as it gets!

Alas, I fear the PC Plods in Notts County lack the guts to go after shariah hate crimes.

——————

Of course the very idea of ‘hate crime’ is an affront to justice.

If you kill or injure somebody, whether in a fit of temper and/or jealousy, or during a bar-room brawl, or, most horrendous of all, surely, because he or she converts to another religion – ooops, that’s shariah law again…

……………..

……………

…then you are guilty of murder.

There’s neither fairness nor logic in making the penalty heavier if your crime was motivated by ‘hate.’

However, if the ruling PC ideology imposes such a nonsense as ‘hate crime’ on our legislation, then the Guardian scribbler whose link I’ve appended above, makes a fair point.

---

—

If the gigantic PC catch-all net includes ‘disability, gender identity, race, ethnicity or nationality, religion, faith or belief and sexual orientation. Is it really so shocking for sex to be included in that list?

---

————

And that’s what Nottinghamshire Police have done.

But here’s another curious extract from her article, a statement from Notts Police, which declares that a ‘hate crime’ is not a crime at all.

—

Madhouse England, yeah? Here’s the full quote – 

“A hate crime is simply any incident, which may or may not be deemed as a criminal offence, which is perceived by the victim or any other person, as being motivated by prejudice or hatred.”

In other words, whether it’s a crime depends if the complainant or his or her pals or some agitprop pinko whiner have a big enough chip on their shoulders.

A charter for uptights.

The authoress ( that’ll wind her up nicely – I’m sure ‘authoress’ is as non-PC as ‘actress’ these days) is named Laura Bates, BTW.

Laura doesn’t like being whistled at!

0000000000000000000

Laura in fact began her article with the words wolf-whistling has been reclassified as a crime! But then she explains how that sentence, that ‘crime,’ wolf-whistling is not even mentioned in the police report.

She blames the Guardian’s media rivals for trivialising abuse of women by introducing the non-existent ‘wolf-whistling’ crime. Again, fair comment.

But then she exposes her own loopy libber mentality, by adding that wolf-whistles are the thin end of this wedge…

---

——-

I don’t walk around Jakarta whistling at girls – a friendly smile seems a more decorous approach, and is often reciprocated.  

And on my rare trips to the Wicked West I regret to admit that nobody has wolf-whistled me.

 Were it to happen, assuming the whistler wasn’t a poofter, I’d not be upset at all. It’s a compliment, albeit an unsophisticated one.

So why should it be cause  for complaint?

The Tim Hunt Scandal – ‘When You Criticise Pinkos, They Cry…?’

I’ve no idea how clever Sir Tim Hunt is, but it’s likely that his brain-power, all by itself, dwarfs the combined intellectual ability of the pinko dorks in charge of Universitiy College London.

——————–

• 
• ——-

• I refer to those who dumped him, after all, a witch-hunt against a distinguished scientist for telling a joke – and it was a joke, as the full transcript proves beyond doubt -and what kind of society has Britain become that transcripts or videos of joke-telling have become essential to fight career-destruction at the hands of politically-correct shrills?

• 
• ———————————————

• But their stupidity pales in comparison with their hypocrisy, dining out at a men-only club whilst their collective hands are raised in horror at a few (actually quite funny) comments about women’s undoubtedly greater propensity to weep.  

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/sir-tim-hunt-sexism-row-college-that-refused-to-reinstate-scientist-for-sexist-comments-holds-dinners-at-menonly-garrick-club-10390696.html

Nothing wrong with men-only clubs, of course, despite the inane ramblings of their critics, like this uptight bint.

“Although the Garrick itself has since removed some of the ridiculous rules, you are still on territory that is gender-segregated, and to my mind that feels very odd,” she said. “It does not feel comfortable.”

That’s the input from one (wisely) anonymous female ‘academic,’ and the daft cow sounds near to tears, arguably confirming Hunt’s jocular remarks.

If she so easily is made to feel odd, perhaps she is.

–

–

Why shouldn’t men have their own clubs?

No self-respecting woman can object, any more than a club which bars left-handed Ulster-Scots-Canadians would meet any objections from me – if they don’t wish to socialise with me, I damn sure do not wish to socialise with them.

Why shouldn’t women have private clubs where they can feel comfortable doing things and discussing things they like, recipes, perhaps…

===========================

.….or knitting, in that anonymous nitwit’s case (so she can be usefully occupied while sitting beneath the guillotine when sexists are executed! ) without members of the opposite sex – oops, the pinko word is ‘gender‘ – intruding.

We’ve heard it all before! Hunourless, witless, typical feminazis…

AARGH! Shock-Horror! Scotsmen Heard JOKING! 

Feminists are infantile. A place that makes them feel odd and uncomfortable and they WANT to become regulars?

Just to spoil it for those who like it as it is?  

Psycho vixens, they really are! 

We heard the same hogwash from St. Andrews a year ago.

And I commented then as I must comment today – People can’t take a joke these days?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/sir-tim-hunt-sexism-row-college-that-refused-to-reinstate-scientist-for-sexist-comments-holds-dinners-at-menonly-garrick-club-10390696.html

Why Is Oberlin College Infested With Retards?

 

Not so long an outing as usual, a little lazy today, but time to hit Superindo supermarket on Jalan Panjang. Discounts on ice-cream (durian/choc flavour) and those nice big cartons of milk, about Rp.4000 cheaper than elsewhere.

But the beer has been moved to the new shariah-lite section, a kind of sin-bin area away from the regular shelves. As if even seeing the stuff might subvert the morals of shoppers.

• 

• Still, there’s pork available. So not as bad as the Superindo in Meruya, where piggy products had been removed altogether last time I dropped by a few months ago.

==========================

=

Anyway, home – via the warteg for a spot of lunch – just as twilight is starting to gather, and to an amazing story about a once-distinguished American academic institution, which is now evidently infested with retards.

I know that PC twits don’t like that noun (which of course is why I use it)  but let’s use their left-lib lingo then, and describe these appalling asses as ‘people with learning difficulties.’

=======================

• 
• ——————–

• Speaking of appalling asses, here’s a picture of two ‘women’ students from the story, and they do indeed seem not only to be, but also to have such things!

These lissom lovelies set up a ‘safe space’ for any brain-dead bints unable to cope with the horror of listening to opinions that don’t match their prejudices.

http://redalertpolitics.com/2015/04/21/panicked-liberal-students-demand-trigger-warnings-safe-spaces-conservative-woman-visits-campus/

• 
• ===================

• I reckon few normal students would enter such a sturdily ‘gate-keepered’ zone, but given the dull-witted calibre of the anguished protests – the morons can’t even spell ‘participant!’ – no doubt the muscular pair would not lack company. 

Unlike the smartly-turned out and very smart conservative, Christina Hoff Sommers…

…, whose mere appearance on campus caused something like nervous break-downs all over the place. And  for even better insights into these ignoramesses, try this link. 

http://www.thirdbasepolitics.com/oberlin-feminists-accuse-christina-hoff-sommers-of-supporting-racists/

The writer of that piece was present and tried to reason with one of the dorkettes. To no avail.

——————