Tagged: free speech Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 12:56 on March 19, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: free speech, hooligan Yale law students, Law Society wokers,   

    Trainee Legalice Crawling Around Top Campus 

    Not all lawyers are scumbags, but as the honest ones retire or die off, it looks like the next generation will be even scummier than the current crop!



    More than 100 Yale Law School students ambushed and disrupted a recent free speech panel — and added enough intimidation to the mix that police were called to escort the speakers to safety.

    What are the details? … Read more


    And while the appalling facts of this episode – that it was not just a minority of red nazi louts that shamed Yale…



    …but that their hatred of free speech was backed by a majority of law undergrads – relate to a formerly distinguished American college, it seems very likely, from previous reports….


    Jun 20, 2021 — The Law Society has faced a storm of online mockery and criticism after it showcased its guide for the use of pronouns in the workplace

    https://www.rt.com › UK news
    ..that British lawyers are just as bad.
  • ross1948 00:04 on February 18, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Colorado Springs, free speech, Mayor John Suthers, VDare conference   

    Court Hands Free Speech Veto To Red Nazis! 

    I don’t always agree with Ann Coulter but she has got it right this time. .

    When a mayor in any country menaces his political opponents with threats to block law enforcement….

    Photo of mayor John Suthers


    Phone: (719) 385-5900
    Contact the Mayor’s Office

    “I would encourage local businesses to be attentive to the types of events they accept and the groups that they invite to our great city,” Suthers warned. “The City of Colorado Springs will not provide any support or resources to this event, and does not condone hate speech in any fashion.”


    …knowing full well that there’s a clear danger from Antifa Red Nazis…



    If the Supreme Court does not agree to take up this case and brutally slap down the 10th Circuit, “free speech” will be officially limited to speech acceptable to Antifa, working hand-in-hand with liberal mayors and governors.


    …and ‘liberal’ judges refuse to step in on behalf of the victims…

    …where next for free speech?


  • ross1948 21:22 on November 9, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Canada jihadists, Democratic values, free speech, French beheading, , , , , teacher Paty   

    In Turdistanada, Pretty Boy Weasels Once More 

    Justin ‘Pretty Boy’ Turdo has embarrassed Canada again, even more than when he did his prancing in that photo.


    No, this time he shamed his country with his weasel words on free speech.

    The foul fop has a record of being soft on terrorism, going back at least as far as the Boston Marathon Bombing…

    Canada’s Enemy Within – Will Turdeau “Have To Look at The Root Causes?” 

    …..and it would be quite wrong to blame it on genetics, even though his equally foul father was similarly without backbone, as when Pierre Elliot Turdo deliberately gave a green light to those murderous FLQ terrorists to fly off to sanctuary with his soul-mate…


    Tyrant Castro and Turdo Senior


    …the Communist dictator Fidel Castro, who unfortunately died of natural causes before he could be brought to justice.


    Turdo Junior has now told Canadians that their freedom of expression, enshrined in the bogus ‘Charter’ devised by Turdo Senior, only extends to saying things that don’t ‘hurt’ people.

    The morally vacuous slug does not, however, mean actual hurt, not harm, not injury, but merely ‘hurt feelings!’



    How pathetic can it get?

    In response to the controversial caricature, Pretty Boy feels that of “freedom of expression is not without limits!”


    Why didn’t the slimy swine not just go to Paris and spit on Samuel Paty’s grave, muttering that the slain teacher should not have tried to instill France’s democratic principles in those young pupils. 



    Or Pretty Boy might take a stroll to the Charlie Hebdo office and lecture the souls of the murdered staff on how they should never, ever have upset sectarian uptights?

    We owe it to ourselves to act with respect for others and to seek not to arbitrarily or unnecessarily injure those with whom we are sharing a society and a planet.”

    This from the freak who affronted the best of immigrants to his own country?

    In Turdistan, Decent Muslims Protest Junior’s Jihad Jaunt! 

    We do not have the right for example to shout fire in a movie theatre crowded with people, there are always limits.”



    Smarten up, you wart!

    Shouting fire in a movie theatre can cause REAL injury, as people panic, stampeding in fear for their lives.

    (Hell, do we honestly have to explain this to the crud!) 

    How does anyone compare that to drawing a cartoon?

    People may fear for their lives but NOT because of the cartoon!



    People fear the savagery of those who make a drawing an excuse for murderous mayhem.

    Here in Indonesia, such cartoons, and all kinds of other stuff, are illegal.

    That’s Indonesia’s business, whether we foreigners like it or not.

    But in France, and Canada, and in Western countries in general, there are no such restrictive laws…

    .( well, there are, but they need to be repealed!)


    ….and any alien who doesn’t like freedom of expression should not choose to settle there.

    AND it is the height of intrusive arrogance  for foreign governments to demand that curbs on freedoms be introduced.

    NB – It goes without saying that anyone unhappy with cartoons or opinions may express disapproval – but under NO circumstances by violence or threats thereof.



    For a louse like Turdo Junior to grovel to such undesirable aliens, whether those in Canada, or wannabe meddlers overseas, is nauseating.



  • ross1948 15:33 on September 25, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , free speech, , , ,   

    ‘Freedom!’ Shouted Braveheart – But Not On Sturgeon’s Watch! 


    Remember him?

    No, not Mel Gibson, but the Scottish hero he played so well in ‘Braveheart,’ a film I am always happy to watch whenever it returns to the tv screen.

    Sir William Wallace’s war-cry was ‘FREEDOM,’ and it’s being stomped by the leftist separatist SNP leader…

    No “People’s Vote” For Scots Parents! The Separatist ‘Brat-Charter! 

    Separatist Socialist Sturgeon – Biden’s Trans-Atlantic Twin? 

    “I believe passionately in free speech but..” she said.

    Nicola Sturgeon quits BBC event over Steve Bannon invitation …https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/oct/20/nicola-sturgeon-quits-bbc-event-over-steve-bannon-invitation


     ….Nicola Sturgeon, whose record on almost everything stinks!

    Please read on, especially our doughty band of readers in Scotland, who should FIGHT Sturgeon’s gaystapo agenda..


    …and heed the C4M appeal.

    AND please check out the petition I have appended at the bottom of the page!

    It’s going to be more difficult to disagree with same-sex marriage in Scotland – and in the rest of the UK. ”

    The new hate crime Bill there seems to confuse disagreement with hatred.

    C4M is particularly concerned as there is no free speech clause on marriage (unlike England, Wales and Northern Ireland). Our sister organisation, Scotland for Marriage, has circulated the following:“The proposals, currently making their way through the Scottish Parliament, have drawn strident criticism from every corner of Scottish society because of the potential to shut down freedom of expression.

    This is because the Bill:

    ‘has no free speech clause on marriage – unlike England, Wales and NI;has thresholds so low that you could even commit a criminal offence without intending to;could see people prosecuted for things said in the privacy of their own home;

    has no free speech clause protecting discussion of transgenderism – a controversial issue which totally undermines a ‘one man, one woman’ definition of marriage; 

    has no backstop to prevent misuse of the law – unlike England and Wales where the Attorney General (or in Northern Ireland the DPP) must give permission to prosecute.”

    Judges, police, lawyers, actors, comedians, academics, feminists, secularists, Christians, left and right wing commentators, civil liberties groups and politicians from almost every party have raised concerns about the hate crime Bill’s impact on free speech.


    ”The law covers all publications distributed in Scotland.

    If Police Scotland believe an English newspaper on sale in Edinburgh “is likely” to “stir up hatred”, they could get a warrant from a Scottish Court, drive down to London and arrest the editor. 

    ”C4M defends the freedom to speak out in defence of marriage.We know that marriage can be a contentious subject and some activists would do anything to shut down the debate.

    That’s why, when same-sex marriage was going through the Westminster Parliament, C4M fought hard to get a marriage clause into the law on hate speech.“In this Part, for the avoidance of doubt, any discussion or criticism of marriage which concerns the sex of the parties to marriage shall not be taken of itself to be threatening or intended to stir up hatred.”Section 29JA, Public Order Act 1986 (as amended)This important protection, which applies in England and Wales and is duplicated in Northern Ireland, allows people to speak freely about traditional marriage without fear of the criminal law.

    It is troubling that this essential provision is missing from Scotland’s hate crime Bill, and C4M will be making representations to Scottish politicians to ensure this is addressed.


    Oh, and BTW, here’s a petition, begun by a fellow with whom I have almost nothing in common, but targetting that Sturgeon.


    Any readers in Scotland should have a look and add their names to the rapidly increasing number of signatures!

    • Tam Birnie 17:10 on September 25, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      She makes a lot of Scots squirm every time she opens her naggy wee mooth.


  • ross1948 22:11 on February 15, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , free speech, ,   

    Not 3 Cheers, Just 1.5 – For UK ‘Free Speech On Freaks’ Ruling! 

    Police compared to Stasi and Gestapo by judge as he rules they interfered in freedom of speech by investigating ‘non crime’ trans tweet


    We called for support of the brave Brit who went to court…

    Christmas Giving? Skip ‘Charities’ – Support British Freedoms! 

    suggesting then, as now, that ‘you can read an excellent article here…


    ……which explains the background to one brave man’s court battle against intolerant PC gestapo cops.’


    Harry Miller

    Challenging Thought Crime: HarryTheOwl v The College of Policing


    …and are pleased that he won…

    …but he only won on one of the issues he took to the judge.

    The individual assault on his liberties was correctly neutralised, but the major threat to free speech represented by the evil ideologues…



    …who concocted the College of Policing’s ‘guidance’ which defines a hate incident as “any non-crime incident which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender…”

    …has NOT been disallowed.

    So when Spiked.com gives a banner headline commending the good ruling…

    We need more Harry Millers

    He fought the thoughtpolice, and he won.


    … okay, I agree.

    But the main threat remains to be dealt with.


    A lot of top cops in the UK are mere political ciphers, serving the ruling class’s gaystapo and other (e.g. multicult) agendas in order to win promotion, or, worse, because they share the intolerance of the elite.

    The reponse of those Berk Bobbies in Humberside shows little sign of repentance.

    They are slugs who deserve no respect from those they police.

    And the response of the vexed freaks represents a downright dangerous mentality – they seem to think normal people may not enjoy the right openly to despise their degenerate delusions.


    Pro-Freak English Judge Rules -Truth Is ‘Offensive, Exclusionary!’ 

    And they have friends in high places –

    Men mincing about pretending to be women earn ridicule or contempt.

    The College of Policing has dedicated itself to suppress the expression of normal human feelings.

    Time that cabal was purged.


    mbeiles d

    • Mack the Knife 23:54 on February 15, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Time they were purged, very long overdue, but do you think ‘Bojo’ will clean up the College of Policing?
      Not in a hundred years.
      We may be out of the EUSSR but Britain is still snared in their so-called ‘values.’


    • Amanda Adams 19:17 on February 16, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      We have even seen people in big trouble for calling a him a her.
      These trannies need to be told to get a life, or dare I say it, grow a set!
      If they dont like being mocked they should stop masquerading as members of the opposite sex.


  • ross1948 22:56 on February 2, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , free speech, ,   

    Help This Canadian Victim Of The Gaystapo! 

    An obviously good cause- help this guy, please!


    Suppression of speech in Canada: Bill Whatcott’s trial for “willful promotion of hatred” to begin in Toronto June 1

    Facing prison time for passing out flyers warning about LGBT medical issues, with Bible verses

    Is this coming to America?

    New crowd-funding page to help Bill pay living expenses during expected 6-week trial (see below)

    January 29, 2019
    ALT TEXT Bill Whatcott interviewed by Toronto TV station outside of the courthouse after his initial hearing in 2018. (See video of TV report below.) This case could make waves across Canada — and beyond.

    Bill Whatcott continues to be a prime target of Canada’s powerful and venomous LGBT movement. His upcoming June trial – and his supposed “crime” that drew charges of “willful promotion of hatred” – has already made Canadian national news and involved top figures in the Canadian government.

    It also has attracted Canada’s foremost criminal defense lawyer to Bill’s case.

    Why is this Canadian story so important? Whatcott’s ordeal brings to the forefront the frightening future that the international LGBT movement has planned for all of us. So far, Canada appears to be the first country to severely criminalize any speech critical of homosexual or transgender behavior or “gender” ideology – or even factual medical information. But forced silence is clearly the goal the LGBT movement is working to put in place around the world.

    And, to be honest, the way Bill incorporates a sense of humor into his activism has obviously exacerbated the hatred directed at him by the arrogant and completely humorless Left.

    Whatcott’s infamous “crime”

    Just what did Bill Whatcott do to ignite all this fury?

    In 2016, Whatcott used an assumed name to successfully register to march in the Toronto Gay Pride Parade. He and a group of friends called themselves “The Gay Zombies Cannabis Consumers Association.” They marched in the July 3 parade wearing skin-tight green body suits that disguised their faces. (This “Pride” parade was particularly obscene. Bill’s group was marching right behind a group of completely naked men – considered “normal” among the LGBT crowd.)


    While they were marching, the “Gay Zombies” handed out approximately 3,000 “zombie safe sex” packets. But they were not at all like the usual “safe sex” packets that contain a condom and instructions on how to use it.

    ALT TEXT The “safe sex” packet with the flyer inside. They passed out 3,000 of these that day!

    Inside each packet was a folded up two-sided flyer with very explicit medical-related information about the dangers of LGBT behavior. It also included graphic images of anal warts, genital warts, and a blotched corpse labeled an “AIDS fatality.” (Bear in mind that Bill has worked as a nurse and cared for many homosexual men, including AIDS patients. He knows what health dangers “gay” behavior entails. He is motivated by compassion.)

    The flyer called on people to give up their sins and come to Christ. It also criticized the Prime Minister and other Canadian political figures for their homosexual activism, and how they have led Canada “on a destructive journey toward sexual anarchy and homosexual inspired oppression.” It included Bill’s personal email and phone number.

    See for yourself! Below is a 39-second video of Bill and his group in the 2016 Toronto Gay Pride Parade.

    When word got back to the “LGBT community” in Toronto what the “Gay Zombies” had done, they were livid. But Bill Whatcott was the only member of the group they could identify, since his name was on packet information and the whole group was disguised.

    Bill publicly admitted he was part of the “Gay Zombies,” but he refused to name any of the others who were with him. However, he was not initially charged with any crime.

    The $104 million lawsuit

    Instead, a month after the parade, several prominent homosexual activists filed a civil lawsuit charging Whatcott and his supporters with defamation and “hate speech.” In the lawsuit, they demanded an absurd $104 million in damages to various LGBT groups.

    The lawsuit claimed that the defamed parties included all the marchers of the Toronto Gay Pride Parade, all the spectators who had received the packets, the Liberal Party of Canada, and the politicians named in the flyer. Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne (an “out” lesbian) agreed to be included in the lawsuit.

    To make their point on a national level, the plaintiffs held a grand press conference announcing the lawsuit in the Press Gallery of the Canadian Parliament in Ottawa. Their absurd hysteria over this was stunning. Watch the video of it here.

    ALT TEXT The press conference in the Press Gallery of the Canadian Parliament in Ottowa, led by four homosexual activists.

    In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs demanded not only that Whatcott and the other marchers in the group (who have still never been identified) be held liable, but also anyone who supported the effort financially or through any other means.

    According to the homosexual activists, the main purpose of the $104 million claim was to “smoke out” and extract monetary damages from all the wealthy financial backers of Whatcott and his group. They simply assumed that Bill was being bankrolled by a cabal of big right-wing donors – because that’s how the Left does things. (They also wanted to put fear into anyone who might help Whatcott in the future.) But in fact, there were no wealthy donors. The “Gay Zombies” accomplished their mission on a shoestring budget, funded by the participants themselves.

    The lawsuit would also ban Whatcott and his group from leafletting or even posting their information on a website. It would also ban them from marching in any “gay pride” parade in Canada.

    But in 2019, after three years of effort, the homosexual activists gave up and dropped the $104 million lawsuit. It became very clear that there were no “wealthy right-wing donors” to go after. And Whatcott continued to refuse to disclose the names of the other “zombies” who marched with him.

    So Bill was free from their vindictive legal stunts. Well, not exactly.

    In June 2018, as the $104 million lawsuit was losing steam, the second LGBT shoe finally dropped.

    Two years after the fact – Bill is charged with a “hate crime”

    Suddenly, almost two years after the “crime,” the Toronto Police decided to formally charge Bill Whatcott with the crime of “inciting hatred” under Canada’s Criminal Code. According to published reports, the Attorney General of Ontario personally authorized the charge against Whatcott.

    Why did they wait so long to charge him? According to news reports, the police claimed that they had conducted “a two-year investigation” and also had to “liaise” with the prosecution. The more obvious reason is that the LGBT movement realized they had run out of other options to punish Bill, and the government was happy to cooperate by concocting a criminal charge.

    Nationwide warrant for Bill’s arrest!

    But that wasn’t enough. Immediately after charging him, the Canadian government took the unnecessary but dramatic step of issuing a nation-wide arrest warrant for Bill. In Canada, that kind of warrant is almost always reserved for very serious crimes like murder – not a minor incident that happened three years ago. They could have just called him, or contacted his lawyer instead.

    Bill immediately turns himself in to authorities

    As soon as Bill heard about the nation-wide warrant for his arrest, he publicly announced he would be traveling to nearby Calgary, Alberta to turn himself in at the local police station.

    By then, pro-family people across the region had also heard about the over-zealous actions the government was taking against Bill. As MassResistance reported that day from Calgary, about two dozen Christian protesters, including several local pastors, loudly protested outside the police station as Bill came to turn himself in. 

    ALT TEXT Some of the two dozen Christian protesters outside of the Calgary Police Station as Bill Whatcott comes to turn himself in. [MassResistance photo]

    As we also reported, after turning himself in Bill was treated harshly in the Calgary jail and even denied food for 24 hours before being flown to Toronto for his preliminary court hearing.

    Initial court hearing in Toronto

    The initial court procedure in Toronto was a bail hearing. Bill was there with a local Christian lawyer. The judge granted bail, but imposed several severe restrictions: Bill had to surrender his passport and not leave the country. He could not post or distribute the pamphlet (but MassResistance still posts it). And for the “protection” of the LGBT community, Bill must stay away from all gay pride parades in Canada and not enter the “Gay Village” district of Toronto.

    This was clearly no ordinary bail hearing. Bill’s hearing made the Toronto TV news:

    VIDEO: Toronto TV Report of Bill’s hearing (mainstream media)

    Almost immediately afterwards, Bill was suddenly fired from his truck-driving job (the company refused to give a reason) and was “banned for life” from using GoFundMe to raise money. We suspect the usual forces of “tolerance” were behind that. But Bill is not deterred!

    If Bill loses this case, he could be sent to prison two years, and possibly also fined. (Meanwhile, he is already facing a $55,000 fine in British Columbia he can’t afford – for his “hate speech” of calling a transgender candidate for Parliament a “man” – which that person is.)

    Bill gains a prominent defense attorney!

    As the government began building up its criminal case against Bill, his local Christian lawyer realized he had too many other commitments to continue with his case. Then a miraculous thing happened.

    Around September 2019, Canadian attorney John Rosen agreed to take Bill’s case if he could get a government subsidy (because of Bill’s lack of funds). Rosen is universally considered the best criminal defense attorney in Canada.

    Apparently, although he does not necessarily agree with Bill’s opinions, Rosen believes strongly in free speech and finds this case an interesting test of that. Surprisingly, Rosen was granted the subsidy. He’s officially Bill’s lawyer on this case! Now, Bill has the best chance of winning this that we can imagine!

    Each side lines up an “expert witness”

    Each side has lined up a prominent “expert witness” for the upcoming trial.

    To help try to “prove” that Bill’s actions constitute “hate,” the government has hired Dr. Nick J. Mulé, an Associate Professor of Social Work at York University in Toronto. According to reports, Mulé is also an LGBT activist. He has already submitted a 16-page paper that basically medical and moral criticism of homosexually is simply a method for promoting hate and discrimination against individuals, and Whatcott is particularly guilty of that. All of Mulé’s expenses are being paid for by the government.

    Bill has brought on for his expert witness Dr. Michael Brown, a well-known and highly regarded writer and speaker in the United States on moral and religious issues. Dr. Brown is author of the landmark book, A Queer Thing Happened to America: And What a Long, Strange Trip It’s Been. Dr. Brown’s appearance is not being paid for by the government – he is paying for all his own travel and lodging expenses!

    BILL NEEDS HELP for this trial!!

    Can the LGBT anti-free speech juggernaut be stopped – and beaten back? This will surely be an epic trial for all of Canada – and beyond!

    And, as we’ve been reporting, Bill Whatcott has been fearlessly telling the truth across Canada for a while (while most people are afraid to). This is really where the rubber meets the road. Bill and his lawyer are basically up against the top politicians in the country.

    Bill Whatcott is standing up for all the rest of us!

    The trial starts in Toronto on June 1. It is slated to last four weeks. Bill’s lawyer wants him there two weeks early to prepare for it.

    Bill needs financial help. During his six weeks in Toronto for his trial, he will not be able to work. He needs money to pay for food and lodging while in Toronto. Also during that time, he needs to pay for his household expenses back home.

    MassResistance hopes to raise $3,000 for Bill’s expenses. We have started a GoGetFunding page for that purpose. (It’s a conservative alternative to GoFundMe.) We would be grateful for any help you can give him:

    Bill Whatcott’s GoGetFunding page

    MassResistance will keep you fully informed on the developments in this trial!

  • ross1948 09:14 on November 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Don Cherry, free speech,   

    SUPPORT DON CHERRY – And Defend Canada’s Free Speech! 

    SUPPORT DON CHERRY: Don Cherry is right about Remembrance Day poppies!


    Good for The Rebel, and good for this good old guy!

    Don Cherry is right.

    More Canadians should be wearing poppies.

    And new immigrants to Canada must be taught about our Remembrance Day traditions, be it wearing a poppy or observing a minute of silence on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month.

    Don Cherry must not be censored or de-platformed simply for speaking out on behalf of so many patriotic Canadians — including new Canadians. Aren’t freedom of speech and freedom of expression just a couple of our cherished freedoms that so many patriots gave their lives defending?

    But Don Cherry is under attack, especially by those in the Media Party who have always loathed him. They want this national icon off the air and relegated to the scrapheap of obsolescence — simply for making an observation about a troubling trend he’d noticed. These nattering nabobs of negativity want you to believe that Grapes is a racist, but anyone who has dealt with Don Cherry knows this is an outright falsehood.

    And where was the outrage from so many in the media when it was discovered that Justin Trudeau had donned blackface and brownface on multiple occasions, so many occasions that not even the Prime Minister knows for sure?

    They defended his behaviour, or at the very least, ignored or minimized such odious actions. Clearly, those calling for the removal of Don Cherry from Coach’s Corner subscribe to a different standard when it comes to a personality who leans right-of-centre.

    This is wrong, as is the vulgar politicization of Remembrance Day. On this day, we should be honouring those who died, those who served, and those who continue to serve. That’s what Remembrance Day is all about — not some grotesque witch-hunt to de-platform someone for the sin of being politically incorrect.

    Don Cherry is right. More Canadians need to wear poppies. Immigrants to Canada need to be taught about our Remembrance Day traditions. And Don Cherry should not be censored for speaking on behalf of so many patriotic Canadians, including new Canadians.

    47,911 signatures

    Will you sign?

    • Ken Gilpin 14:43 on November 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Thank You , I signed.

      Ken Gilpin : Stuck in Trudeau’s Hell ________________________________


    • katalin toth 19:11 on November 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Well done Don. Go get them!


    • Arnold 19:25 on November 12, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Don Cherry remembers when Canada was a more or less coherent country. Now in Toronto, more than 100 languages are spoken.
      A lot of them take no pride in Canada’s past. That’s because they dontknow about Canada’s past. That’s multicult.
      Anything but ‘inclusive.’


  • ross1948 18:38 on November 6, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , free speech, , Jonas Eika, Jonas the Jerk, Mette Frederiksen, Scandinavia, Swede brat, ,   

    Another, Bigger, Scandinavian Brat, Rude To Its Elders And Betters 

    Not as young in years as The Addled Swede Brat, but a Dane named Jonas Eika showed a similarly ill-brought-up demeanour last week…



    …at the awards ceremony organised by the Nordic Council.

    The ceremony hit some headlines when T.A.S.B *. gracelessly refused a prize for her infantile antics….

    = * the addled Swede brat!

    ….but what about this?


    Image result for jonas eika"


    You might not expect such a gaping galoot to produce much in the way of creative writing, but evidently his pinko scribbling, with its “global perspective” and…dealing with “contemporary political challenges,” appealed to the jury.


    Jonas the Jerk is in his late 20s, so even if his parents were as bad as Ghastly Greta’s at bringing up children…




    ….he ought by now to have learned a few basic manners all by himself.

    But no, once he’d said a brief thank-you to the jury, he showed the large gathering what a slob he truly is, launching a nasty pro-crimmigrant verbal salvo at Danish prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, sitting on first row.

    The oaf whined that Denmark was ‘continuing the former government’s “racist language and policies”.

    By that, ignoring the fact that such a rant was completely irrelevant to the occasion, presumably he meant that alien ingrates were not being treated with soft enough kid-gloves…


    civilised man v savage


    …and that primitives couldn’t just barge across Danish borders and do as they damn well please.

    Nor was it only his own country’s concern for security that upset the klutz.

    He criticised all Nordic countries for placing refugees in prisons or remote camps, where they break down, get ill and some attempt to commit suicide.


    If the blighters don’t like it, they shouldn’t have imposed their ingrate selves on somebody else’s country

    Or countries

    Jonas the Jerk continued.

    “Many of you are contributing to the militarising of the EU borders in a process that risks the lives of thousands of migrants, while at the same time benefitting the security and arms industries, including several Nordic companies,”

    When you recall the sort of savages demanding, and sadly getting, easy entry into Europe…




    …one could only wish for some genuinely serious ‘militarising,’ instead of the idiotic importation of more and more primitives!


    After the awards, winners and nominees, politicians and guests were served a climate-friendly beetroot steak with potatoes.


    Beetroot steak?

    No beef on the menu? Glad I wasn’t invited!

    angry face

    Maybe foreknowledge of the fare on offer had put Jonas the Jerk in such a bilious frame of mind!


    All credit to PM Ms. Mette Frederiksen, who took the fanatic leftist’s discourtesy in her stride, afterwards merely observing –

    “Well, we live in a country with free speech.” https://euobserver.com/nordic/146465


    Which is what some of the dirty ingrates who have settled in civilised countries don’t seem to like…





    …swine such as the scum who were charged for their role in a murderous outrage, the terrorist attempt on the life of the cartoonist Lars Vilks…



    Cartoonist Vilks


    … which Vilks survived, but in which – and in a related attack, on a synagogue the same night – other innocent people died, slaughter about which  a pignoramus named Bhostan Khan Hossein had this gem of jihadist intolerance to add…


     “Those who died were innocent. The cartoonist deserved to die!”


    ..AND also in Denmark….

    Three months?

    Better just to hang scumbags like those, but if the death penalty is not yet re-introduced, DEPORT THEM.

    No doubt Jonas the Jerk would object!

    • Johnny Baines 20:02 on November 6, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      These leftists soil all they touch.
      Over the past few months I have read here how even quilting and sewing clubs have been taken over and turned into far-left fronts. I have seen fashion shows on tv waffling about promoting ‘diversity’ too.
      That book award ceremony should have been all about literary merit but that ‘jerk’ used it to push his extremist politics and so very discourteously.
      The left are infiltrating and politicising everything.


  • ross1948 07:53 on October 18, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: abortion, billboards, , , free election, free speech, ,   

    Canada’s Intolerant ‘Democracy!’ 

    Naturally, something had to be said about the federal election next month, if only to correct the inaccurate adjective, because Canada was founded not as a federation but as a CONFEDERATION!



    And the sooner the provinces redeem their constitutionally-intended status, the better, I hear many of you say.


    How sad that free speech is so emasculated in the Dominion whose anthem still includes a description of the country as ‘strong and free.’

    I read an article in the National Post about the Green Party leader who, having declared that her personal hero was Jesus Christ, then almost at once apologised.



    Jesus teaching by example – on the subject of corporal punishment


    Since most serious Christians might well say that Jesus is their hero, just as you’d expect Muslims might say Mohammed is their hero, and Buddhists to say the same about Buddha…


    ….Mrs. Elizabeth May’s spineless retraction is incomprehensible – and her explanation, that her party is ‘inclusive and all-embracing…’ 



    … ….

    …..is on the face of it near imbecilic.

    Except that the pathetic word ‘inclusive’ is instantly recognisable  — as a war- cry for the forces of intolerance.



    Not just in Canada but across the Western world, if people take a stand against the media-political ruling class, if people speak up for what’s good and true, they’re branded as ‘divisive.’

    Those who want to enforce monochrome opinions, on the other hand, are deemed ‘inclusive.’

    Just as those who like best to brandish that other word, now rendered almost meaningless, ‘diversity,’ are often those most rabid to stamp out diversity of opinion.



    Speaking of monochrome opinions and suppression of dissent, naturally, brings us back to that billboard.

    C’mon Canada

    Image result for bernier billboard


    It was perfectly legal and reflected the views of millions, but was suppressed by leftist shrills determined to deny free speech rights to Canadians disgusted by multicult, even in the run-up to a national election.


    The whole point of democracy is that people get to choose.

    They may tell candidates what they want done, and if the in-crowd candidates won’t listen, people may gather a few signatures and stand as candidates themselves.

    referndmlet peole vote

    Most importantly, any and every issue should be up for debate.

    The in-crowd should not be allowed to hide their views by dissimulative drivel about ‘settled law!’

    It’s parliament’s job to make law, amend law or repeal law. Even when uppity judges interfere, Canada is fortunate to possess the ‘Notwithstanding’ rule.

    Even more importantly, no parliament can bind its successors.




    Conservative leader Andrew Scheer has offered a very legalistic response when accused of having a hidden agenda…he simply insists that he will not open those issues, because they are settled in Canadian law.


    Hasil gambar untuk scheer the rebel

    Conservative leader’s free speech pledge wouldn’t apply in U of T ..

    It doesn’t MATTER what you think about the issues that freak Shifty Scheer out ( abortion and homo-weddings are his bete noire)

    If you believe those things are wrong, or ANY law is unjust, then – unlike gutless Shifty – you should get off your ass and say so.

    And yet inexplicably, such morally vacuous attitudes are embraced by many otherwise decent folk, like the guy who wrote the NP piece.

    I don’t see any value in the Conservatives reopening these issues, and I see lots of potential dangers if they do.

    If the National Post writer sees no value in reviewing the values on which Canadian society currently rests, so be it.

    But he is reprehensible to prophesy danger, not if the relevant laws are revoked, but if the arguments around them are open to debate in Canada’s democratic confederal election.

    Anyway, I’ll be supporting the PPC.

    As if you didn’t know!
    • Tharg 16:34 on October 18, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The First Turd was a toxic traitor.
      Junior is a plastic replica.


  • ross1948 22:36 on September 21, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , free speech, , , , , , , ,   

    Turdo’s ‘Brown-Face?’ Howzabout Singh’s Brown-Shirt? 

    Canada’s socialist party, the NDP, has a leader with a fairly dodgy record of extremist connections…

    …but nobody has ‘written to the Leaders’ Debates Commissioner asking him to reconsider his decision to allow Jagmeet Singh to participate in the federal election debates.’

    Yet remove Singh’s name from the previous sentence and substitute Maxime Bernier’s, and that’s exactly what Singh has done to the patriot party leader.



    “I am troubled by your decision to allow the leader of the People’s Party of Canada in the debates. It is wrong that Mr. Bernier be given a platform to promote an ideology of hate that spreads prejudice and disinformation,” Singh said in his letter. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/singh-johnston-bernier-debate-letter-


    In Singh’s far from humble opinion, maybe…

    Jagmeet Singh at the 2nd National Bike Summit in Ottawa in 2018

    ….but maybe, too, millions of Canadians are old enough to make up their own minds and want to see and hear Bernier for themselves before they swallow any yammering about ‘hate-speech.’

    By this anti-free speech outburst, the far-left NDP has aligned itself absolutely with the sloganeering of the Red Nazi Antifa gang,



    That kind of ‘hate-speech’ hogwash is exactly the sort of excuse the Red Nazis advance as their excuse for vicious violence against anyone who disputes cultural marxist ideology.



Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: