Tagged: free speech Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 8:05 pm on June 14, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , free speech, ,   

    Petition To Shifty Scheer – Defend Free Speech From Turdo! 


    We don’t get many petitions from Canada, so I am doubly pleased to receive this one, from Ezra Levant at The Rebel.

    We have noted the Tory Party leader Andrew Scheer’s resemblance to shifting sands, as with his cowardly veto on an excellent Muslim Conservative candidate -.

    =

    Image result for salim mansur

    https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2019/06/14/the-wrong-kind-of-muslim-vetoed-by-gutless-tories/

    – and his unprincipled abandonment of the commitment he made to free speech.

    Canada’s Universities, ‘Diversity’ Madness – Will Tories Roll Back Cultural Marxism? 

    Hasil gambar untuk scheer the rebel

    Scheer

    Conservative leader’s free speech pledge wouldn’t apply in U of T ..

    ==

    But this intro to the petition should ring alarm bells among all Canadians who care for free speech!

    ====

    Stephen Harper’s Conservatives voted to repeal section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act back in 2013.

    That’s the censorship provision that made it an offence to hurt someone’s feelings.

    But now the Liberals are looking to bring it back, and to my horror, Andrew Scheer’s Conservatives haven’t lifted a finger against it.

    When he ran for leader of the Conservatives, Scheer promised to fight for free speech— especially on campus. But since then, he’s deleted that policy from his website. You can’t find it. 

    And he’s gone wobbly — out of fear of the media. Fear that he’ll be demonized.

    But this is serious stuff — I can’t name a more important issue for conservatives. 

    It’s more important than taxes, or immigration, or fighting terrorism and respecting our military; it’s more important than any trade deal, more important than criminal justice. Because if you don’t have free speech, you can’t talk meaningfully about any of those other issues.

    How crazy is that? Why is not a single Conservative MP allowed to talk about this issue? Why are they being so passive and weak?

    But what do you think? 

    I know that most people watching my shows are Conservative Party members. Some are even Maxime Bernier supporters. I could ask you to sign a petition to Justin Trudeau to have him stop Section 13, but I know that he won’t listen. 

    What if I asked you to sign a petition to Andrew Scheer himself? To take off the whip from his own MPs. To let them be true conservatives — to stand up for freedom of speech.

    It’s simple. The petition simply says:

    “We call upon Andrew Scheer to stand up for freedom of speech by opposing the revival of section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.”

    That’s it. He promised he’d be for free speech when he ran for the leadership. His Party was unanimously for free speech under Stephen Harper. Don’t let Harper’s work be undone.

    Click here, or visit StopSection13.com to add your name to the petition. 

    Advertisements
     
  • ross1948 7:11 pm on May 4, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , free speech, PC police state,   

    Police State Britannia! 


     

    Whatever happened to the old offence of ‘wasting police time?’

    I’m moved once more to ask that sadly perennial question after reading the news about a UKIP candidate who found himself be interrogated by the local gestapo about a ‘hate crime!’

    All the man had done was discuss the origin of the word ‘wog.’ You may have seen what he wrote or check it via the link…

    https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/ukip-candidate-facing-fury-over-16199506

    …but it sounds like he had  done hisresearch, and he didn’t call anyone a ‘wog.’

    Calling people names was never an offence,no mater how offensive, but nowadays all it takes is for some uptight whiner to get his or her knickers in a twist and go crying to the cops.

    If the candidate had committed, or threatened to commit, violence, arson, vandalism or some real crime, then of course the police should be talking to him.

    But he didn’t do any such thing.

    Read the report again and that’s clear.

    .

    393a3-yorkregioonalpoliceprotest

    So why were local constabulary set on him?

    ‘Hate crime’ is a nonsense.

    If those police, or rather the senior officers who instigated the intimidatory intrusion on his right to free speech, had an ounce of sense, or reponsibility, they’d have hauled in the pinko puke who reported him. Wasting police time, especially when done for political malice,IS a serious offence.

    The sooner leftist trouble-makers of that sort are arrested and given salutory sentences, the better.

     
    • Petra Malley 5:05 am on May 5, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      It is sad that the police are at the beck and call of these intolerant leftwingers.
      I wish British leaders would take as principled a stand as Trump has, re-tweeting the anti-left people censored by Faecesbook.

      Like

  • ross1948 7:58 pm on April 6, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Brexit debate, free speech, Martin Hewitt, MPs treason, ,   

    Fire Martin Hewitt, UK Police-State Prattler! 


    And Who The Hell Is Hewitt, I hear you ask?

    He’s top dog at the National Police Chiefs Council.

    =

    And what an insolent uppity pup he is!

    Police chief: campaigners and MPs must avoid inciting bad Brexit behaviour!

    Take a look at the man who seeks to dictate what the people he’s paid to serve may say when their country’s freedom is at stake…

    .Campaigners and politicians should watch their language to avoid inflaming the “incredibly febrile” atmosphere around Brexit…

    ..

    Would you trust Martin Hewitt to stand guard over your right to engage in free debate on Brexit…or on anything?
    ==================================.

    ….public figures should be wary of “consequences that weren’t intended” when speaking about the issue.

    …….

    ..to tell people to cool it, to bottle up the anger, rage, fury, righteous indignation, that 17,000,000 British patriots are ABSOLUTELY entitled to feel…

    …about the antics of all those liars, quislings and collaborators at Westminster.

    Talking down like that to the deceived and disrespected people of the United Kingdom at a time like this is asking for nothing but trouble!

    But Hewitt witters on, spewing police-state piffle.

    “…. I think there is a responsibility on those individuals that have a platform and have a voice, to communicate in a way that is temperate…there is a lot of angry talk that you can pick up if you look across social media….

     ….

    Temperate?

    In the face of treason in high places?

    Stuff that!

    High-handed Hewitt is concerned that all those outraged citizens, stabbed in the back by the MP rats who had previously pledged compliance with the referendum result, should…

    .=

    silence-is-not-golden-just-yellow-anonymous-354192

    “… just think carefully about the way that they express their views and their opinions, so that what they’re not doing is inciting behaviour or causing anybody to behave in a way that we wouldn’t want them to…”  https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-warning-top-cop-tells-politicians-and-campaigners-to-watch-their-language-to-avoid-inflaming-a4108791.html

    ‘They,’ in Hewitt-Speak, are the patriotic millions.

    ‘We…?’  Clearly, the ruling class who refuse to represent them.

    Hewitt’s harangue, made to a media get-together, makes me ponder that old saying…

    .

    treason

    ..

    …and I interpret his gabbling to mean that Brits should not tell it like it is, should not call out those traitors for what they are.

    I don’t pretend to speak for everyone whose democratic rights have been trampled and spat on, but…

    =

    =

    ….but I’d say what many DO want is precisely to cause all those arrogant elitists in the House of Commons who abase themselves before the vile ‘European Project’ to be named and shamed..

    .===

    evilempire

    …., loud and long whenever they’re seen in public – and the consequences thus intended?

    Their banishment from public life!

    .

    .

    And that should include not only Fourth Reich fans like Shrill Soubry…

    Shrill Soubry Should Get Out Of The Kitchen! 

    …but also, yes, guess who…

    =

    Image result for quisling must go

    Traitrix Deplorabilis! 

    ....and as for Hewitt himself?

    The man is not fit for purpose…

     
    • Petra Malley 10:27 pm on April 6, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Thank you for this very welcome alert.
      It is unprecedented that a senior police officer issues threats to our freedom of speech and it worries me just how far this repressive attitude has spread among Hewitt’s colleagues.
      Are we all now to turn down the volume and stop calling May and her gang traitors and collaborators?
      That’s what they are, so what else are we to call them?

      The Home Secretary should haul Hewitt over the coals but since the Home Secretary has remained in May’s anti-Brexit cabinet, there’s no chance of that.
      Quite the opposite. I expect May and all her ministers are quietly cheering on Hewitt.
      They must be dreading what will happen when they pass their treason deal. There will be a reckoning, as an angry nation erupts.

      Like

    • Vanessa R 10:41 pm on April 6, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      No Dixon of Dock Green, that one!
      More like Maystapo!
      Our police have become more and more politiicised, as you have recorded, especially regarding that leftist Metropolitan Police Commissioner.
      This Hewitt now shows how far the rot has got.
      I hear Britain’s prisons are over-crowded. If we all stand together, and keep speaking up against the traitors, can they cram all 17 million of us into cells?

      Like

      • Noreen Paterson 12:33 am on April 7, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Vanessa, hardly anybody even remembers George Dixon, and not many remember the days when we were all proud of our police.
        I was at primary school when Dixon ceased to appear on our tv screens.
        The police today are political, though I think many of them must hate being used to enforce the anti-free-speech laws etc that the liberal-left crowd have passed against us.
        Some police however like to rise through the ranks by currying favour.
        Which kind is Hewitt?
        I know what I think.

        Like

    • Frank McLeod 11:03 pm on April 6, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      So who appointed him to head the police chiefs association?
      If the all the top police officers in the land chose him as their spokesman, they need to unchoose him, oust him today, or nobody patriotic is going to trust the police from now on.

      Like

      • Jimmy Tapper 9:28 pm on April 7, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        That’s the question that bothers me, Frank.
        We have seen several fanatical PC chief constables turn their constabularies into witch-hunters, and we know that the Home Secretary has responsibility for policing.
        May herself held that job for years, and then we had Amber Rudd.
        No wonder things have gone from bad to worse.

        Like

    • Mack the Knife 11:17 pm on April 6, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      It was only a few months ago that you reported on senior police anti-Brexit agitation –
      https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2019/02/09/the-uks-political-police-now-theyre-taking-sides-on-brexit/

      and now we have this authoritarian cop ordering us not to give the sell-outs the tongue-lashings they deserve.

      I don’t know who it was who said that for evil to triumph, it is only necessary for good people to do nothing.
      Now we have Assistant Commissar Hewitt telling us to say nothing, nothing that might upset the anti-Brexit apple-cart. He wants us to wimp out, asking the worst betrayers, the Clarks and Soubrys etc , nicely and pretty please not to stab Britain in the back.
      Get lost, Hewitt.
      True Brits speak their minds!

      Like

    • Augie 9:02 am on April 7, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      It is sad to see British people told not to condemn their politicians for what is verifiably a great betrayal of democracy.
      If people no longer trust politicians, and cannot say so, for fear of police intimidation, then the only alternative is extra-parliamentary action.
      Yellow Vest Anglais?

      Like

    • Yves Berchant 4:12 pm on April 7, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      May may need a lot of help from security forces like the police, and the army, if she does her deal with Corbyn.
      She has now told the British people that it’s whatever deal she cooks up with the IRA sympathising Labour leader or else she will enforce continued membership of the EUSSR.
      In that situation, a revolutionary uprising would be the people’s only recourse. It would then be up to coppers and armed services ‘other ranks’ to decide who to side with, the people in revolt or a disgraced regime.
      Very much like Venezuela.

      Like

  • ross1948 10:54 am on December 30, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , free speech, ,   

    Talking Free Speech In Big Apple! 


    An interesting event next month, which those who believe in free debate on big issues might want to attend.

    voltaire

    Voltaire would be burned at the stake if HE stood up and said that in today’s Hollywood!

    ————-

    In view of the clamp-down by (anti-) ‘social media’ leftist plutocrats on patriots, ‘populists,’ and conservatives…

    Circumvent Google Gag Order! ‘Russia Today’ OK! 

    facebook-censorship

    https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2018/11/24/zuckwits-geekstapo-gags-bruges-group-brexiteers/

    ==

    …it’s important that this be kept in the forefront of public attention.

    ……

    Should we be free to hate?

    SHOULD WE BE FREE TO HATE?

    SPIKED EVENT

    Tuesday, January 29, 2019 – 6pm-7.30pm
    ….

    Should we be free to hate?

    That’s the bracing question that will be asked, and hopefully answered, at the next event organised by Spiked US, at the New York Law School on 29 January. Should the principle of free speech cover hateful views? More to the point, who gets to define what is hateful?

    After all, one person’s idea of hate might be another person’s deeply held moral conviction. Featuring Nadine Strossen of the New York Law School and Paul Coleman of the Alliance Defending Freedom, and moderated by me, this promises to be an essential discussion. Get your tickets here.

     
  • ross1948 5:03 pm on December 22, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'human rights' kangaroo court, , , , free speech   

    Canada ‘Strong And Free?’ Gotta Be Kidding! 


    Those adjectives are part of Canada’s National Anthem, but, whatever accuracy they reflected in the past..

    canadaredensignold2

    =

    …that’s long past.

    We can talk about how ‘strong’ Canada is another day, dwelling at length on its policy on welcoming traitors who scuttled off to serve the ISIS rape-gang ‘caliphate…’

    =

    Image result for jihad jack trudeau

    =

    ….or fought with the evil Taliban in Afghanistan, but today let’s look at ‘freedom,’ and in particular at a kangaroo court in British Columbia, where a man went on trial this month….

    =

    gay_inquisition_500_web_001

    https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen3/18d/Whatcott-BC-Tribunal/menu.html

    …because of what he thinks, or at least because he says what he thinks.

    Read all about it, via the Mass Resistance link above.

     
    • Arnold 7:45 pm on December 22, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      British Columbia is like a gaystapo playground, with normal people bullied for speaking their minds.
      It’s been like that for years now, and I do not for the life of me understand why people are not fighting back.
      What this man Whatcott is going through is why most people fear to speak up. It is not what Canada is or at least was all about.

      Like

  • ross1948 10:00 pm on July 1, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Anne Ayette, , , free speech, , Leith Dunick Thunder Bay, , , ,   

    Ford’s Folly, Dodgy Dunick…Tarek Fateh’s Wise Warning! 


    Ignore a warning once and you’re unwise. Ignore it twice and you deserve all you get.

    =

    My interest in the problem that afflicts Canada is spurred by thoughts of Dominion Day…

    =

    …which falls today.

    Yes, I still call it Dominion Day and am digging out my Red Ensign t-shirt in readiness for celebrating it.

    =

    Yes, America has Independence Day! France has Bastille Day! And for 115 years — through two World Wars, the Korean conflict, and our early United Nations peacekeeping missions — Canada had Dominion Day.

    But in July 1982, on a Friday afternoon with only 13 Members of Parliament sitting in session, on the last day before the summer recess, the government moved to change the name of our National Day and its celebration to “Canada Day”. Unimaginative some say — as banal as “America Day”, “France Day” or “Britain Day”   http://mapleleafup.ca/dominion.html

    =

    It’s my way, in the far-off tropical climes of Indonesia, of reasserting the survival of the real Canadian identity I was raised with, loyalty to Queen and Country, a country that was a beacon of true Western values, which of course included the right to say what one thinks…

    =

    =

    …no matter if some sad little twit feels my views are ‘inappropriate’ nor if some fanatical alien is ‘offended.’

    The inability or unwillingness for the liberal elite to present a coherent defence of their illiberal intolerance of free speech – specifically on the issue of the sectarian threat – is powerfully exemplified by this burping bark from one of its enforcers when challenged to justify his despicable betrayal of honest journalism.

    “Dude, we talked to her. She admitted she said it, but added it was taken out of context. Move on.”

    FATAH: Lessons for Doug Ford from Bernard Lewis

    Gambar terkait

    Dodgy Dunick

    =

    That was – incredibly – from a Canadian ‘editor’ (Leith Dunick, TB News) responding to Tarek Fateh, who is a first-class example of the kind of immigrant Canada has always needed, a founder-member of the Canadian Muslim Congress.

    =

    Tarek Fateh

    A Muslim Voice of Reason – Khadr May Return, IF………!!!!  

    First of all, he must renounce jihad and the application of jihad and sharia law.” 

    oooooooooooo

    Tarek had had the temerity politely to approach Dunick, asking him ‘where Ayette had mentioned the words “Islam” or “Muslims.”

    Background

    Lying Leith told his readers that Anne Ayette was fired for posting “anti-Muslim statements published on her Twitter account.”

    NOT TRUE. She didn’t!

    Anne was on the campaign staff of the Progressive Conservative candidate in Kiiwetinoong, in Northern Ontario, until she was purged by a politically-correct puke…

    =

    ….evidently acting in collusion with Doug Ford (and that purge was one of the reasons I made no effort to utter pre-election praise for Ford, albeit he is a better politician than the lesbian liberal Wynne, whom he has recently replaced as Ontario’s Premier)

    =

    =

    Anne’s ‘crime’ was to re-tweet approvingly a Tarek-tweet, concerning not the religion of Islam but the menace of ISLAMISM, the sectarian ideology I referred to above.

    Anne hadn’t, of course, mentioned the words “Islam” or “Muslims.”

    Yet Dunick’s standards of journalism are so sloppy, or his character so craven…

    =

    =

    …that he didn’t hesitate to misrepresent her viciously in his lousy little newspaper.

    I let the good Muslim patriot’s final paragraph speak for itself, and for many of us here – not just foreigners like me but honest decent Muslims too- who live in Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim-majority country.

    If criticism and repudiation of Islamism  as opposed to Islam and Muslims, in general  is a punishable offence, deserving being fired without a hearing under a Doug Ford government, then heaven help us all.

     
  • ross1948 7:21 pm on May 29, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Andreas Püttmann, , , , free speech, , , , Thomas Sternberg, ZdK   

    “Unfortunately, by God,” We Need To Play At Playing Fair! 


    “The members of every party responsible for religious policy” were invited, ZdK President Thomas Sternberg told public broadcaster WDR. He said that included “unfortunately, by God,” the AfD…

    AfD row overshadows German Catholic Convention

    ‘Unfortunately?’

    The Alternative for Deutschland is the country’s main opposition party.

    How happy the Argie Dope in Rome must be with his running-dog in Germany!

    How far down the list of this slug Sternberg’s personal moral code does democratic fair play rank?

    =

    Gambar terkait

    Sternberg

    =

    ‘Si, si, he justas bigga bigot as me!’

    =

    DW’s piece carefully omitted a key fact about Slug Sternberg – he’s not only a card-carrying member of Mama Stasi Merkel’s CDU party but has served the Berlin Bitch’s cause in high level capacities, notably as a legislator.

    =

    =

    Instead DW rabbited about ‘a divisive debate’ at the annual ‘Catholic Day’ festival

    – that word ‘divisive’ again – Prick Up Your Ears When You Hear ‘Divisive!’ – which is deployed indignantly when some rash participant in the debate declines to kow-tow to the anti-PC line…

    …this time a debate on the ‘the relationship between church and state,’ and, as noted, although a representative from each party in parliament…

    =

     

     – that would include Die Linke, the Left Party, direct political descendants of the DDR quisling party that ran East Germany as the Kremlin’s puppets –

    …was expected to speak, the participation of an AfD nationalist had sowed the seeds of controversy.

    Dope Francis’ slug evidently did not consider the red Left Party rats’ inclusion ‘unfortunate,‘ nor do we read anything about his view on the Catholic committee’s stalinoid stance in 2016, when its anti-patriot bias caused outrage, for intentionally neglecting to invite any of the right-wing populists to that year’s celebration in Leipzig.

    • Sternberg has clearly decided not to repeat his predecessor’s nazi-style ban on patriot dissenters -okay, but his graceless acquiescence in basic fair play shows typical Merkelite distaste for democracy.

    =

    Arrogant Mama Stasi Cowers From German Patriots! 

    The AfD’s inclusion this year seems to have provoked tantrums from church youth organizations.

    Aaah, the millennial morons again.

    But not millennial morons only.

    =

    Gambar terkait

    Some professional ranter – aka ‘publicist’ – named Andreas Püttmann is given DW space to regurgitate his own left-liberal prejudice against the patriot party.

    “If taboo breakers like this are allowed on Catholic podiums, this could contribute to the fracturing of the Christian ethos. In this case it would have been better for the church to clearly draw a line against this.”

    TABOO BREAKERS!?!

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk taboo definition

    =

    Püttmann sounds like some primitive tribesman rather than a citizen of a West European democracy.

    =

    Primitives tended to think ‘taboo-breakers’ deserved dire punishments, like burning them at the stake.

    And exactly what ‘taboo’ has the AfD ‘broken?’

    Simply the shut-down on REAL debate about Merkel’s crimmigrant horde.

    Patriotic Germans, in this scribbler’s opinion, must not, on holy ground, say what they think, if they happen to be Catholic.

    They must be condemned to silence or they could contribute to the fracturing of the Christian ethos?

    ===============

    Well, we know what the Argie Dope tells us about his Catholic ethos.

    Dope! “Prioritise Migrants’ Dignity Over National Security!”

    Hey, Old Argie Dope! Jesus’ Folks Were NOT Crimmigrants! 

    Argie Dope Says ‘No Hell?’ He’d Help Create It In Europe! 

     
    • Epper 9:39 pm on May 29, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Don’t expect Sternberg to stand up to Merkel, the pastor daughter who decided to serve the secret police when she was living in East Germany.
      Naturaly Sternberg will not criticise or feel it is ‘unfortunate’ if the Left ( communist) Party attend his Catholic meetings. Merkel treats the Left Party with so great respect.
      That is what Old Comrades do.
      All the pastors and priests executed and gaoled by communism will turn in their graves if they might see the German churches today. They serve not any god but socialism.

      Like

  • ross1948 7:52 pm on May 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , free speech, , ,   

    Calling All Katie Hopkins Fans! Help A Lady In Distress! 


    Only last week I suggested Katie Hopkins should be given a peerage.

    https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/calling-my-peerless-uk-readers-submit-your-names-to-may-today/

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk katie hopkins

    Katie Hopkins!

    =

    And why not? She’s a patriotic lady!

    It was something of a shock therefore on Sunday to receive the following appeal for help.

     

    Last week I went to Molenbeek, a Muslim no-go zone in Brussels, Belgium.

    It’s the most terrorist-infested neighbourhood in all of Europe. 

    Even its mayor, Francoise Schepmans, describes Molenbeek as a “breeding ground for violence.”

    Countless terrorist attacks around the world have been plotted from there.

    Including the horrific attack on Paris in November, 2015, that killed 130 people and wounded more than 400.

    And after the Paris attacks, the orchestrator of the slaughter went back to Molenbeek to hide.

    In fact, it wasn’t until four months later that one of the Paris terrorists, Salah Abdeslam, was finally captured. The people of Molenbeek kept him hidden from police for that long.

    Here’s the thing: when I was in Molenbeek, I literally bumped into Mayor Schepmans in the street. She approached me and told me not to sit on the benches because they were filthy. 

    So I asked her a simple question: why didn’t you do anything?

    After all, she knew.

    A month before the Paris attack, Mayor Schepmans was given a list of jihadists plotting in Molenbeek.

    And Salah Abdeslam’s name was on the list.

    I asked her why she didn’t have police arrest him.

    And she told me: it wasn’t her job.

    She actually said that. And she said it again and again. Here, watch the interview for yourself:

    Well, that video went viral. And so did my other videos from Molenbeek — including when I made a list of all 22 mosques in town; and when I put on a burka, to “fit in” with the submissive women there.

    If you haven’t watched my videos yet, you can see them all, here.

    Well, Mayor Schepmans watched my videos.

    And she has decided to finally do something about the problem of the jihadis in her town.

    She’s launching a public prosecution.

    But she’s not prosecuting any terrorists. That’s not her job, remember.

    No: she’s suing me.

    For my reports — including for my interview with her!

    To her, my journalism is a bigger threat than terrorists using her town as a base camp.

    Here’s a story about her lawsuit in a Belgian newspaper. Mayor Schepmans says she is going to sue me on behalf of all of Molenbeek, claiming I have “defamed” their reputation.

    Really? Because If you are known as The Jihadi Capital of Europe I think it’s impossible for your reputation to sink any lower than it is. They did that all by themselves — and because of a mayor who says it’s just not her job to arrest terrorists.

    I need your help.

    Mayor Schepmans has all of the resources of the city government at her disposal. She has government lawyers, and a multi-million dollar budget. I’m an independent journalist, working with The Rebel media. We’re 100% viewer-supported.

    Can you please help me level the playing field? Can you help fill up my legal war chest, so I can keep standing on guard for our western values of freedom of speech, and the separation of mosque and state?

    If you can help me with my legal bills, I promise I’ll keep fighting. 

    I know we can win this case. My journalism was fair and accurate. She’s abusing the courts. 

    Mayor Schepmans admitted she had a list with Salah Abdeslam’s name on it. It was her own statement that was embarrassing — not mine. Any judge would throw the case out.

    But that’s not the point of the lawsuit — it’s designed to harass me, to waste my time and money, and to warn other journalists not to ask embarrassing questions about Islam, open borders or terrorism.

    It’s designed to install a sense of fear into the public discussion, to create “libel chill”.

    If you think it’s important to be able to talk freely about terrorism, please help me and The Rebel cover my legal bills. You can click here to make a secure, online donation. Whether it’s $10, $100 or even $500, it all adds up.

    Let’s show this mayor we’re as passionate about freedom as she is about censorship.

    Yours gratefully,

    Katie Hopkins

    P.S. Please help me level the playing field against this Belgian bully, by making a secure online contribution to my legal defence fund, here. If you prefer to make a contribution by regular mail, click hereThank you.

    P.P.S. Please feel free to forward this e-mail to your friends and family who care about freedom too — and make http://www.SaveHopkins.com your Facebook status!

     
    • Jacko 9:36 pm on May 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      On it, mate.
      I love Katie!

      Like

    • Petra Malley 9:48 pm on May 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      There’s no doubt in my mind at all that any legal action in relation to this ought to be taken against the Mayor of Molenbeek.
      Legal eviction notices served on a large number of the undesirables living there might also be considered, eviction not only from the neighbourhood but from Belgium, and from Europe.
      Thank you for letting us know about this.
      I shall pass the appeal along to as many people as possible..

      Like

    • Mort 10:11 pm on May 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I’ve only just gotten an email containing your appeal ten minutes ago but I am responding right away.
      We don’t have to be British to appreciate Ms. Hopkins.
      She is famous among Americans too.
      When she speaks out against the jihadists, then the cause she champions is ours too.

      Like

    • Edward Lamont 10:55 pm on May 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      By pure coincidence, I was reading that the Mail has let us all down and taken the side of Theresa the Appeaser.
      The Mail used to be a patriotic paper but dumped Katie Hopkins because she was too much in tune with public opinion..
      Katie is about the only true British journalist who tells the truth.
      Of course I’ll help her.

      Like

    • Marty Nagel 11:59 pm on May 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      She writes for The Rebel?
      She must be OK.
      Why can that mayor not be taken to court instead of Katie?

      Like

  • ross1948 10:31 pm on May 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , free speech,   

    Let’s Cut The Cr-P About Jolly Nice Javid! 


    Yes, he’s well-spoken, polite, and well-educated.

    And this man who has succeeded Amber The Ass as Home Secretary is bound to seem like an improvement on the arrogant shrill who let in the Calais Curs.

    =

     

    Arrest Amber Rudd? Calais Crimmigrant “Age Checks Not Carried Out! “ 

    =

    Heck, you might think even Medusa might make a better Home Secretary than that Remainiac liberal!

    ==========

    But Mr. Javid is all the more dangerous PRECISELY because he is so much more personable and presentable!Gambar terkait

       I quote from today’s CfM bulletin.Coalition for Marriage

    We need to be very vigilant on free speech, particularly so given that Sajid Javid is the new Home Secretary.

    It was Mr Javid who backed the incredibly daft idea of stopping extremism by getting all politicians and public sector workers to swear an equality oath.

    Thankfully the idea, first drawn up by former integration tsar Dame Louise Casey, has now been dropped.

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =

    But the fact that Mr Javid was “drawn” to her proposals (his words) shows a pretty poor understanding of free speech. This proposal would have turned the clock back 300 years to the dark days of the Test and Corporation Acts. A time when only card-carrying Anglicans could serve in public life.

    Much was made these past days of Mr. Javid’s colour, or, as PC hogwash-talk has it, his status as ‘a BME.’ That’s irrelevant. After my May Day fun in a nice pool, it’s fair to say I’m browner than he is.

    His ethnicity is no big deal.

    It’s his opinions that alarm us. Nobody should EVER be told that abnormality merits ‘equality’ of respect with normality.

    =

    =

    A human being with a healthy mind should be capable of discriminating between the two.

    And citizens who exercise their right to discriminate, between those who opt for a maladjusted life-style on the one hand and, on the other, people who are NOT into aberration, should not be bullied by politicians and their tame police flunkeys.

    Oh, AND…Javid’s a Remainer.

     
    • Harriet Eddiler 2:53 pm on May 3, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Never trust a Tory.
      Getting rid of Rudd was not the Tory Party’s idea, they defended her, even though she is so bent on hurting our country.
      Even if they get rid of May, the chances of getting a real conservative as leader are slimmer than a match-stick.
      I’m voting Ukip today.

      Like

  • ross1948 9:04 pm on April 30, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: free speech, , Mumsnet, ,   

    Freaks Versus Freedom – Battlefield Britain! 


    Transgender activists try to curb free speech on site

    I think my headline is better than the one in The Times, but then I would, wouldn’t I?

    There’s also the likelihood that, were The Times – or anyone else in the UK  – to refer to ‘transgenders’ as what they are, freaks…

    .

    ….they’d be at risk of prosecution, such is the parlous condition of free speech in Britain these days, under St. Theresa of Transgendria, who has cast off any pretence of conservatism…

    Tory Purge – Theresa May Dances To Gaystapo Tune!  

    May Extols ‘Gay’ Agenda – Now Her Fans Back Polygamy! 

    ….and led the charge against all who stand in the way of implementing her gaystapo agenda.

    But the headlines, mine and the Times, refer to the latest example of intimidation by arrogant aberrants.

    Transgender activists are targeting companies which advertise on Mumsnet, because the online forum allows people to debate transgenderism.

    Mumsnet founder Justine Roberts said she had been approached by three significant advertisers who had been contacted by pro-trans groups threatening boycotts.

    Roberts said: “What’s worrying to me is the thought-police action around speech and the shutting down of the right to be able to disagree and immediately labelling it as transphobic”.

    She added that there is “a section of the hardline trans side which thinks that any discussion at all is by definition transphobic.”

    I had never heard of Mumsnet before, but according to the report, it’s Britain’s most popular parenting website with twelve million monthly users.

    We also learn that websitedoes not take a position on the debate, which is a pity, but at least its founder is determined to protect free speech.

    =

    =

    The activists, she said, demonise anyone critical of the self-identification plans by portraying them as evil bigots who want to eradicate transsexuals and incite violence against them.

    I would gladly walk a mile barefoot on broken glass to avoid having to mingle with ‘trans’ freaks but I have never incited violence against them.

    On the contrary, I am benevolent, and would approve funding for therapy to cure them.

    The Mumsnet lady may not agree with me but at least she correctly asserts that proper debate is essential, as “what is proposed is nothing less than changing the very definition of man and woman in law – biology replaced with identity..”   https://www.thetimes.co.uk/past-six-days/2018-04-15/news/mumsnet-founder-justine-roberts-transgender-activists-try-to-curb-free-speech-on-site-

    http://www.christian.org.uk/news/trans-activists-attack-free-speech-mumsnet-threats/

     

     
    • Brian Bernard 10:05 pm on April 30, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Thank God for somebody willing to call a spade a spade.
      Seeing these things prance about as if we should all treat them as normal human beings offends a lot of us but it is totally true what you say, they are protected by the British political class and their politicised police. None of it makes sense.
      Why do the ruling class not only want power but feel the need to use that power to destroy every value that made Britain a satisfactory place to live in and bring up families?.

      My children are now grown up but if they were still in school and subjected to May’s Ofsted approved indoctrination, then I would be prepared to go to jail to protect them.
      But it’s up to the present generation of parents with kids in school to take a stand..

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: