Tagged: Gab Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 18:00 on December 17, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Gab, ,   

    Reuters Rotters Ride Rough-Shod Over True Story! 


    We have seen more than once what kind of people work for Reuters.

    Rotten Reuters Goes Postal, Twisting ‘Facts’ Leftwards! 

    Reuters Ranter Ignores Madrid’s Media Jackboot! 

    Reuters Rotters Spread Crimmigrant Sob-Story -Albeit ‘Unverified!’ 

    Reuters Rotters? Worse Than Even I’d Realised! 

    No, Reuters Rotters! Crimmigrants CAN Be Deported! 

    …not forgetting the unsavoury left intolerance of one of their hacks-in-chief, Luke Baker…

     

    Luke Baker, Reuters’ Paris Bureau Chief

    ………..

    …who presumptuously claimed to know what the rest of us want to hear!

     ‘The rhetoric that’s coming out of Poland and Hungary is not what anybody wants to hear.’

    Bloody liar!

    Millions not only want to hear it, and cheer it, and Baker surely knew that!

    00000000000

    Now a reader on Gab has alerted us to yet another example of what sort of ‘journalism’ that ‘news’ agency practises!

    .

    Gambar terkait

    =

    What happened was that Gab were alerted to one of their community members having violated their code of conduct’ rules.

    Within minutes of receiving the email alerting us to the existence of this account we took immediate action by backing up the account information for law enforcement and then terminating the account from our service.

    Gab went above and beyond, to deal effectively with the offender.

    You can read all the details here. Click here to read our full email exchange with Reuters.

    So Gab is above reproach, but Reuters?

    ??????

    ?

    ??????

    Rotten Reuters went to press but neglected to reach out to Gab for comment before publication.

    In the story Reuters falsely claimed that the account remained active on Gab even though it had been suspended within minutes of it being brought to our attention the night before.

    .

    .

    Again, I can let Gab’s statement speak for itself, for they spotlight how “journalists” recklessly print whatever they want without fact checking or asking the subject of a story for comment on the matter…

     
  • ross1948 14:30 on August 10, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Gab, , , ,   

    Good for Gab! Google’s Witch-Hunt Victim Gets New Job 


    Good for Gab, indeed, a social network which promptly announced they want to offer a job to the victim of Google’s red nazi management.

    James Damore deserves all the help decent people can provide.

    ======

    That news comes from, of all places, the left-lib UK newspaper, The Guardian –

    ‘There was a witch-hunt’: Silicon Valley conservatives decry Google groupthink

    After a Google employee was fired for penning a controversial ‘anti-diversity’ manifesto, conservatives say it proves Silicon Valley is a liberal echo chamber

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/09/google-diversity-memo-conservatives-react 

    – in an article which includes a surprisingly fair report about the rancid intolerance practised by the hypocrites who run a ‘diversity’ regime yet constantly war down dissent.

    =

    =

    Unfortunately, The Guardian reverts to its normal style with another article…  https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/09/james-damore-google-memo-youtube-interviews–

    …which really plumbs the depths of gutter journalism…

    =

    Damore’s former Harvard class-mate

    =

    …including quotes from an anonymous (of course!) slimy cur who claims to be a former Harvard class-mate .

     Damore’s views, the source said, made him an outlier in the department, which values diversity.

    “It’s pretty unusual someone would have those opinions and be stupid enough to voice them,” the former classmate said. 

    My God, what an arrogant little turd!

    And so much stupidity mingling with that arrogance, insults devoid of logical consistency!

    =

    =

    If a college department values diversity, how can it possibly countenance an atmosphere wherein it is unwise to express views at odds with the in-crowd.  Academic freedom? Scientific method?

    Drop dead, creepoid!

    Next time you launch a snotty diatribe via the left-lib media on a former class-mate, put your name to it.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: