Tagged: FRIENDS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 00:12 on July 8, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , FRIENDS, Maria Kauffman, victimised for a joke   

    Maria Kauffman, A Nasty Hypocrite! 


    What a repulsive old bat Maria Kauffman must be.

    She’s the fatuous far-left millionairess, who’s been splashing oodles of cash on black causes…

    Why?

    Because the cast of ‘Friends’ was White.

    Seriously!

    .

    Nuts!

    And get a load of how she agonises over the portrayal of Friends character Chandler’s transfreak dad.

    Oh dear…they called him…

    ‘…he!‘

    ..

    Go figure!

    But that’s not why I call Kauffman repulsive.

    If some black people benefit from her uptight hang-up hand-outs, no problem.

    However, her jackboot intolerance IS repulsive.

    “It’s very important to me that where we are is a safe place, a tolerant place…

    Aaah, ‘tolerance,’ the essence of wokery!

    …

    …

    Then the mask drops, her pretended ‘tolerance’ evaporates!

    “… I fired a guy on the spot for making a joke about a trans cameraperson. That just can’t happen.. ” https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/ustv/a40511690/friends-marta-kauffman-regret-misgendering-trans-character/

    ..

    …

     

    • Lorne Marzio 05:18 on July 8, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      Friends was very funny but this vindictive woman isn’t.
      Firing anybody for a joke is what you expect in a totalitarian state.
      Not in a free country.

      Like

    • Barb Cassain 06:43 on July 8, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      The typical tolerance of a woker.
      “Where we are is a safe place, a tolerant place? ”
      Unless your sense of humor doesn’t suit me.
      Horrible hypocrite. .

      Like

  • ross1948 09:09 on January 16, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: FRIENDS, , , Rachel Phoebe Ross, ,   

     OMG! So Ross Is ‘Annoying and Homophobic!?!’ 


     Never realised just how annoying and homophobic Ross was with stuff like this!

    I don’t get as many pinko creeps raving in my comments column as I used to.

    That Flemish guy ( sorry, Leo – I’m not categorising you as a ‘creep’ but you are a pinko) who used to drop in for a rant whenever I took aim at the gaystapo has evidently lost interest.

    ……

    ……

    Even the cowardly commie queer who asked his hate-question –Why don’t you just die! – without risking public obloquy by giving his real name – hasn’t bothered to give vent to further hate-paeans.

    So it was intriguing to be notified of a tweet by somebody called Amy, from which I quoted at the top of my page today.

    But her target turns out NOT to be Yours Truly!

    Rewatching Friends on Netflix and damn!

    Back in Friends heyday, I never had much time for tv, but more recently I have, for want of anything better to watch, tuned into Friends late at night, while typing up my ‘stuff.’

    ==

    It’s harmless stuff and often funny.

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =====

    Scatter-brained Phoebe always makes me laugh, and it’s never boring to watch sexy Rachel.

    .

    Gambar terkait

    ==

    Yet it seems that the dreaded brat-pack begs to differ.

    ‘Friends’ Slammed By Millennials As ‘Transphobic’, ‘Homophobic’ & ‘Sexist’ — See Scathing Tweets

    ‘Friends’ Slammed By Millennials As ‘Transphobic’, ‘Homophobic’ & ‘Sexist’ — See Scathing Tweets

    Hence poor Ross is idiotically denounced as ‘annoying’ and ‘homophobic’ – as if the two words somehow go together. In fact most normal people probably regard much of today’s ‘gay’-grovel approach as INTENSELY ‘annoying.’

    But the cretinous condemnation of Friends – the tweet I quoted is by no means the most furious, nor the most imbecilic…

    =

    =

    ….makes me fear, not for the very likely suppression of the enjoyable and innocuous 1990s series, but for the very survival of any society…

    ….in which so many spiritually sick millennials seem obsessed with elevating abnormality to parity of esteem with decency.

     

    • Leo Cozijn 12:26 on January 16, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I don’t know why you refer to me as “Flamish”, cause I’m not from Belgium, nor is your assumption that I lost interest in your immature, backward ideas about homosexuality correct! I just spent 3 months in your country of residence as I do every year, during which time I don’t use my computer! As you’re obviously haven’t got the guts to “check” on the explanation about homosexuality by prominent scientists like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, A.C. Grayling and Lawrence Kraus among others, there’s no use to try and enlighten you as there is no cure for thickness! Like Friedrich von Schiller remarked: “With stupidity even the gods struggle in vain”.

      Like

      • ross1948 19:25 on January 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Abuse as a substitute for argument!
        Your characteristic carping marks your return to whichever secret sanctuary city you call home.
        Why are you so keen on poofters?
        Have you ‘the guts’ to explain?

        Like

      • Petra Malley 23:31 on January 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Your accusation against Ross that he hasn’t ‘the guts’ to look at the ‘scientists’ you recommend is just silly., You only need to look at what he writes almost every day to know that he always reads material published by people whose views are antithetical to his own.

        That’s why many of us enjoy this blog, because he doesn’t just quote from the like-minded but takes apart opposition sources like the Guardian and The Leftal and Euronews and he does a very good job of it.
        As for your own particular sexual problems, that is something I have no interest in but too many of you ‘gays’ are intolerant and have been trying to impose your agenda on the rest of society, which means that less than ten per cent are telling the 90% what they may say or do.

        Like

      • Nils 08:39 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        I am not very enthusiastic about an argument on sexual perversion because I do not support either your opinions or Ross’s..
        .
        Even so, in reply to your question why Ross referred to you as ‘Flamish’ ( you mean Flemish?) then I give these possible clues to you.

        Number 1, your name sounds like a Flemish or Dutch name.
        Number 2, your English is not very good.

        I am not an English Native Speaker but I have been reading all your comments on this occasion and am very surprised you call other people ‘thick’ when you harm basic grammar with ‘As you’re obviously haven’t ..’
        A typing error cannot be the excuse for that..
        Are you a non-English speaker or only uneducated?

        Like

        • Mack the Knife 14:52 on January 21, 2018 Permalink

          I bet it’s not his real name.
          That can be our Sunday puzzle, work out the anagram!.
          I have been trying.

          C L O S E T….. no, there’s no ‘T.’
          L I Z …no, it’s got to be a bloke ( sort of! ).
          NICE… no!

          Any better ideas? Go down for a pub lunch and ask around?

          Like

        • Justine 22:12 on January 21, 2018 Permalink

          Hear hear, Nils.
          I hardly ever comment because Ross puts into words almost everything I want to say.
          This time you have done that job, Nils, and my thanks.

          I have read and met lefties who can debate well and that can be fun but this non-Flemish
          person is so bad-tempered and arrogant. .
          Millions in many countries all over the world,intelligent and educated people, share Ross’s views.
          You say you don’t, Nils, but unlike Leo, you are grown up enough not to dismiss everyone with different opinions as ‘unintelligent’ and ‘uneducated.’
          Leo is supercilious, with no reason to be. That kind of superiority complex makes me think there’s something very odd about him.

          Like

    • Mort 22:23 on January 17, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I sincerely worry about these complainers’ mental health.
      I think the fashionable phrase to use at them is ‘Get A Life!’

      Like

    • Leo Cozijn 21:00 on January 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      It’s not about complaining. It’s about you advertizing backwardness, while you’re trying to suggest and promote the so-called macho-man. A kind of John Wayne who as a child already liked cowboys more than indians. When you preach your nonsense in a more grown-up, intelligent environment, you will be laughed out of the room. Apart from that, why would an educated, civilized and happy person busy him/herself with the sexlife of others? Those who do, almost certainly have mental issue’s!

      Like

      • ross1948 21:42 on January 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Oh dear.
        You have just has a nice long holiday in beautiful Indonesia and yet you are even more testy than usual. ‘Laughed out of the room?’ Your sort don;t tend to laugh a lot, as your frequent rants indicate.
        It’s quite hard to discern any rational thread in your rambling, but as ever you appear to be oblivious to the evils your gaystapo heroes are still perpetrating against all manner of decent folk.
        John Wayne? A good guy!
        You’d do better to skip your homophiliac homilies and watch his great film, The Green Berets.
        But then the marxists are the villains, so you’d be no happier than you are now.
        I feel sorry for somebody in such a state of perpetual vexation.

        Like

      • Keith Milner 23:00 on January 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Sir, as far as I am concerned you may do as you please with your boy-friends.

        However what your gaystapo lobby is doing, to have children even in primary schools told that sexual perversions of that sort are ‘normal’ is completely wrong.
        More so when parents are prevented from withdrawing their children from such indoctrination.

        As far as mental health is concerned, you must know as well as I do that your sort of maladjustments were always regarded as appropriate for psychological treatment until you ‘gay’ lobby launched an intimidation campaign and had the professional associations reverse policy with no evidence at all to support the change.

        Like

      • Kezia 10:01 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        I read that thick is English slang for stupid.
        Many of my friends learned English from Ross and he was a good teacher always funny and kind and never never stupid! .
        I like to read his blog because it gives good vocabulary and more interesting than many other blogs..

        Like

    • Leo Cozijn 00:44 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Perhaps you ought to respond to or at least try to acknowledge what I wrote, rather than trying to evade and change the subject. Honesty is a very epensive gift which one doesn’t expect from cheap people. As far as i’m concerned you’re not only morally disorientated and functionally obsolete, you also have a serious attitude problem and a curious relationship with the truth. By the way:HALLIWELL’S – the only film guide that matters – writes about that “great ” film The Green Berets: “Propaganda as crude as this can only do damage to its cause. A film best handled from a distance and with a pair of thongs. Overlong actioner criticized for unquestioningly accepting the Vietnam cause; violent, exhausting and dull”. No wonder people like you call it a great film, taking into account your regular misguided infantile comments that are often cherry-picked from obscure publications.

      Like

      • ross1948 01:07 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        If you ever managed an argument without insults, I would respond, but your pro-queer bigotry is so engrained that I feel it’s a waste of time.
        However your saving grace is that you always rise to any bait thrown at you.
        I knew my reference to The Green Berets would provoke exactly the outburst it did.
        Your taste in films probably doesn’t extend beyond the kind of pretentious ‘crepe’ feted at the Cannes Film Festival!
        It’s late now so time for sleep.
        No doubt I will rise tomorrow morn to find fresh barbs.

        Like

        • Pamela 01:57 on January 21, 2018 Permalink

          I knew as soon as I read your reference to The Green Berets that you were setting Little Leo up and I had to laugh when he went crashing right in, snapping at your bait.
          In my opinion, it was not a great film but good enough and had the right message on what Vietnam was about.
          If he had any sense, or at least a sense of humour, at all, he’d have twigged what you were up to, but like so many of those concerned with the ‘gay’ cause, he is miserable and lacks humour.
          His loss, not ours..

          Like

      • Edward Lamont 02:08 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Halliwell’s?
        I never heard of it.
        Your trouble Leo is you’re so full of yourself, like when you pluck that Halliwell’s off the top of your head and then tell us ‘it’s the ‘only film guide that matters.’
        To you, maybe, but not to everyone else.

        I hesitate to ask, but did you see The Green Berets for yourself or do you let this ‘Halliwell’s’ do your thinking for you?
        Please tell us, Leo and tell us too what did the same guide have to say about American Sniper? That was a fantastic film as Ross said after he watched it.
        https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/my-wallow-in-the-swamp-of-moral-depravity/
        I went to see it after he praised it and I loved it.

        Like

    • Leo Cozijn 01:48 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      YOU talk about managing an argument without insults? Don’t make me laugh! You truly have serious attitude problems. Anyway, your histrionics don’t keep me awake.

      Like

    • Leo Cozijn 18:27 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Edward Lamont My edition of HALLIWELL’S is from 2008, so Amerian Sniper is not in it. This film guide has the size of a big telephone book. I never tell anyone “it’s the only guide that matters”, It’s written on the book itself, which you could have understood if you read how I put it in my mail. Do I let HALLIWELL’S do my thinking for me? Certainly not., but it seems Ross does the thinking for you, as “he called it a fantastic film after watching it”, And because of that you went to watch it! It seems your rather perejudiced towards me, but that’s your problem.

      Like

      • Edward Lamont 22:24 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        I did read how you put it and anyone else can read how you put it, no inverted commas so it comes across as your opinion.
        It’s your poor standard of English that’s the trouble.

        I go to see films based on the opinion of those who have seen it already, if they’re people whose opinion I respect. if Ross liked the film, why not see it?
        He included in his review also who didn’t like it and that made my mind up.

        Like

    • Leo Cozijn 20:04 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Pamela I dont see the relevance. Stating Ross has backward ideas about homosexuality has nothing to do with my sense of humour. Any intelligent, educated person knows this ideas are out of date. You should focus on that, instead of my alledged “vices” and the so-called “virtues” of Ross. He just arrogantly avoids what I write; he dodges and ridicules the issue which is a sign of weakness.

      Like

      • ross1948 22:40 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        This is dragging on but I shouldn’t complain because te stats are hopping.
        OK
        You inform us that ‘any intelligent, educated person rejects my ideas.’
        However, only in a very few places, Leo, has your gaystapo agenda been approved, most recently in Australia, before that in Eire and in a few American states.
        Elsewhere militant queers needed unelected judges to impose it, even, in California, to have the result of a democratic ballot set aside by an unelected queer judge! .
        I suppose you think that California majority were all unintelligent, uneducated, etc, because they don’t match your pro-homo outlook?
        Like so many people, I regard homosexuality as far from natural. It’s like bestiality and incest. Disgusting.
        I have thus told you why I write things that get you so rabidly angry.
        Now do me the courtesy of telling me why you think homosexuality is natural. Please advise what’s NOT disgusting about it.
        .

        Like

        • Leo Cozijn 00:13 on January 22, 2018 Permalink

          Your Tourettic utterances confirm that you lack proper edification as far as homosexuality is concerned, though I believe that most of your childish comments are meant to provoke. No matter what you “claim”, the scientific world accepts that homosexuals are born gay and as such beyond criticism (one cannot BECOME gay!). Homosexuality is as old as mankind and exists in any culture. Whether you find it unnatural or disgusting is totally irrelevant. Facts don’t care about your feelings and truth is not subject to your opinion! No matter what one’s orientation is, it’s about how one deals with it. Perverts you find among any group of people. It may take a while – thanks to backward, uninformed people like you – but there will come a time when one doesn’t have to explain one’s sexuality anymore.

          Like

        • ross1948 16:25 on January 22, 2018 Permalink

          Enough! You have kept many readers entertained over the weekend but I am closing this particular ‘debate,’ not because I’m stunned by your fascinating notion that getting a ‘letter to the editor’ published in a magazine affirms beyond doubt your mastery of English grammar (I’m not!)… nor even because I’m wounded deeply by your personal insults (again, I’m not!) Those sticks and stones break neither my bones nor my heart

          Basically, I have no wish to have my blog end up like one other local blog, which is distinguished (?) by endless series of “yes it is- no it isn’t” boredom marathons.

          You may return when next I have another go at gaystapo intolerance ( so probably not long for you to wait!) but while you’re idling, please research the lady who’s married to the Mayor of New York City and find a convincing explanation of how she was cured of her homosexuality and is now a happy wife and mother.

          Feel free to comment again sometime after Saint Valentine’s Day – but no valentines, thanks just the same.
          For the time being, enough!

          Like

    • Jim in Jakarta 23:01 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Best laugh I had for weeks, Ross.

      I don’t exactly think like you do but that Flemish fellow just can’t argue.
      He ran right into it and look what it got him!
      Thanks!.
      .

      Like

      • ross1948 23:04 on January 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

        Yes, I do find him amusing, Jim, but only in small doses.
        Goodnight!

        Like

    • Leo Cozijn 00:23 on January 22, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Nils My English is not good enough? Well, two years ago TIME magazine published a letter of mine. Think about that whatever you want, but I dare say you will never realze this in your entire life!

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: