Tagged: ‘gay’ weddings Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 15:29 on December 9, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'gay' weddings, , Janet Daby MP Labour, , UK marriage registrars   

    In Today’s UK, An MP Apologises For Being Tolerant! 

    I was sorry to see that the UK Labour Party’s ‘Shadow Equalities Minister for Faith,’ ( who invented that title?) a woman named Janet Daby MP, has quit her position.


    Official portrait of Janet Daby MP crop 2.jpg

    Janet Daby MP

    Her reason?

    According to a press release by C4M, her terrible misdeed was ‘backing conscience rights for marriage registrars to opt out’ if those intending to ‘marry’ were a pair of queers!

    During a Zoom briefing for the Religion Media Centre last week, Ms Daby said: “There needs to be something in place that protects people of faith as well as those who think the other way.

    ”It is an issue of conscience….”


    Alas, showing sympathy and tolerance put her so badly out of step with current Labour ( and Tory?) pro-maladjust ideology….

    ….that ‘Ms Daby has now apologised for her “misjudged” comments and her office has rowed back on them, clarifying that the MP “believes registrars should not be in the role if they do not want to conduct same-sex weddings”.

    That’s just grand, isn’t it?

    Make them kowtow, coerce them into conducting homo-weddings…



    …and if they won’t bow down, force them out!


    C4M fight the good fight valiantly.

    With so many ‘charities’ rendering themselves undeserving of support, why not make a Christmas donation?


    • Pamela 22:55 on December 9, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Any credit she might deserve for resigning is lost with her apology.
      She has surrendered her conscience and bowed to Labour’s gaystapo bullies.


  • ross1948 17:14 on February 20, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'gay' weddings, , integrity, , , Ruth Ginsburg,   

    Get Pro-‘Gay’ Ginsburg OFF the Case! Sign the Petition! 

    In her 1993 confirmation hearing, Ginsburg steadfastly refused to respond to questions put to her by elected officials about any her views on issues that might come before the court, citing the ethical obligations of a judge to maintain both the fact and the appearance of impartiality.

    She specifically responded to a question about sexual orientation by saying: “I cannot say one word on that subject that would not violate what I said had to be my rule about no hints, no forecasts, no previews. “


    Justice Ruth Ginsburg


    And yet, now Justice Ginsburg apparently feels that presiding over same-sex ‘weddings’ and speaking openly about how she believes the American people are ready for the Court to recognize a constitutional right allowing same-sex couples to marry….


    This arrogant old woman formerly worked for the ACLU, so nobody should expect pro-American opinions from her corner of the Supreme Court.

    • aclu2si

    But that’s not the issue at present. 

    A justice who performs same-sex ‘weddings’ and comments openly about how America is supposedly ready to accept same-sex ‘marriage’ when a case on the very subject is pending before the court is anything but impartial.




    Her blatant pre-hearing bias on pervert ‘weddings’ makes it imperative, if she has any sense of personal or professional honour, to recuse herself from the case.

    That’s why our readers in the USA should sign up to the NOM petition seeking exactly that. 

    Here’s the link with the details.  https://actright.com/petition/140?ref=EB150218EANT

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: